SUWS tap ( Top left) with pipes connected to households for multiple purposes (Jhuna Kattel)

Odaltaal-10 Single Use Water System (Nepal)

Tanki

Description

Water from source is collected in a reservoir tank ( RVT) of volume 13000 Ltr and then distributed to each household for Single Use. Traditionally, the system was constructed to serve a single purpose-drinking (hence the name "Single Use" water system). However, due to increasing demand and need to meet multiple uses, the water users are using the same water for different purposes like drinking, irrigation and other domestic uses.

A Single Use Water System (SUWS) is the one in which the supplied water serves a single purpose. Traditionally, the system was constructed in order to meet the growing demand and serve a single purpose i.e. supply drinking water to households ( hence the name "Single Use" water systems). However, people's demands and needs increased and supplied water was then used for various purposes like for irrigation, animal husbandry, domestic chores like bathing, washing, etc.
The technology is applied in a natural environment (community forest). The source of water is a natural source that lies in a community forest and hence, the availability is seasonal. The land where the source falls is owned by the government and the implementation of the technology was primarily assisted by the Village Development Committee (VDC). Its use rights falls under the water users. The main elements include a concrete Reservoir tank (RVT), pipeline and tap system or tap towers with faucets. The major functions of this technology are to store water and distribute to the 30-35 households and to ensure the preservation of natural water source through its sustainable use. Major activities are labor and construction activities for building the reservoir tank and laying down the pipeline. Maintenance work, if and when it is needed, is carried out with the help of the water users. No specific group or committee has been formed that looks onto the matters of discussion of the committee. No investment has been made by the local water users' group towards the construction of the technology. Benefits of the technology are the availability of clean drinking water at household level and the preservation of the natural source of water that ensures its perennial availability. Water users admire the overall improvement of their health status through the availability of clean drinking water.
They dislike the fact of water scarcity during dry seasons and the poor management of the system. The quantity of the water is adequate for most of the year. However, scarcity of water during the dry months (when the source dries out) is still eminent. Quality of water is good with low salinity and or iron and other elements but persistence of lime in the water remains.

Location

Location: Kunathari VDC -10, Odaltaal, Province 6, Karnali, Mid - Western Development Region, Nepal

No. of Technology sites analysed: single site

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 81.50293, 28.71852

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 1-10 km2)

In a permanently protected area?: Yes

Date of implementation: 10-50 years ago

Type of introduction
SUWS tap system (Jhuna Kattel)
SUWS tap tower (Jhuna Kattel)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
  • drinking water purpose ( to improve water security at a household level)
Land use

  • Forest/ woodlands
    • (Semi-)natural forests/ woodlands. Management: Selective felling
    Tree types (evergreen): n.a.
    Products and services: Nature conservation/ protection
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation
  • Natural Water Source

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • water degradation - Hs: change in quantity of surface water, Hp: decline of surface water quality
SLM group
  • water harvesting
  • ground water management
  • water management ( for Drinking purpose) - Gravity Fed Single Line
SLM measures
  • structural measures - S5: Dams, pans, ponds, S6: Walls, barriers, palisades, fences, S7: Water harvesting/ supply/ irrigation equipment, S11: Others

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Reservoir Tank (13,000 LTR in volume). Both the source and the RVT are located inside community forest ( Samjhana Samudayik Ban). The water then flows due to the effects of gravity onto the tap towers, wherein water is supplied for 30-35 households for Single Use. Even though single use (drinking) was considered in the construction of technology, people have been fulfilling various needs with the water supplied ( eg. Drinking, irrigation, and other domestic uses).

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 10 Dhurs; conversion factor to one hectare: 1 ha = 1 ha= 590.70 dhurs)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: NPR
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 113.0 NPR
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: N/A
Most important factors affecting the costs
The construction materials, pipelines were the ones which costed the most.
Establishment activities
  1. Construction of Reservoir Tank (Timing/ frequency: None)
  2. Laying down the pipeline (Timing/ frequency: None)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 10 Dhurs)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (NPR) Total costs per input (NPR) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Voluntary
Equipment
Construction of RVT
Laying down pipeline
Maintenance activities
  1. Laying down pipeline ( by RRN) (Timing/ frequency: Once (2056 B.S,) during winter)
  2. Operation and maintenance costs (borne by a NGO- DFID) (Timing/ frequency: Once (2071 B.S.) during summer)
  3. Changing of pipes ( borne by NGO- Newasanstha and the locals) (Timing/ frequency: 6-7 times ( during summer, winter and during rains))
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 10 Dhurs)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (NPR) Total costs per input (NPR) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Voluntary Labour contribution by locals 100.0
Equipment
Changing of PVC Pipes 25.0

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Total annual rainfall of the region was around 1609 mm; however no literature could give an idea on the annual "average" rainfall. Thus, estimated rainfall was mentioned.
Name of the meteorological station: Meteorological Forecasting Division, Nepal ( www.mfd.gov.np)
The climate is overall humid with monsoon consisting of 2-3 months ( June - August) and dry and arid conditions during the winter seasons.
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to: both ground and surface water
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good
Comments

The access to all these services is limited as the locals have to traverse a distance of almost 30 minutes to bazaar area / marketplace. The road infrastructure is good.

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
x
increased

fodder production
decreased
x
increased

forest/ woodland quality
decreased
x
increased

risk of production failure
increased
x
decreased

product diversity
decreased
x
increased

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
x
increased

drinking water availability
decreased
x
increased

drinking water quality
decreased
x
increased

water availability for livestock
decreased
x
increased

water quality for livestock
decreased
x
increased

irrigation water availability
decreased
x
increased

irrigation water quality
decreased
x
increased

demand for irrigation water
increased
x
decreased

diversity of income sources
decreased
x
increased

Socio-cultural impacts
health situation
worsened
x
improved


Prior to the adoption of the technology, typhoid, jaundice, diarrhea and dysentery used to be a problem during the summer and rainy seasons. However, after the adoption of technology, the number of cases of such illnesses have drastically decreased and overall health status of the people greatly improved due to availability of clean drinking water.

Ecological impacts
drought impacts
increased
x
decreased

Off-site impacts
water availability (groundwater, springs)
decreased
x
increased


Water can be made available to distant places with the connection of a PVC pipe to the faucet in SUWS tap towers. Thus, more people are being benefitted from the technology.

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Estimated maintenance and running costs could not be exactly calculated, but weighing down the pros with the costs; the benefits outweigh the costs.

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
annual rainfall decrease

not well at all
x
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
drought

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Availability of clean source of drinking water is ensured.
  • Need to travel long distances to fetch water not prevalent due the the availability of taps with drinking water at household levels.
  • Water being used for various purposes like drinking, irrigation, domestic purposes, etc.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Water scarcity during arid and dry winters decreased if not stopped overall.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Water not available all year-round By construction of another reservoir tank (RVT)
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Pipeline severely damaged due to lime Lime treatment and changing of pipes to more resistant ones ( GI ) pipes instead of feeble PVC ones used
  • No specific committee / group set up to discuss the problems Setting up water users' committee and donating a small sum per household every month that goes onto a fund, that can be later used to address various problems that may arise in the future.
  • Water being supplied for a single use only upgrading the technology to Multiple Use Water Systems (MUWS) in place of Single-Use Water Systems (SUWS) could address the multiple uses of water users.

References

Compiler
  • Jhuna Kattel
Editors
Reviewer
  • Renate Fleiner
Date of documentation: July 9, 2019
Last update: Dec. 3, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International