This is an outdated, inactive version of this case. Go to the current version.
Technologies
Inactive

Organic agriculture [Slovenia]

Ekološko kmetijstvo

technologies_2795 - Slovenia

Completeness: 88%

1. General information

1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology

Key resource person(s)

land user:
Name of project which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Interactive Soil Quality assessment in Europe and China for Agricultural productivity and Environmental Resilience (EU-iSQAPER)
Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Department for Agronomy, University of Ljubljana - Slovenia

1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT

When were the data compiled (in the field)?

31/05/2017

The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:

Yes

1.4 Declaration on sustainability of the described Technology

Is the Technology described here problematic with regard to land degradation, so that it cannot be declared a sustainable land management technology?

No

2. Description of the SLM Technology

2.1 Short description of the Technology

Definition of the Technology:

It is based on 5 years crop rotation, full absence of artificial plant protection products and mineral nitrogen and the circulation of nitrogen via organic manure, crops and residues.

2.2 Detailed description of the Technology

Description:

1.The technology is applied in the flatlands of Ljubljana with an average altitude of 350 m.a.s.l. The average annual precipitation is 1400 mm. The area is characterized with often stormy precipitation events and occasional droughts. Silty loam soils in the area are moderately deep to deep with medium soil organic matter. Area has good availability of surface water and groundwater of good drinking quality. Area has medium biodiversity without salinity and flooding problems. Sedentary agriculture with mixed or commercial agriculture is practiced with less than 10 percemt from off-farm activities. The examined farm household has an average wealth and is mechanized/motorized. The farm is run by middle aged and elderly mens. The farm household has good access to all services and infrastructure. Farm is of medium scale with land partly owned by the land users and partly leased from other private owners.

2. Main characteristics are
(1) full 5 year crop rotation
(2) at least 0.5 livestock units
(3) circulation of nitrogen via organic manure
(4) cycle of other nutrients closed as much as possible
(5) absence of artificial plant protection products and mineral nitrogen.
(6) nitrogen fixation leguminous in crop rotation
(7) production of local traditional species (buckwheat)

3. Purpose of the technology is to manage the land in a sustainable way with closed nutrient cycles and to increase the biodiversity. Organic matter increases organic matter and fertility of the soils. Reduced soil acidificatino, pollution, salinization and alkalinization. Reduced soil compaction, slaking and crusting of soils. Increased bio-productive function of soils. Increased vegetation cover, biomass and improves habitats with better quantity of species and its composition and diversity. The purpose is also to offer customers food of local and well known products without any use of chemically based plant protection.

4. Major activities:
(1) keeping of farm animals in stables for closing the N-balance
(2) a lot of further manual farm and cultivation work. Some of it is replaced by new machinery. This causes additional costs at the moment of establishment
(3) regular manual checking for pests, diseases.

5. Benefits are the closed N cycle and the CO2 sequestration - high organic matter content, lower loss of nutrients, higher biodiversity.

6. Farm users dislike lots of costs connected with the new machinery, lots of paper work for the certification, the pressure on productivity, a great deal of work with planning crop rotations and nutrient management, coping with pests and diseases. But they like the better price on the market.


2.3 Photos of the Technology

2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment

Country:

Slovenia

Further specification of location:

Municipality of Ljubljana

Comments:

Georeferenced map locations are part of the same farm.

2.6 Date of implementation

Indicate year of implementation:

2008

If precise year is not known, indicate approximate date:
  • less than 10 years ago (recently)

2.7 Introduction of the Technology

Specify how the Technology was introduced:
  • through land users' innovation
  • Common agricultural policy
Comments (type of project, etc.):

The land user saw the opportunity of capital city market and rising market of organic food in Slovenia. The subsidy payments accelerated the whole process of transformation from conventional to organic farm.

3. Classification of the SLM Technology

3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology

  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact

3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied

Cropland

Cropland

  • Annual cropping
Main crops (cash and food crops):

cereals (wheat, barley) / buckwheat / peas / alfalfa / corn / potato / vegetable / in winter cover crops

Grazing land

Grazing land

Intensive grazing/ fodder production:
  • Cut-and-carry/ zero grazing
Main animal species and products:

Dairy cows (milk, cheese). Due to the dispersed land parcels they are not able to implement grazing.

3.3 Further information about land use

Water supply for the land on which the Technology is applied:
  • rainfed
Comments:

Vegetable on limited area is also irrigated.

Number of growing seasons per year:
  • 1

3.4 SLM group to which the Technology belongs

  • rotational systems (crop rotation, fallows, shifting cultivation)
  • integrated soil fertility management
  • integrated pest and disease management (incl. organic agriculture)

3.5 Spread of the Technology

Specify the spread of the Technology:
  • applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area
Comments:

Only one farmer of the village is engaged in organic farming.

3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology

agronomic measures

agronomic measures

  • A1: Vegetation/ soil cover
  • A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility
management measures

management measures

  • M2: Change of management/ intensity level

3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology

chemical soil deterioration

chemical soil deterioration

  • Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • Ca: acidification
  • Cp: soil pollution
physical soil deterioration

physical soil deterioration

  • Pc: compaction
  • Pk: slaking and crusting
  • Pu: loss of bio-productive function due to other activities
biological degradation

biological degradation

  • Bc: reduction of vegetation cover
  • Bh: loss of habitats
  • Bq: quantity/ biomass decline
  • Bs: quality and species composition/ diversity decline
  • Bl: loss of soil life
  • Bp: increase of pests/ diseases, loss of predators

3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation

Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation

4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs

4.1 Technical drawing of the Technology

Author:

Matjaž Glavan

Date:

02/08/2017

4.2 Technical specifications/ explanations of technical drawing

Infographic presents main activities taken place under organic farming technology (rotation, weed and pest control, animal welfare and use of organic fertilisers) . All of them finally result in benefits at the bottom of figure (local market, known origin of food, healthy food, food self-sufficiency).

4.3 General information regarding the calculation of inputs and costs

Specify how costs and inputs were calculated:
  • per Technology area
Indicate size and area unit:

24 hectares

other/ national currency (specify):

EUR

Indicate average wage cost of hired labour per day:

50 EUR

4.4 Establishment activities

Activity Type of measure Timing
1. Exclusion of artificial chemiclas (plant protection products) Agronomic all year around
2. Only organic N in use Agronomic all year around
3. 5 year rotation Agronomic all year arround
4. Winter cover crops Agronomic in autumn, winter
5. Working with papers, records Agronomic all year around
6. Animal stall reconstruction Agronomic first year
7. machinery (cultivator, grubber, harrows) Agronomic first three years
8. Plant protection preparations (for diseases and pests) Agronomic First year
9. Further cost for diverse supplement activities (50% more work) Agronomic all year around

4.5 Costs and inputs needed for establishment

Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit Total costs per input % of costs borne by land users
Labour Working with papers, records hour 20.0 6.25 125.0 20.0
Labour Further cost for diverse supplement activities hour 700.0 6.25 4375.0 100.0
Equipment machinery (cultivator, grubber, harrows) pcs 3.0 4000.0 12000.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides Copper preparations (diseases) ml 100.0 0.2 20.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides Naturalis (potato) ml 100.0 0.2 20.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides Nivezal (potato) ml 100.0 0.2 20.0 100.0
Construction material Animal stall reconstruction pcs 1.0 60000.0 60000.0 100.0
Other Regular certifiaction control for organic production pcs 1.0 400.0 400.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 76960.0

4.6 Maintenance/ recurrent activities

Activity Type of measure Timing/ frequency
1. Working with papers, records Agronomic all year around
2. Equipment maintenance Agronomic all year around
3. Only organic N in use Agronomic all year around
4. Winter cover crops Agronomic autumn, winter
5. 5 year rotation Agronomic all year around
6. Buying plant protection products Agronomic all year around
7. Further cost for diverse supplement activities (35% more work) Agronomic all year aroud

4.7 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)

Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit Total costs per input % of costs borne by land users
Labour Working with papers, records hour 20.0 6.25 125.0 100.0
Labour Further cost for diverse supplement activities hour 490.0 6.25 3062.5 100.0
Equipment regular maintenance of machinery hour 1.0 50.0 50.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides Copper preparations (diseases) ml 100.0 0.2 20.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides Naturalis (potato) ml 100.0 0.2 20.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides Nivezal (potato) ml 100.0 0.2 20.0 100.0
Other Regular certifiaction control for organic production pcs 1.0 400.0 400.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 3697.5
If land user bore less than 100% of costs, indicate who covered the remaining costs:

The reamining costs are coverd by subsidy payments.

4.8 Most important factors affecting the costs

Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:

Labour availability, price of organic plant protection products and fertilisers, price of the machinery

5. Natural and human environment

5.1 Climate

Annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Specify average annual rainfall (if known), in mm:

1352.00

Specifications/ comments on rainfall:

Average annual period (1991-2000)
Majority of rainfall in autumn, followed by summer, spring and winter.

Indicate the name of the reference meteorological station considered:

Ljubljana - Bežigrad

Agro-climatic zone
  • sub-humid

Strong summer tunder storms, showers, local precipitation.

5.2 Topography

Slopes on average:
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Indicate if the Technology is specifically applied in:
  • not relevant

5.3 Soils

Soil depth on average:
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface):
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
Topsoil organic matter:
  • medium (1-3%)

5.4 Water availability and quality

Ground water table:

5-50 m

Availability of surface water:

good

Water quality (untreated):

good drinking water

Is water salinity a problem?

No

Is flooding of the area occurring?

No

5.5 Biodiversity

Species diversity:
  • medium
Habitat diversity:
  • medium

5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Sedentary or nomadic:
  • Sedentary
Market orientation of production system:
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial
Off-farm income:
  • less than 10% of all income
Relative level of wealth:
  • average
Individuals or groups:
  • individual/ household
Level of mechanization:
  • mechanized/ motorized
Gender:
  • women
  • men
Age of land users:
  • middle-aged
  • elderly

5.7 Average area of land owned or leased by land users applying the Technology

  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Is this considered small-, medium- or large-scale (referring to local context)?
  • medium-scale

5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights

Land ownership:
  • individual, titled
Land use rights:
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights:
  • individual

5.9 Access to services and infrastructure

health:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
education:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
technical assistance:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
employment (e.g. off-farm):
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
markets:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
energy:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
roads and transport:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
drinking water and sanitation:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
financial services:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good

6. Impacts and concluding statements

6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown

Socio-economic impacts

Production

crop production

decreased
increased
Comments/ specify:

Production in comparison with conventional production is lower by at least 20 percent. As chemical plant protection is not applied the production can not be raised. And the cows eat only fodder coming directly from farm production without buying concentraded feed.

crop quality

decreased
increased

fodder production

decreased
increased
Comments/ specify:

They do not use mineral fertilizers. Thus, fodder quantity decreased slightly

fodder quality

decreased
increased

animal production

decreased
increased
Comments/ specify:

Organic technology requires the dairy cows stall reconstruction. On the same area only half can be kept compared to the conventional dairy.

risk of production failure

increased
decreased
Comments/ specify:

Plant diseases or pests can develop very rapidly and if it can't be addressed in its early stage it can destroy the yield. Sometime it happens, when nothing succeeds.

product diversity

decreased
increased

land management

hindered
simplified
Comments/ specify:

Farmer is saying that every technology has its pluses and minuses and on general he doesn't observe differences. It is never simple.

Water availability and quality

drinking water quality

decreased
increased
Income and costs

expenses on agricultural inputs

increased
decreased
Comments/ specify:

The plant protection products and organic fertilisers and organic seeds are more expensive.

farm income

decreased
increased
Comments/ specify:

Due to regular customers, the location near the capital city and good prices income increases for 50% . Three persons are fully employed.

diversity of income sources

decreased
increased
Comments/ specify:

When they started with organic farming they started to produce dairy products (yogurt, cheese), flour and bread and vegetable. Before they produced only raw milk.

workload

increased
decreased
Comments/ specify:

A lot of hand/manual work in the field or at production of dairy product or bread.

Socio-cultural impacts

food security/ self-sufficiency

reduced
improved

health situation

worsened
improved

Ecological impacts

Water cycle/ runoff

water quality

decreased
increased
Soil

soil accumulation

decreased
increased

soil organic matter/ below ground C

decreased
increased
Biodiversity: vegetation, animals

plant diversity

decreased
increased

beneficial species

decreased
increased

habitat diversity

decreased
increased

pest/ disease control

decreased
increased
Climate and disaster risk reduction

drought impacts

increased
decreased

emission of carbon and greenhouse gases

increased
decreased

6.2 Off-site impacts the Technology has shown

groundwater/ river pollution

increased
reduced

6.3 Exposure and sensitivity of the Technology to gradual climate change and climate-related extremes/ disasters (as perceived by land users)

Gradual climate change

Gradual climate change
Season Type of climatic change/ extreme How does the Technology cope with it?
annual temperature increase not known
seasonal temperature summer increase not known

6.4 Cost-benefit analysis

How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:

neutral/ balanced

Long-term returns:

positive

How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:

neutral/ balanced

Long-term returns:

positive

Comments:

It is important that land user is engaged on market with self-promotion and good quality of product.

6.5 Adoption of the Technology

  • single cases/ experimental
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so spontaneously, i.e. without receiving any material incentives/ payments?
  • 90-100%
Comments:

It is self-initiated as farm has its land on a water protection zone with many restrictions in management.

6.6 Adaptation

Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?

No

6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology

Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the land user’s view
Lower use of plant protection products - less impact on bidiversity and water sources.
Quality of products.
Demand over organic food on the market is high, Farm is close (1 km) to capital city market.
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
Food produced without chemicals is of better quality and more interesting for the market.

6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them

Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the land user’s view How can they be overcome?
Working force, especialy in vegetable production New machinery, rotation
Shortage of nitrogen fabaceae (legumes) as part of crop rotation
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view How can they be overcome?
A lot of work force and expensive specialized machinery needed. This is part of this technology. This can be overcome with higher prices of products.

7. References and links

7.1 Methods/ sources of information

  • field visits, field surveys

1

  • interviews with land users

1

Links and modules

Expand all Collapse all

Modules