Bioslurry structure with feedstock from livestock manure and human toilet. (Gerba Leta)

Bioslurry (Ethiopia)

Siico biogaazi

Description

Bioslurry is a byproduct of the anaerobic process used for production of methane (biogas). It is derived from the manure used to feed the biodigester. Bioslurry is an organic fertilizer that serves as a replacement for chemical fertilizers, and also plays a pesticidal role.

Bioslurry is a byproduct of the anaerobic process used for production of methane (biogas). It is derived from the manure and other organic materials used to feed the biodigester – which is central to a biogas plant. The biodigester is fed with thoroughly mixed livestock manure and water. For instance, a biodigester with a capacity of 8m3 requires manure from 8 cattle mixed with 20 litres of water daily. This allows consistent production of biogas, and bioslurry as a byproduct.
Bioslurry is used as an organic soil amendment that serves as an alternative to chemical fertilizers. It can also play a pesticidal role. Increasing the use of organic fertilizer can reduce the money spent on inorganic fertilizer by at least half. It also improves soil structure via the addition of organic matter. Essentially, the organic matter content of bioslurry is about 20-30%. Appropriate application of the bioslurry as organic fertilizer leads to more moisture retention in the root zone and improves crop resilience to adverse conditions. Usually, bioslurry is applied around homesteads where the biogas plant is sited where it produces energy and light for the household. The main functions of bioslurry are improving soil fertility, increasing crop production, and deterring invasion by various insects. Applying filtered liquid bioslurry to the crop supplies available liquid nutrients and manages crop infestation such as by fall armyworms and maize stalk borer.
Bioslurry is a replacement for chemical fertilizers. It is applied in two forms: liquid and dry forms. The liquid form is mainly used around the homestead, using a watering can or bucket. The dried form can more easily be carried to fields for application. Bioslurry as organic fertilizer is applied to vegetables and other perennial crops around the homestead, once during the growing season. The overall application rate by smallholders is not necessarily based on the recommendation rate per hectare but on the availability of the by-product. Row application is the efficient and effective use of resources in short supply. The rate of application to the specific parcel is on a decremental basis. The end users are pleased by its merit of increasing production, reducing investment costs on chemical fertilizers, improving soil structure and associated properties. They also like the way it makes constructive use of a byproduct that needs to be disposed of. Nevertheless, bioslurry is only available to those who invest in costly biogas plants which also require intensive labour input to collect cattle manure and fetch water.

Location

Location: Adale-Bise Kebele, Mattu district, Oromia, Ethiopia

No. of Technology sites analysed: single site

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 35.48012, 8.32526

Spread of the Technology: applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area

In a permanently protected area?: No

Date of implementation: 2020

Type of introduction
A farmer composting and drying bioslurry for use in remote farmland. (Gerba Leta)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: No

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: cereals - maize, cereals - sorghum, Wheat
    • Tree and shrub cropping: avocado
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
    Is crop rotation practiced? Yes

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion), Ca: acidification
  • physical soil deterioration - Ps: subsidence of organic soils, settling of soil, Pu: loss of bio-productive function due to other activities
SLM group
  • integrated crop-livestock management
  • integrated soil fertility management
  • integrated pest and disease management (incl. organic agriculture)
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility, A3: Soil surface treatment
  • management measures - M2: Change of management/ intensity level, M5: Control/ change of species composition

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
The Photo clearly portrays where the feedstock is added; the biodigester produces methane gas; gas collection and energy production points, and the final collection pits for bioslurry are located. The photo is adopted from W. Critchley PPT presentation. The dimension of the different parts is variable based on the supply of feedstock and financial resources the land users have for investment.

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology unit (unit: Biogas structure volume, length: Structure with 8m3 digester)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: ETB
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 53.12 ETB
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 200
Most important factors affecting the costs
Economic crisis and price volatility of the labor and materials.
Establishment activities
  1. Constructing biogas structure (Timing/ frequency: Anytime wanted)
  2. Supplying feedstock to the digester (Timing/ frequency: On dial basis)
  3. Collect bioslurry via collection pits (Timing/ frequency: when collection pits are filled and try to compost to transport the dry to remote farmlands.)
  4. Apply the slurry to the crop or the farm either in liquid or dry forms. (Timing/ frequency: During planting and other time of the season depending, on the types of crop.)
Establishment inputs and costs (per Biogas structure)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (ETB) Total costs per input (ETB) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Labor PDs 10.0 200.0 2000.0 100.0
Technician Lump sum 1.0 10000.0 10000.0
Equipment
PBC, Gate valve, plastic pipes, stove, bulbs Lump sum 1.0 6000.0 6000.0
Spade Nnumber 1.0 300.0 300.0 100.0
Wheel barrow Number 1.0 1600.0 1600.0
Construction material
Cement ton 1.0 10000.0 10000.0
Stone m3 2.0 1500.0 3000.0 100.0
Sand m3 8.0 500.0 4000.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 36'900.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 694.65
Maintenance activities
  1. Labor for collection of livestock drops, supply water, and drying the outputs. (Timing/ frequency: Throughout)
  2. Maintenance of the malfunctioning structure and supply of biogas accessories. (Timing/ frequency: Throughout)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per Biogas structure)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (ETB) Total costs per input (ETB) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Family labor to supply feedstock and collect the product. PDs 365.0 100.0
Equipment
Accessories Lump sum 5.0 200.0 1000.0 50.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 1'000.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 18.83

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Dry season: January to March, and wet season: June to September.
Name of the meteorological station: Mettu
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to: surface water
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased


The farmer observed a significant increase in crop yield per unit of land post the application of bioslurry. According to the farmer, the yield increment amounts to more than double the harvest that used to be gained via the use of chemical fertilizers.

crop quality
decreased
increased


A farmer communicated the improvement in the taste of the maize grain harvested from the farmland treated with bioslurry.

fodder production
decreased
increased


It increases biomass production and feed availability from crop residues.

fodder quality
decreased
increased

risk of production failure
increased
decreased

land management
hindered
simplified


According to the land user, tilling the farmland treated by bioslurry is lighter than the other soil. Furthermore, it forms an aggregate that otherwise remains dusty on tillage without the use of organic fertilizer or the bioslurry.

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
decreased

farm income
decreased
increased

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
improved

health situation
worsened
improved

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
improved

Ecological impacts
water quantity
decreased
increased

water quality
decreased
increased

surface runoff
increased
decreased

excess water drainage
reduced
improved

groundwater table/ aquifer
lowered
recharge


Not yet empirically measured.

evaporation
increased
decreased


As it promotes the growth of diverse plant species, it has positive effects on reducing evoration.

soil moisture
decreased
increased

soil cover
reduced
improved

soil loss
increased
decreased

soil accumulation
decreased
increased

soil compaction
increased
reduced

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
increased

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
increased

acidity
increased
reduced

vegetation cover
decreased
increased

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
increased

plant diversity
decreased
increased

emission of carbon and greenhouse gases
increased
decreased

Off-site impacts
water availability (groundwater, springs)
decreased
increased

reliable and stable stream flows in dry season (incl. low flows)
reduced
increased


As the technology is not widely adopted and measured its impact is negligible in this regard.

downstream flooding (undesired)
increased
reduced

downstream siltation
increased
decreased


Reduces the runoff of soil and water because of good ground cover and high biomass production.

damage on neighbours' fields
increased
reduced


As it arrest the downstream runoff, it reduces the damage it may imposes on the adjacent fields.

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

During the establishment phase, the farmer hesitates to engage as the cost is on the higher side.

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
very well
seasonal temperature increase

not well at all
very well
Season: dry season
annual rainfall decrease

not well at all
very well
seasonal rainfall decrease

not well at all
very well
Season: summer

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
The technology piloted by three farmers in a kebele.
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Improve soil fertility
  • Increase production per unit of land
  • The process allows for cleaning the environment, as cattle manure and urine are collected and safely disposed of or used as feedstock to the biogas structure.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Allows the farm to retain moisture and nutrients, keep the crop vigorous, and become resilient to adverse conditions.
  • It creates employment opportunities for the member of the family farmers.
  • Liquid slurry deters insect pests from the farm and the crop.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Labor-intensive technology for its production and application to the farm. Aware of family members and engaged them in the production and uses of slurry.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • High initial investment cost. Provide support via the project as well as relevant government organizations such as water and energy, also through strengthening cost sharing with the end user.
  • As the production per structure is relatively low, the rate and frequency of application have not yet worked out. Need follow-up, documentation, and defining the right amount and frequency of application to crop and the farm.

References

Compiler
  • GERBA LETA
Editors
  • Noel Templer
  • Julia Doldt
  • Kidist Yilma
  • Likissa Kurmana Dufera
  • Tabitha Nekesa
  • Ahmadou Gaye
  • Siagbé Golli
Reviewer
  • William Critchley
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
  • Sally Bunning
Date of documentation: Feb. 7, 2023
Last update: April 18, 2024
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Bioslurry: A supreme fertilizer. Warnass, L. 2014. ISBN: 978-90-70435-07-3: https://www.academia.edu/83905083/Bioslurry_A_Supreme_Fertilizer
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International