Goats grazing (Betty Adoch)

Rotational grazing of goats for pasture conservation and improvement. (Uganda)

Gwoko Dyel

Description

Rotational grazing by improved goats variety enhances/ increases soil fertility, biodiversity and production of pastures and generates farmyard manure applied on cropland.

Rotational grazing is the shifting of livestock to different units of a pasture or range in regular sequence to permit the recovery and regrowth of the pasture plants after grazing, which increased forage production. Forage that are over-grazed or are less healthy from being grazed every few days have smaller root mass, which leads to less soil organic matter. Northern Uganda has tropical savannah climate characterized by moderate rainfall of 750-1000mm per annum. This region also experiences prolonged dry spells from June to July and also November to March characterised by wild fire outbreaks which retards pasture growth. Because of this, land user has to conserve pastures through rotational grazing in a paddock system. The land is gently sloping with moderate soil humus that has also supported the growth of pastures. The land user is a subsistence farmer who graze goat in a paddock system for pasture conservations, manure generation for cropland, and goats for home consumptions and sale. About 90% of his income is from on farm activities.
A well-managed controlled grazing program can increase quality forage production by 30-70% each year. Much of this increase in forage production is accomplished by minimizing overgrazing. In this technology, six paddocks were created measuring 40x50meters on a five acres’ piece of land. Goats are shifted from one paddock to another in an interval of one month and later shifted to another section. The water tank is also moved as the goats are shifted to another paddocks. The shifting is to reduce on overgrazing. The land user has 40 goats. Two paddocks are grazed at the same time with each having a carrying capacity of 20goats to minimize on overcrowding and congestion at the water point. controlled grazing is practiced in order to protect the area from the damages of grazing that is digging up roots and everything in the field since this will de-grass an area and make it susceptible for erosion. By limiting graze time, fields can produce all year round instead of being a one-time harvest. Goats are not allowed to graze a paddock until it is at least 10 to 12 inches in height. If grazed any shorter, this compromises root recovery, energy storage in the roots, and grass' ability to depend on photosynthesis alone. This is why the land user preferred rotational grazing to prevent overgrazing, and allow the forage plenty of time to recover.
The inputs needed for the establishment of this technology are pangas, hand hoes, slashers, poles, and labour force to carry out the work of paddock constructions. To main the technology, the over grown grass is slashed to a height of 10 to 12 inches in height which is consumable by goats, water point is cleaned every two weeks to avoid contamination, paddocks repaired and goats constantly checked for treatment
The technology provides beneficial impacts like improvement of organic matter content and pasture soil fertility as a result of spreading manure around the whole pasture while grazing and browsing. Grazing goats typically return to the water tanks or a single favourite shade tree. The manure deposited around water tanks/tree shade is collected and used as farmyard manure for the seasonal crop production like cereals, vegetables, and legumes.
The technology is disliked because it is tedious to look after so many goats, wild animal attacks and drought affects water supply and pasture growth for the goats.

Location

Location: Omoro District., Northern Uganda., Uganda

No. of Technology sites analysed: single site

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 32.33574, 2.55368

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 0.1-1 km2)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 2003; 10-50 years ago

Type of introduction
A paddock (Betty Adoch)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: cereals - maize, cereals - sorghum, simsim
    Number of growing seasons per year: 2
  • Grazing land
    • Improved pastures
    • Rotational grazing
    Animal type: cattle - non-dairy beef, goats, poultry
      SpeciesCount
      cattle - non-dairy beef8
      goats40
      poultry50
    Water supply
    • rainfed
    • mixed rainfed-irrigated
    • full irrigation

    Purpose related to land degradation
    • prevent land degradation
    • reduce land degradation
    • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
    • adapt to land degradation
    • not applicable
    Degradation addressed
    • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
    • physical soil deterioration - Pc: compaction
    • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover, Bs: quality and species composition/ diversity decline
    SLM group
    • rotational systems (crop rotation, fallows, shifting cultivation)
    • integrated crop-livestock management
    SLM measures
    • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover, A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility
    • management measures - M1: Change of land use type, M2: Change of management/ intensity level, M3: Layout according to natural and human environment
    • other measures

    Technical drawing

    Technical specifications
    Five acres of land under paddock system of rotational grazing. The paddocks measures 40x50meter. Poles of about 1meter high are used to fenced the paddocks.
    Author: Betty Adoch

    Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

    Calculation of inputs and costs
    • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 5acres)
    • Currency used for cost calculation: UGX
    • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 3718.0 UGX
    • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 1000shs
    Most important factors affecting the costs
    The labour costs for fencing the paddocks, and the high costs of fencing materials.
    Establishment activities
    1. Clearning the bush through digging and slashing (Timing/ frequency: Dry season.)
    2. Marking the paddocks and planting poles (Timing/ frequency: Dry season)
    3. Fencing the area (Timing/ frequency: Dry season)
    4. Installing the water tank (Timing/ frequency: Dry season)
    5. Introducing the goats into the paddock (Timing/ frequency: Rainy season)
    Maintenance activities
    1. Slashing the over grown grass (Timing/ frequency: wet season)
    2. cleaning the water tank (Timing/ frequency: wet and dry season)
    3. Refilling the water tank (Timing/ frequency: wet and dry season)
    4. Repairing the paddock (Timing/ frequency: Dry season)
    5. Creating firelines (Timing/ frequency: dry season)

    Natural environment

    Average annual rainfall
    • < 250 mm
    • 251-500 mm
    • 501-750 mm
    • 751-1,000 mm
    • 1,001-1,500 mm
    • 1,501-2,000 mm
    • 2,001-3,000 mm
    • 3,001-4,000 mm
    • > 4,000 mm
    Agro-climatic zone
    • humid
    • sub-humid
    • semi-arid
    • arid
    Specifications on climate
    The rainfall is moderate and unreliable.
    Name of the meteorological station: Gulu meterological station.
    Climate is suitable for pasture growth.
    Slope
    • flat (0-2%)
    • gentle (3-5%)
    • moderate (6-10%)
    • rolling (11-15%)
    • hilly (16-30%)
    • steep (31-60%)
    • very steep (>60%)
    Landforms
    • plateau/plains
    • ridges
    • mountain slopes
    • hill slopes
    • footslopes
    • valley floors
    Altitude
    • 0-100 m a.s.l.
    • 101-500 m a.s.l.
    • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
    • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
    • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
    • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
    • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
    • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
    • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
    Technology is applied in
    • convex situations
    • concave situations
    • not relevant
    Soil depth
    • very shallow (0-20 cm)
    • shallow (21-50 cm)
    • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
    • deep (81-120 cm)
    • very deep (> 120 cm)
    Soil texture (topsoil)
    • coarse/ light (sandy)
    • medium (loamy, silty)
    • fine/ heavy (clay)
    Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
    • coarse/ light (sandy)
    • medium (loamy, silty)
    • fine/ heavy (clay)
    Topsoil organic matter content
    • high (>3%)
    • medium (1-3%)
    • low (<1%)
    Groundwater table
    • on surface
    • < 5 m
    • 5-50 m
    • > 50 m
    Availability of surface water
    • excess
    • good
    • medium
    • poor/ none
    Water quality (untreated)
    • good drinking water
    • poor drinking water (treatment required)
    • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
    • unusable
    Water quality refers to:
    Is salinity a problem?
    • Yes
    • No

    Occurrence of flooding
    • Yes
    • No
    Species diversity
    • high
    • medium
    • low
    Habitat diversity
    • high
    • medium
    • low

    Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

    Market orientation
    • subsistence (self-supply)
    • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
    • commercial/ market
    Off-farm income
    • less than 10% of all income
    • 10-50% of all income
    • > 50% of all income
    Relative level of wealth
    • very poor
    • poor
    • average
    • rich
    • very rich
    Level of mechanization
    • manual work
    • animal traction
    • mechanized/ motorized
    Sedentary or nomadic
    • Sedentary
    • Semi-nomadic
    • Nomadic
    Individuals or groups
    • individual/ household
    • groups/ community
    • cooperative
    • employee (company, government)
    Gender
    • women
    • men
    Age
    • children
    • youth
    • middle-aged
    • elderly
    Area used per household
    • < 0.5 ha
    • 0.5-1 ha
    • 1-2 ha
    • 2-5 ha
    • 5-15 ha
    • 15-50 ha
    • 50-100 ha
    • 100-500 ha
    • 500-1,000 ha
    • 1,000-10,000 ha
    • > 10,000 ha
    Scale
    • small-scale
    • medium-scale
    • large-scale
    Land ownership
    • state
    • company
    • communal/ village
    • group
    • individual, not titled
    • individual, titled
    Land use rights
    • open access (unorganized)
    • communal (organized)
    • leased
    • individual
    Water use rights
    • open access (unorganized)
    • communal (organized)
    • leased
    • individual
    Access to services and infrastructure
    health

    poor
    x
    good
    education

    poor
    x
    good
    technical assistance

    poor
    x
    good
    employment (e.g. off-farm)

    poor
    x
    good
    markets

    poor
    x
    good
    energy

    poor
    x
    good
    roads and transport

    poor
    x
    good
    drinking water and sanitation

    poor
    x
    good
    financial services

    poor
    x
    good

    Impacts

    Socio-economic impacts
    fodder production
    decreased
    x
    increased

    Quantity before SLM: negative
    Quantity after SLM: positive
    Due to conserved pastures.

    drinking water availability
    decreased
    x
    increased

    Quantity before SLM: negative
    Quantity after SLM: positive
    Source of water is secured by the land user.

    water availability for livestock
    decreased
    x
    increased

    Quantity before SLM: slightly negative
    Quantity after SLM: very positive
    Water filled in a tank for goats consumption.

    water quality for livestock
    decreased
    x
    increased

    Quantity before SLM: negative
    Quantity after SLM: positive
    Goats fenced off which avoid water contamination.

    farm income
    decreased
    x
    increased

    Quantity before SLM: negative
    Quantity after SLM: positive
    Rotational grazing has saved the land user from purchasing animal feeds which would be very expensive.

    Socio-cultural impacts
    SLM/ land degradation knowledge
    reduced
    x
    improved

    Quantity before SLM: negative
    Quantity after SLM: very positive
    Land user is aware of climate smart agriculture which has a lots of site benefits in terms of increased animal productions.

    Ecological impacts
    evaporation
    increased
    x
    decreased

    Quantity before SLM: very positive
    Quantity after SLM: very negative
    Grass cover the soil from effects of evaporation.

    soil moisture
    decreased
    x
    increased

    Quantity before SLM: negative
    Quantity after SLM: positive
    Grass covers the soil from erosion.

    soil cover
    reduced
    x
    improved

    Quantity before SLM: slightly negative
    Quantity after SLM: very positive
    Grass covers the soil from being exposed to agents of erosion.

    soil loss
    increased
    x
    decreased

    Quantity before SLM: very positive
    Quantity after SLM: very negative
    The grass covers the soil from erosion.

    soil compaction
    increased
    x
    reduced

    Quantity before SLM: very positive
    Quantity after SLM: very negative
    Grazing goats loosen the soil particles which helps in fertile soil formation.

    biomass/ above ground C
    decreased
    x
    increased

    Quantity before SLM: negative
    Quantity after SLM: very positive
    Dry grass decompose to form humus.

    plant diversity
    decreased
    x
    increased

    Quantity before SLM: negative
    Quantity after SLM: positive
    Different vegetation covers exist in the grazing fields.

    fire risk
    increased
    x
    decreased

    Quantity before SLM: very positive
    Quantity after SLM: very negative
    Fire lines are created during dry seasons to prevent wildfire spread to the grazing fields.

    Off-site impacts
    buffering/ filtering capacity (by soil, vegetation, wetlands)
    reduced
    x
    improved

    Quantity before SLM: negative
    Quantity after SLM: positive
    Grass roots filters and purifies the surface water.

    damage on neighbours' fields
    increased
    x
    reduced

    Quantity before SLM: positive
    Quantity after SLM: negative
    Goats are fenced off from crop land reducing unnecessary destruction.

    Cost-benefit analysis

    Benefits compared with establishment costs
    Short-term returns
    very negative
    x
    very positive

    Long-term returns
    very negative
    x
    very positive

    Benefits compared with maintenance costs
    Short-term returns
    very negative
    x
    very positive

    Long-term returns
    very negative
    x
    very positive

    The farmer has been able to generate income to improve his standard of living.

    Climate change

    -

    Adoption and adaptation

    Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
    • single cases/ experimental
    • 1-10%
    • 11-50%
    • > 50%
    Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
    • 0-10%
    • 11-50%
    • 51-90%
    • 91-100%
    Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
    • Yes
    • No
    To which changing conditions?
    • climatic change/ extremes
    • changing markets
    • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)
    indegineous pastures are conserved for the goats.

    Conclusions and lessons learnt

    Strengths: land user's view
    • Conserve indegineous pastures.
    • The vegetation roots filters the surface water.
    Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
    • Availability of pastures for the goats through out the year.
    • The paddocks protects the land from land wrangles.
    Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
    • Limited capital to establish the paddocks. Extenal support from doners.
    • Prolonged dry spells that retards pastures growth. Practice climate smart agriculture like rotational grazing.
    Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
    • Limited labour force to look after the goats. Employing farm workers.
    • Pests and diseases that disturb the goats. Technical services from the extension workers.

    References

    Compiler
    • betty adoch
    Editors
    • JOY TUKAHIRWA
    Reviewer
    • Drake Mubiru
    • Nicole Harari
    • Renate Fleiner
    • Stephanie Jaquet
    • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
    • Alexandra Gavilano
    Date of documentation: May 3, 2017
    Last update: Aug. 10, 2019
    Resource persons
    Full description in the WOCAT database
    Linked SLM data
    Documentation was faciliated by
    Institution Project
    Key references
    • Mixed crop-livestock farming - FAO: www.fao.org/docrep/004/Y0501E/y0501e03.htm
    Links to relevant information which is available online
    This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International