The farmer starts the ridge sowing of winter wheat (Islamov A.R.)

The ridge sowing technology (CACILM) (Kyrgyzstan)

Kyrgyzstan – Central Asian Countries Initiative on Land Management

Description

The ridge sowing technology utilizes a special seeder, which is operated with special machinery and at the same time cuts the irrigation furrows and sows crops’ seeds on ridges. This method is primarily improved irrigation water use efficiency, reduced water erosion and more importantly lowers the expenses on irrigation water by 30%.

The ridge sowing technology is applied in CIS countries (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Tajikistan.) in the production of wheat and other cereals. Kyrgyzstan first applied this technology with the support of the SIDA project “Support to seed development industry in Kyrgyzstan”. Further dissemination of this method was supported by the Seed Growers’ Association of Kyrgyzstan. This technology was utilized in Kyrgyzstan through the use of the Turkish seeder СBP-2,8, which forms ridges, sows and simultaneously cuts furrows to irrigate between the ridges. The ridge sowing technology creates optimal conditions for agricultural crops and provides effective furrow irrigation. This prevents excessive use of irrigation water (saving 25-30%) and irrigation erosion, which happens in the case of using flooding methods on the crop fields using common corn planters. In addition, it prevents the flooding of useful soil micro fauna, as well as saves time. Prior to irrigation or after irrigation, a tractor or agricultural machine can easily go along the irrigation furrows to spray plants with herbicides and pesticides. Ridge sowing of cereals can be implemented almost on all types of grey-brownish, grey, red, yellow soil types with middle and light mechanical composition. In addition to cereals, ridge sowing can be used for growing vegetables and legumes (including potato), as well as industrial and oil crops (sugar beet, rape, soya bean, sesame)
Depending on natural climatic conditions and biological peculiarities of the cultivated varieties, width between the ridges is about 60-70cm. 2-3 rows of seeds can be sown on the ridges with a row spacing of 15cm. Over the course of 3 years, 10 ha of land were sown by using this technology, and the wheat grain yield was not reduced in comparison to the conventional cultivation method using a corn planter. While sowing cereals with such a seeder, it is recommended to cultivate well-bushing varieties. The ridge seeder decreases the seeding rate to a minimum. The seeding rate of cereals is 100-150kg/ha instead of 200-250kg/ha when using the usual sowing method with a classical corn planter and provides additional yield of winter grain wheat up to 5 -8,3 centner/ha. Practice is documented in the frame of CACILM.

Purpose of the Technology: The purpose of this technology is to decrease irrigation erosion and to improve soil moisture content through the use of effective irrigation techniques utilizing irrigation furrows.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: The main cost linked to the introduction of ridge sowing is the purchase of the ridge seeder. The establishment costs of ridge sowing are similar to the ones for conventional sowing methods using corn planters, but in the long term the maintenance costs will be far lower. The utilization of this technology includes the following operations once per vegetation period: plowing (harrowing and leveling), ridge sowing, irrigation and harvesting

Natural / human environment: This technology was implemented on the fields of the Kant local administration of the Kant Rayon in Chui Oblast by 10 land users

Location

Location: Chui oblast, Kant rayon, Kyrgyz Republic, Kyrgyzstan

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 74.8333, 42.9565

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (0.1 km²)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
Winter wheat field prior to harvesting (Islamov A.R.)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
  • Grazing land
    • Semi-nomadic pastoralism
    • Ranching
    Animal type: cattle - dairy, cattle - non-dairy beef
    Products and services: milk, meat
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
  • biological degradation - Bl: loss of soil life
SLM group
  • n.a.
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A3: Soil surface treatment

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
The illustration shows sowing methods in cross-section. The distance between rows is 15 cm in both methods of sowing. The raised bed planting method is using irrigation water more effectively.

Location: Issyk-Ata region. Chui

Date: 04.10.2011

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: high

Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate

Main technical functions: improvement of topsoil structure (compaction)

Secondary technical functions: increase / maintain water stored in soil

Furrows (drainage, irrigation)
Material/ species: Soil
Quantity/ density: 70 cm
Remarks: Formation of ridges and furrows by turns every 70 cm on a background of a well leveled field
Author: Asanaliev A., Bishkek 11-27-1, 720049

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: KGS (Kyrgyz som)
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 40.0 KGS (Kyrgyz som)
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 11.00
Most important factors affecting the costs
The technology’s cost depends on the physical state of the soil (degree of moisture, field slope, mechanical composition of soil), seed costs and fuel to be used for the machinery
Establishment activities
  1. Purchase of the second hand seeder by the land users (Timing/ frequency: None)
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (KGS (Kyrgyz som)) Total costs per input (KGS (Kyrgyz som)) % of costs borne by land users
Equipment
Second hand seeder piece 1.0 3000.0 3000.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 3'000.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 75.0
Maintenance activities
  1. Plowing (careful harrowing and leveling) (Timing/ frequency: Prior to sowing)
  2. Ridge sowing (Timing/ frequency: During sowing)
  3. Ridge sowing (Timing/ frequency: During sowing)
  4. Ridge sowing (Timing/ frequency: During sowing)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (KGS (Kyrgyz som)) Total costs per input (KGS (Kyrgyz som)) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Plowing (careful harrowing and leveling) person/days 8.0 3.4375 27.5 100.0
Irrigation person/days 8.0 0.9375 7.5 100.0
Equipment
Machine use for irrigation ha 1.0 10.0 10.0 100.0
Machine use for harvesting ha 1.0 10.0 10.0 100.0
Plant material
Seeds (150kg/ha) ha 1.0 37.5 37.5 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Fertilizer (100kg/ha) ha 1.0 50.0 50.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 142.5
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 3.56

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Thermal climate class: temperate
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
x
increased

Quantity before SLM: 0
Quantity after SLM: 5-8 centner/ha

land management
hindered
x
simplified

demand for irrigation water
increased
x
decreased

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
x
decreased

farm income
decreased
x
increased

economic disparities
increased
x
decreased

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
x
improved

recreational opportunities
reduced
x
improved

Quantity before SLM: 2
Quantity after SLM: 3

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
x
improved

Quantity before SLM: 0
Quantity after SLM: 50

Ecological impacts
soil moisture
decreased
x
increased

soil cover
reduced
x
improved

Quantity before SLM: None
Quantity after SLM: 10

Off-site impacts

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
x
very well
local windstorm

not well at all
very well
Answer: not known
drought

not well at all
x
very well
general (river) flood

not well at all
very well
Answer: not known
Other climate-related consequences
reduced growing period

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Saving of seeds and irrigation water

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Within the service life of the seeder
  • A good possibility for quickly getting a large quantity of seeds of the deficit varieties by an order of magnitude

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Production of a large quantity of seeds is possible, which is especially important for varieties where seed deficits exist
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Effective control of waterlogging and salinization of soil by the optimal irrigation through furrows
  • With the help of optimal furrows water is better absorbed by the soil and is better conserved
  • Facilitates adaptation of crop production to climate change through the increased water use efficiency and applicability of highly productive varieties

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Test different crop varieties for identifying the most resilient crops to be used with the ridge sowing technology
  • Reduces production costs

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Within the service life of the seeder
  • Application of the integrated plant protection methods

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? An increase in awareness among farmers related to the integrated plant protection methods by means of advisory services
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • The use of the ridge seeders requires high capacity tractors with over 100 horse power Buy tractor jointly or lease them
  • Difficulties for combines to move along the fields with the furrows. Level furrows at the ends of the field to allow combines to turn around allows their use in the furrows
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Comparatively high cost of the ridge seeders for farmers The organization of a reasonable credit system for farmers
  • Risk of irrigation erosion along the furrows. An optimal furrow length is to be selected according to the slope and filtering properties of the soil

References

Compiler
  • Abdybek Asanaliev
Editors
Reviewer
  • Fabian Ottiger
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: Dec. 16, 2011
Last update: May 9, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Пожарский В.Г. Норма высева озимой пшеницы при гребневой технологии возделывания в условиях Чуйской долины Кыргызстана//Агромеридиан, Алматы.2006.: В библиотеке Кыргызского НИИ Земледелия, 200 сом.
  • Пожарский.В.Г Акималиев . М. Д Технология возделывания озимой и яровой пшеницы на гребнях в условиях Чуйской и Иссык-Кульской долины КР.//Материалы 1-ой Центрально Азиатской конференции по пшенице,10-13 июня 2003 г. г. Алматы.: В библиотеке Кыргызского НИИ Земледелия, 300 сом.
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International