Photo taken in Setto, Commune of Bohicon, using the GDT technology (OGOUDEDJI Bérenger)

The Half-Moon Technique (Benin)

Soun man kpéka

Description

The half-moon technique is designed to enhance water retention and soil infiltration. This is achieved by constructing crescent-shaped mounds around the base of trees. A compass can be used to outline a semi-circle with a diameter of 4 meters. The soil within this outlined area is then excavated and used to form a ridge.

The half-moon technique is commonly used on sloping land in arid or semi-arid climates, especially for fruit plantations such as cashew and orange trees. It involves clearing the ground to create basin-like structures, which are a few meters in diameter and bordered by ridges. This technique is essentially used to (i) cultivate encrusted land, (ii) reduce runoff, (iii) concentrate rainwater at the foot of trees by improving its infiltration into the soil, (iv) induce early flowering of fruit trees, (v) improve fruit tree production and (vi) restore biological diversity to agroecosystems.
The protocol for installing the technique is as follows :
-Use a compass with a 2-meter radius to pivot and create the half-moon shape;
-Use a pick, pickaxe, and shovel to dig the half-moon to a depth of 15 to 20 cm;
-Build the ridges starting from the inside and working outward. The height of the ridges can vary, depending on the slope severity, but can reach up to 40 cm;
-Arrange the half-moons in a staggered pattern perpendicular to the slope or following the contour lines; and
-Maintain a 4-metre spacing between two rows of half-moons.
It is recommended to enrich the half-moons with organic fertilizer or well-decomposed compost. Depending on availability, up to 35 kg of compost or manure, or a wheelbarrow full, could be added to each half-moon. Once the half-moon has been installed, it is recommended that it be systematically mulched to minimize moisture loss.
The half-moon technique can be implemented at any time of the year, but preferably in February-March or August-September on orange and cashew trees, to maintain structures designed to collect runoff water. To ensure the longevity of the technique, it is advisable to reshape larger ridges whenever their size diminishes, to strengthen the barrier.

Location

Location: Bohicon, Benin

No. of Technology sites analysed: 2-10 sites

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 2.05168, 7.18511

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (2.0 km²)

In a permanently protected area?: No

Date of implementation: 2020

Type of introduction

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: No

  • Cropland
    • Tree and shrub cropping
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
    Is intercropping practiced? No
    Is crop rotation practiced? No

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
  • biological degradation - Bl: loss of soil life
SLM group
  • agroforestry
  • integrated soil fertility management
  • water harvesting
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover, A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
The installation protocol involves the following steps:
-Establish the half-moon by pivoting using a compass with a 2-meter radius.
-Use a pick, pickaxe, and shovel to open the half-moon to a depth of 15 to 20 cm.
-Use a pickaxe to dig an area of approximately 6.283 square meters.
-Place the excavated earth on the semicircle, creating a semicircular ridge with a flattened top.
-Arrange the half-moons in a staggered pattern perpendicular to the slope or following the contour lines. Ensure that the arc is intercepted at the slope, allowing the water runoff to be struck by the crest of the ground.
-Maintain a spacing of 4m between two series of half-moons. In one hectare, a total of 625 half-moons should be planted.
-Before sowing, add 35 kg of compost or manure (equivalent to one wheelbarrow) to each half-moon.
-Note that the surface of the half-moon can be utilized for planting crops or perennial crops.

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology unit (unit: 1 half moon volume, length: 6.283 square meters)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: CFA F
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 615.18 CFA F
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 2000
Most important factors affecting the costs
Salaried labour is a limiting factor affecting costs.
Establishment activities
  1. Sourcing the straw (Timing/ frequency: January)
  2. Demarcation of the semi-circles (Timing/ frequency: April)
  3. Digging to create ridges (Timing/ frequency: April)
  4. Mulching (Timing/ frequency: April)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 1 half moon)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (CFA F) Total costs per input (CFA F) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Sourcing the straw Half moon 625.0 50.0 31250.0 100.0
Demarcation of the semi-circles Half moon 625.0 50.0 31250.0 100.0
Digging to create ridges Half moon 625.0 100.0 62500.0 100.0
Equipment
Pickaxe or daba Unit 3500.0 1.0 3500.0 100.0
Construction material
Straw Half moon 625.0 50.0 31250.0 100.0
Compost Half moon 625.0 1000.0 625000.0 99.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 784'750.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 1'275.64
Maintenance activities
  1. Addition of manure or compost (Timing/ frequency: June to July)
  2. Weeding (Timing/ frequency: June to October)
  3. Filling in collapsed areas (due to water) (Timing/ frequency: June to September)
  4. Mulching (Timing/ frequency: June to September)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 1 half moon)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (CFA F) Total costs per input (CFA F) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Maintenance/Weeding Half moon 625.0 25.0 15625.0 100.0
Mulching Half moon 625.0 25.0 15625.0 100.0
Filling in collapsed areas (due to water) Half moon 625.0 50.0 31250.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Addition of manure or compost Half moon 625.0 100.0 62500.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 125'000.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 203.19

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average annual rainfall in mm: 1025.0
Bohicon is characterized by a tropical climate, featuring a very hot and dry season from December to February, and a rainy season extending from mid-March to October.
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to: ground water
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased


Applied to citrus fruits (orange trees), the technology has resulted in a doubling of seedling production.

risk of production failure
increased
decreased

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
increased

land management
hindered
simplified

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
decreased


Half-moons are costly to create but beneficial in terms of results.

farm income
decreased
increased

economic disparities
increased
decreased

workload
increased
decreased


Half-moon application is labor-intensive.

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
improved

health situation
worsened
improved


Improved income means better access to health services.

recreational opportunities
reduced
improved

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
improved

situation of socially and economically disadvantaged groups (gender, age, status, ehtnicity etc.)
worsened
improved

Ecological impacts
soil moisture
decreased
increased

soil cover
reduced
improved

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
increased

drought impacts
increased
decreased

fire risk
increased
decreased

Off-site impacts

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
very well
seasonal temperature increase

not well at all
very well
Season: dry season
annual rainfall decrease

not well at all
very well
seasonal rainfall decrease

not well at all
very well
Season: wet/ rainy season

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
50 ha
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Enhanced soil fertility; increased crop yields
  • Facilitation of water infiltration
  • Water and wind erosion control
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Rainwater catchment
  • Resistance to climatic hazards; high retention capacity for vegetal matter and dissolved particles
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Labour-intensive Combine workers (salaried and family) for synergistic action
  • Very slow soil restoration speed Add organic matter
  • Flooding of the excavated surface during heavy rains Drain in the event of flooding, since the technology is more suited to arid and semi-arid zones
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Compost or organic fertilizer required Mineral fertilizers to be added if compost or manure is difficult to produce
  • Very slow soil restoration speed Use of mineral fertilizers before the start of the fertilizing process

References

Compiler
  • Gatien AGBOKOUN CHRISTOPHE
Editors
  • Siagbé Golli
  • Abdoul Karim MIEN
  • DOSSOU-YOVO bernardin
  • Tabitha Nekesa
  • Ahmadou Gaye
Reviewer
  • Sally Bunning
  • William Critchley
Date of documentation: Feb. 14, 2023
Last update: May 23, 2024
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, 2018. Compendium de fiches techniques du formateur:
  • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, 2018. Mesures de Gestion Durable des Terres (GDT) et d’Adaptation au Changement Climatique (ACC) : Boîte à images pour l’animation des séances de formation avec les agriculteurs:
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International