Large semi circular stone bunds on hillside (Eyasu Yazew (Mekelle University, P.O.Box 231, Mekelle, Ethiopia))

Large semi circular stone bunds (Ethiopia)

Abiy nay emni firki werhi

Description

These consist of stone embankments built in the shape of a semi circle with the tips of the bund on the contour and are arranged in staggered orientation in rows so that overflow from one row will run into the next downslope.

Large semi circular stone bunds are constructed by excavating a foundation of 0.1 - 0.2 m following the semi circle and building of the embankment using stones with a decreasing height at the tips to evacuate excess runoff. 1 - 3 pits are excavated within the semi circle for for planting trees.

Large semi circular stone bunds (Large half moons) are constructed with a diameter of 6 m and corresponding perimeter/length of 9.42 m. The spacing between the tips of adjacent bunds within a row and between the base bund and tip of adjacent rows is 3 m. The height of the embankment varies from 0.5 - 0.75 m at the base bund to 0.4 - 0.5 m at the tip while the corresponding width varies from 0.4 - 0.5 m to 0.2 - 0.3 m. The planting pit has a diameter and depth of 0.3 m.

Purpose of the Technology: Large semi circular stone bunds assist in decreasing slope length, runoff velocity and soil loss; and improving runoff harvesting, soil moisture and groundwater recharge.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: The establishment of large semi circular stone bunds involves collection of stones, alignment of a contour and the semi circle, excavation of foundation, construction of the embankment and digging of planting pits and runoff harvesting ditch. The maintenance includes re-enforcing the embankment and dredging sediment from runoff harvesting ditch during the dry season.

Natural / human environment: Large semi circular stone bunds are implemented in foot (5 - 8%) and hill (8 - 16%) slopes and in medium and light soil types of shallow to moderate depth (0.2 - 0.8 m). It reduces runoff amount and velocity thereby decreasing soil loss and desertification/land degradation. It also improves soil moisture availability and groundwater recharge.

It is mostly constructed using communal labour and there is a moderate trend of spontaneous adoption. The technology is witnessed to be increasing fruit and fodder production thereby improving the livelihood of the land users. It, however, demands high labour especially during establishment.

Location

Location: Kilte Awlaelo, Tigray, Ethiopia

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 39.5, 13.75

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 10-100 km2)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
Large semi circular stone bunds on gentle slopping terrain (Eyasu Yazew (Mekelle University, P.O.Box 231, Mekelle, Ethiopia))

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Tree and shrub cropping: citrus, mango, mangosteen, guava, lemon, guava
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
  • Forest/ woodlandsProducts and services: Timber, Fuelwood, Fruits and nuts, Grazing/ browsing, Nature conservation/ protection

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion, Wg: gully erosion/ gullying, Wo: offsite degradation effects
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover, Bs: quality and species composition/ diversity decline
SLM group
  • cross-slope measure
  • ground water management
SLM measures
  • structural measures - S2: Bunds, banks

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Large semi circular stone bunds are stone embankments built in the shape of a semi circle with the tips of the bund on the contour and are arranged in staggered orientation in rows so that overflow from one row will run into the next downslope.

Location: Tigray. Kilte Awlaelo

Date: 10/10/2014

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: moderate

Technical knowledge required for land users: low

Main technical functions: control of dispersed runoff: retain / trap, reduction of slope length

Secondary technical functions: increase of infiltration, increase / maintain water stored in soil, increase of groundwater level / recharge of groundwater, sediment retention / trapping, sediment harvesting, increase of biomass (quantity)

Bund/ bank: semi-circular/V shaped trapezoidal
Vertical interval between structures (m): 0.2 - 0.3
Spacing between structures (m): 3
Depth of ditches/pits/dams (m): 1
Width of ditches/pits/dams (m): 1
Length of ditches/pits/dams (m): 1
Height of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.5 - 0.75
Width of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.4 - 0.5
Length of bunds/banks/others (m): 9.42

Construction material (stone): The embankment of the semi circular bunds is constructed by the stones.

Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 6.5 and 12%

Lateral gradient along the structure: 0%
Author: Eyasu Yazew, P.O.Box 231, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Birr
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 18.0 Birr
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 2.50
Most important factors affecting the costs
Labour, slope, stone availability and size.
Establishment activities
  1. Collection of stones, contour and semi circle alignment, excavation of foundation, construction of bunds and excavation of planting pits and water storage ditch. (Timing/ frequency: January - May)
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Birr) Total costs per input (Birr) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Labour ha 1.0 3667.0 3667.0 60.0
Equipment
Tools ha 1.0 75.0 75.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 3'742.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 207.89
Maintenance activities
  1. Replacement of displaced stones and dredging of planting pits and storage ditch (Timing/ frequency: January - May)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Birr) Total costs per input (Birr) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Labour ha 1.0 117.0 117.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 117.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 6.5

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average rainfall of 450-550 mm, Main rainy season from Mid-June to August
Thermal climate class: subtropics
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good
Mobile communication

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased

fodder production
decreased
increased

animal production
decreased
increased

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
increased

farm income
decreased
increased

diversity of income sources
decreased
increased

workload
increased
decreased

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
improved

health situation
worsened
improved


Increased investment in health care as a result of increased income.

community institutions
weakened
strengthened

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
improved

situation of socially and economically disadvantaged groups (gender, age, status, ehtnicity etc.)
worsened
improved

Improved livelihoods and human well-being
decreased
increased

Ecological impacts
harvesting/ collection of water (runoff, dew, snow, etc)
reduced
improved

surface runoff
increased
decreased

groundwater table/ aquifer
lowered
recharge

soil moisture
decreased
increased

soil cover
reduced
improved

soil loss
increased
decreased

plant diversity
decreased
increased

Off-site impacts
water availability (groundwater, springs)
decreased
increased

reliable and stable stream flows in dry season (incl. low flows)
reduced
increased

downstream flooding (undesired)
increased
reduced

downstream siltation
increased
decreased

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Climate change

-

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
2820
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Increased vegetation coverage and fruit and fodder production

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Continuous maintenance of the structure.
  • Reduced soil erosion and increased soil moisture

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Continuous maintenance of the structure.
  • Increased spring discharges downstream

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Continuous maintenance of the structure.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Decreased slope length, reduced runoff amount and velocity and soil erosion

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Maintenance of bunds and runoff harvesting ditch.
  • Increase in rainwater harvesting, soil moisture and groundwater recharge

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Maintenance of bunds and runoff harvesting ditch.
  • Increase in fruit and fodder production

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Proper agronomic management
  • Reduced maintenance requirement compared to bunds made of soils

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? No action needed, as is inherent to technology
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Damage to structures constructed at foot slopes if the hillside is not well conserved Conserve the upper catchment first.
  • Increase labour requirement Mass mobilization and/or increased incentives to households.
    Reducing the size of the structure.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Poor design approach (the same diameter and spacing for different slope ranges) Improve the design approach.
  • Increased labour demand Mass mobilization and improving the design.
  • Reduced farm land Increasing the spacing and reducing the dimension of bunds without compromising their effectiveness.

References

Compiler
  • Eyasu Yazew
Editors
Reviewer
  • Fabian Ottiger
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: Nov. 11, 2012
Last update: Sept. 9, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Staff members of the Kilte Awlaelo Wereda Office of Agriculture and Rural Development:
  • Carucci, V. (2000). Guidelines on Water Harvesting and Soil Conservation for Moisture Deficit Areas in Ethiopia:the productive use of water and soil. First draft manual for trainers, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.:
  • Lakew, D., Carucci, V., Asrat, W. and Yitayew, A. (2005). Community Based Participatory Watershed Development: A guideline. Part I, first edition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.:
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International