Gliricidia sepium locally known as "kakawate" served as live trellis "balag" / or anchorage for annual crops and erosion control measure. (Mr. Baldwin Pine)

Highly Diversified Cropping in Live Trellis System (Philippines)

Kakawate as live trellis "balag"

Description

Gliricidia sepium locally known as "kakawate" served as live trellis / or anchorage for annual crops (mostly creeping-type vegetables) and erosion control measure. The technology is well-adopted in the community providing immediate food for the farmers and increased income due to diversified farming.

The Highly Diversified Cropping in Live Trellis System is a traditional or local farmers' initiative technology widely practiced in Brgy. Bukal, Nagcarlan, Laguna situated in the area of Mt. Banahaw. The area with rolling to hilly terrain is receiving an annual rainfall of 1000-2000 mm. Each of the farmers who practiced the technology has 0.5 to 1.0 ha production area. Moreover, the community is accessible to infrastructures such as schools and market. Soils in the area is relatively good for agriculture cultivation.

Kakawate, a small to medium-sized, thornless tree which usually attains a height of 10-12 m is being used as live trellis or "balag" to various annual crops such as tomato, cucumber, chayote, beans, and ampalaya in the community. The cropping system is highly diversified since crop rotation is being practiced throughout the year. Aside from being an anchorage for annual crops, kakawate also stabilizes sloping lands and reduces soil erosion due to its strong roots which can grow 3-5 meters laterally, thereby holding the soil firmly. They are planted in a row of approximately 2-3 meters making it more effective in preventing soil erosion. Furthermore, kakawate is being trimmed and maintained every 3-6 months or as needs arise to a approximate 3 meters high as live trellis, the trimmed leaves are very rich in nitrogen and will eventually serve as compost or crop cover. These will help in improving soil quality and moisture in the soil. In addition, kakawate has multiple uses and benefits; they can serve as hardwood or firewood when matured, as materials in making furniture and anchorage for flowering plants like orchids.

In establishing the live trellis system, kakawate trunks/or cuttings "quick sticks" with at least 2-meter height are planted in a row. An estimate of 0.5 to 1 meter planting distance within a row and also between rows is used. When the kakawate trunks are already set up and planted, they are interconnected using a metallic wires. Along these wires, plastic straws are tied in a vertical position whereby crops can utilize this straws for creeping/ climbing . Finally, the desired crop will be planted according to their cropping pattern. Maintenance of the technology includes: weeding and trimming. During infestation, application of pesticide is done but in minimal.

The technology requires manual works resulting to elimination of machines that contributes to soil compaction.

The technology has been a practice in the community for a long time, and land users continue to adopt the technology because of it's easiness and inexpensiveness to establish, and low cost in terms of maintenance activity. Adding up to this is the variety of plants to be grown, making their market more profitable.

Gliricidia normally grows in tropical countries like the Philippines and is being utilized as hedgerows for erosion control measures. Over the years, its effectiveness as erosion control is known, and an increasingly used forage crop in cut-and-carry systems.

Location

Location: Brgy. Bukal, Nagcarlan, Laguna, Philippines

No. of Technology sites analysed: single site

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 121.44696, 14.07943

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 1-10 km2)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 1950; more than 50 years ago (traditional)

Type of introduction
Live trellis system widely practiced in Brgy. Bukal, Nagcarlan, Laguna (Mr. Baldwin Pine)
Under the live trellis are lettuce grown in the area as part of crop rotation practice (Mr. Baldwin Pine)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: legumes and pulses - beans, vegetables - leafy vegetables (salads, cabbage, spinach, other), tomatoes
    • Tree and shrub cropping
    Number of growing seasons per year: 3
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion, Wo: offsite degradation effects
SLM group
  • agroforestry
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
  • integrated soil fertility management
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover, A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility, A3: Soil surface treatment
  • vegetative measures - V1: Tree and shrub cover

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Kakawate cuttings are planted with an estimated planting distance of 0.5 m to 1 m. They are trimmed and maintained at around 3 meters high for every 3-6 months or as needs arise. In between the kakawate are annual crops like tomato, chayote, beans,cucumber, lettuce and cabbages which are planted in rotation depending on the season.
Author: Baldwin M. Pine

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 0.5 hectare)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Philippine Peso (Php)
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 50.0 Philippine Peso (Php)
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 300
Most important factors affecting the costs
n.a.
Establishment activities
  1. Clearing of the area (Timing/ frequency: As needs arise or before planting of kakawate and annual crops)
  2. Planting of kakawate cuttings (Timing/ frequency: None)
  3. Installation of metal wire and plastic straws (Timing/ frequency: None)
  4. Planting of annual crop: tomato (Timing/ frequency: First cropping usually from December to March)
  5. Planting of annual crop: cucumber or beans (Timing/ frequency: After harvest of the 1st crop (tomato) usually from April to June)
  6. Planting of annual crop: chayote (Timing/ frequency: After harvest of the second crop ( cucumber or beans) usually from July to December)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 0.5 hectare)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Philippine Peso (Php)) Total costs per input (Philippine Peso (Php)) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Manual labour: Weeding person-days 3.0 300.0 900.0 100.0
Manual labour: Planting person-days 3.0 300.0 900.0 100.0
Manual labour: Fertilizer Application person-days 3.0 300.0 900.0 100.0
Manual labour: Harvesting and Hauling person-days 3.0 300.0 900.0 100.0
Plant material
Kakawate cuttings (cuttings are abundant in the area and not for sale) 100.0
Tomato @ 100grams per can can 1.0 1950.0 1950.0 100.0
Cucumber @ 100grams per can can 1.0 600.0 600.0 100.0
Chayote (seeds are abundant in the area) 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Inorganic fertilizer: Urea bag 5.0 1500.0 7500.0 100.0
Organic fertilizer: chicken dung bag 5.0 450.0 2250.0 100.0
Pesticide bottle 1.0 280.0 280.0 100.0
Construction material
Metal wire ( can be used for a long time, up to 10 years life span roll 6.0 480.0 2880.0 100.0
Straw roll 10.0 100.0 1000.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 20'060.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 401.2
Maintenance activities
  1. Weeding (Timing/ frequency: As needs arise but normally twice per cropping per crop)
  2. Trimming of kakawate (Timing/ frequency: As needs arise)
  3. Application of organic fertilizer (Timing/ frequency: Once per cropping)
  4. Application of inorganic fertilizer (Timing/ frequency: Twice per cropping)
  5. Spraying of pesticide (Timing/ frequency: As needs arise)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 0.5 hectare)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Philippine Peso (Php)) Total costs per input (Philippine Peso (Php)) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Weeding person-days 3.0 300.0 900.0 100.0
Trimming of kakawate person-days 3.0 300.0 900.0 100.0
Application of organic fertilizer person-days 3.0 300.0 900.0 100.0
Application of inorganic fertilizer person-days 3.0 300.0 900.0 100.0
Equipment
Spraying of pesticide person-days 3.0 300.0 900.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 4'500.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 90.0

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average annual rainfall in mm: 1500.0
Rainfall is evenly distributed throughout the year
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
x
increased


An increase in production due to crop diversification

crop quality
decreased
x
increased


Organic farming is a common practice in the community, and with this, it aids in the development of crop quality.

fodder production
decreased
x
increased


Kakawate are being utilized as forage crop for ruminants in the area.

fodder quality
decreased
x
increased


Kakawate is rich in Nitrogen.

wood production
decreased
x
increased


Kakawate when matured can be utilized as firewood and materials for making furnitures.

product diversity
decreased
x
increased


Crop rotation makes the technology diverse.

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
x
increased


The area is maximized for cultivation at a minimum soil disturbance.

land management
hindered
x
simplified

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
x
decreased


The application of inorganic fertilizer is minimal due to organic farming.

farm income
decreased
x
increased


Farmers' income is increased due to crop diversicification

diversity of income sources
decreased
x
increased


Farmers' income is increased due to crop diversicification.

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
x
improved

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
x
improved


The continued adoption of the technology testifies that SLM and/land degradation knowledge is improved in the community.

Ecological impacts
soil moisture
decreased
x
increased


Kakawate when left on the ground aids in the improvement of soil moisture.

soil cover
reduced
x
improved


Crop rotation practice improves soil cover.

soil loss
increased
x
decreased


Over the years, kakawate is proven to be an effective erosion control measure in the sloping areas.

soil compaction
increased
x
reduced


Manual cultivation aids in minimal disturbance of the soil, thereby does not contribute to soil compaction in the area.

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
x
increased


Organic farming is a practice in the community.

vegetation cover
decreased
x
increased

pest/ disease control
decreased
x
increased


Crop rotation helps in the decreased of pest population.

landslides/ debris flows
increased
x
decreased

emission of carbon and greenhouse gases
increased
x
decreased


The technology requires manual cultivation with least or no machine intervention, organic farming is a must with minimum usage of inorganic fertilizer, and biodiversity is also encourage. With that, the technology is believed to be effective to address carbon emission and greenhouse gases.

Off-site impacts
downstream flooding (undesired)
increased
x
reduced

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Climate change

-

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
Almost all of local farmers practice the technology
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • (1) Increase farm income
    (2) Diverse farm produce
    (3) Easiness to establish, no need for technical knowledge to establish
    (4) Inexpensive
    (4) Organic farming
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • (1) Low production cost
    (2) Easiness to maintain
    (3) Effective erosion control measure
    (4) Increase farm yield and income
    (5) Diverse farm produce
    (6) Easiness to transfer
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • (1) Pest infestation (1) Pesticide application
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • (1) The technology is very good in terms of erosion control and improving lives of farmers in the community, but then the technology is not well-known for the whole country. (1). The WOCAT database as an excellent information tool /or medium in the dissemination of this kind of technology, not only within Philippines but all over the world. These would highlight initiatives of the local farmers situated in remote areas in terms of managing the land productively and sustainably.

References

Compiler
  • Philippine Overview of Conservation Approaches and Technologies
Editors
Reviewer
  • Ursula Gaemperli
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: March 11, 2017
Last update: Sept. 5, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International