Plantation of Agave inaequidens on eroded soil (Acrisol) and volcanic tuf ('tepetate') (Christian Prat (christian.prat@ird.fr))

Land reclamation by agave forestry with native species (Mexico)

Recuperación de tierras degradadas por agaveforestería con especies locales de agaves, arboles y herbaceas (Spanish)

Description

Agave forestry land reclamation system with native agaves, trees, shrubs and grasses planted through participatory action for a sustainable production of mezcal and other products in order to generate high incomes for farmers.

Rehabilitation of degraded land is achieved using native agave (Agave inaequidens), trees and/or fruit trees, shrubs and grasses to create, over the medium-term (7-10 years), sustainable production of a traditional alcoholic drink (mezcal) made from agave and/or cosmetic and medicinal products, and/or fibres and/or fodder for cattle and/or wood. Between the agave plants, native vegetation is managed or planted for use as food, fodder and/or medicinal products. Depending on the slope and the level of land degradation, continuous planted rows of agave provide a ’green’ barrier that controls soil erosion and runoff.

Purpose of the Technology: The main purpose is to achieve sustainable land rehabilitation while generating a high income for the farmer. This allows reducing the amount of livestock and overgrazing, which is the main cause of soil erosion in this region. The production of mezcal gives local farmers high incomes. Trees, shrubs and grasses for medicinal uses, food, and fodder are complements of agave production and are processed mainly by women, while agave harvesting is a male activity. As it is very attractive financially, farmers stay in the communities instead of emigrating to cities or abroad. Biodiversity is preserved and increased using native plants (agaves, trees, shrubs, grasses). These plant associations are effective at controlling plant pests and diseases. Turning eroded into productive soil sequesters carbon and increases water availability as a result of the new soil cover.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: Unlike most agave, Agave inaequidens reproduces from seed, which requires harvesting the seeds from native plants in the fields. One plant generates 80,000 seeds with a 90% success rate of germination, which is enough to cover 25 ha of agave forestry plantations set up to control soil erosion. After harvesting seeds from native agaves, trees and shrubs, seedlings and small plants are raised in a greenhouse and nursery managed by the owners and tenants of the land in the first year. At the beginning of the rainy season, these are planted in plots protected from cattle grazing for at least the first two years after planting. The harvesting activity for trees, shrubs and grasses is done annually, but for the agaves only once every 7 to 12 years depending on the degree of soil degradation. Some months before harvesting, the flower from the stem has to be cut. The leaves are then cut and left in the plot while the 50 kg heart of the agave (“piña”) is removed. Mezcal is produced from the heart and requires an average of three weeks and at least two men to process 25 agave plants (1.5 tonnes), which produces about 300 litres of mezcal.

Natural / human environment: Poverty levels in the area are medium to high and the income from agriculture accounts for only 10 to 20% of the total family budget. People, therefore, do not have time to install soil erosion protection systems in the fields. Cattle graze freely everywhere and the number of animals is increasing annually, which also increases soil erosion. Locals know how to produce mezcal, but they prefer to buy it from other people who take wild plants from their lands to process them. The proximity of the site to the Michoacán of Ocampo state capital and the recognition of the designation of origin for mezcal by the authorities will enhance its value for future production.

Location

Location: Morelia municipality, Mexico/Michoacán state, Mexico

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • -101.17, 19.64

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 0.1-1 km2)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 10-50 years ago

Type of introduction
Example of plantation of Agave: case of Titzio project with Agave cupreata (since 2002). With or without tree cover (Alejandro Martinez (apalacios56@gmail.com))
Example of plantation of Agave (since 2002): Titzio project with Agave cupreata (“Agave papalote”). With and without tree cover (A. Martínez)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Yes - Agro-silvopastoralism

  • Cropland
    • Perennial (non-woody) cropping: agave / sisal
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
  • Grazing land
    • Semi-nomadic pastoralism
  • Forest/ woodlandsProducts and services: Timber, Fuelwood, Fruits and nuts, Other forest products, Grazing/ browsing, Nature conservation/ protection

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion, Wg: gully erosion/ gullying
  • physical soil deterioration - Pu: loss of bio-productive function due to other activities
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover, Bq: quantity/ biomass decline, Bs: quality and species composition/ diversity decline
  • water degradation - Hs: change in quantity of surface water
SLM group
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
  • cross-slope measure
  • improved plant varieties/ animal breeds
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover
  • vegetative measures - V1: Tree and shrub cover
  • structural measures - S11: Others
  • management measures - M3: Layout according to natural and human environment

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Agave production is based on planting them with trees along the contour. Herbs are maintained / planted or sown between the plants. Depending on the slope, one or more dense lines of agaves (1 plant every 25 cm) is planted for control of soil erosion and runoff, including a lateral gradient to the gully which will evacuate the excessive runoff. Footpaths are planned for the maintenance of the plantation

Location: Michoacán. Mexico

Date: 2010

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: low (low for reproduction, plantation and cultivation and middle for alcohol production)

Technical knowledge required for land users: low (low for reproduction, plantation and cultivation and middle for alcohol production)

Main technical functions: control of dispersed runoff: retain / trap, control of concentrated runoff: retain / trap, improvement of ground cover, improvement of surface structure (crusting, sealing), improvement of topsoil structure (compaction), improvement of subsoil structure (hardpan), increase of infiltration, sediment retention / trapping, sediment harvesting, increase of biomass (quantity), promotion of vegetation species and varieties (quality, eg palatable fodder)

Secondary technical functions: control of raindrop splash, control of dispersed runoff: impede / retard, control of concentrated runoff: impede / retard, control of concentrated runoff: drain / divert, reduction of slope angle, reduction of slope length, increase of surface roughness, stabilisation of soil (eg by tree roots against land slides), increase in organic matter, increase in nutrient availability (supply, recycling,…), increase / maintain water stored in soil, increase of groundwater level / recharge of groundwater, water harvesting / increase water supply, water spreading, improvement of water quality, buffering / filtering water, spatial arrangement and diversification of land use

Better crop cover
Material/ species: Agave inaequidens+native trees+herbaceous
Quantity/ density: 830/270
Remarks: Agaves/Trees per ha

Mixed cropping / intercropping
Material/ species: Agave inaequidens+native trees+herbaceous
Quantity/ density: 830/270
Remarks: Agaves/Trees per ha

Contour planting / strip cropping
Material/ species: Agave inaequidens+native trees+herbaceous
Quantity/ density: 830/270
Remarks: Agaves/Trees per ha

Cover cropping
Material/ species: Native trees+herbaceous

Agronomic measure: Herbaceous
Material/ species: Native herbaceous

Agronomic measure: Leafs from trees
Material/ species: Native trees
Quantity/ density: 270
Remarks: Trees per ha

Breaking compacted topsoil
Material/ species: Agave inaequidens+native trees+herbaceous
Quantity/ density: 830/270
Remarks: Agaves/Trees per ha

Contour ridging
Material/ species: Agave inaequidens+native trees+herbaceous
Quantity/ density: 830/270
Remarks: Agaves/Trees per ha

Breaking compacted subsoil
Material/ species: Agave inaequidens+native trees+herbaceous
Quantity/ density: 830/270
Remarks: Agaves/Trees per ha

Aligned: -contour
Vegetative material: C : perennial crops
Number of plants per (ha): 1200
Spacing between rows / strips / blocks (m): 30
Vertical interval within rows / strips / blocks (m): 0,25
Width within rows / strips / blocks (m): 1

Aligned: -along boundary
Vegetative material: O : other

Vegetative measure: Vegetative material: F : fruit trees / shrubs

Perennial crops species: Agave inaequidens (mature between 7 to 14 years)

Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 30%

Gradient along the rows / strips: 30%

Vegetation is used for stabilisation of structures.

Layout change according to natural and human environment: Natives plants are used, planted according to the slopes and the rest of vegetation still existing
Author: Alejandro Martinez, apalacios56@gmail.com

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 100 ha)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: mexican pesos
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 13.0 mexican pesos
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 160
Most important factors affecting the costs
The most important factors determining the costs are: 1) the materials to build a greenhouse and the personal to take care of young plants; 2) the difficulties to make holes in the indurated soils, which takes time and efforts; and 3) the distance between the nursery and the field requires time and efforts (truck carrying the plants).
Establishment activities
  1. Selection and collect Agave and tree seeds (Timing/ frequency: 1 week)
  2. Building of greenhouses incl. soil and organic matter (Timing/ frequency: 1 month)
  3. Fencing of greenhouses with barbed wire, poles and nails (0.5 ha (Timing/ frequency: None)
  4. Seeding & maintaining in greenhouses (Timing/ frequency: 3 monthes)
  5. Installation of a nursery for agaves and trees and transplantation of seedlings in plastic bags (Timing/ frequency: 2 weeks)
  6. Plant care and maintaining in nursery (9 months) (Timing/ frequency: 9 monthes)
  7. Transportation of plants in plastic bags (Timing/ frequency: None)
  8. Plantation of plants (agaves and trees) (Timing/ frequency: None)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 100 ha)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (mexican pesos) Total costs per input (mexican pesos) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Building of greenhouses persons/day 21.0 523.8095 11000.0
Seeding & maintaining in greenhouses persons/3 months 2.0 5000.0 10000.0
Installation of a nursery for agaves and trees persons/day 14.0 1071.4285 15000.0
Plant care and maintaining in nursery persons/9months 2.0 15000.0 30000.0
Plant material
Selection and collect Agave and tree seeds plants 5.0 100.0 500.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Materials for plant care months 9.0 2777.7777777 25000.0
Construction material
Materials for greenhouse trees 60000.0 0.056666666 3400.0
Materials for greenhouse agave 200000.0 0.035 7000.0
Materials for fences m 1500.0 2.4 3600.0
Materials for nurserys trees 60000.0 1.5 90000.0
Materials for nurserys agaves 200000.0 0.2 40000.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 235'500.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 18'115.38
Maintenance activities
  1. Cleaning around plants to give them space the first 3 years (For 1 person 10 days) (Timing/ frequency: 1 time/year)
  2. Cutting the scape before the harvest (For 1 person 15 days) (Timing/ frequency: 1 time in agave life (between 7-14 years))
  3. Weeding around plants to give them space during the first 3 years (10 person days) (Timing/ frequency: 1 time/year)
  4. Cutting the stalk before the harvest (15 person days) (Timing/ frequency: 1 Agavelife time (7 to 14 years old))
  5. Replanting of agaves after 7 to 14 years (restarting of a new cycle of production, see establishment activities) (Timing/ frequency: None)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 100 ha)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (mexican pesos) Total costs per input (mexican pesos) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Weeding around plants persons/day 10.0 160.0 1600.0 10.0
Cutting the stalk before the harvest persons/day 15.0 150.0 2250.0 10.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 3'850.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 296.15

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Rainy season from june to october
Thermal climate class: subtropics

Thermal climate class: temperate
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
  • ejido
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
  • ejido
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
  • ejido
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased

fodder production
decreased
increased

fodder quality
decreased
increased

animal production
decreased
increased


Reduction number of animals but improvement of meat production

wood production
decreased
increased

product diversity
decreased
increased

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
increased

farm income
decreased
increased

diversity of income sources
decreased
increased

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
improved

health situation
worsened
improved


Directly by plants , indirectly with the money earned, it is possible to buy medecinal products.

If producers sell their alcohol production abroad, no problems, if not problems!

cultural opportunities (eg spiritual, aesthetic, others)
reduced
improved

recreational opportunities
reduced
improved

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
improved


Huge beneficts can create great conflicts!

conflict mitigation
worsened
improved

situation of socially and economically disadvantaged groups (gender, age, status, ehtnicity etc.)
worsened
improved

impact on the community due to the huge beneficts
small
big


It can be positive as well as negative (may induce corruption, violence)

livelihood and human well-being
reduced
improved


The production of alcohol beverage (certified Mescal) from agaves, and/or in medicinal products, will generate very high Incomes for stakeholders. Life will change drastically. This allows the farmer's sons to stay in the community and work in the fields.

Ecological impacts
harvesting/ collection of water (runoff, dew, snow, etc)
reduced
improved

surface runoff
increased
decreased

groundwater table/ aquifer
lowered
recharge

soil moisture
decreased
increased

soil cover
reduced
improved

soil loss
increased
decreased

soil crusting/ sealing
increased
reduced

soil compaction
increased
reduced

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
increased

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
increased

plant diversity
decreased
increased

animal diversity
decreased
increased

habitat diversity
decreased
increased

fire risk
increased
decreased

wind velocity
increased
decreased

Off-site impacts
water availability (groundwater, springs)
decreased
increased

reliable and stable stream flows in dry season (incl. low flows)
reduced
increased

downstream flooding (undesired)
increased
reduced

downstream siltation
increased
decreased

groundwater/ river pollution
increased
reduced

buffering/ filtering capacity (by soil, vegetation, wetlands)
reduced
improved

damage on neighbours' fields
increased
reduced

damage on public/ private infrastructure
increased
reduced

biodiversity
decreased
increased

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

That is why, state institutions fund the installations of this system meanwhile the production did not start. After that, benefits generated will be enough to motivate people to increase by themselves, the surface to remediate, without economical helps.

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
very well
local windstorm

not well at all
very well
drought

not well at all
very well
general (river) flood

not well at all
very well
Other climate-related consequences
reduced growing period

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
50 households covering 10 percent of the stated area
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Remediation of degraded land turning it to a sustainable production generating very high incomes in the medium term

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? life will change drastically and not necessarily for the better. Transparency and communication regarding benefits and land use are necessary.
  • Project done in a participative way where different kind of stakeholders are involved: administrations, politics, scientists and people.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Maintain workshops dynamic between stakeholders, present results to other authorities and forum
  • Low-cost project but need to be funded and supported with technical and institutional advice to initiate the first cycle of the project.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Farmers can start to produce their mezcal from the wild agaves to sell them to wholesalers and use this money to pay for the project.
  • As a result of the economical benefits, young people will stay in the communities.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Involve the young to guarantee the future: develop the marketing, the diversification of the products, the quality of production, etc.
  • It will hopefully reduce the number of cattle, which are the main cause of soil erosion, as farmers lose interest in cattle raising.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Authorities need to monitor this and inform the farmers about the ecological impact of too much free cattle grazing.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Obligation to find external funds to pay the first steps of the system (greenhouse, planting, etc.) due to the lack of incomes amongst farmers. Involve all stakeholders in the project
  • Be sure that alcohol production will not be consummed in excess in the community Control of the volume of the production, and the sufficiently high selling price should avoid "losing" the production at local scale
  • Risk that the benefits will be captured by few people Transparency and stakeholder communication in accounting for the benefits
  • Marketing and selling the products Authorities help the farmers to contact sellers. The formation of communities of producers, leading to products conforming to regulations that maintain good quality and provide certification.
  • Owing to the high incomes, life will change drastically and not necessarily for the better.

References

Compiler
  • Christian Prat
Editors
Reviewer
  • David Streiff
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: March 4, 2011
Last update: May 28, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Colunga-García Marín P., D. Zizumbo-Villareal, J.T. Martínez. 2007. Tradiciones en el aprovechamiento de los agaves mexicanos: una aportación a la protección legal y conservación de su diversidad biológica y cultural. In: En lo Ancestral hay Futuro: del Tequila, los Mezcales y otros Agaves. P. Colunga-GarcíaMarín, L. Eguiarte, A. Larqué, D. Zizumbo-Villarreal (eds). CICY-CONACYT-CONABIO-SEMARNAT-INE. México D.F., pp. 85-112.:
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International