Mixed herd passing a narrow point on its way to the pastures. (Christian Wirz (Switzerland))

Daily grazing of village-herds (Tajikistan)

Charogo bistumi (pasture for everyone)

Description

Rotational grazing on village pastures with heavy pressure with daily to weekly change of grazing places.

The herding season is from the beginnning of March to the End of Octobre or even beginning of Decembre. Total area is between 10-20 km2, depending on how strictly the borders are understood. Cows, sheep, goats and donkeys compose the herds. Grazing begins when soil moisture begins to decreaset, first with the little animals, that are supposed to better cope with slippery conditions. After two weeks the cows are led to the pastures and in some cases they will be grazed alone, because sheep and goats disturb them. The grazing zone is situated between 1400 and 1700 m. Rotation begins on the lower pastures, at the beginning of summer the higher pastures are used and towards autumn the animals graze near the villages again, sometimes on cropland, feeding on crop residues. The herders are advised to change place after 2-3 days, but often stay in one place for a longer time. The animals are gathered on the way out of the village a little after dawn, than brought to the pastures. At noon-time they will be lead to a shady place close to a stream, if possible. The same places are visited three or more times per season.

Purpose of the Technology: The animals should be nourished and the cows should give milk. A land user kept his cow at home towards the end of summer, because it stopped giving milk, from the sparse and dry vegetation on the pastures.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: The costs for this form of herding are lost days at school for the children. It largely works without external inputs (such as fertilisers). Other inputs such as salt for the animals are covered by the landowner.

Natural / human environment: These pasture-areas are heaviliy suffering from overuse on one hand and from droughts on the other side. They are in a generally well-conserved state. Fractional vegetation cover is low, especially tree cover, and the proportion non-palatable species relatively high. Erosion by water, including gullies, and crusting, are common phenomena, especially in low cover areas.

Location

Location: Faizabad, Region of Republican Subordination, Tajikistan

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 69.33265, 38.59609

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 10-100 km2)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: more than 50 years ago (traditional)

Type of introduction
Animals on the pastures of the village Karsang. (Christian Wirz (Switzerland))

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Grazing land
    • Ranching
    Animal type: goats, sheep, cow, donkey

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion, Wg: gully erosion/ gullying, Wm: mass movements/ landslides
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover
SLM group
  • pastoralism and grazing land management
SLM measures
  • management measures - M1: Change of land use type

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Rotation of the village herds.

Location: Karsang and other villages. Faizabad

Date: 20.08.09

Technical knowledge required for land users: low (The practiced rotation follows the humour of the herders (often children) and is not complicated.)

Secondary technical functions: improvement of surface structure (crusting, sealing), increase of biomass (quantity)

Change of land use practices / intensity level: The begin of grazing and the rotation is fixed by a village committee. Animals should not stay at one place for longer than 3 days.
Author: Christian Wirz, Switzerland

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Somoni
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 3.42 Somoni
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: n.a
Most important factors affecting the costs
The most important cost factor is buying livestock. Recurrent costs are low, but rent fees for pastures are percieved as being high.
Establishment activities
  1. Villagers buy animals, usually 6-10 goats and / or sheep, 1-2 cows and / or donkeys. (Timing/ frequency: Constantly size is regulated.)
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Somoni) Total costs per input (Somoni) % of costs borne by land users
Other
buy the animals per year 1.0 1170.0 1170.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 1'170.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 342.11
Maintenance activities
  1. Per capita fee taxes (Timing/ frequency: Once per year.)
  2. Buying concentrated feed, depending on the financial resources of the land user. (Timing/ frequency: Bought once per year, for winter period.)
  3. Haymaking and / or buying, depending on labour, financial resources and livestock numbers. (Timing/ frequency: June-July, respectively later, if bought.)
  4. Medecine and salt for animals (Timing/ frequency: Irregularly, resp. daily to weekly.)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Somoni) Total costs per input (Somoni) % of costs borne by land users
Other
Per capita fee taxes per year 12.0 1.0 12.0
Buying concentrated feed kg 425.0 0.53 225.25
Medecine and salt for the animals for all animals 1.0 45.0 45.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 282.25
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 82.53

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Thermal climate class: subtropics
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
fodder quality
decreased
increased


Compared with all other areas the proportion of forbs is very high.

animal production
decreased
increased


Compared with an efficient grazing rotation, returns (in terms of milk and meat) are very low.

wood production
decreased
increased


Very little trees are left because of goats eating them.

product diversity
decreased
increased


During war most people depended on cropland (wheat).

workload
increased
decreased


This system does not depend on professional herders, is thus economic, also in financial terms.

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
improved


It is better for land users to have communal pastures but worse than having a well-implemented rotational grazing system, but the family does not have to buy meat.

community institutions
weakened
strengthened

Livelihoods and human well-being
reduced
improved

Ecological impacts
surface runoff
increased
decreased


Especially trampling paths of livestock are very vulnerable to water erosion

soil crusting/ sealing
increased
reduced


The degree of compaction is higher than elsewhere.

soil compaction
increased
reduced


The degree of compaction is higher than elsewhere.

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
increased


Organic matter is very low compared with all other areas. Biomass might be stonger reduced with animals grazing earlier in spring.

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
increased

Off-site impacts

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

The land users see the problem of reduced productivity when pastures are overexploited. They complain about having to sell animals, but mainly attribute this to droughts.

Climate change

Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
very well
drought

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
NA
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Animal husbandry is an economic basis which permits development.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? People should be allowed to keep as much animals as they want to. And the pasture-area should not become smaller.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • It is the most cheap form of self-sufficient meat-production.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Pasture-quality needs to be preserved, otherwise the carrying-capacity of pastures will be reduced.
  • Livestock with its semimonetary value is much more stable in value than money on the bank (increasing livestock prices).

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Only if alternatives for animal husbandry emerge will the prices for livestock not fall.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Animals and pastures are less productive (reduced biomass) and pastures show more signs of erosion than those on forest department. There, pasture-areas are bigger and, by consequence, there is more space for herding. If there were not always more people affording to rent land for orchards or haymaking the pressure on the remaining pastures would not increase.
  • The pastures very much depend on enough water: If there is little rain (like in 2008) animals return hungry from the pastures. There is hope that the planned water pipe from Rogun (planned giant dam) will bring water for irrigation (of cropland, where animals graze in late summer and where forbs are collected as winter fodder).
  • Rent fees have to be paid, which are percieved as high by some land users. They fear additional per-capita animal taxes. No more taxes should be introduced and herding should not be stronger regulated, because many people depend on animal husbandry.
  • This herding system is vulnerable to droughts and temperature increase, which are percieved as main degradation causes. Besides this, excessive livestock numbers are seen as a cause of cover reduction and compaction. Especially where animals graze the soil is naked and dry after 2-3 days. It might be helpful to let the pastures recover for 3-5 years for trees (which bring moisture) to grow. But this might require administration through external institutions and people fear that they will not get back the pastures.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Degradation of soils and vegetation on these relatively small areas is high and the pastures cannot recuperate due to constant pressure. The pastures need to have periods of recovery.
  • The soils are decreasing in fertility because animal dung is used as energy source. A not too expensive alternative for hot water might be solar heaters or charcoal. And to counteract general fertility problems interchanging pasture- and haymaking areas would bring dung everywhere. But this would require fencing of the remaining trees in order not to further damage vegetation cover.

References

Compiler
  • Christian Wirz
Editors
Reviewer
  • David Streiff
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: March 8, 2011
Last update: Aug. 4, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International