Terrace Demonstration For Soil Conservation [Nepal]
- Creación:
- Actualización:
- Compilador: Sabita Aryal
- Editor: –
- Revisor: Fabian Ottiger
Gara Sudhar (Nepali)
approaches_2480 - Nepal
Visualizar secciones
Expandir todo Colapsar todos1. Información general
1.2 Detalles de contacto de las personas de referencia e instituciones involucradas en la evaluación y la documentación del Enfoque
Especialista MST:
Singtan Gangaraj
Chyamramgbesi 2 Kavre
Nepal
Especialista MST:
Khanna Sabita
Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel
Nepal
Nombre de la(s) institución(es) que facilitaron la documentación/ evaluación del Enfoque si fuera relevante)
Kathmandu University (KU) - Nepal1.3 Condiciones referidas al uso de datos documentados mediante WOCAT
El compilador y la/s persona(s) de referencia claves aceptan las condiciones acerca del uso de los datos documentados mediante WOCAT :
Sí
2. Descripción del Enfoque MST
2.1 Breve descripción del Enfoque
The slopy land used for farming process or just for land management by planting trees or grasses on those areas is terrace farming.
2.2 Descripción detallada del Enfoque MST
Descripción detallada del Enfoque MST:
Aims / objectives: Main aim of terrace farming is to conserve the soil, but the system not only conserve the soil,but also help in agriculture, so it also helps people to earn their living.
Methods: Terrace farming starts from the tillaging process of the sloppy area. Usually people do not plant, productive plants on those area mainly they plant fast growing grasses and plant on those sloppy and risky areas. After some years when the mud and soil of that area get settled there properly than people also start the agriculture on those land also, from which they can earn their living.
Stages of implementation: To implement the project on that area local people had provided a lot of support. The huge economic support was provided by the European Union. Specially the Bagmati watershed management project had given huge huge economic support to this area. Mainly for water management purpose but also for land management.
Role of stakeholders: No presence of such kind of stakeholder in the project but the economic support was provided by European Union to plant trees and manage soil erosion in common land but land owner has also given their support in this project by planting trees and grasses on their land by themselves.
Other important information: Terrace farming has really helped local people to manage the land of that area, but the road making process has created a lots of problem of soil erosion which is also suppose to be managed by applying same process additional with some new process.
2.3 Fotos del Enfoque
2.5 País/ región/ lugares donde el Enfoque fue aplicado
País:
Nepal
Región/ Estado/ Provincia:
Nepal
Especifique más el lugar :
Kavre
Map
×2.7 Tipo de Enfoque
- proyecto/ basado en un programa
2.8 Propósitos/ objetivos principales del Enfoque
The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (Agriculture)
1. Soil conservation.
2. Agriculture
3. For fodder, grasses etc.
The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Low agricultural production is one of the main problem of this approach, because at initial period the soil is too loose so it may easily get lost from particular place. So, first trees were to be grown which supports the soil. Then only agriculture was to be performed. So, this is the main problem encountered by local peoples other problems were also faced by people but they were not big as the first one.
2.9 Condiciones que facilitan o impiden la implementación de la/s Tecnología/s aplicadas bajo el Enfoque
disponibilidad/ acceso a recursos y servicios financieros
- impiden
The financial support was provided by European union. So there was not much financial crisis.
Treatment through the SLM Approach:
marco de trabajo legal (tenencia de tierra, derechos de uso de tierra y agua)
- facilitan
The existing land ownership, land use rights / water rights moderately helped the approach implementation: As the system helps for managing the soil and prevent different environmental calamities the land user do not create any problem while the system runs.
conocimiento de MST, acceso a apoyo técnico
- impiden
Lack of technical knowledge had created lots of difficulties.
Treatment through the SLM Approach: Some kind of training given by technician had removed this kind of problems.
carga de trabajo, disponibilidad de mano de obra
- impiden
Because of personal workload, all local people could not be present on the program on time.
Treatment through the SLM Approach: Proper schedule making for program according to local people favorable time might remove this problem.
3. Participación y roles de las partes interesadas involucradas
3.1 Partes interesadas involucradas en el Enfoque y sus roles
- usuarios locales de tierras/ comunidades locales
Whoever be the land users,does not matter with sex, basically for all age group farmers, with simple living standard are aimed to be focused by stakeholders(European union).
More male participation than female because female were busy in household works. Men particularly were more because women were mostly busy in theit home, preparing meal and performing internal task of he house. No discrimination
- gobierno local
Villagers itself were implementing.
- gobierno nacional (planificadores, autoridades)
3.2 Involucramiento de los usuarios locales de tierras/ comunidades locales en las distintas fases del Enfoque
Involucramiento de los usuarios locales de tierras/ comunidades locales | Especifique quién se involucró y describa las actividades | |
---|---|---|
iniciación/ motivación | apoyo externo | European Union |
planificación | interactivo | Local people and specialist |
implementación | interactivo | Specialist and local people |
monitoreo y evaluación | apoyo externo | Specialist |
Research | auto-movilización | individuals |
3.3 Flujograma (si estuviera disponible)
3.4 La toma de decisiones en la selección de Tecnología(s) MST
Especifique quién decidió la selección de las Tecnología/ Tecnologías a implementarse:
- principalmente por especialistas MST en consulta con usuarios de tierras
Explique:
According to the advice of SLM specialist, the land users utilized their land in a systematic way.
Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by mainly by land users supported by SLM specialists. Mainly soil conservation programs are lunched by local people in which the SLM specialist also help them providing various techniques, equipments and guidelines.
4. Apoyo técnico, fortalecimiento institucional y gestión del conocimiento
4.1 Construcción de capacidades / capacitación
¿Se proporcionó la capacitación a usuarios de tierras/ otras partes interesadas?
Sí
Especifique quién fue capacitado:
- usuarios de tierras
Forma de capacitación:
- de agricultor a agricultor
- áreas de demostración
- reuniones públicas
Temas avanzados:
The training was given to the land users so that they also can adopt those techniques of training for conservation of their soil from erosion and other wastage.
4.2 Servicio de asesoría
¿Los usuarios de tierras tienen acceso a un servicio de asesoría?
Sí
Especifique si servicio proporcionado se realizó:
- en los campos de los usuarios de tierras
Describa/ comentarios:
Name of method used for advisory service: Meeting, field visit; Local people get gather and discuss.
Advisory service is quite adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; The requirement was provided by the international supports for the project.
4.3 Fortalecimiento institucional (desarrollo institucional)
¿Se establecieron o fortalecieron instituciones mediante el Enfoque?
- sí, mucho
Especifique el nivel o los niveles en los que se fortalecieron o establecieron las instituciones:
- local
Especifique el tipo de apoyo:
- construcción de capacidades/ entrenamiento
- equipo
Proporcione detalles adicionales:
European Union provided the equipments and training for local people
4.4 Monitoreo y evaluación
¿El monitoreo y la evaluación forman parte del Enfoque?
Sí
Comentarios:
bio-physical aspects were regular monitored by project staff, land users through observations; indicators: erosion rate was estimated
4.5 Investigación
¿La investigación formó parte del Enfoque?
Sí
Especifique los temas:
- economía/ marketing
Proporcione detalles adicionales e indique quién hizo la investigación:
The research was part of approach because research was done on local area within a society by student of KU which help to give further information of technology and approach to local people.
Research was carried out on-farm
5. Financiamiento y apoyo material externo
5.1 Presupuesto anual para el componente MST del Enfoque
Comentarios (ej. fuentes principales de financiamiento/ donantes principales):
Approach costs were met by the following donors: international (European Union): 95.0%; government (No support): 4.0%; international non-government (No support): 1.0%; national non-government (No support); private sector (No support); local government (district, county, municipality, village etc) (from VDC); local community / land user(s) (Local people)
5.2 Apoyo financiero/material proporcionado a los usuarios de tierras
¿Los usuarios de tierras recibieron financiamiento/ apoyo material para implementar la Tecnología/ Tecnologías? :
Sí
5.3 Subsidios para insumos específicos (incluyendo mano de obra)
- equipo
Especifique qué insumos se subsidiaron | En qué grado | Especifique los subsidios |
---|---|---|
maquinaria | parcialmente financiado | |
herramientas | parcialmente financiado | |
- infraestructura
Especifique qué insumos se subsidiaron | En qué grado | Especifique los subsidios |
---|---|---|
caminos | parcialmente financiado | |
Si la mano de obra de usuarios de tierras fue un insumo sustancial, ¿fue:
- comida por trabajo?
Comentarios:
Mostly the financial support was provided by the European union.
5.4 Crédito
¿Se proporcionó crédito bajo el Enfoque para actividades MST?
No
6. Análisis de impacto y comentarios de conclusión
6.1 Impactos del Enfoque
¿El Enfoque ayudó a los usuarios de tierras a implementar y mantener Tecnologías MST?
- No
- Sí, un poco
- Sí, moderadamente
- Sí, mucho
Land management was done properly mainly from application of countering process.
¿El Enfoque empoderó a grupos en desventaja social y económica?
- No
- Sí, un poco
- Sí, moderadamente
- Sí, mucho
By utilizing the terrace land for agriculture, economically backward people were helped.
¿El Enfoque mejoró cuestiones de tenencia de tierra/ derechos de usuarios que obstaculizaron la implementación de la Tecnologías MST?
- No
- Sí, un poco
- Sí, moderadamente
- Sí, mucho
The problem is unlikely to be overcome in the near future. No, I don't think any problem would be created in coming future if this runs smoothly
Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?
- No
- Sí, un poco
- Sí, moderadamente
- Sí, mucho
Almost all of the land users adopted the approach.
Did the Approach lead to improved livelihoods / human well-being?
- No
- Sí, un poco
- Sí, moderadamente
- Sí, mucho
By growing different crops on terrace land, production was increased in some extent which also helped the local people to supports the living.
Did the Approach help to alleviate poverty?
- No
- Sí, un poco
- Sí, moderadamente
- Sí, mucho
By increasing the agricultural production and utilizing terrace land.
6.2 Motivación principal del usuario de la tierra para implementar MST
- producción incrementada
- incremento de la renta(bilidad), proporción mejorada de costo-beneficio
- conciencia medioambiental
- well-being and livelihoods improvement
6.3 Sostenibilidad de las actividades del Enfoque
¿Pueden los usuarios de tierras sostener lo que se implementó mediante el Enfoque (sin apoyo externo)?
- sí
Si respondió que sí, describa cómo:
They can continue the task without any supports because initial support and finance from European Union was gained to established the project.
6.4 Fortalezas/ ventajas del Enfoque
Fuerzas/ ventajas/ oportunidades desde la perspectiva del usuario de la tierra |
---|
It has controlled soil erosion (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Can be sustain by controlling deforestation, firing in jungle, controlling over extracting of medical herbs and so on.) |
Provide woods and other domestic products |
Provide fodder grass etc. |
Fuerzas/ ventajas/ oportunidades desde la perspectiva del compilador o de otra persona de referencia clave |
---|
Helps land management (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: By handling the process from generation to generation) |
Increase productivity by controlling soil loss (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Awareness should be given to local people) |
Prevent natural calamities (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: By plaining more plants soil erosion can be controlled) |
Preserve water source (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Afforestation program helps to preserve water source) |
Prevent land mass and control gullies formation (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Planting trees also helps to prevent land from gullies formation.) |
6.5 Debilidades/ desventajas del Enfoque y formas de sobreponerse a ellos
Debilidades/ desventajas/ riesgos desde la perspectiva del usuario de la tierra | ¿Cómo sobreponerse a ellas? |
---|---|
None |
Debilidades/ desventajas/ riesgos desde la perspectiva del compilador o de otra persona de referencia clave | ¿Cómo sobreponerse a ellas? |
---|---|
Lack of technical knowledge | By providing training and skills |
Production is less at initial phase | By adopting process continuously can increase as time passes, the plan controlled the soil loss and add nutrition to the land. |
7. Referencias y vínculos
7.1 Métodos/ fuentes de información
- visitas de campo, encuestas de campo
- entrevistas con usuarios de tierras
Vínculos y módulos
Expandir todo Colapsar todosVínculos
No hay vínculos
Módulos
No se hallaron módulos