The goats are kept in the stable around noon-time. (Christian Wirz, Switzerland)

Reduced livestock numbers (Tajikistan)

Description

The grasslands are used as pastures by a reduced number of livestock belonging to an individual land user.

The around 50 goats are brought to the pastures early in the morning and will be brought back to their stable from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. After this, they will be accompanied to the pastures again. In the morning the west-exposed and in the afternoon the east-exposed pastures are visited. The same rotational scheme is applied over the whole year, which means that the same pastures are visited daily. The pastures are exclusively used by the land user fror more than the half of the year (from autumn to spring). In summer the pastures are also used by the village herd of the nearby village (Karsang). Herding is mostly the task of the land user's sons but sometimes he will accompany the animals by himself. Cows are let out on the pastures in the morning and come back in the evening by themselves.

Purpose of the Technology: The reason for west-facing grazing in the morning and east-facing in the evening is that grass is moist at these times of day. This is also why at noontime animals are not on the pastures. The animals are led slowly by the herder as to not tire them, to make them fatter and to avoid damages on vegetation.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: No special pasture maintenance activities are undertaken.

Natural / human environment: The area is around one hour away from the village which actually controls the pastures (communal pastures). In addition snow lies longer in spring than further down. This means that the village herd only comes here from late spring to late summer, which decreases the pressure on the pastures. Together with the situation in a small depression that protects from high radiation in summer this contributes to the generally better pasture quality (greener, more grasses) compared with the village pastures in proximity to the villages. An important factor contributing to the generally good conservation state are the reduced livestock numbers. They are only reduced because the land user is close to these more distant pastures and the village is quite far away.

Location

Location: Faizabad, Region of Republican Subordination, Tajikistan

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 69.35677, 38.59791

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 0.1-1 km2)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 10-50 years ago

Type of introduction
Pastures with a high grass-proportion around the land user's stable. (Christian Wirz, Switzerland)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Grazing land
    • Ranching
    Animal type: goats, cows
      SpeciesCount
      goats50

    Water supply
    • rainfed
    • mixed rainfed-irrigated
    • full irrigation

    Purpose related to land degradation
    • prevent land degradation
    • reduce land degradation
    • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
    • adapt to land degradation
    • not applicable
    Degradation addressed
    • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
    • physical soil deterioration - Pk: slaking and crusting, Pi: soil sealing
    • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover, Bs: quality and species composition/ diversity decline
    SLM group
    • pastoralism and grazing land management
    SLM measures
    • management measures - M2: Change of management/ intensity level

    Technical drawing

    Technical specifications
    Daily rotation on pastures of the village Karsang.

    Location: Above Naobad. Faizabad / Tajikistan

    Date: 25.08.09

    Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate (The land user developed his own rotational scheme.)

    Technical knowledge required for herders (sons and grandsons of land user): low (They just need to apply the scheme.)

    Main technical functions: increase in nutrient availability (supply, recycling,…)

    Secondary technical functions: control of dispersed runoff: impede / retard, increase in organic matter, improvement of water quality, buffering / filtering water, promotion of vegetation species and varieties (quality, eg palatable fodder)

    Change of land use practices / intensity level: Reduced livestock numbers
    Author: Christian Wirz, Switzerland

    Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

    Calculation of inputs and costs
    • Costs are calculated:
    • Currency used for cost calculation: Somoni
    • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 3.42 Somoni
    • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: n.a
    Most important factors affecting the costs
    Labour input is decisive: As long as work is done by family members costs are restricted on alimentation. If external labour is hired, wages have to be added.
    Establishment activities
    1. Buying livestock (Timing/ frequency: Reduced livestock numbers)
    Establishment inputs and costs
    Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Somoni) Total costs per input (Somoni) % of costs borne by land users
    Other
    Buying livestock Goats 50.0 87.7 4385.0 100.0
    Total costs for establishment of the Technology 4'385.0
    Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 1'282.16
    Maintenance activities
    1. Herding (Timing/ frequency: Daily)
    2. Giving salt to livestock (Timing/ frequency: Twice per week)
    3. Fodder for livestock (Timing/ frequency: In winter)
    Maintenance inputs and costs
    Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Somoni) Total costs per input (Somoni) % of costs borne by land users
    Labour
    Herding daily days 365.0
    Other
    Salt for animals for one year 1.0 12.0 12.0
    Fooder for livestock winter 1.0
    Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 12.0
    Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 3.51

    Natural environment

    Average annual rainfall
    • < 250 mm
    • 251-500 mm
    • 501-750 mm
    • 751-1,000 mm
    • 1,001-1,500 mm
    • 1,501-2,000 mm
    • 2,001-3,000 mm
    • 3,001-4,000 mm
    • > 4,000 mm
    Agro-climatic zone
    • humid
    • sub-humid
    • semi-arid
    • arid
    Specifications on climate
    Thermal climate class: subtropics
    Slope
    • flat (0-2%)
    • gentle (3-5%)
    • moderate (6-10%)
    • rolling (11-15%)
    • hilly (16-30%)
    • steep (31-60%)
    • very steep (>60%)
    Landforms
    • plateau/plains
    • ridges
    • mountain slopes
    • hill slopes
    • footslopes
    • valley floors
    Altitude
    • 0-100 m a.s.l.
    • 101-500 m a.s.l.
    • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
    • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
    • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
    • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
    • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
    • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
    • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
    Technology is applied in
    • convex situations
    • concave situations
    • not relevant
    Soil depth
    • very shallow (0-20 cm)
    • shallow (21-50 cm)
    • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
    • deep (81-120 cm)
    • very deep (> 120 cm)
    Soil texture (topsoil)
    • coarse/ light (sandy)
    • medium (loamy, silty)
    • fine/ heavy (clay)
    Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
    • coarse/ light (sandy)
    • medium (loamy, silty)
    • fine/ heavy (clay)
    Topsoil organic matter content
    • high (>3%)
    • medium (1-3%)
    • low (<1%)
    Groundwater table
    • on surface
    • < 5 m
    • 5-50 m
    • > 50 m
    Availability of surface water
    • excess
    • good
    • medium
    • poor/ none
    Water quality (untreated)
    • good drinking water
    • poor drinking water (treatment required)
    • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
    • unusable
    Water quality refers to:
    Is salinity a problem?
    • Yes
    • No

    Occurrence of flooding
    • Yes
    • No
    Species diversity
    • high
    • medium
    • low
    Habitat diversity
    • high
    • medium
    • low

    Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

    Market orientation
    • subsistence (self-supply)
    • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
    • commercial/ market
    Off-farm income
    • less than 10% of all income
    • 10-50% of all income
    • > 50% of all income
    Relative level of wealth
    • very poor
    • poor
    • average
    • rich
    • very rich
    Level of mechanization
    • manual work
    • animal traction
    • mechanized/ motorized
    Sedentary or nomadic
    • Sedentary
    • Semi-nomadic
    • Nomadic
    Individuals or groups
    • individual/ household
    • groups/ community
    • cooperative
    • employee (company, government)
    Gender
    • women
    • men
    Age
    • children
    • youth
    • middle-aged
    • elderly
    Area used per household
    • < 0.5 ha
    • 0.5-1 ha
    • 1-2 ha
    • 2-5 ha
    • 5-15 ha
    • 15-50 ha
    • 50-100 ha
    • 100-500 ha
    • 500-1,000 ha
    • 1,000-10,000 ha
    • > 10,000 ha
    Scale
    • small-scale
    • medium-scale
    • large-scale
    Land ownership
    • state
    • company
    • communal/ village
    • group
    • individual, not titled
    • individual, titled
    Land use rights
    • open access (unorganized)
    • communal (organized)
    • leased
    • individual
    Water use rights
    • open access (unorganized)
    • communal (organized)
    • leased
    • individual
    Access to services and infrastructure
    health

    poor
    good
    education

    poor
    good
    technical assistance

    poor
    good
    employment (e.g. off-farm)

    poor
    good
    markets

    poor
    good
    energy

    poor
    good
    roads and transport

    poor
    good
    drinking water and sanitation

    poor
    good
    financial services

    poor
    good

    Impacts

    Socio-economic impacts
    fodder quality
    decreased
    increased

    animal production
    decreased
    increased

    farm income
    decreased
    increased


    His animals yield higher prices on the market than average livestock.

    economic disparities
    increased
    decreased


    The productive success of the land user lets him appear richer than the rest of the village.

    Socio-cultural impacts
    food security/ self-sufficiency
    reduced
    improved


    Having a big herd on a big pasture area is a guarantee for better self-sufficiency.

    conflict mitigation
    worsened
    improved


    Especially in the establishment phase there was jealousy about the success, especially in fruit-production.

    Livelihood and human well-being
    reduced
    improved

    Ecological impacts
    soil cover
    reduced
    improved


    Especially biomass is reduced by daily grazing.

    soil loss
    increased
    decreased

    soil crusting/ sealing
    increased
    reduced

    plant diversity
    decreased
    increased


    Especially the proportion of grasses is higher compared with other village pastures

    Off-site impacts

    Cost-benefit analysis

    Benefits compared with establishment costs
    Short-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    Long-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    Benefits compared with maintenance costs
    Short-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    Long-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    On the long term benefits of animal husbandry might be slightly reduced due to damages on vegetation (and soils) by the own and by the animals of the village herd.

    Climate change

    Gradual climate change
    annual temperature increase

    not well at all
    very well
    Climate-related extremes (disasters)
    drought

    not well at all
    very well

    Adoption and adaptation

    Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
    • single cases/ experimental
    • 1-10%
    • 11-50%
    • > 50%
    Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
    • 0-10%
    • 11-50%
    • 51-90%
    • 91-100%
    Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
    • Yes
    • No
    To which changing conditions?
    • climatic change/ extremes
    • changing markets
    • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

    Conclusions and lessons learnt

    Strengths: land user's view
    • Self-sufficiency is the main success for him.

      How can they be sustained / enhanced? It requires high labour inputs and motivation, which for the land user are necessary to have success in the post-USSR setting.
    • The animals yield a higher price because they are fatter than the other animals.
    • The geographic location is clearly an advantage, because the land user is far away from the negative impact of village herds.
    Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
    • At the same time quite positive for soil and water conservation and productive in terms of meat and sold livestock.

      How can they be sustained / enhanced? If the land user could rent (parts of the) pastures the interest of planting trees as a measure of rehabilitation would increase.
    Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
    • Trees cannot recover because of constant grazing. Only if the land user is sure that investments will profit him, that is if land tenure is clarified, will he invest into active conservation measures.
    Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
    • Especially at the crossing-points of the land user's herd with the village herd degradation phenomena (trampling paths) are visible. By an agreement between the village (land commitee) and the land user the land use could be reglemented clearer.
    • This form of land use is difficult to maintain for young people who want to participate in social life. And it is not sustainable because it does not permit allvillagers to practice such forms of herding that require much land. The land user should be able to rent a part of the pastures (smaller than the actually grazed 50 ha) where he would be need to conserve soils and vegetation (for instance. by tree-planting or more sophisticated rotation.

    References

    Compiler
    • Christian Wirz
    Editors
    Reviewer
    • Alexandra Gavilano
    • David Streiff
    Date of documentation: Aug. 23, 2010
    Last update: Aug. 5, 2019
    Resource persons
    Full description in the WOCAT database
    Linked SLM data
    Documentation was faciliated by
    Institution Project
    This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International