céréales/légumineuses fourragères (lupin) (Jamal Al Karkouri)

Crop rotation: cereals / fodder legumes (lupin) (Morocco)

Bernicha

Description

Crops rotation: cereals / fodder legumes (lupin), with a biennial crop rotation

Farming is the main activity of the Sehoul population. In the past, it was based on subsistence cultivation and especially on extensive breeding outside the farm. The cultivation practice mostly applied was barley monoculture. Nowadays, crop rotation is more and more diversified (use of other cereal species and mainly legumes). Because of land degradation on forest pasture, farmers increasingly use their farm land for fodder or legume production such as oats and lupin. White lupins were introduced in the region during the colonial era (1912-1956), through individual initiatives with no external support. The advantages of lupin cultivation are its ability to grow on poor and stony soils and, like other leguminous crops, it does not need nitrogen fertilizers because of its ability to fix nitrogen from the air, which reduces the costs. Additionally, lupin does not require much water (a minimum of 350 mm per year is sufficient). Considering the importance of pastoral activity in the production system of the Sehoul district, this technology meets the expectations of the population as follows. Firstly, there is improvement of fodder production. Lupin is a leguminous crop which can be eaten by ruminants either as green fodder or as grain. Secondly, there is soil improvement through a better structure, an increased soil organic matter content and better nitrogen retention that can be used for the next cultivation. Thirdly, there is a better soil cover because lupin is an invasive plant with efficient roots for finding nutrients, which allows its cultivation on poor soils.
The lupin cultivation technique consists of the following: spreading the seed in October-November, and possibly until mid-December. Early sowing shows good yields, because cold temperatures cause early blossoming. For white lupin, sowing density is about 100 kg/ha. Ploughing (20-25 cm deep ploughing is sufficient) to bury the seed is performed with a swing plough and two mules on slopes, and with a metallic plough or a tractor on plains. No weeding or fertilization activities are required because of the lupin's good nitrogen fixation capacity. However, an additional second or third ploughing can improve the harvest, but is often constrained by a lack of means. A first grazing is allowed in March but afterwards it is left so that it can recover again. Harvesting is done manually with sickles in August and residues are grazed again. Seed production is 8-10 quintals/ha, biomass is 3000 kg/ha.
This technology is applied on plateau margins with steep slopes, where traditional small-scale land use includes predominantly winter crop cultivations (wheat and barley) and secondary spring food cultivations (broad beans, chickpea, maize). On the plateau, bigger and better maintained farms perform irrigated cultivation with ground water. The cork oak forests are coveted as pasture land and firewood source and therefore they are regarded as important for their free natural fodder resources. Pasture land (except forests) covers a small area (12% of the Sehoul area) because of land appropriation and cultivation. Only the collective and the fallow lands are now used as pasture lands and generally show important and alarming degradation processes.

Location

Location: Sehoul, Salé, Morocco

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • -6.63361, 33.87

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (2.0 km²)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 10-50 years ago

Type of introduction
vue détaillée du lupin blanc (Jamal Al Karkouri (Boite postale 1074. Kenitra principale. Maroc))
Vue d’ensemble de la technologie : Succession de 2 cultures sur versant en pente douce, avec lupin en haut (sur sol pauvre et caillouteux) et maïs au bas du versant (sur sol plus épais), (Jamal Al Karkouri (Boite postale 1074. Kenitra principale. Maroc))

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: fodder crops - other, cereals - maize, cereals - barley, legumes and pulses - other, legumes and pulses - beans, blé

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • biological degradation - Bq: quantity/ biomass decline
SLM group
  • n.a.
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
The lupin plot occupies the upper part of the watershed, characterized by very fragile soils because of their thinness (20-40cm) and low organic matter content.

Location: High watershed of Ain Bendar. Salé

Date: 2008/03/15

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: low

Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate

Main technical functions: improvement of ground cover, increase of biomass (quantity)

Secondary technical functions: increase in organic matter, increase in nutrient availability (supply, recycling,…), increase of infiltration, promotion of vegetation species and varieties (quality, eg palatable fodder)

Better crop cover
Material/ species: Lupin (leguminous plant)
Quantity/ density: 23p/m2
Remarks: March

Rotations / fallows
Material/ species: legumes / crops
Quantity/ density: 1/2
Remarks: legumes are cultivated in rotation with the crops in alternate years

Contour tillage
Material/ species: swing plow or plough and mules
Quantity/ density: 1
Remarks: 2 mules
Author: Issam Machmachi, 3, Avenue Ibn Battouta, BP 1040, Rabat, Maroc

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Dirham
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 8.0 Dirham
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 5.00
Most important factors affecting the costs
les équipements et les semences
Establishment activities
  1. Purchase a swing plough (Timing/ frequency: None)
  2. Purchase a metallic plough (Timing/ frequency: None)
  3. Purchase mules (Timing/ frequency: None)
  4. Purchase a cart (Timing/ frequency: None)
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Dirham) Total costs per input (Dirham) % of costs borne by land users
Equipment
Reaping hook piece 1.0 3.0 3.0 100.0
Swing plough piece 1.0 20.0 20.0 100.0
Metallic plough piece 1.0 42.0 42.0 100.0
Mule piece 2.0 2703.0 5406.0 100.0
Cart piece 1.0 203.0 203.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 5'674.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 709.25
Maintenance activities
  1. Seeds (Timing/ frequency: during the first rains in Autumn)
  2. Ploughing (Timing/ frequency: after seeding)
  3. Harvest (Timing/ frequency: end of June)
  4. Gathering and canning (Timing/ frequency: end of the harvest)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Dirham) Total costs per input (Dirham) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Seeding person days 1.0 5.0 5.0 100.0
Ploughing person days 2.0 10.0 20.0 100.0
Harvest person days 2.0 10.0 20.0 100.0
Gathering and canning person days 1.0 5.0 5.0 100.0
Plant material
Seeds kg 100.0 0.42 42.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 92.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 11.5

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Thermal climate class: subtropics. The mean monthly temperature is between 11° (coldest month) and 23° (hottest month)
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
  • in associations
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased

Quantity before SLM: 10 qt/ha
Quantity after SLM: 18 qt/ha

product diversity
decreased
increased

Quantity before SLM: 2 cultivations
Quantity after SLM: 8 cultivations

farm income
decreased
increased

Socio-cultural impacts
cultural opportunities (eg spiritual, aesthetic, others)
reduced
improved

Quantity before SLM: 2culture
Quantity after SLM: 8culture

Ecological impacts
soil moisture
decreased
increased

Quantity before SLM: 4.99%
Quantity after SLM: 10.31%

soil loss
increased
decreased

Quantity before SLM: 2 g/h/m²
Quantity after SLM: 0.5 g/h/m²

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
increased

Quantity before SLM: 0
Quantity after SLM: 50 kg/ha

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
increased

Quantity before SLM: 0.88%
Quantity after SLM: 2.21%

plant diversity
decreased
increased

Quantity before SLM: 2 species
Quantity after SLM: 8 species

Off-site impacts
downstream siltation
increased
decreased

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Rotation benefits can only appear in the long-term, after the amortization of implementation expenses.

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
very well
local windstorm

not well at all
very well
drought

not well at all
very well
general (river) flood

not well at all
very well
Other climate-related consequences
reduced growing period

not well at all
very well
Answer: not known

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Better soil fertility management

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Make demonstrations for the benefit of the population
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Maintenance of the soil fertility

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Encourage the crop rotation by subsidy of the administration
  • Low-cost technology

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Make demonstrations for the benefit of the population
  • Technology not very demanding in SWC knowledge

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Technical support to use the technology better
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Reduce the use of crop rotation and move the animals away from the exploited land occupied by cultivations throughout the year. Replace legumes by fodder crop on the open-field
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Erosion risks for the spring cultivations (maize), because the soil is bare during a high rainfall period. Introduce a catch crop cultivation before the legumes or maize cultivation in order to cover the soil during the heavy rains. Mulching can also be done.
  • Very demanding in family and animals workforce Mechanization

References

Compiler
  • Al Karkouri Jamal
Editors
Reviewer
  • Deborah Niggli
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: April 24, 2011
Last update: May 31, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Antari M. (2007) : Mesure de l’érosion et du ruissemellent dans le micro-bassin versant Matlaq et essai de modélisation (Région de Rabat, Maroc). Thèse de Doctorat, Université Mohammed V-Agdal, Faculté des Lettres et Science Humaines, Rabat. 218p.: Bibliothèque de la Faculté des Lettres et Science Humaines, Rabat, Maroc
  • Nafaa R. (1997) : Dynamique du milieu naturel de la Mamora : paléoenvironnements et évolution actuelle de la surface. Thèse d’Etat en géographie physique, FLSH Rabat, 275p: Bibliothèque de la Faculté des Lettres et Science Humaines, Rabat, Maroc
  • Ghanem H. (1981) : Contribution à la connaissance des sols du Maroc. Genèse et répartition des sols des régions des Zaers, de la basse Chaouia et des Shouls (Méséta marocaine). Cahiers de la Recherche Agronomique n°37&38, INRA, Rabat.: Bibliothèque de la Faculté des Lettres et Science Humaines, Rabat, Maroc
  • DPA (2001) : Projet de mise en valeur bour des Shouls. Direction Provinciale de l’Agriculture, Rabat.: Direction Provinciale de l’Agriculture, Rabat.
  • DPA (2002): Étude de l’analyse des sols dans le périmètre de mise en valeur en bour des Shouls. Evaluation de la fertilité des sols et fertilisation des cultures. Marché négocié 01-2002-DPA-36.: Direction Provinciale de l’Agriculture, Rabat.
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International