Chagga homegardens with the snow-capped peak of Mt. Kilimanjaro in the background (Hanspeter Liniger (Centre for Development and Environment, University of Bern))

Chagga Homegardens (Tanzania, United Republic of)

Description

The Chagga homegardens are traditional, densely planted ‘banana forests’ with a scattered upper tree layer.

The complex multicropping system evolved over several centuries through a gradual transformation of the natural forest on the footslopes of Kilimanjaro. A Chagga homegarden has an average size of 0.68 ha and integrates numerous multipurpose trees and shrubs with food crops, and stall-fed animals, without a specific spatial arrangement. However, vertically, the following 4 stories/canopies can be distinguished: (1) food crops: taro, beans, vegetables and fodder herbs / grasses; (2) coffee: 500-1,400 plants/ha; (3) banana: primary crop; 50% cover; 330-1,200 clumps/ha; and (4) Trees, such as Cordia abyssinica, Albizia schimperiana and Grevillea robusta. The trees provide shade for coffee, act as live fences, provide medicines, firewood, fodder, mulching material, bee forage; and some have pesticidal properties (e.g. Rauwolfia caffra). This multilayer system maximizes the use of limited land in a highly populated area, making sustained production possible with a minimum of external inputs, minimizes risk (less production failure, increased resistance against droughts and pests) and ensures at the same time environmental protection. The large species diversity provides both subsistence and cash crops. Parts of the homegarden area are irrigated and drained by a network of over 1000 canals and furrows tapping runoff from the montane forest. However, many systems are now in disrepair.

Natural / human environment: Starting in the 1930s when coffee took more space from the food production, it became necessary to expand food production to the lowlands. Today, the Chagga highland homegarden works only in combination with a lowland field where maize, millet, beans, sunflower and groundnuts are grown to ensure food security.

Location

Location: Mt. Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania, United Republic of

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 37.43, -3.27

Spread of the Technology:

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: more than 50 years ago (traditional)

Type of introduction

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Yes - Agroforestry

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: fodder crops - grasses, fodder crops - other, vegetables - other, Taro
    • Perennial (non-woody) cropping: banana/plantain/abaca
    • Tree and shrub cropping: avocado, coffee, open grown
    Number of growing seasons per year: 2
  • Forest/ woodlandsProducts and services: Fuelwood, Other forest products, Grazing/ browsing
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
SLM group
  • agroforestry
  • home gardens
SLM measures
  • vegetative measures - V1: Tree and shrub cover
  • management measures - M5: Control/ change of species composition

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Typical chagga homegarden on a 45% slope at 1400 m a.s.l. with 4 vegetation layers: open light upper canopy with Albizia schimperiana (up to 20 m high); upper shrub layer with banana (4-6 m); a lower shrub layer with coffee (1.5-2 m) and food crops such as taro (< 1.5 m) -2.5 m; 3-6 m; 5-30 m

Mt. Kilimanjaro Region

Date: 2009

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: moderate

Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate

Main technical functions: control of raindrop splash, stabilisation of soil (eg by tree roots against land slides), increase in organic matter, increase in nutrient availability (supply, recycling,…), increase of infiltration, increase of biomass (quantity), promotion of vegetation species and varieties (quality, eg palatable fodder)

Scattered / dispersed
Vegetative material: T : trees / shrubs

Trees/ shrubs species: Cordia abyssinica, Albizia schimperiana, Grevillea robusta, Rauwolfia caffra, Persea americana

Fruit trees / shrubs species: banana, avocado, mango

Perennial crops species: taro, coffee

Grass species: fodder herbs / grasses

Change of land use type: from natural forests to agroforest
Author: Hemp, A. / Hemp, C.

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology unit (unit: homegarden)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: USD
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = n.a
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: n.a
Most important factors affecting the costs
n.a.
Establishment activities
  1. Transforming the native forest: trees that provided fodder, fuel, fruits, medicines, shade, timber, bee forage, anti-pest properties are retained while the less useful species are eliminated (Timing/ frequency: None)
  2. Introduction of new fruit and timber tree species, such as avocado, mango, Grevillea robusta, Persea americana (Timing/ frequency: None)
  3. Planting crops species (banana, coffee, taro, beans, vegetables) (Timing/ frequency: None)
  4. Establishment of irrigation/drainage channels (Timing/ frequency: None)
  5. Terracing or building of bunds in steep places (Timing/ frequency: None)
Maintenance activities
  1. Planting, tending and harvesting of bananas, taro, yams / Opening up the canopy to ensure better fruiting of the coffee (Timing/ frequency: all year round)
  2. Spacing out the banana stools; Manuring crops (using dung from the stall-fed livestock and compost) (Timing/ frequency: None)
  3. Lopping fodder trees/shrubs; Pruning and spraying against coffee berry disease and leaf rust (Timing/ frequency: None)
  4. Maintaining irrigation furrows; Coffee harvest (Timing/ frequency: August to January)
  5. Tending and milking the stall-fed cows (typically only one cow) / Mulching, terrace maintenance (soil erosion prevention in general) (Timing/ frequency: None)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per homegarden)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Planting, tending and harvesting unit 1.0 300.0 300.0 100.0
Equipment
Tools unit 1.0 45.0 45.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Compost / manure unit 1.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 445.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 445.0

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
depending on slope orientation and altitude
Thermal climate class: tropics

Tropical montane; bimodal: long rains in March-May, short rains in Nov-Dec
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
wood production
decreased
x
increased


Fuelwood production 1.5-3 m3/ha/year

risk of production failure
increased
x
decreased

product diversity
decreased
x
increased


185 kg beans/ha; 410 kg coffee/ha; 400 bunches of banana /ha; ca. 30 kg honey/ha

workload
increased
x
decreased


increased labour efficiency

value of gene pool
decreased
x
increased


for breeding programmes to improve crop varieties for multistorey cropping systems

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
x
improved

health situation
worsened
x
improved

preservation of traditional knowledge
reduced
x
improved

Ecological impacts
soil cover
reduced
x
improved

soil loss
increased
x
decreased

plant diversity
decreased
x
increased


over 500 plant species including 400 non-cultivated plants

animal diversity
decreased
x
increased

pest/ disease control
decreased
x
increased

micro-climate
reduced
x
improved

biodiversity / crop diversity
reduced
x
improved


? land use change from natural forest to agroforest

Off-site impacts

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
x
very well
local windstorm

not well at all
x
very well
drought

not well at all
x
very well
general (river) flood

not well at all
x
very well
Other climate-related consequences
reduced growing period

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • this system allows for maintaining high biodiversity at the same time with diversified production of fruits, vegetables, timber, medicinal products etc.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • High demand of wood, low coffee prices and the introduction of sun-tolerant coffee varieties endanger the homegardens incentive-based tree planting in the gardens to reduce the pressure on the forest
  • None
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Productivity of Chagga homegardens is not optimal (1) Replace the less productive trees / shrubs with fast growing nitrogen fixing species; (2) improve animal husbandry (e.g. to increase lactation period), (3) improve apiculture,
  • Productivity of Chagga homegardens is not optimal (4) introduce new crop varieties using the gene pool developed by natural and farmer selection, (5) use fertilizers,
  • Productivity of Chagga homegardens is not optimal (6) improve coffee production: certified production (organic, fair trade) to fetch higher prices, (7) replace old coffee plants with new ones, (8) integrated pest management, (9) facilitate access to capital for farm investments
  • Productivity of Chagga homegardens is not optimal (10) improve erosion control (terraces and bunds), (11) include productive fruit trees, (12) improve advisory services
  • Water management causes nutrient loss in the gardens and water shortages on the lower slopes improve efficiency of furrows: Install pipes and surfacing by cement, protect river banks from cultivation

References

Compiler
  • Unknown User
Editors
Reviewer
  • Alexandra Gavilano
  • Deborah Niggli
  • David Streiff
Date of documentation: Oct. 20, 2010
Last update: Aug. 21, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Hemp, A. (1999): An ethnobotanical study on Mt. Kilimanjaro. Ecotropica 5: 147-165:
  • Hemp, A. (2006): The banana forests of Kilimanjaro. Biodiversity and conservation of the agroforestry system of the Chagga Homegardens. Biodiversity and Conservation 15(4): 1193-1217.:
  • Hemp, C. (2005): The Chagga Home Gardens – relict areas for endemic Saltatoria Species (Insecta: Orthoptera) on Mt. Kilimanjaro. Biological Conservatrion 125: 203-210.:
  • Hemp, A., C. Lambrechts, and C. Hemp. (in press). Global trends and Africa. The case of Mt. Kilimanjaro. (UNEP, Nairobi):
  • Hemp, A., Hemp, C., Winter, C. (2009) Environment and worldview: The Chagga homegardens. In: Clack, T.A.R. (ed.) Culture, history and identity: Landscapes of inhabitation in the Mount Kilimanjar area, Tanzania. BAR International Series 1966, Archaeopress Oxford, pp. 235-303:
  • Fernandes E.C.M., Oktingati A., Maghembe J. 1985. The Chagga homegardens: a multistoried agroforestry cropping system on Mt. Kilimanjaro (Northern Tanzania) in Agroforestry Systems 2: 73-86:
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International