'Preparation 500' application in agricultural soils under a biodynamic management. (Alicia Morugán Coronado)

Application of 'Preparation 500' in agricultural soils under a biodynamic management (Spain)

Cow horn manure applied in biodynamic agricultural management.

Description

Application of 'preparation number 500', commonly known as cow horn manure. Preparation 500 is made by filling a cow's horn with cow dung, and burying it in the soil during the cooler months to turn into dark humus. This is then sprayed up to four times a year over the orchard.

1. Preparation 500 application in agricultural soils under a biodynamic management is applied in a flat orchard of 40 ha located in Jumilla in southeastern Spain. It is sited in the north east of the Murcia region, on the Altiplano area, close to the towns of Cieza and Yecla. This area has an important agricultural activity where the main plantations are vineyards, but as well orchards of different mediterranean fruits. Jumilla is a Spanish Denominación de Origen (DO) for wines that extends over the north of the region of Murcia.

2. This technology is based on the application of the preparation number 500, commonly known as cow horn manure. Preparation 500 is made by filling a cow's horn with cow dung every year, and burying it in the soil during the cooler months (November through February). The horns should be buried open end down so that they will not become water logged if the pit is over watered. When the preparation is ready after 4 months it should have turned into dark humus. It should then be stored in a cool place and in glazed, isolated pots. It is sprayed up to four times a year. The best times are in October and November and then again in February and March. It is stirred for one hour making a vortex. The Horn Manure preparation 500 should be diluted in good-quality rainwater that has been properly stored. The preparation is then stirred vigorously for exactly one hour before spraying. The water should be heated before stirring, ideally to body temperature. Spraying in the field area should be done in the evening, not before 5 pm (4 pm in winter) on a day that is not too windy or too hot, avoiding direct sunlight. A slightly overcast, late afternoon is ideal. Avoid spraying in the rain, or if heavy rains are forecasted after spraying. Don't spray if night frost is expected, in order to ensure the correct working of preparation 500.

3. The main purpose of this technology is to sustain living soils, since application of ‘Preparation 500’ is intended to increase soil bacteria life, enhance the earthworm activity, promote rooting and greater absorption and retention of water.

4. The flat tree orchard was already under organic farming management (since 1998) before the current technology was applied. In 2014 the farmer changed the agricultural management on his own initiative to biodynamic practice with the same crop. The major new activity was the elaboration of the preparation 500, that is sprayed out in the orchard after the weeds are cutted. Secondary activities focus on maintaining the preparation 500 during the rest of the year and on improving the soil by keeping a permanent vegetation cover and reducing the tillage.

5. There were several benefits observed after this technology was applied: regarding the soil quality a strong humus layer was formed and organic matter increased. In general the soil structure improved. Another positive impact was the response against plagues: the establishment of this self-sustaining agro-ecosystem as a whole increases the biodiversity and the beneficial species in the orchard.

6. The land user is satisfied with the results of this technology in his orchard because it opened him a new market sector - the biodynamic farm market. The fruit quality and the soil characteristics improved, soil organic matter, soil structure and response against plagues were enhanced. On the other hand, the land user mentioned as challenging factors the big amount of money to change the agricultural management to biodynamic farming and the great effort to get the Preparation 500 and the external organization certifications, which are expensive.

Location

Location: Jumilla, Murcia, Spain

No. of Technology sites analysed: single site

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • -1.3866, 38.39914

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 0.1-1 km2)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 2014

Type of introduction
Biodynamic agriculture in the southern Spain (Alicia Morugán Coronado)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Yes - Agroforestry

  • Cropland
    • Perennial (non-woody) cropping
    • Tree and shrub cropping: grapes, flat peaches (Prunus persica var. platycarpa), mediterranean fruits
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • physical soil deterioration - Pk: slaking and crusting, Pu: loss of bio-productive function due to other activities
  • biological degradation - Bq: quantity/ biomass decline, Bs: quality and species composition/ diversity decline
SLM group
  • integrated soil fertility management
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility, A3: Soil surface treatment

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Species used: Flat peaches (Prunus persica var. platycarpa)
Flat peach tree root depth: 0.4m
Spacing between plants: 1.5m
Intervals between trees rows: 4m
Preparation 500 consist of cow manure without straw applied 4-5 times per year by spray.
Before application, the cow manure is buried in cow horn during the winter.
Author: Alicia Morugán Coronado

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 40 hectares)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Euro
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 0.944508 Euro
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 60 Euro
Most important factors affecting the costs
Unforseen weather is always a risk in conventional as well as in bio-dynamic agriculture. The rainy days, high temperatures and direct sunlight can affect the correct application of preparation 500 and could cause a decrease in the orchard production.
Establishment activities
  1. weed cutting (Timing/ frequency: october)
  2. filling a cow's horns with cow dung (Timing/ frequency: november)
  3. burying the cow's horns it in the soil (Timing/ frequency: november-february)
  4. store the cow's horns in a cool place in glazed pots (Timing/ frequency: after 4 months burying)
  5. mix with water and spray in the orchard (Timing/ frequency: october-november and february-march)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 40 hectares)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Euro) Total costs per input (Euro) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Weed cutting person-day 2.0 60.0 120.0 100.0
Elaboration process Preparation 500 persona/dia 15.0 60.0 900.0 100.0
organic amendment persona/dia 5.0 60.0 300.0 100.0
Equipment
picks and shovels to dig the cow horns during winter item 2.0 18.0 36.0 100.0
glazed storing pots for Preparation 500 item 100.0 10.0 1000.0 100.0
Cow horns to be filled with cow dung item 3.0 50.0 150.0 100.0
tractor with trailer (hire per day) pieza 1.0 30.0 30.0 100.0
cow dung item 5.0 60.0 300.0 100.0
Plant material
shovel item 1.0 15.0 15.0 100.0
tank item 1.0 10.0 10.0 100.0
Ride-on Mowers item 1.0 3000.0 3000.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
cow manure needed to produce Preparation 500 kg 10.0 10.0 100.0 100.0
organic amendment
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 5'961.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 6'311.22
Maintenance activities
  1. weed cutting (Timing/ frequency: October)
  2. filling a cow's horns with cow dung (Timing/ frequency: November-December)
  3. burying the cow's horns it in the soil (Timing/ frequency: November-February)
  4. store the cow's horns in a cool place in glazed pots (Timing/ frequency: After 4 months burying)
  5. mix with water and spray in the orchard (Timing/ frequency: october-november and february-march)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 40 hectares)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Euro) Total costs per input (Euro) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Elaboration process Preparation 500 person/day 15.0 60.0 900.0 100.0
organic amendment person/day 5.0 60.0 300.0 100.0
weed cutting person/day 2.0 60.0 120.0 100.0
Equipment
tractor with trailer (hire per day) day 8.0 30.0 240.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
cow manure needed to produce Preparation 500 kg 10.0 10.0 100.0 100.0
manure item
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 1'660.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 1'757.53

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average annual rainfall in mm: 369.0
Torrential rains occur on September and October
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
crop quality
decreased
increased


The product quality improved with preparation 500 and higher resistance to plagues was observed.

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
increased


New production areas were acquired for new market opportunities thanks to the biodynamic product.

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
decreased


Expenses on agricultural inputs increased after the application of preparation 500.

farm income
decreased
increased


After the preparation 500 application, the incomes in the farm increased because new market opportunities appear in biodynamic sector, and the land user can establish the product price because the flat peaches in biodynamic market is a new product in markets.

Socio-cultural impacts
SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
improved


Biodynamic farming reduces soil degradation

Ecological impacts
water quantity
decreased
increased


The application of preparation 500 increases the moisture in soil.

soil moisture
decreased
increased


The soil keeps the moisture because of the organic amendment applied through preparation 500.

soil loss
increased
decreased


After application of preparation 500 the tillage was reduced and the soil loss decreased.

soil crusting/ sealing
increased
reduced


Soil structure was improved after preparation 500 application.

soil compaction
increased
reduced


Soil structure was improved after preparation 500 application.

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
increased


Soil nutrient was improved after preparation 500 application.

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
increased


Soil organic matter was enhanced after preparation 500 application.

acidity
increased
reduced


Reduction of soil pH was observed after the application of organic amendment in preparation 500.

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
increased


Biomass was enhanced after preparation 500 application.

invasive alien species
increased
reduced


The response of the soil and the orchard against invasive species was empowered after preparation 500 application.

beneficial species (predators, earthworms, pollinators)
decreased
increased


Beneficial species have appeared in the agro-ecosystem after preparation 500 application

habitat diversity
decreased
increased


After preparation 500 application a self-sustainable agro-ecosystem was formed.

pest/ disease control
decreased
increased


The response of the soil and the orchard against disease or pest were empowered after preparation 500 application.

Off-site impacts
groundwater/ river pollution
increased
reduced


With the application of preparation 500 inorganic fertilizers and plaguicides are not needed anymore, and therefore groundwater pollution was reduced.

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
seasonal rainfall increase

not well at all
very well
Season: autumn
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
heatwave

not well at all
very well
drought

not well at all
very well
epidemic diseases

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Strong humus formation.
  • Improvement against plagues.
  • Greater water absorption and retention.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Increase of organic matter.
  • Enhancement of soil structure.
  • Increase of soil biodiversity.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Short response time to the weather risks. The land user must apply the preparation 500 avoiding rainy days, high temperatures and direct sunlight. The application of preparation 500 around the orchard must be in the afternoon 4 times per year to ensure the effectiveness of this preparation.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • The high dependency on climatological conditions The land user must apply the preparation 500 avoiding rainy days, high temperatures and direct sunlight. The application of preparation 500 around the orchard must be in the afternoon 4 times per year to ensure the effectiveness of this preparation.

References

Compiler
  • Alicia Morugán-Coronado
Editors
Reviewer
  • Ursula Gaemperli
  • Gudrun Schwilch
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: May 29, 2017
Last update: July 23, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • no:
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International