General overview of field where conservation agriculture is implemented (Mandakh N.)

Conservation agriculture to restore abandoned cropland (Mongolia)

Khurs Khamgaalliin gazar tarialan

Description

This technology aimed to restore abandoned cropland which was used for crop and fodder production during the 1970s-1980s. Since 2016, the farmer applied conservation agriculture and mixed cropping to reduce land degradation, revive cropping practices, increase land productivity for agriculture and enhance soil health.

The land in Kherlen soum, Khentii province, spanning 500 hectares, was used for crop production and later for producing fodder for livestock. However, since 1984, it has been left abandoned. To rehabilitate the area and revive cropland, conservation agriculture combined with mixed cropping was introduced in 2014.
Mixed cropping encompasses various agrotechnical practices that involve the cultivation of different crops together, making use of their ability to interact with each other. The aim is to sustain crop yield in regions with limited moisture, protect the soil surface, regulate soil moisture levels, and enhance the availability of micro and macro-nutrients. In Kherlen soum, Khentii province, mixed cropping was implemented by planting seed mixtures of different proportions, taking into consideration the specific requirements and differences among various crops. Presently, annual crops such as mustard, peas, Cape rice, and wheat, rye along with rapeseeds, are successfully cultivated mixed and/or in rotation in the area.
Conservation agriculture in soil protection agriculture offers several advantages, including the enhancement of soil, its resilience to external factors such as erosion by wind, regulation of soil fertility and microorganism populations, avoidance of highly toxic substances in agriculture, and increased productivity. One significant aspect of conservation agriculture is using no-till and direct sowing techniques to minimize soil disturbance. During harvesting, only the crop heads are collected, while the remaining rootsystems and stems are left in and above the soil contributing to increasing soil organic matter. Other residues and parts of plants, such as straw/ stalks and leaves, are shredded and spread across the field to reduce soil moisture evaporation and protect it from the sun and wind. Soil erosion by wind can be mitigated by covering the soil as much and long as possible either by leaving the crop residues on the soil and/or including cover crops into crop rotations. Furthermore, this technology improves the soil health and microenvironment/ microclimate.
To initiate and implement this technology, the land user leased most of his land through a proposal, aimed at improving the soil quality of abandoned land, to the local government, and also purchased a certain amount of land through a land auction announced on the government website. Initial preparation of land for sowing consisted of removing stones from the field and spraying herbicides to get rid of weeds and their seeds. A minimal dose of herbicides with low toxicity is used to control the growth and spread of weed plants commonly found in abandoned fields. Later on mustard was incorporated into mixed cropping and rotations suppressing the growth of weed.
In the first year, the farmer planted a mixture of mustard, oilseed rape and lucerne to enhance soil penetration and break up compacted soil, as well as wheat in a 40 cm strip on stony soil with low fertility. First few years 2014-2018), the farmer didn’t harvest all the yields to keep the soil covered and improve the soil quality.
In 2019 the farmer built a fence to protect against grazing and yields significantly improved. Moreover, various equipment such as direct seeder for no till or minimum tillage crop cultivation, combine harvester, tractor, herbicide spraying machine and seed sorting machines to improve the quality of produce for the market (clean and separate seeds of different sizes and different types of crops) were bought with a bank loan.
A comprehensive knowledge of the interactions and symbiotic relationships between different crops is also essential to plan for crop mixtures and rotations. Crop morphology such as root system, competition for nutrients and water should be considered. Mustard-pea mixture facilitates harvesting as pea is difficult to harvest in monoculture and mustard can provide biological weed control.
He divided the land / field into 12 plots, which were planted with different crop mixtures and in rotation, maintaining soil fertility, limiting pests and diseases, and increasing crop yields. Legumes can improve soil fertility by adding nitrogen to the soil. The farmer practiced five-field rotation in his cropland using legumes including pea, bean, lentils and alfalfa. The rotation plan depends on climate conditions.
The levels of potassium and phosphorous in the soil were monitored and regularly measured. Only when a deficit occurred the land user used mineral fertilizers.
According to farmers who practice conservation agriculture and mixed farming, these technologies effectively maintains soil stability, ensuring its long-term sustainability.

Location

Location: Kherlen soum, Takhilgat bag, Khentii province, Mongolia

No. of Technology sites analysed: single site

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 110.9931, 47.56904

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (8.0 km²)

In a permanently protected area?: No

Date of implementation: 2014; less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
After sowing and before cover crops emerged, 29th, May, 2018 (Batnaran B.)
Soil quality and land productivity improved after cover crop development (Batnaran B.)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: No

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: cereals - barley, cereals - oats, cereals - wheat (spring), fibre crops - flax, hemp, other, fodder crops - alfalfa, legumes and pulses - lentils, legumes and pulses - peas, oilseed crops - sunflower, rapeseed, other, seed crops - sesame, poppy, mustard, other. Cropping system: Wheat or similar rotation with hay/pasture
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
    Is intercropping practiced? No
    Is crop rotation practiced? Yes
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by wind - Et: loss of topsoil, Eo: offsite degradation effects
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover, Bq: quantity/ biomass decline, Bs: quality and species composition/ diversity decline
SLM group
  • rotational systems (crop rotation, fallows, shifting cultivation)
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
  • minimal soil disturbance
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover, A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility, A3: Soil surface treatment (A 3.1: No tillage), A5: Seed management, improved varieties, A6: Residue management (A 6.4: retained)
  • management measures - M1: Change of land use type

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
This diagram shows how the crop mix was distributed across the field in 2023 (on different plots). Entire field was divided into 5 main sections which are intended for crop rotation and also several small sections which are for ensuring seed source. More than 20 types of crops were planted in the whole field. A five-field rotation is practiced in this cropland with a sequence of cereal grains (wheat, barley, oats, etc.) followed by leafy plants (flax, lentils, peas, mustard, etc.), depending on the climatic conditions of the year. In dry years, the land user prefers to grow cereals and flax, which are more resistant to drought, and then rotate cereals with a mixture of leafy plants the following year. In years with good humidity, on the other hand, a mixture of mustard + peas + oats + lentils is suitable. The advantages of this mixture is to improve soil fertility and to control diseases and pest. In addition, soil remains covered against soil erosion. Inclusion of different crops means also increase in agrobiodiversity.

Overview on total area of Batnaran’s cropland:
Crop mixture
1 – mixture of mustard + wheat
2 – mixture of flax + lentil
3 – mixture of mustard 2 + pea
4 - mixture of wheat + mustard
5 - mixture of mustard 1 + pea
6 - mixture of wheat + oat+ mustard
7 – wheat
8 – staff house
Author: Ankhbayar N., Gereltuya G.

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 800 hа)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Tugrik
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 3453.0 Tugrik
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 50000 - 100000
Most important factors affecting the costs
Factors that mainly affect the cost are inflation and the MNT exchange rate (mainly relevant when purchasing imported products). In addition, in the event of extreme weather and disastrous conditions, extra labor may be required to mitigate damage.
Establishment activities
  1. Build fence (Timing/ frequency: before sowing)
  2. Prepare (picking stones) and plough land (Timing/ frequency: before sowing)
  3. Buy and spray herbicide (Timing/ frequency: before sowing)
  4. Purchase tractor (Timing/ frequency: before sowing)
  5. Purchase direct seeder (Timing/ frequency: before sowing)
  6. Purchase combine harvester (Timing/ frequency: before sowing)
  7. Purchase spray machine (Timing/ frequency: before sowing)
  8. Purchase seed cleaning machine (Timing/ frequency: before sowing)
  9. Purchase stone picker machine (Timing/ frequency: before sowing)
  10. Purchase or rent pile machine for fencing (Timing/ frequency: before sowing)
  11. Purchase silos (Timing/ frequency: before harvesting)
  12. Storage shed (Timing/ frequency: before harvesting)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 800 hа)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Tugrik) Total costs per input (Tugrik) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Build fence person 2.0 15000000.0 30000000.0 100.0
Spray herbicide person 2.0 350000.0 700000.0 100.0
Sowing person 1.0 4000000.0 4000000.0 100.0
Stone picking хүнperson 1.0 4800000.0 4800000.0 100.0
Equipment
Tractor piece 1.0 220000000.0 220000000.0 100.0
Direct seeder piece 1.0 224000000.0 224000000.0 100.0
Combine harvester piece 2.0 397000000.0 794000000.0 100.0
Agriculture spray machine шpiece 1.0 170000000.0 170000000.0 100.0
Stone picker machine piece 1.0 15000000.0 15000000.0 100.0
Seed cleaning machine piece 3.0 35000000.0 105000000.0 100.0
Pile machine for fencing piece 1.0 6900000.0 6900000.0 100.0
Silos tonnes (holding capacity) 700.0 714285.72 500000004.0 100.0
Plant material
Seeds first year tonnes 70.5 4400000.0 310200000.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Herbicide l 2400.0 8000.0 19200000.0 100.0
Construction material
Poles and net for fence км 25.0 10800000.0 270000000.0 100.0
Other
Land lease 800.0 500000.0 400000000.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 3'073'800'004.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 890'182.45
Maintenance activities
  1. Sowing/ direct seeding (Timing/ frequency: April to May per year)
  2. Harvesting and separating harvested seeds (Timing/ frequency: once in August to September)
  3. Reproducing seed for own use and sowing (Timing/ frequency: after harvest)
  4. Spray herbicide (Timing/ frequency: if necessary, once in 2-3 year)
  5. Monitoring on plant development (e.g. germination, flowering, maturity) (Timing/ frequency: at each plant development stage)
  6. Monitoring soil fertility (Timing/ frequency: once a year, in August)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 800 hа)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Tugrik) Total costs per input (Tugrik) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Spray herbicide person 2.0 1400000.0 2800000.0 100.0
Harvesting person 4.0 1500000.0 6000000.0 100.0
Separating seeds person 2.0 1000000.0 2000000.0 100.0
Sowing seeds person 2.0 1500000.0 3000000.0 100.0
Equipment
Spraying machine (fuel) l/year 400.0 2400.0 960000.0 100.0
Combine harvesting machine (fuel) l/year 4000.0 2400.0 9600000.0 100.0
Sowing machine (fuel) l/year 4000.0 2400.0 9600000.0 100.0
Spare parts and maintenance of machines ha 800.0 10500.0 8400000.0 100.0
Plant material
Seeds tonne/year 13.7 4400000.0 60280000.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Herbicide (different types) l 1.0 30000.0 30000.0 100.0
Other
Land use tax MNT/year 1.0 1900000.0 1900000.0 100.0
Soil sampling and testing MNT/year 1.0 830000.0 830000.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 105'400'000.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 30'524.18

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average annual rainfall in mm: 150.0
Name of the meteorological station: Undurkhaan
This region includes a region with harsh cold winters and dry summers. The average annual air temperature is -0.2 celsius, and the difference between day and night temperature ranges from 13 to 15 degrees.
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to: both ground and surface water
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
x
increased

Quantity before SLM: 0
Quantity after SLM: 25 centner/ha
It is important to note that crop production is highly dependent on weather conditions. In 2021, when there was enough precipitation, a yield of 25 centner/ha was achieved. However, in 2014-2016, when technology implementation was just starting in severely degraded land and coincided with drought, there were occasions where all yield was lost.

crop quality
decreased
x
increased


Specific weight, indicating seed quality, of grain reached 900 g/l and, gluten content of wheat always meets the requirements of first grade of food.

fodder production
decreased
x
increased


Comparisons between 2018 and 2022 indicate that the average length of the wheat grain head increased and reached 10 - 12 centimeters by 1st July, resulting in a higher yield. Oats and wheat are harvested for fodder production while peas are supplied to chicken farms.

fodder quality
decreased
x
increased


In terms of wheat quality, it is classified into first grade. The protein content of Bayalag variety of peas is 18-20%, starch content is 26-35%.

risk of production failure
increased
x
decreased


We concluded that this technology can overcome any risks related to labor and expenses, because sowing time is different for many types of crops, reducing the amount of expenses and labor load.

product diversity
decreased
x
increased

Quantity before SLM: 1
Quantity after SLM: 20
About 20 species of plants are being cultivated.

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
x
decreased

Quantity before SLM: 9 centner
Quantity after SLM: 3 centner
The amount of seeds used for planting is lower, the seeds can be used for the next year cultivation: The spread of plant diseases / pests and use of pesticides is relatively low. Herbizides and fertilizers are not applied in this technology. Thus, there is no expense on that.

farm income
decreased
x
increased

Quantity before SLM: None
Quantity after SLM: 5 centner
The yield is dependent on the climatic conditions of the year. In wheat yield, 3 centners were spent on sowing and 5 centners were obtained for each hectare when the weather was not favorable and precipitation was relatively low. Therefore, the net income is 2 centners in this case.

workload
increased
x
decreased

Quantity before SLM: 4
Quantity after SLM: 2
Sowing time is different for many types of crops, so it does not requires a high number of labor. 2 persons typically work on the entire area throughout the year and, 2 more persons are employed during harvesting.

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
x
improved

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
x
improved


Mentorship program for other farmers is organized.

Ecological impacts
evaporation
increased
x
decreased


Due to cover crops and residue left on the soil, it reduces the amount of water evaporation from the soil and keeps the soil moisture .

soil moisture
decreased
x
increased


Cover crops and plant residues left on the soil surface protect against wind erosion, reduces soil water evaporation and improves soil moisture content.

soil cover
reduced
x
improved

Quantity before SLM: 0 см
Quantity after SLM: 2 см
Технологи хэрэгжүүлэхээс өмнө тус талбайд ургамал сийрэг тархсан, өнгөн хөрс салхиар хүчтэй элэгдэж үржил шимээ алдсан, хайргаар битүү хучигдсан байсан.

soil loss
increased
x
decreased


Snow cover in winter, has an important effect on protecting the soil from wind erosion in the spring.

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
x
increased

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
x
increased


It is believed that when the content of organic matter in the soil increases by 1 percent, the water holding capacity of the soil increases by 4 percent. From this point of view, it can be concluded that the content of organic matter has improved.

vegetation cover
decreased
x
increased


Before the technology, vegetation cover was sparse and there were only 2-3 species of weeds in a square of 1m x 1m.

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
x
increased


Aboveground biomass increased. Prairie sagebrush is predominating in natural vegetation community.

plant diversity
decreased
x
increased

animal diversity
decreased
x
increased


According to the results of soil sampling, the ratio of microorganisms in the soil has increased. It is also clearly observed that the variety of insects and the birds that feed on them have increased due to the rise in plant species.

beneficial species (predators, earthworms, pollinators)
decreased
x
increased


From 2019, mushrooms started growing in the field. Flaxes, forming symbioses with fungus, are planted in order to enhance distribution of fungus in soil. Fungus has a positive effect on soil quality.

pest/ disease control
decreased
x
increased


Mustard and peas have been observed to limit the growth of weeds such as hogweed. Additionally, mustard releases two powerful substances that can help limit the spread of diseases.

flood impacts
increased
x
decreased

Quantity before SLM: high
Quantity after SLM: low
Sown stands and plant cover can mitigate heavy flooding, then, the risk of washing away the fertile layer of the soil can be reduced. In addition, the stands will retain plant residues and other objects carried by the flood water. It can also be composted into the soil.

drought impacts
increased
x
decreased

Quantity before SLM: high
Quantity after SLM: low
Because the soil moisture content is good compared to other areas, the yield is higher in drought years and soil erosion is less.

wind velocity
increased
x
decreased


Wind velocity is high in this region. We are thinking about establishing windbreak in the field.

Off-site impacts
wind transported sediments
increased
x
reduced


Improves wind cleanliness by catching organic material and other residues carried by the wind.

damage on neighbours' fields
increased
x
reduced


The technology can reduce the risk of flooding

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Establishment cost for 800 hectare of agricultural farm was approximately 3.6 billion MNT and there is no income in first several years. In long term, annual cost have decreased and, annual income became 320 million MNT, net income 128 million MNT. Thus, income can be positive in long term.

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
seasonal temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
Season: summer
seasonal temperature decrease

not well at all
x
very well
Season: winter
seasonal rainfall decrease

not well at all
x
very well
Season: summer
seasonal rainfall decrease

not well at all
x
very well
Season: spring
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local snowstorm

not well at all
x
very well
local sandstorm/ duststorm

not well at all
x
very well
heatwave

not well at all
x
very well
drought

not well at all
x
very well
epidemic diseases

not well at all
x
very well
Other climate-related consequences
reduced growing period

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
1 household
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)
Crop rotation decisions are made based on spring weather conditions and soil moisture of the planting year. In some years, the crop rotation and mixture is not changed.

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • The technology provides higher yields than traditional monoculture in climate condition in Mongolia.
  • The technology allows to plant crops early in spring, because soil moisture absorbed from winter snow provide convenient condition.
  • Soil erosion and sand accumulation have been significantly reduced.
  • Conservation agricuture can significantly improve the physical properties of soil, providing sustainable and ecological rehabilitation of abandoned land.
  • Conservation agricuture can significantly improve the physical properties of soil, providing sustainable and ecological rehabilitation of abandoned land.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Abandoned land can be restored at the lowest cost.
  • Soil conservation technology was used without reducing the soil fertility as well as returning of abandoned land into use.
  • The use of machinery in medium-scale farming is advantageous because it reduces labor costs.
  • Planting with low seed rates increases the economic efficiency in the long term.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Due to climate change and aridity, in some years, crop loss occurs during the planting and growing period. Install irrigation system for seasonal irrigation or irrigation when needed.
  • When harvesting, it is necessary to leave a plant cover as high as possible, which requires particular harvesting machine. A combine harvester or a machine (head stripper) that collects only heads of the crop is required.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • The use of imported seeds increases the cost. To cultivate crop seeds in small isolated areas.
  • With climate change, the lack of irrigation facilities increases risk of production failure. More water harvesting techniiques and soil moisture conservation/accumulation technologies to be identified and implemented. Installation of an irrigation system for supplementary irrigation or irrigation when needed.
  • It is difficult to separate the seeds after harvesting due to the lack of techniques and appropriate equipement. Sorted seeds will increase market value. Improve seed sorting mechanism.
  • Due to the lack of appriopriate harvesting equipment, the crop cannot be harvested completely. Buy a new type of combine harvester or rent from others.

References

Compiler
  • Otgontsetseg Davaanyam
Editors
  • Mandakh Nyamtseren
Reviewer
  • Mandakh Nyamtseren
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
  • Joana Eichenberger
Date of documentation: Oct. 25, 2023
Last update: May 15, 2024
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Guidelines for Intercropping. Charles L. Mohler, Sue Ellen Johnson. 2009. ISBN 978-1-933395-21-0: https://www.sare.org/wp-content/uploads/Crop-Rotation-on-Organic-Farms.pdf
  • Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Reference Work. Second Edition. 2013. ISBN 978-0123847195: https://www.amazon.com/Encyclopedia-Biodiversity-2nd-Set/dp/0123847192
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International