Northern Rangelands Trust - Livestock to Markets (Kenia)

Descripción

Northern Rangeland Trust works across the rangelands of northern Kenya to improve market access to pastoral communities across 20,000 km2. The program improves local revenue generation, incentives to reduce herd size, and channels funding into improved rangeland management across the conservancies.

The Northern Rangelands Trust (NRT) is a non profit organisation established in 2004. It works with communities to develop community conservancies, to transform peoples lives, secure peace and conserves natural resources in northern Kenya. NRT works cross 20,000 km2, with 33 conservancies.

NRT established NRT Trading to identify, incubate, and pilot, and scale sustainable business across the NRT conservancies. The help to incubate and run business that encourages conservation ethics, while improving livelihoods.

The Livestock to Market Program (LTM) was established in 2006 as a partnership between NRT, NRT affiliated conservancies, and two private conservancies - Ol Pejeta and Lewa. The program was funded by Flora and Fauna International and The Nature Conservancy. The program was designed to: to build resilient livelihoods for local pastoralists through providing a local, equitable, reliable, fair market for a large number of cattle; provide incentives to increase production viability of cattle, reduce herd size and avoid losses during droughts; build conservation momentum; directly benefit individual conservancies through sale levies.

The model works to first buy cattle from NRT affiliated conservancies, these cattle are sold on weight and grade, and tries to embrace a more market-driven approach. Once bough cattle is quarantined and vaccinated on Lewa. They are then fattened and sold on to different markets depending on size and age.

The program aims to benefit local people through providing an equitable market with similar or better rates than available and through revenue generation for each conservancy - to provide health and education benefit. A key goal of this benefit system is through channeling conservancy levies and behavioral change into improved rangeland management. Improved management, implemented by conservancies, will lead to improved productivity of the rangelands, increased livestock quality, increased revenue for pastoralists, and ultimately contribute to the goals of NRT - Peace and security; resilient livelihoods; productive rangelands; stable wildlife; and growing enterprise.

NRT has a fully fledged grazing management team working across the conservancies to enhance pasture and land management is upheld by all members, this working by involving alienation of dry season and wet season grazing corridors in order to guarantee animal –wildlife sustainable grazing. Several technologies are implemented under this approach to improve rangeland management. Strategic destocking and cattle bunching in conservancies is one method. Supplementary feed is also provided to increase the weight gain of cattle before sale.

Lugar

Lugar: Baringo, Garissa, Isiolo, Laiikipia, Meru, Samburu, Turkana and Lamu Counties, Kenia

Georreferencia de sitios seleccionados
  • 37.487, 0.2439

Dato de inicio: 2006

Año de conclusión: n.d.

Tipo de Enfoque
Investing in Conservations and Communities. (NRT - LTM)
Investing in Conservations and Communities. (NRT - LTM)

Metas del Enfoque y entorno facilitador

Propósitos/ objetivos principales del Enfoque
Assist pastoralists and families in the NRT Conservancies to build resilient livelihoods by providing a local, equitable, reliable, fair market for large numbers of cattle.
Provide incentives to pastoralists to manage cattle for ready markets and over time reduce herd sizes to avoid loses due to drought among other factors, in an effort to improve rangeland health and productivity.
Gain conservation leverage by linking market access to conservation outcomes.
Directly benefit Conservancies through purchase and sale levies.
Involve a complete value chain model i.e. involving pastoralist producers, disease control actors & quarantine, designated fattening ranches, slaughter, and marketing.
Condiciones que facilitan la implementación de la/s Tecnología/s aplicadas bajo el Enfoque
  • Disponibilidad/ acceso a recursos y servicios financieros : The spread of Mpesa (Mobile Money) is helping to improve the ability for people to share money across the region.
Condiciones que impiden la implementación de la/s Tecnología/s aplicadas bajo el Enfoque
  • Normas y valores sociales/ culturales/ religiosos: Pastoral societies do not necessarily have cattle for revenue generation, and they currently do not manage cattle for weight and the beef market.
  • Disponibilidad/ acceso a recursos y servicios financieros : Lack of funding to support disease control in the conservancies, especially those which may hinder the movement and sale of livestock. e.g FMD.
  • Colaboración/ coordinación de actores: Certain value chain operations are hindered by the lack of cohesion between country and national government. This includes disease control and taxes.
  • Gobernanza de tierras (toma de decisiones, implementación y aplicación): There are challenges in implementing improved grazing management across many of the conservancies due to a lack of ability to enforce.
  • Conocimiento de MST, acceso a apoyo técnico: High costs of technical expertise needed to upscale grazing and land management.
  • Otros: The region is insecure and hinders the impact and effectiveness of the program.

Participación y roles de las partes interesadas involucradas

Partes interesadas involucradas en el Enfoque y sus roles
¿Qué partes interesadas/ entidades implementadoras estuvieron involucradas en el Enfoque? Especifique las partes interesadas Describa los roles de las partes interesadas
usuarios locales de tierras/ comunidades locales 27 community conservancies Land-owners and managers of cattle. They benefit from the sale of cattle through LTM and implement the grazing management plans.
especialistas MST/consejeros agrícolas NRT - Grazing management team Provide technical advise to conservancies to improve grazing management.
ONG Sidai Sidai is working with community conservancies by selling drugs. LTM purchases some basic veterinary drugs from Sidai outlets.
gobierno local County Government Extension services for livestock management and disease control. Beneficiaries of county levies.
Involucramiento de los usuarios locales de tierras/ comunidades locales en las distintas fases del Enfoque
ninguno
pasivo
apoyo externo
interactivo
auto-movilización
iniciación/ motivación
x
NRT conservancy model creates independent units that have strong leadership and governance structures. These conservancy boards and management are involved and are the drivers at each stage.
planificación
x
Conservancies are involved in planning stages.
implementación
x
NRT-LTM runs the markets and livestock fattening with support from both local and private conservancies.
monitoreo y evaluación
x
Monitoring is done through the NRT monitoring systems.
Flujograma

Livestock to Market Benefit Systems

Autor: NRT
La toma de decisiones en la selección de Tecnología MST

Las decisiones fueron tomadas por

  • solamente usuarios de tierras (autoiniciativa)
  • principalmente usuarios de tierras con el apoyo de especialistas MST
  • todos los actores relevantes, como parte de un enfoque participativo
  • principalmente por especialistas MST en consulta con usuarios de tierras
  • solo por especialistas MST
  • por políticos/ líderes

La toma de decisiones se basa en

  • la evaluación de conocimiento MST bien documentado (la toma de decisiones se basa en evidencia)
  • hallazgos de investigaciones
  • la experiencia personal y opiniones (no documentadas)

Apoyo técnico, fortalecimiento institucional y gestión del conocimiento

Las siguientes actividades o servicios fueron parte del enfoque
Construcción de capacidades/ capacitación
Se proporcionó capacitación a las siguientes partes interesadas
  • usuarios de tierras
  • personal de campo/ consejeros
Forma de capacitación
  • en el contexto de trabajo
  • de agricultor a agricultor
  • áreas de demostración
  • reuniones públicas
  • cursos
Temas avanzados

Servicio de asesoría
Se proporcionó servicio de asesoría
  • en los campos de los usuarios de tierras
  • en centros permanentes
Some support is provided by county government extensions services. NRT also provides support.
Fortalecimiento institucional
Se fortalecieron/ establecieron instituciones
  • no
  • sí, un poco
  • sí, moderadamente
  • sí, mucho
en el siguiente nivel
  • local
  • regional
  • nacional
Describa la institución, los roles y las responsabilidades, miembros, etc.
Community conservancies have gained funding to implement projects and strengthened their knowledge on livestock production systems and rangeland management.
Tipo de apoyo
  • financiero
  • construcción de capacidades/ entrenamiento
  • equipo
Detalles adicionales
Monitoreo y evaluación
Monitoring and evaluation are annually conducted through the mandatory annual statutory audit by contracted reputable audit firms. Internal production monitoring is done through the monthly internal tracking systems.
Investigación
La investigación trató los siguientes temas
  • sociología
  • economía/ marketing
  • ecología
  • tecnología

The research formed the basis of choosing to scale up the programme and recommendations to run the programme as a business.

Financiamiento y apoyo material externo

Presupuesto anual en dólares americanos para el componente MST
  • < 2,000
  • 2,000-10,000
  • 10,000-100,000
  • 100,000-1,000,000
  • > 1,000,000
Precise annual budget: n.d.
The program is supported by a loan from The Nature Conservancy, that is repayable in 10 years.
Los siguientes servicios o incentivos fueron proporcionados a los usuarios de las tierras
  • Apoyo financiero/material proporcionado a los usuarios de tierras
  • Subsidios para insumos específicos
  • Crédito
  • Otros incentivos o instrumentos
Apoyo financiero/material proporcionado a los usuarios de tierras
Financial support comes in the form of improved livestock markets.

Análisis de impacto y comentarios de conclusión

Impactos del Enfoque
No
Sí, un poco
Sí, moderadamente
Sí, mucho
¿El Enfoque empoderó a los usuarios locales de tierras, mejoró el involucramiento de las partes interesadas?

Through the strengthening of community conservation.

x
¿El Enfoque ayudó a los usuarios de tierras a implementar y mantener Tecnologías MST?

Provide financial incentives and technical support from NRT.

x
¿El Enfoque movilizó/mejoró el acceso a recursos financieros para implementar MST?

Through financing of conservancy operation which supports governance, security and conservation programs ($80,000 over 4 years).

x
¿El Enfoque mejoró el conocimiento y capacidades de los usuarios para implementar MST?

Yes through the outreach from NRT grazing management team.

x
¿El Enfoque construyó/ fortaleció instituciones, colaboración entre partes interesadas?

Strengthen ties between community conservancies, NRT and private conservancies.

x
¿El Enfoque empoderó a grupos en desventaja social y económica?

Empower marginalized pastoralists through the provision of $1,982,210 over 4 years in income to 14,864 families.

x
¿El Enfoque resultó en mejor seguridad alimentaria/ mejoró la nutrición?

Through financial provision to pastoral people.

x
¿El Enfoque mejoró el acceso a los mercados?

This created regional livestock markets with 5630 cattle bought over 4 years.

x
Motivación principal del usuario de la tierra para implementar MST
Sostenibilidad de las actividades del Enfoque
¿Pueden los usuarios de tierras sostener lo que se implementó mediante el Enfoque (sin apoyo externo)?

Conclusiones y lecciones aprendidas

Fortalezas: perspectiva del usuario de tierras
  • Access to a reliable, close, and equitable weight and grade based market for cattle.
  • Opportunities to restore and prevent landscape degradation through funding provided to communities, support from NRT, and through the shift towards higher quality beef, which requires improved rangeland management to meet demands.
  • Funding for community projects through conservancies.
Fortalezas: punto de vista del compilador o de otra persona recurso clave
  • Strengthening institutions of grazing management, which should improve the ability to implement sustainable rangeland management technologies.
  • Creating a shift to a production based focus on livestock management, which should increase livestock quality, and the underlying rangeland productivity.
Debilidades/ desventajas/ riesgos: perspectiva del usuario de tierrascómo sobreponerse
  • Unfair or inequitable pricing of livestock. Clarity on revenue sharing from NRT - Trading. Prices per weight and grade clear and fair.
  • Some pastoralists do not want to sell cattle, and are not motivated by increasing revenue through market-based systems.
Debilidades/ desventajas/ riesgos: punto de vista del compilador o de otra persona recurso clavecómo sobreponerse
  • Lack of ownership and participation in the NRT LTM may isolate community members and create friction over finances and project ownership.
  • Land and resources on the fattening ranches are limited and land invasions have complicated this.

Referencias

Compilador
  • Peter Tyrrell
Editors
Revisado por
  • Donia Mühlematter
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
  • Hanspeter Liniger
Fecha de la implementación: 13 de marzo de 2018
Últimas actualización: 10 de octubre de 2018
Personas de referencia
Descripción completa en la base de datos de WOCAT
Datos MST vinculados
La documentación fue facilitada por
Institución Proyecto
Vínculos a la información relevante disponible en línea
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International