Exemplary solar greenhouse in Khorog (Julie Zähringer (Baumackerstr. 51, 8050 Zürich))

Passive solar greenhouses for winter commercial vegetable production (Tajikistan)

Description

Passive solar greenhouses heated entirely by sunlight were established with the aim to produce vegetables for commercial use during the harsh winter conditions.

A passive solar greenhouse is a greenhouse heated entirely by sunlight, with no additional fuel-based heating. In the Pamirs, the temperature inside these greenhouses can be kept high enough to grow vegetables throughout the year, even in winter if the greenhouse is built efficiently. Thus greenhouses can be of great use, particularly in those areas where there are continuing concerns about food security and economic development. These greenhouses were developed by GERES (Renewable Energy and Environment Group) and ICIMOD (International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development) and first tested with farmers in Ladakh, India. MSDSP adopted the idea and introduced it to the GBAO region in Tajikistan establishing 3 demonstration greenhouses in collaboration with farmers in the Shugnan district in 2010.

Purpose of the Technology: A solar greenhouse aims to trap and intensify the heating effect of solar radiation and thus enables plants to be grown that cannot be grown under the normal (outside) ambient conditions. Solar greenhouses are particularly useful in areas where there is a lot of sunshine in winter, but where the air is too cold for growing crops. The main benefits of solar greenhouses are that vegetables can be grown during the winter, helping to fulfill basic subsistence needs of people in remote areas and income generation through selling the produce.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: A greenhouse is only efficient if it is constructed in the right place, in the right way, and is used properly. An efficient solar greenhouse should be designed along an east-west axis, with the length of the south face increased and angled to present the largest possible surface area to the sun, the size of the east and west facing walls reduced to minimise heat loss and provide shade inside the greenhouse, and the north wall should be heavily insulated.
The following steps are required in constructing an efficient greenhouse: (1) selecting an appropriate place: there needs to be a source of running water close to the greenhouse, solar radiation needs to be sufficient (sunrise should be before 9.30 and sunset after 3.00 pm even on the shortest days of the year), the land has to be flat and dry; (2) selecting the most appropriate design: (see manual); (3) constructing the foundation: digging a trench and filling the foundation with mud mortar; (4) preparing the floor; (5) building the double walls separated by one insulation layer; (6) making and installing an access door; (7) making and installing the wall ventilator; (8) constructing the roof; (9) making and installing the roof ventilator (shutter); (10) installing the polyethylene shutter; (11) installing night insulation.

Natural / human environment: The greenhouses were established in three villages of Shugnan district: Buni, Sokhcharv and Darmoracht. Two of these villages are located at about 2,500 metres a.s.l. and receive less than 300 mm of annual precipitation. The farmers who constructed these greenhouses are small-scale farmers with less than 0.5 ha of land available.

Location

Location: GBAO/Shugnan, Tajikistan, Tajikistan

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 71.5176, 37.6002

Spread of the Technology:

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
South-facing side of a solar greenhouse during construction process before the cellophane layer was put in place (MSDSP Khorog)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
  • Settlements, infrastructure - Settlements, buildings

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • biological degradation - Bq: quantity/ biomass decline, Bs: quality and species composition/ diversity decline
SLM group
  • home gardens
  • greenhouse
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility
  • structural measures - S11: Others

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
The diagram shows a greenhouse adapted to a cold climate, for greenhouses adapted to different climates please see the manual (annex 1)

GBAO

Date: 2004

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: high

Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate (brochures available in Tajik)

Main technical functions: increase in organic matter, reduction in wind speed, increase of biomass (quantity), spatial arrangement and diversification of land use, production of microclimate suitable for crop growth in winter

Manure / compost / residues
Material/ species: manure is mixed with the soil to cover the floor of the greenhouse

Structural measure: greenhouse

Construction material (earth): mud

Construction material (stone): stone

Construction material (wood): wood (poplar, willow)

Construction material (other): straw, wool
Author: GERES / ICIMOD

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Somoni
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 4.5 Somoni
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 9.00
Most important factors affecting the costs
Apart from the cellophane cover, mainly local materials were used which did not require investments. If labour has to be paid, this is the most determinate factor, also wooden poles if they have to be bought.
Establishment activities
  1. Digging trench for fundament, 60 cm deep (Timing/ frequency: spring)
  2. Put fundament using stones mixed with mud (Timing/ frequency: None)
  3. Build walls: outer layer stones (40 cm width), then insulation layer with straw or wool (10 cm), inner layer out of mudbricks (15-20 cm). Total height of wall is 1.20 m. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  4. Build doors (Timing/ frequency: None)
  5. Build wall ventilators (Timing/ frequency: None)
  6. Build roof: southfacing side put 2 layers of each 40m2 cellophane, northfacing side put woodlogs (Timing/ frequency: None)
  7. Build roof ventilators (Timing/ frequency: None)
  8. Install night insulation (Timing/ frequency: None)
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Somoni) Total costs per input (Somoni) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Digging trench for fundament, Persons/day 3.0 40.0 120.0 100.0
Put fundament Persons/day 10.5 40.0 420.0 100.0
Build walls Persons/day 30.0 40.0 1200.0 100.0
Build doors Persons/day 2.0 20.0 40.0 100.0
Equipment
Shovels Pieces 2.0 20.0 40.0 100.0
Nails kg 3.0 10.0 30.0
Construction material
Cellophane foil sq m 80.0 4.0 320.0
Other
Labour: Build wall ventilators Persons/day 12.0 40.0 480.0 100.0
Labour: Build roof ventilators Persons/day 4.0 40.0 160.0 100.0
Labour: Install night insulation Persons/day 5.0 40.0 200.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 3'010.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 668.89
Maintenance activities
  1. Replace cellophane (Timing/ frequency: when needed, every 1-2 years for bad material, 5 years for good material)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Somoni) Total costs per input (Somoni) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Replace cellophane Persons/day 2.0 40.0 80.0 100.0
Construction material
Cellophane sq m 80.0 4.0 320.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 400.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 88.89

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
200-300 mm
Thermal climate class: temperate
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased

risk of production failure
increased
decreased

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
increased

farm income
decreased
increased

diversity of income sources
decreased
increased

workload
increased
decreased


During construction of the greenhouse, 6 weeks

Establishment costs
high
low


high investment (400 $ for 1 greenhouse)

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
improved

health situation
worsened
improved

Livelihood and human well-being
reduced
improved


Higher income and better health through availability of vegetables in the winter

Ecological impacts
Creation of microclimate for growing vegetables during wintertime
reduced
improved

Off-site impacts
Availability of vegetables on the market during wintertime
reduced
improved

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Income revenues from vegetables are high, during one winter season two yields of vegetables can be planted.

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local windstorm

not well at all
very well
drought

not well at all
very well
Other climate-related consequences
reduced growing period

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
3 households
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • The materials are locally available (mud,
    wood, straw, stone), except for the transparent
    cover sheet

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Some traders should start providing transparent foil
  • Using the available construction manual it can be constructed by local builders

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? The local builders still need to be advised by specialists
  • The cost can be recouped in less than
    three years if the production is well-managed
    and the products sold
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Vegetable production during wintertime and diversified food production all year round

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Farmers should have access to microloan organisations in order to be able to invest in building greenhouses (initial investments are relatively high)
  • Availability of vegetables during wintertime, otherwise they have to be brought in from the capital (600 km by road) which makes them very expensive

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Greenhouses should be distributed over the whole of GBAO in order to ensure local availability of crops, because during wintertime transport might be a big problem
  • Income opportunity

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Better access to markets would improve profitability
  • Minimal heat loss, heat is stored during the day time and released at night

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? The greenhouse and should be constructed in a very careful and exact manner in order to make sure that the inside temperature can be well regulated
  • Adequate air circulation and prevention of crop damage by overheating, through installation of manually operated ventilators in walls and roof

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Farmers need access to specialists who will help them in designing greenhouses appropriate to the prevailing ecological conditions
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Comparatively expensive, about 400 USD have to be invested for the construction of one greenhouse The increased revenues from selling the produced vegetables can help cover the initial investment
  • Comparatively time consuming to build compared to conventional greenhouses in the area, one greenhouse needs about 6 weeks to be constructed Plastic poles could be used instead of wooden ones
  • No good quality cellophane foil is available in this area, therefore it has to be replaced every 1-2 years Instead of cellophane plexiglas could be used which is stronger.

References

Compiler
  • Julie Zähringer
Editors
Reviewer
  • Alexandra Gavilano
  • David Streiff
  • Joana Eichenberger
Date of documentation: May 13, 2011
Last update: Nov. 2, 2021
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Stauffer, Vincent. Solar Greenhouses for the Trans-Himalayas. Kathmandu, ICIMOD / Aubagne, GERES 2004.: http://books.icimod.org/index.php/search/publication/93
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International