Technologies

Planting Halophytes (Sporobolus verginicus, Dixie grass) for rehabilitation severely saline soil. [Thailand]

Planting Dixie grass in severely saline soil.

technologies_4158 - Thailand

Completeness: 94%

1. General information

1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology

Key resource person(s)

land user:

Munkarn Charong

6 Bann Donpae Moo 8 Kut Chok Sub-district Bua Yai District Nakhon Ratchasima Province.

Thailand

SLM specialist:
SLM specialist:
SLM specialist:
SLM specialist:
National Consultants:
Name of project which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Book project: where people and their land are safer - A Compendium of Good Practices in Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) (where people and their land are safer)
Name of project which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Book project: where the land is greener - Case Studies and Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation Initiatives Worldwide (where the land is greener)
Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Land Development Department LDD (Land Development Department LDD) - Thailand

1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT

The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:

Yes

1.4 Declaration on sustainability of the described Technology

Is the Technology described here problematic with regard to land degradation, so that it cannot be declared a sustainable land management technology?

No

Comments:

The technology is very well accepted by the land users.

1.5 Reference to Questionnaire(s) on SLM Approaches (documented using WOCAT)

Vegetative approach by using halophyte (Dixie grass) to control severely salt-affected land.
approaches

Vegetative approach by using halophyte (Dixie grass) to ... [Thailand]

The government promotes halophytes (Dixie grass) to control severely salt-affected land, rehabilitate the ecosystem and prevent the spread of salt in soil under cooperation of land owners, livestock farmers, local administration, local government agency, Land Development Department researchers and with specialists/ technical advisors in various fields.

  • Compiler: Kamontip Sasithorn

2. Description of the SLM Technology

2.1 Short description of the Technology

Definition of the Technology:

Planting Dixie grass (Sporobolus verginicus) which is halophytic plant aims to maximize land use for farmers and prevent extensive severely saline soil. The Dixie grass can be used as cattle feed. The LDD has put effort to disseminate the use of halophyte to cover more area of severely salt affected land.

2.2 Detailed description of the Technology

Description:

Land Development Department (LDD) transfered technology of planting Halophytes (Sporobolus virginicus; Dixie grass) for rehabilitation severely saline soil on Mr.Charong Munkarn’s land. It located at 6 Moo 8 Kutchok sub-district, Buayai district, Nakhonratchasima province. The area is 0-2% slope and showing high soil electrical conductivity (ECe) of more than 16 dS/m, classified as severely saline soil which is mainly salt crusted and barren land. The weather is semi -arid, and the rainfall is 751-1,000 millimeters per year. The exotic halophytes, namely Sporobolus virginicus, coarse type (Dixie grass) could very well adapted to survive in severely salt- affected soil. The mechanisms of their tolerant ability include osmotic adjustment within the plant, salt exclusion, ion accumulation and sequestration excretion of salt via glands in plant leave or stem. The benefits of planting halophytes in severely saline soil are soil moisture conservation, salt accumulation prevention on the surface and utilization as feed for livestocks. The objectives of the technology are to 1) prevent distribution of severely saline soil. 2) maximize use of land for farmers. 3) to use halophyte grasses as cover crop and rehabilitation the ecosystem of severely salt-affected soil.
Halophytes plantation has been supported by Land Development Department under the project on Promotion of Integrated Saline Soil Management on sub-watershed area. The activity of rehabilitation severely salt-affected soil is planting salt tolerant tree and grass. The stakeholders are researchers of LDD who worked together with community volunteers on soil improvement, community leaders and farmers. Land Development Regional Office 3 (Nakhonratchasima) supported Dixie grass seedling, compost and chemical fertilizer. Dixie grass was planted at spacing of 20x20 centimeters on abandoned area and on ridges between rows of Acacia ampliceps. After 3 years of planting Dixie grass, it has been found that this barren land was covered by plants and much improved in biodiversity by the evidence of many varieties of wild grass, dragonflies, rats and birds. Farmers can grow rice and they use Dixie grass as feed for livestock. Moreover farmers are able to increased their incomes. The migration for job to big cities is reduced. From interviewing, farmers satisfied this technology of Sporobolus virginicus plantation for rehabilitation of severely saline soil. Besides lower in salination farmers get more rice yields and better environment and livelihoods. Although the planting halophytes is an improvement of severely saline soil, which is low input of vegetative measure however the recovery time of saline soil improvement is not as fast as that of engineering measure of high investment. Furthermore, the neighboring farmers often burn their rice straws after harvesting, that damages the Dixie grass and causes partially dead and thus lower the biomass.

2.3 Photos of the Technology

2.4 Videos of the Technology

Comments, short description:

To interview Mr. Charong Munkarn on the use of Dixie grass for rehabilitation severely saline soil.

Date:

18/10/2018

Location:

6 Bann Donpae Moo 8 Kut Chok Sub-district Bua Yai District Nakhon Ratchasima Province.

Name of videographer:

Kamonthip Sasithorn

2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment

Country:

Thailand

Region/ State/ Province:

6 Bann Donpae Moo 8 Kut Chok Sub-district Bua Yai District Nakhon Ratchasima Province.

Further specification of location:

Bann Donpae

Specify the spread of the Technology:
  • applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area
Is/are the technology site(s) located in a permanently protected area?

No

Comments:

The SLM technology site for planting Halophytes (Sporobolus virginicus; Dixie grass) to rehabilitate severely saline soil

2.6 Date of implementation

Indicate year of implementation:

2015

If precise year is not known, indicate approximate date:
  • less than 10 years ago (recently)

2.7 Introduction of the Technology

Specify how the Technology was introduced:
  • through projects/ external interventions
Comments (type of project, etc.):

Soil management on sub-watershed area, activity of rehabilitation severely salt-affected soil by planting salt tolerant tree and grass.

3. Classification of the SLM Technology

3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology

  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity

3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied

Land use mixed within the same land unit:

Yes

Specify mixed land use (crops/ grazing/ trees):
  • Agro-pastoralism (incl. integrated crop-livestock)

Other

Other

Specify:

Extremely salt affected areas

Remarks:

Extremely salt affected areas that can not used for agricultural land.

Comments:

Saline soil areas should be rehabilitated using low investment technology by planting highly adapted salt tolerant species such as Dixie grass.

3.3 Has land use changed due to the implementation of the Technology?

Has land use changed due to the implementation of the Technology?
  • Yes (Please fill out the questions below with regard to the land use before implementation of the Technology)
Land use mixed within the same land unit:

Yes

Specify mixed land use (crops/ grazing/ trees):
  • Agro-pastoralism (incl. integrated crop-livestock)
Grazing land

Grazing land

Extensive grazing:
  • Semi-nomadic pastoralism
Intensive grazing/ fodder production:
  • Improved pastures
Animal type:
  • livestock - other small
Is integrated crop-livestock management practiced?

No

Products and services:
  • meat
Count:

1

3.4 Water supply

Water supply for the land on which the Technology is applied:
  • rainfed
Comments:

Grass planting area of farmers outside the irrigation or rainfed area don't have enough water for cultivation.

3.5 SLM group to which the Technology belongs

  • pastoralism and grazing land management
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
  • ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction

3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology

vegetative measures

vegetative measures

  • V2: Grasses and perennial herbaceous plants
  • V5: Others

3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology

chemical soil deterioration

chemical soil deterioration

  • Cs: salinization/ alkalinization

3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation

Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:
  • prevent land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
Comments:

Dixie is planted to prevent the spread of salt affect in the area.

4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs

4.1 Technical drawing of the Technology

Technical specifications (related to technical drawing):

(a) Propagation of Dixie grass through shoot cutting of 2-3 inches long with
3 nodes is made and planted in bags filled with soil and compost. The seedling
is 1 month old before planting in the pit of 10x10x10 cubic cm. with 200 gm. of
compost and 6.25 gm of 15-15-15 chemical fertilizer then cover with rice husk
at 400 gm/pit, the spacing between pits is 30x30 square cm.

(b) A sketch of planting Dixie grasses on severely salt affected land with
Acacia ampliceps on the ridges. After 3 years of planting, Dixie grass
has been replaced by rice except those on the ridge.

Author:

Winai Chombut

Date:

18/10/2018

4.2 General information regarding the calculation of inputs and costs

Specify how costs and inputs were calculated:
  • per Technology area
other/ national currency (specify):

Baht

If relevant, indicate exchange rate from USD to local currency (e.g. 1 USD = 79.9 Brazilian Real): 1 USD =:

32.0

Indicate average wage cost of hired labour per day:

300

4.3 Establishment activities

Activity Timing (season)
1. Dixie grass nursery May-July 2015
2. Land preparation for planting May-July 2015
3. Fertilizer application May-July 2015

4.4 Costs and inputs needed for establishment

Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit Total costs per input % of costs borne by land users
Labour Labor cost for planting Eucalyptus (labor wage per day = 300 baht, 1 rai required to labor cost = 1200 baht) Rai 1.0 1200.0 1200.0
Plant material Dixie seedling cost 1600 trees/rai, 1 baht for each seedling seedling 1600.0 0.5 800.0
Fertilizers and biocides Compost cost 3.5 baht/kg, 0.2 kg/pit kg 320.0 3.5 1120.0
Fertilizers and biocides Rice husk cost 4 baht/kg, 0.4 kg/pit kg 640.0 4.0 2560.0
Fertilizers and biocides Chemical fertilizer 15-15-15 cost 20 baht/kg, 6.25 kg/pit kg 10.0 20.0 200.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 5880.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 183.75
If land user bore less than 100% of costs, indicate who covered the remaining costs:

Land Development Department

Comments:

Labor cost for land preparation, planting bored and seedling bored by LDD Chemical fertilizer 15-15-15, compost and rice husk are from farm products.

4.5 Maintenance/ recurrent activities

Activity Timing/ frequency
1. No maintenance activities because Dixies grasses can glow well and be multiplied extensively by themselves

4.6 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)

Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit Total costs per input % of costs borne by land users
Labour No labor cost for maintenance 0

4.7 Most important factors affecting the costs

Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:

The government policy on minimum labor wage is an important factor affected cost of the project.

5. Natural and human environment

5.1 Climate

Annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Specify average annual rainfall (if known), in mm:

1028.00

Specifications/ comments on rainfall:

Average annual rainfall from 1983-2012

Indicate the name of the reference meteorological station considered:

Meteorological Department

Agro-climatic zone
  • semi-arid

Average temperature 21 - 36 degree Celsius, relative humidity is 75%

5.2 Topography

Slopes on average:
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Indicate if the Technology is specifically applied in:
  • not relevant
Comments and further specifications on topography:

The geography is in the lower basin of Korat plateau in the Northeast Thailand

5.3 Soils

Soil depth on average:
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface):
  • medium (loamy, silty)
Topsoil organic matter:
  • low (<1%)
If available, attach full soil description or specify the available information, e.g. soil type, soil PH/ acidity, Cation Exchange Capacity, nitrogen, salinity etc.

Texture of top soil is fine loamy and more than 20 cm. below the surface is sandy loam or sandy clay loam, pH = 7 and increasing with depth up to 8.5, salinity is moderately to highly soil affected identified by percentage of the salt crust on the surface, very low P and K.

5.4 Water availability and quality

Ground water table:

< 5 m

Is water salinity a problem?

Yes

Specify:

Slightly saline

Is flooding of the area occurring?

No

Comments and further specifications on water quality and quantity:

Shallow saline groundwater exists because of low lying discharge area and salt source beneath under the ground.

5.5 Biodiversity

Species diversity:
  • low
Habitat diversity:
  • low
Comments and further specifications on biodiversity:

Before planting Dixie grass, species and habitat were low. After 3 years, field crab, field rat, dragonfly, earthworms, weasel, Snake, Local weeds and wildflowers used to be disappeared now are found.

5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Sedentary or nomadic:
  • Sedentary
Market orientation of production system:
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
Off-farm income:
  • 10-50% of all income
Relative level of wealth:
  • average
Individuals or groups:
  • individual/ household
Level of mechanization:
  • manual work
Gender:
  • men
Age of land users:
  • middle-aged
Indicate other relevant characteristics of the land users:

Diligent farmer seeking more income by raising burn firewood from Acacia tree, catch field rat and bamboo shoot.

5.7 Average area of land used by land users applying the Technology

  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Is this considered small-, medium- or large-scale (referring to local context)?
  • small-scale
Comments:

Farmers have been planting Dixie grass together with Acacia tree on rice bunds and burn firewood from Acacia tree
in order to get additional income.

5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights

Land ownership:
  • individual, titled
Land use rights:
  • individual
  • Rainfed

5.9 Access to services and infrastructure

health:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
education:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
technical assistance:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
employment (e.g. off-farm):
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
markets:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
energy:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
roads and transport:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
drinking water and sanitation:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
financial services:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good

6. Impacts and concluding statements

6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown

Socio-economic impacts

Production

crop production

decreased
increased

crop quality

decreased
increased

fodder production

decreased
increased

risk of production failure

increased
decreased

production area

decreased
increased

land management

hindered
simplified
Water availability and quality

drinking water availability

decreased
increased

drinking water quality

decreased
increased

water availability for livestock

decreased
increased

water quality for livestock

decreased
increased

irrigation water availability

decreased
increased

irrigation water quality

decreased
increased

demand for irrigation water

increased
decreased
Income and costs

expenses on agricultural inputs

increased
decreased

farm income

decreased
increased

diversity of income sources

decreased
increased

workload

increased
decreased

Socio-cultural impacts

food security/ self-sufficiency

reduced
improved

health situation

worsened
improved

land use/ water rights

worsened
improved

cultural opportunities

reduced
improved

community institutions

weakened
strengthened

national institutions

weakened
strengthened

SLM/ land degradation knowledge

reduced
improved

conflict mitigation

worsened
improved

situation of socially and economically disadvantaged groups

worsened
improved

Ecological impacts

Water cycle/ runoff

water quantity

decreased
increased

water quality

decreased
increased

harvesting/ collection of water

reduced
improved

surface runoff

increased
decreased

excess water drainage

reduced
improved

groundwater table/ aquifer

lowered
recharge

evaporation

increased
decreased
Soil

soil moisture

decreased
increased

soil cover

reduced
improved

soil loss

increased
decreased

soil accumulation

decreased
increased

soil crusting/ sealing

increased
reduced

soil compaction

increased
reduced

nutrient cycling/ recharge

decreased
increased

salinity

increased
decreased

soil organic matter/ below ground C

decreased
increased

acidity

increased
reduced
Biodiversity: vegetation, animals

Vegetation cover

decreased
increased

biomass/ above ground C

decreased
increased

plant diversity

decreased
increased

invasive alien species

increased
reduced

animal diversity

decreased
increased

beneficial species

decreased
increased

habitat diversity

decreased
increased

pest/ disease control

decreased
increased
Climate and disaster risk reduction

flood impacts

increased
decreased

landslides/ debris flows

increased
decreased

drought impacts

increased
decreased

impacts of cyclones, rain storms

increased
decreased

emission of carbon and greenhouse gases

increased
decreased

fire risk

increased
decreased

wind velocity

increased
decreased

micro-climate

worsened
improved

6.2 Off-site impacts the Technology has shown

water availability

decreased
increased

reliable and stable stream flows in dry season

reduced
increased

downstream flooding

increased
reduced

downstream siltation

increased
decreased

groundwater/ river pollution

increased
reduced

buffering/ filtering capacity

reduced
improved

wind transported sediments

increased
reduced

damage on neighbours' fields

increased
reduced

damage on public/ private infrastructure

increased
reduced

impact of greenhouse gases

increased
reduced

6.3 Exposure and sensitivity of the Technology to gradual climate change and climate-related extremes/ disasters (as perceived by land users)

Climate-related extremes (disasters)

Climatological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it?
drought not well
forest fire moderately
land fire moderately
Hydrological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it?
flash flood moderately
Biological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it?
insect/ worm infestation moderately

Other climate-related consequences

Other climate-related consequences
How does the Technology cope with it?
extended growing period not well
reduced growing period not well

6.4 Cost-benefit analysis

How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:

negative

Long-term returns:

slightly positive

How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:

neutral/ balanced

Long-term returns:

positive

6.5 Adoption of the Technology

  • 1-10%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many did so spontaneously, i.e. without receiving any material incentives/ payments?
  • 0-10%
Comments:

Farmers and land users acknowledge the benefit of the technology that decreasing salinity effect, planting Dixie grass mulching surface soil and grazing land for livestocks.

6.6 Adaptation

Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?

Yes

6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology

Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the land user’s view
Dixie gases are very high salt tolerance and after planting the salinity obviously decreased.
The better environment that encourages the return of other plant species.
Secondly instead of leaving the land barren the land user can sell the Dixie shoots for propagation to Land Development Department.
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
Only halophytes especially Dixie can grow well on severely salt affected land.
After planting Dixie for few years, the soils are less saline that induces biodiversity of both fauna and flora such as birds butterflies, rats, earthworms and native flowers.
The farmers can use their land more extensively rather leave it barren.
Dixie grasses can be used as cattle feed that the land user can get higher income.

6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them

Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the land user’s view How can they be overcome?
The land user lack of knowledge on halophytes and there is no other choice for better income than Dixie grass. The SLM officers should visit them and provide better knowledge.
The neighboring farmers get used to the burning of rice straw after harvest causing death of Dixie grasses. Public relation is needed to stop burning.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view How can they be overcome?
Not all the researchers and SLM workers understand the mechanism of halophyte and the importance of the Dixie grass to the project flow chart’s work plans. They need to be well trained at various levels.
The farmers are not well approached and many of them know nothing about the project. The officers should be trained and get better knowledge about the project.
The project follows up and evaluation is insufficient and ineffective. The concerned project officers should pay more awareness on weakness and on obstacles of the success of the project.

7. References and links

7.1 Methods/ sources of information

  • field visits, field surveys

Visit 1 farmer/user's land.

  • interviews with land users

Interview with 1 farmer

  • interviews with SLM specialists/ experts

The Land Development Department officers and planners (4)

  • compilation from reports and other existing documentation

Soil salinity research and development group of the Land Development Department's
reports (3)

When were the data compiled (in the field)?

18/10/2018

7.2 References to available publications

Title, author, year, ISBN:

Land Development Department

Available from where? Costs?

http://www.ldd.go.th/

7.3 Links to relevant online information

Title/ description:

where the land is greener - Case Studies and Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation Initiatives Worldwide

URL:

https://www.wocat.net/library/media/27/

Title/ description:

where people and their land are safer - A Compendium of Good Practices in Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) (where people and their land are safer)

URL:

https://www.wocat.net/en/projects-and-countries/projects/drr

Links and modules

Expand all Collapse all

Modules