Farm in Matalom, Leyte with corn (already harvested) and relayed sweet potato (Engr. Jemar G. Raquid (Bureau of Soils and Water Management))

Sweet Potato Relay Cropping (Philippines)

Lapat System

Description

A farmer’s indigenous practice of growing sweet potato as a relay crop to its main crop of either rice or corn.

It is the planting of sweet potato together with rice/corn on the same area, hence, maximizing the area for crop production. Specifically, a local sweet potato variety called “mayaman” is planted one to two months after planting rice/corn and is being cultivated in the field in between the rows of the above-mentioned main crop. The “mayaman” variety is selected by the farmers due to its excellent food quality and ability to produce more roots at its vine, enabling staggered harvesting and extending period of utilization. However, in some instances, rice and corn were planted at the same time.

Purpose of the Technology: The main purpose of using creeping type of sweet potato is to provide cover to the soil which addresses soil moisture conservation primarily during growing period and after main crop harvesting time. It also protects the soil against erosion. Moreover, it provides additional and alternative food source for the farmers, in case the main crop fails due to some reasons.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: The main crop, either corn or rice, is planted first with a specified planting distance--75cm between rows and 75cm between hills with 2 to 3 seeds per hill (for corn) and 30cm between rows and 20cm between hills with 5 to 6 seeds per hill (for rice). After one month, the sweet potato cuttings are planted in between rows of the main crop at a distance of 1.5m between hills.

Natural / human environment: This relay cropping system is locally known as “lapat” in the areas of Matalom and Bato, Southern Leyte where it is commonly practiced.The soil in these areas is characterized as mostly acid soil. Whereas, its topography is generally comprises from rolling to steep hills. In terms of climate, rainfall is more or less evenly distributed throughout the year and typhoons usually occur during the months of October or November. In addition, most of local farmers cultivated 1 to 2 parcels with farm size from 0.12 to 5.95 hectares with farming as the principal source of livelihood and income. The fields ot the farms are basically rainfed because it is totally dependent on rainfall as water supply for irrigation.

Location

Location: Matalom, Southern Leyte, Philippines

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 124.7965, 10.28741

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. < 0.1 km2 (10 ha))

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: more than 50 years ago (traditional)

Type of introduction
sweet potato grown in between rows of corn (Engr. Jemar G. Raquid (Bureau of Soils and Water Management))

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: cereals - maize, root/tuber crops - sweet potatoes, yams, taro/cocoyam, other, rice
    Number of growing seasons per year: 2
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
  • physical soil deterioration - Pc: compaction
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover
  • water degradation - Ha: aridification
SLM group
  • rotational systems (crop rotation, fallows, shifting cultivation)
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
  • Intercropping
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover, A3: Soil surface treatment

Technical drawing

Technical specifications

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: n.a.
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 45.0
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: n.a
Most important factors affecting the costs
n.a.
Establishment activities
n.a.
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (n.a.) Total costs per input (n.a.) % of costs borne by land users
Plant material
Corn seeds kg 2.0 0.78 1.56 100.0
Rice seeds kg 43.2 0.7777777 33.6 100.0
Sweet potato cuttings 13000.0 0.00555555 72.22 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 107.38
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 2.39
Maintenance activities
  1. clearing (Timing/ frequency: March)
  2. plowing (Timing/ frequency: 10 days after clearing)
  3. harrowing (Timing/ frequency: after plowing)
  4. furrowing (Timing/ frequency: after harrowing)
  5. planting of rice (Timing/ frequency: April)
  6. planting of corn (Timing/ frequency: 2 weeks after planting rice)
  7. planting of sweet potato (Timing/ frequency: 2 months after planting corn)
  8. weeding (Timing/ frequency: every month)
  9. spraying (Timing/ frequency: three times before harversting)
  10. harvesting of rice and corn (Timing/ frequency: None)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (n.a.) Total costs per input (n.a.) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Labour ha 1.0 391.5 391.5 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 391.5
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 8.7

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Thermal climate class: tropics
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
  • mixed land ownership
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
farm income
decreased
x
increased

diversity of income sources
decreased
x
increased

workload
increased
x
decreased


less weeding needed since sweet potato served also as cover crop

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
x
improved

conflict mitigation
worsened
x
improved

Ecological impacts
evaporation
increased
x
decreased

soil moisture
decreased
x
increased

soil cover
reduced
x
improved

soil loss
increased
x
decreased

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
x
increased

emission of carbon and greenhouse gases
increased
x
decreased

Off-site impacts

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
drought

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Simplicity of the farming practice with minimal external input requirement

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? improvement in terms of planting distance or in the land preparation activity; look for other potential cover crop aside from sweet potato
  • Enhance Soil moisture conservation

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? conduct research study to have a more scientific basis
  • Additional food source and farm income

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? integration of other suitable crops for diversification; consider possible value-adding activity; help in the marketing of the product
  • Soil protection against erosion

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Practice contouring and other soil conservation measures in the hilly land/sloping production areas to further minimize soil erosion
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Low market price for sweet potato Value adding through post-harvest processing of sweet potato;Livelihood development related to sweet potato post-harvest processing

References

Compiler
  • Philippine Overview of Conservation Approaches and Technologies
Editors
Reviewer
  • Fabian Ottiger
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: March 26, 2016
Last update: June 13, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International