Village school participation and involvement
(Tajikistan)
Чалб ва иштироки мактаби деха
Description
A competitive tendering process for project grant money to implement identified SLM practices within a community, and on completion of the implementation activities the village school will be assigned ownership and responsibility for the maintenance and sustainability.
Aims / objectives: The objective of the approach is to find a mechanism by which you can involve large sections of the community, allocate land for the communities benefit, provide a mechanism for long term maintenance, and establish a demonstration area for cross site visits and educational training.
Methods: Several methods were employed to implement the approach, these included community and local government workshops, seminars on proposal writing followed by subsequent proposal development in conjunction with local experts and community mobilization. The project staff used the approach to train active community members on suitable land management practices that would benefit identified degraded lands and develop sustainable competitive proposals to be reviewed by a selection panel. The community was encouraged to provide substantial input into the funding of their proposed project if they wanted to be successful. A predetermined condition was set on awarded grants that the degraded land had to be officially allocated to the school for a twenty year period.
Stages of implementation: The INGO Welthungerhilfe announced a competition amongst the local communities in one region to submit project proposals for addressing community environmental problems. The local government were involved from the outset, were encouraged to help suggest communities that should compete. The communities were provided with workshops on how to develop sustainable land management proposals with support from local agronomists. The proposals had to outline the commitment of the community, the area of land to be re-established and how, and finally the level of community contribution towards the project. The terms of the competition dictated that the area of rejuvenated land would be officially signed over to the school for a period of twenty year and the school community would thereby be responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of the land and entitled to invest any profits back into the school, hence indirectly supporting many families in the community. The projects were selected based on a predetermined criterion and the winning projects received part funding in the form of fuel, machinery, fencing etc upto 50% of the final costs. The people were mobilised to implement the project though a community day of action know as a ‘Hashar’ and on completion the school assumed responsibility for the plot of land.
Role of stakeholders: Although the approach is project driven it required buy in from the local authorities, and the heads of collective dehkan farms who dedicate land use right to village schools, however it was the school community that had to be the real driving force to see the proposal developed into a tangible outcome.
Location
Location: Khovaling / Dorobi, Tajikistan / Khatlon, Tajikistan
Geo-reference of selected sites
Initiation date: 2
Year of termination: 2009
Type of Approach
-
traditional/ indigenous
-
recent local initiative/ innovative
-
project/ programme based
Approach aims and enabling environment
Main aims / objectives of the approach
The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (Community initiated SWC activities realised with involvement of village school, holistic approach, )
environmental restoration by community involvement. to prevent soil erosion, gulley expansion and land degradation; to convert barren land to agroforestry system. to create capacity of villagers and young generation to protect environment and effective use of locally available natural resources.
The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Poor land management practices compounded by a lack of knowledge and funds that have resulted in continued land degradation and loss of fertility.
Conditions enabling the implementation of the Technology/ ies applied under the Approach
-
Legal framework (land tenure, land and water use rights): The existing land ownership, land use rights / water rights greatly helped the approach implementation: The state were very supportive of the allocation of land to the schools.
Conditions hindering the implementation of the Technology/ ies applied under the Approach
-
Availability/ access to financial resources and services: Limited availability of funds
Treatment through the SLM Approach: Project provided support funding to match contributions provided by the community.
-
Legal framework (land tenure, land and water use rights): There were no formal documented land user rights on the land selected for the implementation of technologies.
Treatment through the SLM Approach: Before the implementation started the plot of land was officially assigned to the school for a period of 20 years.
-
Knowledge about SLM, access to technical support: There is a lack of technical knowledge within the community.
Treatment through the SLM Approach: A series of cross visits and practical trainings were organised by the project to neighboring communities.
-
Workload, availability of manpower: There is extensive work required in the successful implementation and maintenance of the chosen technologies.
Treatment through the SLM Approach: The plot was divided into 3 parts to assign specific responsibilities.
Participation and roles of stakeholders involved
Stakeholders involved in the Approach and their roles
What stakeholders / implementing bodies were involved in the Approach? |
Specify stakeholders |
Describe roles of stakeholders |
local land users/ local communities |
Community members and farmers |
Mainly heavy activities like organic fertilizers carry, ploughing and planting was carried by males.
Women supported with feeding of workers.
All interested community members were involved in all stages of activities implementation and final beneficiary of action is school. |
SLM specialists/ agricultural advisers |
The approach was designed by international experts with input from national specialists
Project technical staff, advisor |
|
teachers/ school children/ students |
School teacher |
|
NGO |
WHH project staff |
|
local government |
Head of jamoat (sub district), and village head |
|
Lead agency
local authorities and project staff
Involvement of local land users/ local communities in the different phases of the Approach
none
passive
external support
interactive
self-mobilization
initiation/ motivation
community members leading by teacher presented project proposal to receive support of project realization to WHH project
planning
teachers together with project staff look through and updated plan
implementation
in the beginning it was really good and active labor and in-kind contribution of activity, once additionally in cash contribution was required teacher continued alone
monitoring/ evaluation
joint (project staff and villagers) monitoring of activities were realized during activities implementation and finalizing
Flow chart
The organisational set up instigated by the project staff with the involvement of the local authorities resulting in a community day of action for implementation of the technologies
Author: Daler Domullojonov (WHH, Dushanbe)
Decision-making on the selection of SLM Technology
Decisions were taken by
-
land users alone (self-initiative)
-
mainly land users, supported by SLM specialists
-
all relevant actors, as part of a participatory approach
-
mainly SLM specialists, following consultation with land users
-
SLM specialists alone
-
politicians/ leaders
Decisions were made based on
-
evaluation of well-documented SLM knowledge (evidence-based decision-making)
-
research findings
-
personal experience and opinions (undocumented)
Technical support, capacity building, and knowledge management
The following activities or services have been part of the approach
-
Capacity building/ training
-
Advisory service
-
Institution strengthening (organizational development)
-
Monitoring and evaluation
-
Research
Capacity building/ training
Training was provided to the following stakeholders
-
land users
-
field staff/ advisers
Form of training
-
on-the-job
-
farmer-to-farmer
-
demonstration areas
-
public meetings
-
courses
Subjects covered
Proposal writing, soil conservation techniques and cross site visits.
Advisory service
Advisory service was provided
-
on land users' fields
-
at permanent centres
Advisory service is quite adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; heads of jamoat (sub district), collective dehkan farm and village
Monitoring and evaluation
area treated aspects were regular monitored by project staff through observations; indicators: covered area
no. of land users involved aspects were ad hoc monitored by land users through observations; indicators: progress of used technics
technical aspects were regular monitored by land users through observations; indicators: None
management of Approach aspects were ad hoc monitored by project staff through observations; indicators: None
There were no changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation: None
There were few changes in the Technology as a result of monitoring and evaluation: Check dams with plastic sacks were covered after observing short durability, The size of contour trenches were adjusted after rainy season, additionally to rain water harvesting pounds establishment of conservation pound was added upstream
Research
Research treated the following topics
-
sociology
-
economics / marketing
-
ecology
-
technology
Research was carried out on-farm
Financing and external material support
Annual budget in USD for the SLM component
-
< 2,000
-
2,000-10,000
-
10,000-100,000
-
100,000-1,000,000
-
> 1,000,000
Precise annual budget: n.a.
Approach costs were met by the following donors: local community / land user(s) (labour, poles for fence, seedlings of trees and shrubs, seeds of grains, rent of tractor ): 60.0%; international non-government (fencing material, fuel for earth works, part of seedlings, seeds of perennial plants): 40.0%
The following services or incentives have been provided to land users
-
Financial/ material support provided to land users
-
Subsidies for specific inputs
-
Credit
-
Other incentives or instruments
Financial/ material support provided to land users
In the implementation EC TACIS financed the Welthungerhilfe project support in form of materials and seeds
partly financed
fully financed
agricultural: seeds: fertilizers
Labour by land users was
-
voluntary
-
food-for-work
-
paid in cash
-
rewarded with other material support
Impact analysis and concluding statements
Impacts of the Approach
No
Yes, little
Yes, moderately
Yes, greatly
Did the Approach help land users to implement and maintain SLM Technologies?
First of all the approach was discussed with all community members.
Did the Approach empower socially and economically disadvantaged groups?
The project was focused on providing for the communitz schools.
Did the Approach improve issues of land tenure/ user rights that hindered implementation of SLM Technologies?
The problem is unlikely to be overcome in the near future.
Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?
The approach was implemented in another 15 communities.
Main motivation of land users to implement SLM
-
increased production
-
increased profit(ability), improved cost-benefit-ratio
-
reduced land degradation
-
reduced risk of disasters
-
reduced workload
-
payments/ subsidies
-
rules and regulations (fines)/ enforcement
-
prestige, social pressure/ social cohesion
-
affiliation to movement/ project/ group/ networks
-
environmental consciousness
-
customs and beliefs, morals
-
enhanced SLM knowledge and skills
-
aesthetic improvement
-
conflict mitigation
-
well-being and livelihoods improvement
Sustainability of Approach activities
Can the land users sustain what hat been implemented through the Approach (without external support)?
Conclusions and lessons learnt
Strengths: land user's view
-
Additional income source for school budget. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Pupils could be taught how to optimise the use of the land.)
-
Improvement in the quality of land and has reduced the risk from natural disasters. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: The technologies could be adapted as the land improves in the future.)
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
-
A major problem was to connect the land tenure with the final beneficiaries within the community. This issue was solved through handing over all rights to village school. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: The approach may benefit from the involvement of legal land specialist.)
-
It is a low cost, holistic, approach involving all community through village school. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: It could be further enhanced with extra support of local authorities)
-
The approach provides a source of income for the school and provides a place of learning for the children. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Further sites with different SLM practices coul dbe developed into school demonstration plots.)
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
-
It required continuously cultivation activities in the beginning. The community became tired of volunteering after several days.
Responsible person /s has to be in charge to mobilise the people
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
-
In the beginning the school did not benefit too much.
Additional crops can be planted
References
Reviewer
-
David Streiff
-
Alexandra Gavilano
-
Joana Eichenberger
Date of documentation: April 9, 2011
Last update: Nov. 2, 2021
Resource persons
-
Daler Domullojonov (dalerd@list.ru) - SLM specialist
Full description in the WOCAT database
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution
- Deutsche Welthungerhilfe e. V. (Welthungerhilfe) - Tajikistan
Project
- Pilot Program for Climate Resilience, Tajikistan (WB / PPCR)
Key references
-
Final narrative report of EC Contract # 144-912: Welthungerhilfe project in Temurmalik district