Desmodium as a cover crop in maize field in Kuto Sorfela Kebele of Sodo Zuria district (Abiyot Kebede)

Cover crops (Ethiopia)

Yeshifan Sebil (in Amharic)

Description

Cover crops are crops grown on bare, fallow farmland or under a main crop to cover and conserve the soil by protecting it from exposure to the sun, wind, and direct impact of rain. It fixes nitrogen (if a legume), improves soil fertility, supplies livestock fodder, and helps manage both pests and weeds.

Cover crops are planted to conserve the soil on bare, fallow farmland or under a main crop. They can be grown on their own or between rows of annual and perennial crops such as maize, coffee, and fruits. The main purposes of growing cover crops are to cover the soil with low-growing vegetation, protect the soil from exposure to sun and rain, suppress weeds, improve soil fertility, supply livestock feed, and manage insect pests. Cover crops may be nitrogen fixing (if legumes), and they make productive use of spaces between crop rows, as well as controlling wind and water erosion. They also have the potential to restore soil fertility and help in climate change adaptation, as well as sequestration of atmospheric carbon above and below soil surface. Furthermore, cover crops can be fed to livestock, helping to bridge periods of shortage of feed when grazing lands are not available – which is an increasing problem because of growing population pressure and expansion of croplands. Land users give huge credit for its role as a pesticide by deterring armyworm and stalk borer when used as a border, and stopping their advance into the maize crop.
Desmodium is an example of a leguminous cover crop, improving soil fertility via fixing atmospheric nitrogen, increasing infiltration and productive use of soil moisture, and catering for livestock via a “cut-and-carry” fodder system. Desmodium is planted between rows of maize crops as well as between grass hedgerows around the farm. For its establishment, access to desmodium seed is essential. Once established, it remains to serve as a permanent source of planting material. Nevertheless, there are some disadvantages of desmodium: seed collection is difficult, it may trap honey bees and it can compete with the crop for light and space if allowed to grow too tall. Thus, efficient management of desmodium is essential. Nevertheless, as part of an agro-ecological intervention, cover crops like desmodium deliver multiple benefits to resource-poor farmers and can be viewed as an investment in improving soil fertility as well as soil health. Overall, cover crops improve productivity, and help ensure yield stability and contribute to a healthier ecosystem.

Location

Location: Kuto Sorfela kebele, Sodo Zuria, SNNPR, Ethiopia

No. of Technology sites analysed: single site

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 37.69179, 6.90513

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. < 0.1 km2 (10 ha))

In a permanently protected area?: No

Date of implementation: 2022

Type of introduction
Desmodium (cover crop) grown between hedgerows of grass at the periphery of maize plot to serve as push-and-pull technology against insect pests. (GERBA LETA)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Yes

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: cereals - maize, Desmodium. Cropping system: Maize/sorghum/millet intercropped with legume
    Number of growing seasons per year: 2
    Is intercropping practiced? Yes
    Is crop rotation practiced? Yes
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • physical soil deterioration - Pc: compaction
SLM group
  • integrated crop-livestock management
  • integrated soil fertility management
  • integrated pest and disease management (incl. organic agriculture)
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility
  • vegetative measures - V2: Grasses and perennial herbaceous plants
  • structural measures - S4: Level ditches, pits
  • management measures - M2: Change of management/ intensity level

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Desmodium and the grass (Brachiaria species) serving as push-pull technology to the pest. Adopted from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/desmodium-legume-cover-crop-solution-food-insecurity-africa-ndiritu/. In this particular case, Brachiaria play the "pull" function on the periphery of the maize farm.
Author: Africa Sustainable Agriculture Biweekly Newsletter, ICIPE Push Pull Project

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: Timad = 0.25 ha; conversion factor to one hectare: 1 ha = 1 ha = 4 Timad)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: ETB
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 53.6283 ETB
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 250
Most important factors affecting the costs
The prevailing economic crisis and rising of inflation in the country contributes to inputs and other services price uncertainty.
Establishment activities
n.a.
Maintenance activities
  1. Land preparation and planting (Timing/ frequency: Before and at planting)
  2. Cutting desmodium to use as feed for cattle (Timing/ frequency: During the growing season)
  3. Harvesting desmodium biomass and /or seed (Timing/ frequency: At harvest maturity)
  4. Access to planting materials, if newly started (Timing/ frequency: Anytime in the offseason)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per Timad = 0.25 ha)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (ETB) Total costs per input (ETB) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Land preparation PDs 4.0 500.0 2000.0 100.0
Cutting for use as feed PDs 8.0 250.0 2000.0 100.0
Harvesting total biomass and /or seed PDs 5.0 250.0 1250.0 100.0
Plant material
Desmodium seed kg 3.0 120.0 360.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 5'610.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 104.61

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Rainfall distribution is uniform except in El Nino cases or recurrent drought experienced in the country and the region.
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to: ground water
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good
Comments

The land user accessed electricity in rural areas. She also used biogas for energy production.

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
x
increased


Increase with proper management of the companion crops on a gradual basis.

crop quality
decreased
x
increased


Simultaneously increase with good harvest per unit of land as the integration allows to combat against pests.

fodder production
decreased
x
increased


Desmodium gives high biomass production. So it supplies more fodder if timely trimmed and supplied to the livestock.

fodder quality
decreased
x
increased


Believed to increase with the application of appropriate management practices.

animal production
decreased
x
increased

land management
hindered
x
simplified


Desmodium fixes atmospheric nitrogen that improves the fertility of the soil in addition to the production of large biomass that supplies organic matter to the soil.

drinking water availability
decreased
x
increased

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
x
decreased


Slightly decrease as desmodium fix atmospheric nitrogen in the long run and partly complements urea fertilizer.

farm income
decreased
x
increased

workload
increased
x
decreased


It demands follow-up and frequently monitors and manages the growth of desmodium to reduce its competition with the main crops.

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
x
improved

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
x
improved


As it creates evidence-based learning, it improves land user's SLM knowledge.

Ecological impacts
water quantity
decreased
x
increased

surface runoff
increased
x
decreased


High biomass production and the ground covering traits of desmodium assist to slow down surface runoff and promote infiltration deep into the soil.

soil moisture
decreased
x
increased

soil cover
reduced
x
improved

soil loss
increased
x
decreased

soil crusting/ sealing
increased
x
reduced

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
x
increased


As the companion crop fixes atmospheric nitrogen, it improves nutrient cycling.

vegetation cover
decreased
x
increased

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
x
increased

pest/ disease control
decreased
x
increased


Land users suggested the pesticidal role of desmodium as compared to the hidden contribution to the improvement of soil fertility through its natural traits of fixing atmospheric nitrogen.

flood impacts
increased
x
decreased

emission of carbon and greenhouse gases
increased
x
decreased


It increases biomass production that absorbs carbon above and below the surface of the soil.

Off-site impacts
water availability (groundwater, springs)
decreased
x
increased


Contributes to groundwater recharge by reducing surface runoff.

reliable and stable stream flows in dry season (incl. low flows)
reduced
x
increased


Facts are not available to complement this allegation since the implementation is on smaller areas of farmland.

downstream flooding (undesired)
increased
x
reduced


It breaks the speed of flood that overflow and damage neighboring areas.

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

The benefit from desmodium can be made in the short term. Its high biomass production to enrich grass fodder and suppression of weeds and pests are promptly seen as compared to some other SLM technologies.

Climate change

Gradual climate change
seasonal temperature increase

not well at all
very well
Season: dry season Answer: not known
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
heatwave

not well at all
very well
Answer: not known
Other climate-related consequences
extended growing period

not well at all
x
very well
reduced growing period

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • The technology improves soil fertility.
  • It manages insect pests and stops their advance and negative consequence they might causes on the main crops.
  • Supply protein-rich feed to the animals.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Cover crops provide multiple benefits to the family farmers such as the best uses of land between the rows of maize crops.
  • It smothers weeds and improves soil fertility and crop productivity which have a positive contribution to the livelihoods of family farmers.
  • Cover crops and the practice itself have a beneficial role in agroecology intervention and improvement of the ecosystem functioning.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Fast growing and overwhelming the main crops (competition for space). Applying intensive management such as cutting and feeding to the animals.
  • Feeding the animals with fresh harvest is not friendly to the livestock. As it is a protein-rich fodder crop the harvest must be slightly dry and mixed with grass fodder that reduces the adverse effects of either bloating or diarrhea.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Difficulty to manage and harvesting desmodium seeds. 1. Intensify the management of desmodium and reduce harvesting inconvenience on main crop.
    2. Replace desmodium with other farmer's friendly legume species such as Dolichos lablab...as cover crops.
  • Hooky nature of the seed that sticks to the clothes. -Wear nylon wears/clothes that reduces the effects of hooky seeds.
    - Produce seeds on separate plots.
  • Quick growth and climbing traits that dominate the main crops. - Apply intensive management and use the above-ground parts as fodder for the livestock by adopting cut-and-carry feeding system. Also, needs to keep the green parts under frequent management practices.

References

Compiler
  • GERBA LETA
Editors
  • Julia Doldt
  • Kidist Yilma
  • Noel Templer
  • Tabitha Nekesa
  • Ahmadou Gaye
  • Siagbé Golli
Reviewer
  • William Critchley
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
  • Sally Bunning
Date of documentation: Jan. 26, 2023
Last update: April 22, 2024
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Cover Crops for Sustainable Crop Rotations. Clark, Andy. 2015: https://www.sare.org/resources/cover-crops/
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International