vineyards (Aslam Qadamov (Pamir Biological Institute, Khorog))

Vineyard with natural grass cover in an arid alpine zone (Switzerland)

L’enherbement spontané des vignobles dans une zone montagneuse sèche (French)

Description

Establishment of natural grass cover in vineyards to reduce the use of herbicides and to increase biodiversity.

A natural grass cover is left to develop in the vineyard. This should only be done once the vines are at least 4-5 years old because if done earlier, competition for water can negatively impact growth of the young vines. During the first years certain weeds are removed manually or through the targeted local application of herbicides. After a diverse grass cover has developed no herbicides are used in the vineyard anymore. There is no additional mulching applied, however, all the leaves and branches shed by the vines are left in the plot to decay and to replenish soil organic matter. In addition, the skins of grapes that remain after pressing are spread out on the plot as an organic fertilizer. In terms of inorganic fertilizers, potassium and magnesium are regularly applied to the vines. In some cases also nitrogen has to be applied because of competition for nitrogen between the vines and the grass cover, but this is avoided if possible. Wine quality can suffer from nitrogen insufficiency as it is needed for the fermentation process. Irrigation via a sprinkler irrigation system installed in the plot is only used during the establishment of the young vines. Later, no irrigation is used any more.

Purpose of the Technology: The main purpose of this technology is to reduce the use of herbicides, to improve soil structure and to promote an increase in biodiversity. A positive impact on reduced evaporation could not be confirmed by the land user as according to him, competition between the grasses and the vines for soil moisture is high. From the researcher’s point of view, the longer roots of the vines compared to those of the grasses should allow the vines to take up moisture from deeper layers and therefore the grass cover should at least have some positive effect on soil moisture. As soil erosion is not an important issue in this area, contrary to other vine producing areas in Switzerland, soil stabilisation is not a major purpose of this technology. However, the grass cover is naturally contributing to soil stabilisation which might still have a positive effect in the case of heavy rainfall events.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: The choice of the plot on which grass cover should be established requires very high knowledge of its condition as on very dry soil there will be increase competition for water. Establishment activities are quite simple as the establishment of the grass cover is completely natural with no seeds added by the land user. Only during the first years of establishment, if needed, some contact herbicides are applied locally to prevent very common and aggressively spreading plants such as the dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) to spread and to impede the establishment of more rare species. In terms of maintenance the grass cover has to be cut. The frequency of cutting depends on the weather but is generally done about every 4-6 weeks. Cutting is alternating between lines in order to always retain seeds for reproduction within the system. The cutting is alternated between rows so that there is always a well-developed cover in at least part of the vineyard. Grass cutting is mechanised with specialised machinery needed to fit in between the vine rows. Because of the need for cutting this technology requires more labour than the common system used for vine cultivation (application of herbicides).

Natural / human environment: The hamlet of Valencon is situated on the right side of the Rhone River, in the central part of the Canton of Valais, in South-western Switzerland. The vineyard is located on a south facing slope at an altitude of about 700 m.a.s.l. The climate in the Rhone Valley is the driest in the whole of Switzerland with only about 500 mm of annual rainfall.
Because of increased labour need the farmer transfers the increased investment onto the price per bottle of vine. This is possible because the whole transformation process including sale takes place on farm. His mainly private customers are willing to pay a price premium for integrated production using less herbicides.
Although the interviewed land user is aware of around 10 other land users that have applied the technology, the spread of this technology is limited by the difficult topography which does not allow for mechanization in every case. It is also limited by conservative views about what a proper vineyard should look like (no grass in between the vines).

Location

Location: Valençon (Chermignon), Valais, Switzerland

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 7.2808, 46.1633

Spread of the Technology:

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 10-50 years ago

Type of introduction
covered wine yard (Julie Zähringer (CDE, University of Bern))
vine yard (Julie Zähringer (CDE, University of Bern))

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Tree and shrub cropping: grapes
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion), Cp: soil pollution
  • biological degradation - Bs: quality and species composition/ diversity decline
  • water degradation - Ha: aridification, Hq: decline of groundwater quality
SLM group
  • n.a.
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover
  • vegetative measures - V5: Others
  • management measures - M7: Others

Technical drawing

Technical specifications

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Swiss Frank
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 0.95 Swiss Frank
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: n.a
Most important factors affecting the costs
Labour costs for grass cutting. An average labour cost of 300 CHF per day was assumed.
Establishment activities
  1. Development of natural grass cover (Timing/ frequency: None)
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Swiss Frank) Total costs per input (Swiss Frank) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Establishment of natural grass cover 100.0
Maintenance activities
  1. cutting grass (Timing/ frequency: 4-6 times / year)
  2. removing the weeds (Timing/ frequency: once / year)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Swiss Frank) Total costs per input (Swiss Frank) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Cutting grass (10-15 p.d.) person days 10.0 400.0 4000.0 100.0
Weeding 100.0
Equipment
Tools ha 1.0 1000.0 1000.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 5'000.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 5'263.16

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Thermal climate class: temperate
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
risk of production failure
increased
x
decreased

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
x
decreased

workload
increased
x
decreased

Quantity before SLM: 0%
Quantity after SLM: 10-20%

Socio-cultural impacts
health situation
worsened
x
improved

cultural opportunities (eg spiritual, aesthetic, others)
reduced
x
improved

conflict mitigation
worsened
x
improved

Ecological impacts
harvesting/ collection of water (runoff, dew, snow, etc)
reduced
x
improved

Quantity before SLM: not known
Quantity after SLM: not known

evaporation
increased
x
decreased

Quantity before SLM: not known
Quantity after SLM: not known

soil moisture
decreased
x
increased

Quantity before SLM: not known
Quantity after SLM: not known

soil cover
reduced
x
improved

Quantity before SLM: 0%
Quantity after SLM: 60-80%

soil loss
increased
x
decreased

soil compaction
increased
x
reduced

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
x
increased

plant diversity
decreased
x
increased

animal diversity
decreased
x
increased

beneficial species (predators, earthworms, pollinators)
decreased
x
increased

habitat diversity
decreased
x
increased

Off-site impacts

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

It takes time for the biodiversity to develop

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
very well
Answer: not known
local windstorm

not well at all
very well
Answer: not known
drought

not well at all
x
very well
general (river) flood

not well at all
very well
Answer: not known
Other climate-related consequences
reduced growing period

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
The land user is aware of about 10 other land users in the surroundings which apply this technology
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Decreased use of herbicides and therefore contribution to ecosystem health.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Increase area of vineyards with grass cover.
  • Improved soil structure.
  • Increased plant and arthropode biodiversity.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Simple to use technology as no specific inputs and knowledge is required.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Spread knowledge and encourage other vinegrowers to apply this technology.
  • More sustainable production system beneficial for land users and the society as a whole.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Increase area of vineyards with grass cover.
  • Increased biodiversity.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? No use of herbicides in the future.
  • Une augmentation de la fertilité et de l'humidité du sol.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Increased competition between grasses and vines can lead to decreased grape quality. The land user needs to have very good knowledge about the plot conditions in order to know where competition can be supported; select only grass species which are less competitive; only apply partial grass cover.
  • Need for mechanization, which is not feasible on every plot due to topography. Only apply grass cover on flatter plots which allow for mechanization.
  • Increased frost can have a devastating impact on grapes. This can be a severe disadvantage but in this case is only a problem for vineyards in the valley planes, not for those on the slopes. Cut grass cover as low down as possible before frost occurs (however, the exact moment is difficult to anticipate).
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Increased frost can have a devastating impact on grapes which can be a severe disadvantage. In this case it is only a problem for vineyards in the valley planes, not for those on the slopes. Cut grass cover as low down as possible before frost occurs (however, exact moment is difficult to anticipate).

References

Compiler
  • Guillaume Grandchamp
Editors
Reviewer
  • Fabian Ottiger
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: Sept. 1, 2012
Last update: Aug. 14, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International