The highly integrated and diversified land use system is concentrated on a 0.4 ha plot, while adjacent land is left to regenerate naturally. The tree belt around the plot is not yet established. (Mats Gurtner)

Intensive agroforestry system (Colombia)

Silvoagricultura (spanish)

Description

A protective and productive high-input agroforestry system comprising multi-purpose ditches with bunds, live barriers of grass, contour ridging,
annual crops and fruit trees.

The intensive agroforestry system (silvoagricultura) combines traditional and newly developed practices adapted to the area’s conditions. The idea is to concentrate cropping on a limited area, a plot of 0.4 ha per household, in a highly integrated, intensive and diversified continuous land use system, thereby integrating soil and water conservation - specifically avoiding traditional slash and burn practices.
Each ‘agroforestry plot’ comprises four to five 50 cm wide and 40 m long multipurpose ditches that are excavated along the contour, 6 to 12 m apart, depending on the slope. The ditches retain runoff water which infiltrates the soil, thus reducing erosion and improving soil moisture. They also act as compost ditches for all types of organic residues on the farm. Residues, enriched with manure (from chickens and guinea pigs) are tipped into the ditches, and within 8 to12 months this decomposes into a fertile medium for the cultivation of vegetables and other crops.

The main purpose is to increase and diversify production, and at the same time to protect natural resources and regenerate degraded areas.

Grass strips are planted on the earth bund on the upper side of the ditch for stabilisation of the structure, retention of runoff and capture of eroded sediment. The grass is cut several times a year to feed guinea pigs, which in turn recycle this into manure. On the lower side of the contour ditches, fruit trees and bananas are planted. Rows of multipurpose trees (mainly indigenous species) are planted around each agroforestry plot as a windbreak and for economic reasons: yielding fruit and timber. Between the structures, annual (and semi-perennial) crops are grown on hand-dug micro-terraces/ridges, again sited along the contour. Some farmers intercrop with legumes. Supportive technologies are protection of wells,
afforestation and, where possible, irrigation to enhance production. Production is based on principles of organic farming.High initial inputs of external manure are subsidised by the project (CISEC; see associated approach). The remainder of each farmer’s land is left to natural regeneration, reforested, or where needed, used for conventional cropping

The system is implemented on degraded and often steep slopes in subhumid areas where intensive rainfall and dry periods alternate. The land is officially owned communally (an ‘Indigenous Reserve’), but land use rights are individual. The region has a high population density: people are basically of indigenous origin and live in very poor conditions.

Location

Location: Santander de Quilichao, Cauca, Colombia

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • -76.28, 3.0

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (1.2 km²)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation:

Type of introduction
Combination of structural measures (multi-purpose ditches), vegetative measures (tree lines, grass strips) and agronomic measures (compost production, intercropping). (Mats Gurtner)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Yes - Agroforestry

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping
    • Tree and shrub cropping
    Is intercropping practiced? Yes

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
  • soil erosion by wind - Et: loss of topsoil
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
SLM group
  • agroforestry
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
  • cross-slope measure
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover
  • vegetative measures - V1: Tree and shrub cover, V2: Grasses and perennial herbaceous plants
  • structural measures - S2: Bunds, banks, S3: Graded ditches, channels, waterways, S4: Level ditches, pits

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Detailed overview of the complex and intensive high-input, high output agroforestry system, usually limited to an area of 64 x 64 metres.
The agroforestry plots are bordered by trees of various species. Note the multipurpose ditches that serve as compost pits (lower ditch, right). Associated bunds are covered by grass (right).

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: high
Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate
Main technical functions: control of raindrop splash, control of dispersed runoff: impede / retard, reduction of slope length, increase in organic matter, increase in nutrient availability (supply, recycling,…), increase / maintain water stored in soil
Secondary technical functions: reduction of slope angle, improvement of ground cover, increase of infiltration, sediment retention / trapping, sediment harvesting, reduction in wind speed

Vegetative measure: bananas
Vegetative material: F : fruit trees / shrubs
Vegetative measure: Vegetative material: F : fruit trees / shrubs
Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 16-30%
Author: Mats Gurtner

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: n.a.
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = n.a
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: n.a
Most important factors affecting the costs
n.a.
Establishment activities
  1. 1. Clear land (only slashing, no burning). (Timing/ frequency: Beginning of rainy season (April))
  2. 2. Determine contours with A-frame, spacing between structures dependson slope (4 m between ditches on steepest slopes, 14 m on gentle slopes). (Timing/ frequency: Beginning of rainy season (April))
  3. 3. Dig ditches, build bunds above, and dig holes for tree seedlings. (Timing/ frequency: Beginning of rainy season (April))
  4. 4. Establish micro-terraces/ridges (earth enriched with manure and residues:all structures along the contour). (Timing/ frequency: During the dry season (June to September))
  5. 6. Plant grass strips on the bund (for stabilisation of structure). (Timing/ frequency: During the dry season (June to September))
  6. 7. Plant fruit/banana trees and legumes below the bunds. (Timing/ frequency: During the dry season (June to September))
  7. 8. Plant fruit and timber trees along the boundaries of the agroforestry (Timing/ frequency: During the dry season (June to September))
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (n.a.) Total costs per input (n.a.) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
labour ha 1.0 220.0 220.0 100.0
Plant material
seeds ha 1.0 15.0 15.0 5.0
seedlings ha 1.0 450.0 450.0 5.0
Fertilizers and biocides
compost/manure ha 1.0 600.0 600.0 5.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 1'285.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 1'285.0
Maintenance activities
  1. 5. Fill ditches with organic residues, adding earth mixed with manure. (Timing/ frequency: During the dry season (June to September) / initial establishment)
  2. 4. Fill ditches with organic material, residues (after harvest), manure, etcand let it decompose. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  3. 6. Dig out compost and spread (Timing/ frequency: (beginning of growing season (September) /)
  4. 7. Apply additional fertilizer/manure (Timing/ frequency: / 3 times/year)
  5. 1. Cut grass ( grass used to feed guinea pigs). (Timing/ frequency: /4–6 times/year)
  6. 2. Control weeds (Timing/ frequency: /3 times/year)
  7. 5. Plant vegetables on fertile composted earth in ditches (Timing/ frequency: /dry season, optional)
  8. 8. Plant various crops: contour cropping, intercropping, integrate greenmanures (legumes). (Timing/ frequency: None)
  9. 3. Rebuild/repair structures (Timing/ frequency: dry season)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (n.a.) Total costs per input (n.a.) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
labour ha 1.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
biocides ha 1.0 45.0 45.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 145.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 145.0

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Thermal climate class: tropics
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased

fodder production
decreased
increased

fodder quality
decreased
increased

wood production
decreased
increased

farm income
decreased
increased

economic disparities
increased
decreased

workload
increased
decreased

Socio-cultural impacts
community institutions
weakened
strengthened

conflict mitigation
worsened
improved


friction between participants and non-participants

Ecological impacts
soil moisture
decreased
increased

soil cover
reduced
improved

soil loss
increased
decreased

acidity
increased
reduced


high content of organic matter

pest/ disease control
decreased
increased

wind velocity
increased
decreased

Off-site impacts
reliable and stable stream flows in dry season (incl. low flows)
reduced
increased


use of water for irrigation

downstream siltation
increased
decreased

groundwater/ river pollution
increased
reduced

wind transported sediments
increased
reduced

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Climate change

-

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Rehabilitation of soil fertility over short term
  • Increased and permanent production
  • Increased food security and balanced diet
  • Adapted to very heterogeneous climatic and topographic conditions.
  • Protective-productive system: compromise between land capability class (forest) and cultivation needs
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Rigid design of the technology and fixed guidelines for implementation activities (pre-conditions for incentive support by project) Give more flexibility to the farmers for individual modifications.
  • High demand for manual labour Emphasis on group work, implement
    in dry season (when labour force is available at the household level).
  • High external inputs at the beginning (makes the technology very expensive) Manure is needed to restore soil fertility in the short-term, land users pay the inputs in form of labour in the CISEC; revolving funds
    and composting ensure manure supplies on the long term.
  • Decreased pH (soil acidity) Compensate by ecological improvements
    such as application of lime and ashes.

References

Compiler
  • Mathias Gurtner
Editors
Reviewer
  • Deborah Niggli
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: March 17, 2011
Last update: March 18, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • CISEC . Establecimiento de Lotes de Silvoagricultura. 1998.:
  • Gurtner M . Bodendegradierung und Bodenkonservierung inden Anden Kolumbiens – Eine Nachhaltigkeitsstudie im Rahmen des WOCAT-Programms, unpublished MSc Thesis, Science Faculty, University of Berne,Centre for Development and Environment. 1999.:
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International