Livestock grazing in a crop field in Gogounou (BONI Mouhamadou)

Dry season grazing in cropland (Benin)

Description

Rotational livestock grazing is an integrated agriculture and livestock management system where livestock are grazed in the dry season, in a crop field, to feed on crop residues and/or weeds and where manure is used as an organic fertiliser for soil restoration purposes. While grazing, the animals feed on crop residues (millet or maize stalks) or, sometimes on Gliricidia sepium leaves.

Livestock grazing, typically with the "Borgou" breed, takes place in the dry season in crop fields dedicated to food production (maize, millet) or cash crops (soy and cotton). This practice involves overnight confinement of the animals which are individually tethered with ropes and stakes.
To effectively deploy this technology, oxen are restrained from late afternoon to early morning in a field, during the dry season, to utilize their manure directly as organic fertilizer. The entire heard is transferred from one plot to another or within the same plot, at varying intervals, ranging from a few days to a maximum of two weeks, to distribute the manure. This grazing technique is the preferred method employed during the dry season for fertilizing cereal fields by farmers who have livestock or can borrow animals. For farmers, the advantage of this grazing approach lies in the fact that the animals themselves transfer the fertilizer with minimal investment (ropes, stakes, etc.). All animal droppings, including faeces and urine, are deposited on the land during the 14 hours they typically spend there during a day. In these conditions, the quantities of faeces deposited amount to approximately 50 kg of dry matter per Tropical Livestock Unit (TLU) per month. With faeces and urine emissions evenly distributed over several hours, animals' droppings are dispersed over the grazing land depending on the amount of time they spend there, the rest being concentrated in resting areas, night paddocks and watering places (streams).
Grazing takes place between January and April. The animals are removed from the fields as soon as the first rains fall, to start preparing the soil for planting crops.
Farmers without animals of their own request livestock from other farmers, offering to feed them in exchange for their use during the grazing period. To ensure the animals are adequately fed during this period, some farmers plant Gliricidia trees on their farms. These fast-growing leguminous fodder trees not only serve as a source of food for the animals but also contribute to stabilizing and restoring the soil through nitrogen fixation.

Location

Location: Gogounou, Alibori, Benin

No. of Technology sites analysed: 2-10 sites

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 2.79746, 10.84771
  • 2.79747, 10.84762
  • 2.79747, 10.84762

Spread of the Technology: applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area

In a permanently protected area?: No

Date of implementation: 10-50 years ago

Type of introduction
Livestock grazing

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Yes - Agro-pastoralism (incl. integrated crop-livestock)

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: cereals - maize, cereals - millet
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
    Is intercropping practiced? No
    Is crop rotation practiced? Yes
  • Grazing land
    • Ranching
    Animal type: cattle - non-dairy beef
    Is integrated crop-livestock management practiced? Yes
    Products and services: manure as fertilizer/ energy production
      SpeciesCount
      cattle - non-dairy beef5000

    Water supply
    • rainfed
    • mixed rainfed-irrigated
    • full irrigation

    Purpose related to land degradation
    • prevent land degradation
    • reduce land degradation
    • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
    • adapt to land degradation
    • not applicable
    Degradation addressed
    • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
    SLM group
    • rotational systems (crop rotation, fallows, shifting cultivation)
    • integrated crop-livestock management
    SLM measures
    • agronomic measures - A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility, A3: Soil surface treatment, A6: Residue management (A 6.2: grazed)

    Technical drawing

    Technical specifications
    Cattle are tethered at a distance exceeding 5 meters to prevent the concentration of their excrement and urine in a small area. After being confined to a specific space for a maximum of 14 consecutive nights, the area is vacated, and another section of the plot is occupied. This method is gradually expanded until the entire surface area or an unproductive portion of the plot is covered. The rate at which excrement is relocated and the extent of coverage in a given area depend on the number of cattle heads being grazed. Typically, 4 to 5 cattle are confined to an area of 0.25 hectares. Grazing occurs from January to April, and as the rainy season commences, the cattle are relocated from the fields to initiate soil preparation for cultivation
    Author: ProSOL / GIZ, Picture from the SLM Image Box

    Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

    Calculation of inputs and costs
    • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 1ha)
    • Currency used for cost calculation: CFA F
    • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 615.46 CFA F
    • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: n.a
    Most important factors affecting the costs
    The manpower needed to install the fence
    Establishment activities
    1. Searching for and removing stakes (Timing/ frequency: December to March)
    2. Positioning stakes (Timing/ frequency: December to March)
    Establishment inputs and costs (per 1ha)
    Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (CFA F) Total costs per input (CFA F) % of costs borne by land users
    Labour
    Positioning stakes Stake 20.0 50.0 1000.0 100.0
    Equipment
    Machette Unit 1.0 3500.0 3500.0 100.0
    Construction material
    Stakes Stakes 20.0 50.0 1000.0 100.0
    Ropes Ropes 20.0 100.0 2000.0 100.0
    Total costs for establishment of the Technology 7'500.0
    Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 12.19
    Maintenance activities
    1. Securing the plot concerned (fencing using millet stalks) (Timing/ frequency: December to April)
    2. Installation of firebreaks to protect crop residues (Timing/ frequency: December to April)
    Total maintenance costs (estimation)
    50000.0

    Natural environment

    Average annual rainfall
    • < 250 mm
    • 251-500 mm
    • 501-750 mm
    • 751-1,000 mm
    • 1,001-1,500 mm
    • 1,501-2,000 mm
    • 2,001-3,000 mm
    • 3,001-4,000 mm
    • > 4,000 mm
    Agro-climatic zone
    • humid
    • sub-humid
    • semi-arid
    • arid
    Specifications on climate
    Average annual rainfall in mm: 1100.0
    The area is characterized by a Sudano-Guinean climate, with a rainy season lasting between May and October and a dry season and Harmattan from November to April.
    Slope
    • flat (0-2%)
    • gentle (3-5%)
    • moderate (6-10%)
    • rolling (11-15%)
    • hilly (16-30%)
    • steep (31-60%)
    • very steep (>60%)
    Landforms
    • plateau/plains
    • ridges
    • mountain slopes
    • hill slopes
    • footslopes
    • valley floors
    Altitude
    • 0-100 m a.s.l.
    • 101-500 m a.s.l.
    • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
    • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
    • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
    • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
    • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
    • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
    • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
    Technology is applied in
    • convex situations
    • concave situations
    • not relevant
    Soil depth
    • very shallow (0-20 cm)
    • shallow (21-50 cm)
    • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
    • deep (81-120 cm)
    • very deep (> 120 cm)
    Soil texture (topsoil)
    • coarse/ light (sandy)
    • medium (loamy, silty)
    • fine/ heavy (clay)
    Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
    • coarse/ light (sandy)
    • medium (loamy, silty)
    • fine/ heavy (clay)
    Topsoil organic matter content
    • high (>3%)
    • medium (1-3%)
    • low (<1%)
    Groundwater table
    • on surface
    • < 5 m
    • 5-50 m
    • > 50 m
    Availability of surface water
    • excess
    • good
    • medium
    • poor/ none
    Water quality (untreated)
    • good drinking water
    • poor drinking water (treatment required)
    • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
    • unusable
    Water quality refers to: ground water
    Is salinity a problem?
    • Yes
    • No

    Occurrence of flooding
    • Yes
    • No
    Species diversity
    • high
    • medium
    • low
    Habitat diversity
    • high
    • medium
    • low

    Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

    Market orientation
    • subsistence (self-supply)
    • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
    • commercial/ market
    Off-farm income
    • less than 10% of all income
    • 10-50% of all income
    • > 50% of all income
    Relative level of wealth
    • very poor
    • poor
    • average
    • rich
    • very rich
    Level of mechanization
    • manual work
    • animal traction
    • mechanized/ motorized
    Sedentary or nomadic
    • Sedentary
    • Semi-nomadic
    • Nomadic
    Individuals or groups
    • individual/ household
    • groups/ community
    • cooperative
    • employee (company, government)
    Gender
    • women
    • men
    Age
    • children
    • youth
    • middle-aged
    • elderly
    Area used per household
    • < 0.5 ha
    • 0.5-1 ha
    • 1-2 ha
    • 2-5 ha
    • 5-15 ha
    • 15-50 ha
    • 50-100 ha
    • 100-500 ha
    • 500-1,000 ha
    • 1,000-10,000 ha
    • > 10,000 ha
    Scale
    • small-scale
    • medium-scale
    • large-scale
    Land ownership
    • state
    • company
    • communal/ village
    • group
    • individual, not titled
    • individual, titled
    Land use rights
    • open access (unorganized)
    • communal (organized)
    • leased
    • individual
    Water use rights
    • open access (unorganized)
    • communal (organized)
    • leased
    • individual
    Access to services and infrastructure
    health

    poor
    good
    education

    poor
    good
    technical assistance

    poor
    good
    employment (e.g. off-farm)

    poor
    good
    markets

    poor
    good
    energy

    poor
    good
    roads and transport

    poor
    good
    drinking water and sanitation

    poor
    good
    financial services

    poor
    good

    Impacts

    Socio-economic impacts
    Crop production
    decreased
    increased

    Quantity before SLM: 1700kg
    Quantity after SLM: 6800
    Producers using the system noticed that their maize yield in the same space doubled during the first year, and as they continued using it, it increased by a factor of 4.

    fodder quality
    decreased
    increased

    production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
    decreased
    increased


    The effectiveness of the system led producers to abandon the practice of cultivating crops over large expanses of land.

    land management
    hindered
    simplified

    expenses on agricultural inputs
    increased
    decreased

    farm income
    decreased
    increased

    workload
    increased
    decreased


    The reduced workload is associated with lower chemical fertiliser transportation activity, which also meant that fertilizer spreading activity dropped.

    Socio-cultural impacts
    food security/ self-sufficiency
    reduced
    improved


    By enhancing harvests, the system empowers farmers to achieve greater self-sufficiency in food production.

    health situation
    worsened
    improved


    Higher incomes mean improved access to healthcare

    SLM/ land degradation knowledge
    reduced
    improved


    They easily understood the relevance of combining livestock farming and crop farming. Some producers who did not have animals, judging by their yields, finally started livestock farming and now have livestock they can use to apply the technique on their farms.

    conflict mitigation
    worsened
    improved


    It is the farmers who ask the breeders to have their cattle grazed on their lands. However, this is done according to precise rules (animals must not be allowed to graze on crop residues beyond those agreed, and grazing ends as soon as the rainy season starts).

    Ecological impacts
    soil compaction
    increased
    reduced


    The greater the number of cattle in a herd, the greater the compaction of field access paths.

    invasive alien species
    increased
    reduced


    Animal droppings can occasionally contain sprouts of foreign plants, including species like Euphorbia hirta.

    Off-site impacts
    reliable and stable stream flows in dry season (incl. low flows)
    reduced
    increased


    When animals are brought in for grazing, there is increased pressure on the watercourses near the grazing areas, as these serve as the water sources for the animals during this period.

    Cost-benefit analysis

    Benefits compared with establishment costs
    Short-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    Long-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    Benefits compared with maintenance costs
    Short-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    Long-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    Climate change

    Gradual climate change
    annual temperature increase

    not well at all
    very well
    seasonal temperature increase

    not well at all
    very well
    Season: dry season
    annual rainfall decrease

    not well at all
    very well
    seasonal rainfall decrease

    not well at all
    very well
    Season: wet/ rainy season
    Climate-related extremes (disasters)
    drought

    not well at all
    very well

    Adoption and adaptation

    Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
    • single cases/ experimental
    • 1-10%
    • 11-50%
    • > 50%
    Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
    • 0-10%
    • 11-50%
    • 51-90%
    • 91-100%
    Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
    • Yes
    • No
    To which changing conditions?
    • climatic change/ extremes
    • changing markets
    • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

    Conclusions and lessons learnt

    Strengths: land user's view
    • Increased crop yields; regeneration of soil fertility; lasting effect (3 to 4 years) in the soil before the new process starts
    • Farmers and livestock breeders live together peacefully
    • Reduced consumption of mineral fertilizers
    • Reduced workload and organic fertiliser transportation requirements
    Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
    • Increased crop yields
    • Improved soil fertility
    • Farmers and livestock breeders fostering better relations; conflict management
    Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
    • Cattle becoming a limiting factor Negotiating grazing arrangements with Fulani herders
    • Limited grazing surface area Perform the operation every year, targeting/prioritising infertile areas
    Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
    • A lack of animals limits adoption of the technique. Farmers can start breeding and have their own animals.

    References

    Compiler
    • Gatien AGBOKOUN CHRISTOPHE
    Editors
    • Siagbé Golli
    • Abdoul Karim MIEN
    • DOSSOU-YOVO bernardin
    • Bona Ibouratou DAFIA
    • Oscar Assa KINDEMIN
    • Tabitha Nekesa
    • Ahmadou Gaye
    Reviewer
    • Sally Bunning
    • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
    • William Critchley
    Date of documentation: Nov. 24, 2022
    Last update: May 27, 2024
    Resource persons
    Full description in the WOCAT database
    Linked SLM data
    Documentation was faciliated by
    Institution Project
    Key references
    • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, 2018, Mesures de Gestion Durable des Terres (GDT) et de l’Adaptation au Changement Climatique (ACC) : Compendium de fiches techniques du formateur:
    Links to relevant information which is available online
    This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International