Biochar application for land improvement (Mr.Nunthapop Chollaket)

Biochar application for land improvement (Thailand)

Biochar application for land improvement

Description

Biological charcoal, or biochar, is porous charcoal obtained from biomass. Biochar as a soil amendment helps improve soil fertility as well as sequestering carbon in the soil.

Biological charcoal or biochar is porous charcoal obtained from biomass. To obtain biochar, biomass is loaded into a kiln that can be heated to very high temperature (higher than 500 degrees Farenheit). The biomass goes through a process of biodegradation called pyrolysis. After a few hours, this biomass is converted into a coal-like substance, which farmers can use as a soil amendment. Biochar is an alternative way to solve the problems of the environment such as healthy soils, food production and global warming reduction.
Such charcoal production is a technology that can be conducted from the level of farmers to the level of industries. Lehmann and Joseph (2009) collated research work related to the properties of biochar. It was found that biochar had a property of neutrality to alkalinity. It is porous, can hold water and has a composition of elements such as phosphorus, potassium and calcium - but especially carbon. Their findings indicated that biochar can absorb nutrients well, can withstand biological and chemical decomposition and promote activities of microorganisms in the soil. In addition to this biochar, through its positive effect on carbon sequestration, is another way to reduce the emission of carbon to the atmosphere - which is the cause of climate change through the greenhouse effect. Carbon is effectively locked in the biochar and not released. Much research has found that biochar is suitable for agricultural application. It improves soil properties physically, chemically and biologically. To work with biochar, we need a biochar kiln to produce it.

Location

Location: Bor Kwang Tong District, Chonburi province, Chonburi province, Thailand

No. of Technology sites analysed: 2-10 sites

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 101.05499, 13.37596

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 1-10 km2)

In a permanently protected area?: No

Date of implementation: less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
Biochar being produced from rice husks (Dr.Bunjirtluk Jintaridth)
Comparing rice production with, and without biochar, for soil improvement (Dr.Pansak Komes)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Yes - Agroforestry

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: cereals - rice (wetland). Cropping system: Vegetables - wheat/barley/oat/upland rice
    Number of growing seasons per year: 2
    Is intercropping practiced? Yes
    Is crop rotation practiced? Yes

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • chemical soil deterioration - Ca: acidification, Cp: soil pollution
  • physical soil deterioration - Pc: compaction, Pk: slaking and crusting, Pi: soil sealing
SLM group
  • natural and semi-natural forest management
  • agroforestry
  • integrated soil fertility management
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility, A6: Residue management (A 6.1: burned)
  • vegetative measures - V1: Tree and shrub cover
  • management measures - M6: Waste management (recycling, re-use or reduce)

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Biochar kiln for rice husk biomass
Author: Dr.Pansak Komes
None

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology unit (unit: Klin volume, length: 0.6 m * 0.9 m)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: n.a.
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 31.9
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 10
Most important factors affecting the costs
construction materials
Establishment activities
  1. Biochar application (Timing/ frequency: after harvest crop)
Establishment inputs and costs (per Klin)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (n.a.) Total costs per input (n.a.) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Finding the area to install the set of the biochar-producing stove, make area adjustment for the base plate and the supply line, and the drainage course person 10.0 35.0 350.0
Building the shelf for keeping Feed Stock and keeping the biochar person 10.0 35.0 350.0
Building the electrical system for using the lighting equipment and Service Water person 0.06 33.0 1.98
Building equipment parts of the biochar-producing stove, namely dust & exhaust -trapping equipment and the equipment assembling work, medium-levelled labor person 0.86 16.6 14.28
Equipment
Building equipment parts of the biochar-producing stove, namely dust & exhaust -trapping equipment and the equipment assembling work, low-levelled labor person 0.86 35.0 30.1
Equipment costs for building biochar-producing stoves(Biochar klin for every kind of biomass together with Biochar klin for only rice husk biomass totalling 1 set),namely 200-liter used tanks, Induce Draft Fan, Electric Water Pump, High pressure water spray, Electric Wood Saw and other miscellaneous equipment person 0.03 400.0 12.0
Costs of materials which are iron ornaments, namely iron pipes, screws-nuts and others totaling 40 items for building the stove for 1 set person 0.03 599.6 17.99
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 776.35
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 24.34
Maintenance activities
  1. Cleaning the pipe system and the spray head transferring the heat flame between the combustion chamber and the chamber containing biomass (Timing/ frequency: Every time of the operation for 3 times)
  2. Cleaning the perforated metal plate containing biomass in the stove producing biochar from rice husk (Timing/ frequency: Every time of the operation for 3 times)
  3. Inspecting defects of the metal exposed to high heat (Hot Spot) (Timing/ frequency: Every year)
  4. Major Overhaul (Timing/ frequency: Every 2 years)
  5. Inspecting and repairing the equipment trapping dust from exhaust (Timing/ frequency: Every time of the operation for 6 times)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per Klin)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (n.a.) Total costs per input (n.a.) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Preparing Feed Stock , transporting biomass materials and products person 0.06 2200.0 132.0
Equipment
Miscellaneous equipment and tools for operation set 0.03 333.3 10.0
Plant material
Firewood scraps can be bought locally(including transportation expenses) kg 333.3 0.03 10.0
Raw rice husk (including transportation expenses) kg 333.3 0.06 20.0
Other
Yearly Inspection and Maintenance time 33.3 1.3 43.29
Electrical energy and tap water time 3.33 3.3 10.99
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 226.28
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 7.09

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
The western part of Chonburi province is adjacent to the coast, making the amount of rain at the coastal areas different from the inland. The coastal area at Muang district has localized downpours and the amount of rain is more than other areas. The total amount of rain throughout the year accounts for more than 1,200 mm. Name of
Name of the meteorological station: weather station: Chonburi Weather Station
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to: both ground and surface water
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good
None

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
crop quality
decreased
increased

fodder production
decreased
increased

product diversity
decreased
increased

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
increased

land management
hindered
simplified

energy generation (e.g. hydro, bio)
decreased
increased

irrigation water quality
decreased
increased

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
improved

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
improved

Ecological impacts
water quantity
decreased
increased

soil moisture
decreased
increased

soil cover
reduced
improved

soil loss
increased
decreased

soil accumulation
decreased
increased

soil crusting/ sealing
increased
reduced

soil compaction
increased
reduced

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
increased

salinity
increased
decreased

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
increased

acidity
increased
reduced

vegetation cover
decreased
increased

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
increased

plant diversity
decreased
increased

Off-site impacts
buffering/ filtering capacity (by soil, vegetation, wetlands)
reduced
improved

impact of greenhouse gases
increased
reduced

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
seasonal temperature increase

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)
soil organic carbon

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Using agricultural material residues as production factors to help reduce costs and increase more soil fertility
  • There are material residues used as the factor producing biochar in the area
  • Being the learning center of the community
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Inventing and designing materials & equipment producing biochar for industrial production
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Regarding making materials & equipment for producing biochar, there ae high costs for some smallholders Aggregation for making materials & equipment for the community
  • Not being able to produce industrially Inventing and designing materials & equipment producing biochar for industrial production
  • Inventing and designing materials & equipment producing biochar for industrial production Building a close system in order to manage the smoke, reducing the impact on the environment
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome

References

Compiler
  • Bunjirtluk Jintaridth
Editors
Reviewer
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
  • Pitayakon Limtong
  • William Critchley
Date of documentation: Aug. 4, 2019
Last update: Jan. 15, 2021
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International