Fodder grain crop (Malgorzata Conder)

Current feed grain cultivation (Tajikistan)

Description

Cultivation of wheat or feed grain for straw production on a degraded plot

The farmer started to plant flax for oil production on his 0.2 hectare plot, which gave a good harvest. Since 1999 the farmer has cultivated wheat and feed grain, rotating year by year. According to the farmer, wheat and feed grain cropping does not provide a benefit on that plot, when money and labour inputs are considered. But as straw is scarce but is needed for his cows, the farmer gets that by-product from harvesting wheat. Furthermore, as that plot is accessible by the tractor for ploughing, he plants wheat and will continue doing that in future, even though the output is low. Though the farmer has a land user's certificate for that property, it becomes common for livestock grazing after the harvest. This causes overgrazing, bare soil, trampling and other issues.

Purpose of the Technology: The purpose of cropping wheat is to get straw for feeding. According to the farmer the bad quality of soil and the absence of water do not allow a different crop type than wheat.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: Establishment and maintenance activities are almost the same. The crop must be ploughed, seeds planted and fertilizer applied. Though no fertilizer was needed at the beginning of crop cultivation, now its use is increasing. Between the time of planting and harvesting, the crop is regularly safe guarded from grazing livestock. If herds approach, the farmer or a family member will protect the crop. After the harvest, the crop is somehow declared as communal land, where cattle are allowed to graze there.

Natural / human environment: The crop is situated on a ridge above the village of Chargii bolo. It is a small sized terrace with a slight slope. Soil quality and moisture were already very poor when the crop was established, which results in a low output comparing to the input. The soil is compacted and shows a low level of organic matter, soil moisture and nutrients. The farmer complains about the small sharp stones of around 1-2 cm of diameter in the soil. They indicate a high level of soil degradation. Although the slope is slight, the vertical ploughing has caused small rills in the lower part of the plot and some more pronounced rills off-site. The plot is the property of the farmer, but is used as pasture after harvest for the livestock. Soil compaction, lowered vegetation cover and water infiltration result from trampling and overgrazing. There’s no agreement between cultivars and herders, reason why this crop continues to be grazed uncontrolled.

Location

Location: Muminobod, Khatlon, Tajikistan, Tajikistan

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 70.05712, 38.07416

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. < 0.1 km2 (10 ha))

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 10-50 years ago

Type of introduction
Petrified clay conglomerate as indicator for soil degradation (Malgorzata Conder)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: fodder crops - grasses, fodder crops - other
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion, Wo: offsite degradation effects
  • physical soil deterioration - Pc: compaction
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover
SLM group
  • rotational systems (crop rotation, fallows, shifting cultivation)
  • pastoralism and grazing land management
  • Feed grain cultivation
SLM measures

Technical drawing

Technical specifications

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Somoni
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 4.83 Somoni
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 12.40
Most important factors affecting the costs
Agricultural inputs as seeds and fertilizer are the most expensive
Establishment activities
n.a.
Maintenance activities
  1. Plowing, 11 hours, 1 person (Timing/ frequency: spring (7.April)/ once a year)
  2. Sowing wheat, 10-12 hours, 3 persons (Timing/ frequency: spring (7.April)/once a year)
  3. Applying fertilizer, 10 hours, 1 person (Timing/ frequency: spring (20.Mai)/ once a year)
  4. Cutting wheat, 4-5 days, 3 persons (Timing/ frequency: autumn/ once a year)
  5. Guarding, 1 person (Timing/ frequency: unregularly - sporadically)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Somoni) Total costs per input (Somoni) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Plowing Person days 1.4 12.214 17.1 100.0
Sowing wheat Person days 4.125 12.412 51.2 100.0
Applying fertilizer Person days 1.4 12.214 17.1 100.0
Cutting wheat Person days 13.5 12.422 167.7 100.0
Equipment
Petrol liters 14.0 1.14 15.96 100.0
Machine use hours 2.0 2.6 5.2 100.0
Plant material
Seeds 12.4 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Fertilizer kg 12.0 0.755 9.06 100.0
Other
Guarding
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 283.32
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 58.66

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Totally 800 mm: 700mm in winter-spring, July-Sept dry season
Thermal climate class: temperate
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
x
increased

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
x
decreased

workload
increased
x
decreased


less/ no guardening

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
x
improved

Ecological impacts
water quantity
decreased
x
increased

surface runoff
increased
x
decreased

evaporation
increased
x
decreased

soil moisture
decreased
x
increased

soil cover
reduced
x
improved

soil crusting/ sealing
increased
x
reduced

soil compaction
increased
x
reduced

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
x
increased

Off-site impacts
buffering/ filtering capacity (by soil, vegetation, wetlands)
reduced
x
improved

damage on neighbours' fields
increased
x
reduced

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Benefits compared with maintenance costs

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
x
very well
local windstorm

not well at all
very well
Answer: not known
drought

not well at all
x
very well
general (river) flood

not well at all
x
very well
Other climate-related consequences
reduced growing period

not well at all
very well
Answer: not known

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Suitable cropland for wheat production as it is accessible by tractor and shows a small inclination.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Soil erosion, high run off rate, low infiltration capacity, low soil moisture. Countour tillage, crop rotation, double digging or breaking of compacted subsoil.
    Knowledge transfer for showing alternatives to wheat and fodder grain cropping (crop rotation).
  • Uncontrolled grazing after the harvest reduces vegetation cover to hardly no cover, which makes soil very exposed to soil erosion etc. Regulate and coordinate grazing.

References

Compiler
  • Malgorzata Conder
Editors
Reviewer
  • Fabian Ottiger
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: Jan. 15, 2013
Last update: Aug. 2, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International