Lines of hybrid poplar trees, 15 years old. Soil around the poplars is much drier: at a distance of around 20 m the soil is moist and covered by reeds. (Hanspeter Liniger)

Poplar trees for bio-drainage (Kyrgyzstan)

bio-drainage, reduce salinity, favourable microclimate for for plant growth

Description

Poplars planted to lower the ground water table and reduce salinity where irrigation drainage systems have broken down; lucerne cultivated between the tree lines.

In irrigated areas of Central Asia, the drainage system introduced during soviet times has broken down due to lack of maintenance. As a result, water tables have been rising and soil salinity increasing. In the Chui Valley, which is the main crop production area in Kyrgyzstan, approximately 90% of the cultivated land is irrigated for wheat, maize, sugar beet, lucerne and vegetables. Of this, approximately one third (ca. 320,000 ha) is degraded due to loss of fertility, salinisation and waterlogging.
The individual initiative described here - poplar planting - has been applied on a degraded plain (about 400 m a.s.l.), under semi-arid conditions on a plot of 5 hectares. Though initially planted for timber, an important side effect was noted by the farmer in question. Poplar trees, well known for their tolerance to waterlogging and salinity, provide ‘bio-drainage’. Excess water is rapidly taken up by the root system and transpired through the dense foliage. Within the plantation the humidity level of the lower layers of air is increased, thus reducing the influence of the dry, hot winds. A more favourable microclimate for plant growth is thus created. Simultaneously the original purpose of planting - to obtain cheap timber and firewood - is achieved through the rapid growth of the trees: there is a severe shortage of wood locally.
The varieties used include the local Populus alba and Populus nigra as well as a hybrid from Kazakhstan, P. pyramidalis. The trees are planted in rows about 5 metres wide, separated by 10-15 metre strips planted with Medicago sativa (lucerne) and Bromus inermis (a grass), both of which are grown for hay (see technical drawing). Around 3,000 saplings are needed per hectare. The young poplars require irrigating during the first year before their roots can reach the water table. The trees are weeded and their lower branches pruned to encourage straight and fast growth. They are thinned twice before they are 14 years old: these thinnings can be sold. The poplars then remain until they are 20-25 years old and suitable for felling. The output of commercial timber of a poplar plantation is 3,000 m2 per hectare (1 m2 per mature tree). Slow-growing/sick trees, as well as pruned branches, are used as firewood - which can amount to 20-30 m3 per hectare. The cycle begins again after approximately 10 years, when new saplings are planted between the existing, thinned, lines of poplars. Desalinisation of the soil takes 10 years or a little longer, when it again becomes suitable for irrigated cereal cropping.

Location

Location: Besh-Terek, Chui valley,, Kyrgyzstan

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 79.0, 42.0

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (0.05 km²)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation:

Type of introduction
Training in the field: a researcher explains the impact of the poplar system on the groundwater level to a group of students. (Hanspeter Liniger)
-

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Yes - Agroforestry

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: fodder crops - alfalfa
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
  • Forest/ woodlandsTree types: Populus species
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion), Cs: salinization/ alkalinization
  • physical soil deterioration - Pw: waterlogging
SLM group
  • forest plantation management
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover
  • vegetative measures - V1: Tree and shrub cover

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Alternating strips of poplar trees for bio-drainage, and lucerne for fodder. Drainage channels (left) are spaced at 50 metres apart.

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: moderate

Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate

Main technical functions: lower ground water level, decrease waterlogging & improve soil fertility, reduce risk of salinisation

Secondary technical functions: reduction in wind speed, increased air humidity & cooling effect

Aligned: -against wind
Vegetative material: T : trees / shrubs

Trees/ shrubs species: Poplars (Populus alba, Populus nigra, P.pyramidalis)
Author: Mats Gurtner

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: USD
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = n.a
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: n.a
Most important factors affecting the costs
n.a.
Establishment activities
  1. Set up tree nursery one year before planting: take cuttings about (Timing/ frequency: None)
  2. Demarcate lines in field. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  3. Dig drainage trenches in the marshy area (50 cm deep, 50 cm wide, (Timing/ frequency: (end of summer, early autumn))
  4. Plough where seedlings of the poplars are to be planted. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  5. Transplant tree seedlings from the nursery to the field . (Timing/ frequency: in spring)
  6. Irrigate the seedlings by furrow for one year. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  7. Protect the area from animals. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  8. Plant lucerne . (Timing/ frequency: in first year after planting of poplars)
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
All the Labour ha 1.0 350.0 350.0 100.0
Machine use ha 1.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Animal traction ha 1.0 5.0 5.0 100.0
Equipment
Tools ha 1.0 15.0 15.0
Plant material
Seeds ha 1.0 20.0 20.0 1.0
Seedlings ha 1.0 350.0 350.0 1.0
Nursery ha 1.0 80.0 80.0 1.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 920.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 920.0
Maintenance activities
  1. Prune lower branches of the trees to encourage tall and straight (Timing/ frequency: None)
  2. Continue protection of the plot (because of lucerne). (Timing/ frequency: None)
  3. Cut lucerne for hay . (Timing/ frequency: /4 times per year)
  4. Weed control (main weeds are Chenopodium album, (Timing/ frequency: None)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
All the labour ha 1.0 25.0 25.0 100.0
Equipment
Machine use ha 1.0 5.0 5.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 30.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 30.0

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
n.a.
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
fodder production
decreased
x
increased


Lucerne between tree lines

fodder quality
decreased
x
increased


Lucerne between tree lines

wood production
decreased
x
increased

farm income
decreased
x
increased

workload
increased
x
decreased

input contstraints
increased
x
decreased


Not all the farmers have enough resources for introduction of this technology (equipment,

main benefit
delayed
x
immediately


However, short-term benefit from lucerne as fodder and from firewood through pruning

Socio-cultural impacts
SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
x
improved

Ecological impacts
excess water drainage
reduced
x
improved

soil moisture
decreased
x
increased

fire risk
increased
x
decreased

wind velocity
increased
x
decreased

soil fertility
decreased
x
increased


Due to lucerne: 100–130 kg of N

biodiversity
diminished
x
enhanced

Off-site impacts
wind transported sediments
increased
x
reduced

General drop of water table
decreased
x
increased

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Climate change

-

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
1 household
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Positive ecological effect: salinity and area of marshy land can be reduced and waterlogged soils reclaimed

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Awareness raising and training of
    farmers to show the effect of poplar trees on reduction of waterlogging
    and salinisation.
  • Rapid benefit through the production of lucerne and grass. Long-term production of valuable firewood and timber (both are in short supply)

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Show the economic benefits of additional lucerne production and timber and firewood; demonstrate marketing opportunities.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • The implementation of the technology is not possible for all land users due to input and labour constraints Financial support, better organisation/
    share of equipment.
  • Major benefit from timber production comes only after 25 years Create awareness about additional short-term benefits, especially firewood
    and fodder, as well as the long-term effects and the sustainability of the system.
  • Cannot be replicated by all farmers in the valley at the same density as the market for trees (timber, firewood) will be saturated, and trees can never completely take the place of irrigated food crops: nevertheless
    the benefits will extend to those growers through the drainage function of the poplars A new overall production system will have to be worked out for the region.
  • The case reported here works in its current design because of its isolated ‘island effect’: if more farmer grew poplar, the same bio-drainage effect could be achieved over the whole valley at a lower density of trees per
    unit area, implying a larger proportion of cultivable land.

References

Compiler
  • Abdybek Asanaliev
Editors
Reviewer
  • David Streiff
  • Deborah Niggli
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: June 6, 2011
Last update: May 9, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Budaychiev D (2002) The prospects for hybrid poplar forest plantations. Resolving problems and the strategy of reformingagrarian science. News of Kyrgyz Agrarian Academy Vol. 2, Issue 3, 4.1 Bishkek:
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International