Enfoques

Returning Life to Mae Chaem Watershed by Integrated Land and Water Management [Tailandia]

Integrated land and water management in landscape of Khok-Nong-Na model

approaches_4280 - Tailandia

Visualizar secciones

Expandir todo
Completado: 97%

1. Información general

1.2 Detalles de contacto de las personas de referencia e instituciones involucradas en la evaluación y la documentación del Enfoque

Persona(s) de referencia clave/s

co-compiler:
co-compiler:
co-compiler:

1.3 Condiciones referidas al uso de datos documentados mediante WOCAT

¿Cuándo se compilaron los datos (en el campo)?

12/09/2018

El compilador y la/s persona(s) de referencia claves aceptan las condiciones acerca del uso de los datos documentados mediante WOCAT :

2. Descripción del Enfoque MST

2.1 Breve descripción del Enfoque

The promotion of a model that supports sustainable cultivation outside the protected forest area in the northern highlands of Thailand. The model is based on the knowledge of King Bhumibol Adulyadej (King Rama 9). It is a prototype model of the Institute of Sufficiency Economy and the Foundation for Natural Agriculture, and uses the New Theory Approach in Agriculture to build a self-sufficiency economy.

2.2 Descripción detallada del Enfoque MST

Descripción detallada del Enfoque MST:

This is the approach that supports "returning life" to the Mae Chaem area by an integrated land and water management system in the highlands, through the King Rama 9 initiative combined with local wisdom: or the "Khok-Nong-Na model". Most of this area is in Mae Chaem Reserved National Forest, an upstream watershed which is strictly preserved as forest and does not officially allow people to live and cultivate. However, communities have been earning their living there for a long time before the reserved forest law was announced, which deprived them of the right to own the land and use it for agriculture. Previously all land users earned income by encroaching into Mae Chaem National Forest Reserve - and converting it into maize, shallot and cabbage fields. The forest area was intruded upon, making the soil erode, and therefore soil fertility and productivity decreased. The integrated water management system by King Rama 9’s initiative together with local wisdom, is a prototype model at the Sufficiency Economy Institute and the Natural Agriculture Foundation, supporting the “New Theory of Agriculture” based on a self-sufficiency economy. The Foundation has explained to all land users that this concept called "Khok-Nong-Na" divides the area into 30:30:30:10 portions as follows; 30% for water sources (farm ponds, small water channels), 30% for rice fields, 30% for trees, and 10% for housing and animals. Implementation of Khok-Nong-Na models will depend on the topography of the area are as follow:
1. Upland or "mound" (Khok) is the highland area as part of the mountain or hill to cultivate "three kinds of trees” as forests, namely "three forests, four benefits". “Three kinds of forests” means for consumption, construction and economy, while the fourth benefit is to preserve the ecosystem.
2. Reservoir (Nong), the lowland area as part of water resources, includes the checkdam or weir, the sediment trap, the water channel and the pond, for both consumption and agricultural use. The checkdam or weir in the upper area serves as a storage and to control the flow rate of water. The water channel is designed to deliver water to the pond or reservoir in the lower area.
3. Paddy field (Na) is an important component for rice cultivation because rice is the main staple. Rice terraces are established in the sloping area, with paddy fields in the lowland. The main purpose of rice production is for the farmer family’s consumption - as well as for income. The ridges around the rice terraces field should be high and wide to store greater amounts of water - as the water level in the paddy field can control weeds, accelerate plant growth and improve crop yields. The native rice variety grown in rich soil is immune to diseases and insects.

2.3 Fotos del Enfoque

Comentarios generales sobre las fotos:

-

2.4 Videos del Enfoque

Fecha:

12/09/2018

2.5 País/ región/ lugares donde el Enfoque fue aplicado

País:

Tailandia

Región/ Estado/ Provincia:

Ban Thap Sub-district, Mae Chaem District, Chiang Mai Province

Especifique más el lugar :

Ban Thap Sub-district, Mae Chaem District

2.6 Fechas de inicio y conclusión del Enfoque

Indique año del inicio:

2015

Si no se conoce el año preciso, indique la fecha aproximada en la que se inició el Enfoque:

hace menos de 10 años (recientemente)

Comentarios:

Almost land users faced problem about debt from the investment loan for their agricultural and other activities.

2.7 Tipo de Enfoque

  • proyecto/ basado en un programa

2.8 Propósitos/ objetivos principales del Enfoque

The integrated land management of Khok-Nong-Na model "returns life to the watershed" by protecting the ecosystem and simultaneously promoting sustainable and productive farming.

2.9 Condiciones que facilitan o impiden la implementación de la/s Tecnología/s aplicadas bajo el Enfoque

disponibilidad/ acceso a recursos y servicios financieros
  • impiden

They should stop borrowing money as they cannot find money to clear their debts.

colaboración/ coordinación de actores
  • facilitan

Almost all land users help each other and collaborate to work together around twice a week.

carga de trabajo, disponibilidad de mano de obra
  • impiden

They have more workload in their field to do comfortably in one day and there are no labourers to hire in this area.

3. Participación y roles de las partes interesadas involucradas

3.1 Partes interesadas involucradas en el Enfoque y sus roles

  • usuarios locales de tierras/ comunidades locales

Household network covers 21 members

All land users cooperate with each others

  • ONG

Natural Agriculture Study Center

Support all knowledge in the New Theory for Agriculture (King Rama 9)

  • sector privado

Chiang Mai Social Enterprise Company Limited

Support seed of some crops and saplings of trees and fruit trees

  • gobierno local

Royal Forest Department and Mae Chaem District Administrative Organization

Create a project to manage to obtain multiple benefits from the forest for sustainable development by King Rama 9.

3.2 Involucramiento de los usuarios locales de tierras/ comunidades locales en las distintas fases del Enfoque
Involucramiento de los usuarios locales de tierras/ comunidades locales Especifique quién se involucró y describa las actividades
iniciación/ motivación apoyo externo All land users normally face drought condition, making them unable to produce agricultural products properly, causing insufficient income and the debts of land users accumulate.
planificación interactivo Mae Chaem District Office set up a project to return life to all land users, so they can join and work together.
implementación interactivo Land users work together with several networks in Khok-Nong-Na model with support from the Royal Forest Department, Natural Agriculture Study Center, Mae Chaem District Office and Chiang Mai Social Enterprise Company Limited.
monitoreo y evaluación auto-movilización Monitor, evaluate and follow up by Deputy Minister of Agriculture and Cooperatives and Natural Agriculture Study Center with local officers in the area.

3.3 Flujograma (si estuviera disponible)

Descripción:

Flow chart Operating procedures:
1. Site selection: the target area will be seen through 5 aspects: community, temple, school, government agency and appropriate topography, with 5 strong network sectors as: government, academic, private, civil social and mass media for sustainability and expansion of civil state
2. Targeting people: all people and community leaders in the target area have been trained at the Mab-Euang Natural Agriculture Foundation.
3. Training course: the main content is agricultural development to the sufficiency economy system by the Natural Agriculture Network. This is to take 5 days and 4 nights, consisting of application of New Theory of Agriculture in the concept of sufficiency economy combined with local wisdom for soil and water management for agricultural area.
4. Workshop: this activity is organized for farmers to learn about participation, extension and to understand the concept of sufficiency economy system.
5. Joint activity: people and communities in the area propose to implement this project and staff of the study center will consider and, when appropriate, approve the project.
6. Finding support agencies: the Mab-Euang Natural Agriculture Center for Sufficiency Economy System, Mae Chaem District Office, Royal Forest Department and Chiang Mai Enterprise Social Enterprise Company Limited.
7. Field training: this activity is the real field training in the selected area, where land users and community members have been trained according to the concept of Khok-Nong-Na model.
8. Area improvement: the practices in the targeted area consist of 5 networks that work together in the land user’s area in the concept of Khok-Nong-Na model with trees and fruit trees in upland and rice cultivation in lowland or rice terraces in upland, including farm ponds. Moreover, this area will be the training and study site for other people in this area.
9. Study center: if this area is completely set up and all components of the Khok-Nong-Na model are installed, the site should be upgraded to be a study center in the future. Now this project has increased cooperation among agencies, i.e. Royal Irrigation Department, Land Development Department, both under the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, and Department of Local Administration, Ministry of the Interior.

Autor:

Ms. Somjit Lertdisayawan

3.4 La toma de decisiones en la selección de Tecnología(s) MST

Especifique quién decidió la selección de las Tecnología/ Tecnologías a implementarse:
  • principalmente usuarios de tierras con el apoyo de especialistas MST
Explique:

All land users had been trained by several agencies, and let they decide the suitable technology to their area.

Especifique las bases que sustentaron la toma de decisiones:
  • la evaluación de conocimiento MST bien documentado (la toma de decisiones se basa en evidencia)

4. Apoyo técnico, fortalecimiento institucional y gestión del conocimiento

4.1 Construcción de capacidades / capacitación

¿Se proporcionó la capacitación a usuarios de tierras/ otras partes interesadas?

Especifique quién fue capacitado:
  • usuarios de tierras
Si fuese relevante, también especifique género, edad, estatus, etnicidad, etc.

-

Forma de capacitación:
  • de agricultor a agricultor
  • áreas de demostración
  • cursos
Temas avanzados:

Agricultural development to achieve a self-sufficiency economy system.

Comentarios:

Training course 5 days and 4 nights before accepting to join the project.

4.2 Servicio de asesoría

¿Los usuarios de tierras tienen acceso a un servicio de asesoría?

Especifique si servicio proporcionado se realizó:
  • en los campos de los usuarios de tierras
Describa/ comentarios:

Monitor, evaluate and follow up in the area.

4.3 Fortalecimiento institucional (desarrollo institucional)

¿Se establecieron o fortalecieron instituciones mediante el Enfoque?
  • sí, moderadamente
Especifique el nivel o los niveles en los que se fortalecieron o establecieron las instituciones:
  • local
Describa la institución, roles y responsabilidades, miembros, etc.

At present there are 21 household members in the group. There are rules and guidelines that indicate they must hold meetings and work together twice a week.

Especifique el tipo de apoyo:
  • equipo
Proporcione detalles adicionales:

Tools to work in the area as spade, shovel, ploughs and also saplings of trees and fruit trees, and the costs for travelling, fuel and food when they work together.

4.4 Monitoreo y evaluación

¿El monitoreo y la evaluación forman parte del Enfoque?

Comentarios:

Monitor, evaluate and follow up by Natural Agriculture Study Center and also local officers.

Si respondió que sí, ¿la documentación se utilizará para monitoreo y evaluación?

No

Comentarios:

-

4.5 Investigación

¿La investigación formó parte del Enfoque?

No

5. Financiamiento y apoyo material externo

5.1 Presupuesto anual para el componente MST del Enfoque

Si no se conoce el presupuesto anual preciso, indique el rango:
  • > 1,000,000

5.2 Apoyo financiero/material proporcionado a los usuarios de tierras

¿Los usuarios de tierras recibieron financiamiento/ apoyo material para implementar la Tecnología/ Tecnologías? :

Si respondió sí, especifique el tipo o los tipos de apoyo, condiciones y proveedor(es) :

Agricultural equipment for land users to set up Khok-Nong-Na model such as spade, shovel, plough and also saplings of soil, trees and fruit trees by the Deputy Minister of Agriculture and Cooperatives, and Natural Agriculture Study Center.

5.3 Subsidios para insumos específicos (incluyendo mano de obra)

  • equipo
Especifique qué insumos se subsidiaron En qué grado Especifique los subsidios
herramientas parcialmente financiado Material and equipment for farming
  • agrícola
Especifique qué insumos se subsidiaron En qué grado Especifique los subsidios
semillas parcialmente financiado Seed of crops and saplings of trees and fruit trees
Si la mano de obra de usuarios de tierras fue un insumo sustancial, ¿fue:
  • voluntario?
Comentarios:

The community network cooperative work together in their land.

5.4 Crédito

¿Se proporcionó crédito bajo el Enfoque para actividades MST?

No

5.5 Otros incentivos o instrumentos

¿Se usaron otros incentivos o instrumentos para promover la implementación de Tecnologías MST?

6. Análisis de impacto y comentarios de conclusión

6.1 Impactos del Enfoque

¿El Enfoque mejoró el conocimiento y capacidades de los usuarios para implementar MST?
  • No
  • Sí, un poco
  • Sí, moderadamente
  • Sí, mucho

All land users are trained to set up the Khok-Nong-Na model.

¿El Enfoque mejoró cuestiones de tenencia de tierra/ derechos de usuarios que obstaculizaron la implementación de la Tecnologías MST?
  • No
  • Sí, un poco
  • Sí, moderadamente
  • Sí, mucho
¿El Enfoque llevó a un uso más sostenible/ fuentes de energía?
  • No
  • Sí, un poco
  • Sí, moderadamente
  • Sí, mucho

6.2 Motivación principal del usuario de la tierra para implementar MST

  • reducción de la degradación del suelo

This system can prevent soil erosion and store water in soil and farm pond

  • reducción del riesgo de desastres naturales

All land users can use their land for agricultural activities in the dry season

  • afiliación al movimiento/ proyecto/ grupo/ redes

Participation and training program encourage land users to joint the community network

  • conciencia medioambiental

This system can increase biodiversity in this area

6.3 Sostenibilidad de las actividades del Enfoque

¿Pueden los usuarios de tierras sostener lo que se implementó mediante el Enfoque (sin apoyo externo)?
  • incierto
Si respondió no o incierto, especifique y comente:

All land users need to understand this model and government sector necessary to support in the early stage of development because they do not have enough budget to start this activity by themselves. Moreover, they have no bargaining power in finance, income and the market.

6.4 Fortalezas/ ventajas del Enfoque

Fuerzas/ ventajas/ oportunidades desde la perspectiva del usuario de la tierra
Improve and restore natural resources, i.e. environment, soil, water, and forest .
This system would save labor, fuel and material cost of pumping water into the fields for fruit trees and various crops.
The network members are harmonious and work together under the regulations and rules.
Fuerzas/ ventajas/ oportunidades desde la perspectiva del compilador o de otra persona de referencia clave
Many official and private agencies cooperate to work with strong network and community, so land users will use their land for agricultural activities and at the same time they would help in reforestation.
This model will discourage all land users to do their slash-and-burn practice.

6.5 Debilidades/ desventajas del Enfoque y formas de sobreponerse a ellos

Debilidades/ desventajas/ riesgos desde la perspectiva del usuario de la tierra ¿Cómo sobreponerse a ellas?
Farmers have more work load per day to do it comfortably. That is good to improve their soil and increase their products and income.
They have not yet started to earn money at this time and have no ability to reduce their debts. They would like the government to help with their debts.
Debilidades/ desventajas/ riesgos desde la perspectiva del compilador o de otra persona de referencia clave ¿Cómo sobreponerse a ellas?
At the first stage they cannot produce agricultural products because they do not have enough water. Local officers should recommend some short-period plants to generate income.
This area has organic and green vegetable market in schools and hospitals nearby but farmers cannot produce sufficiently to serve the demand of that market. This model should serve to help store more water in their area, to be sufficient for agricultural production.

7. Referencias y vínculos

7.1 Métodos/ fuentes de información

  • visitas de campo, encuestas de campo
  • entrevistas con usuarios de tierras

2

  • compilación de informes y otra documentación existente

Ban Thap Subdistrict Administrative Organization

7.2 Referencias a publicaciones disponibles

Título, autor, año, ISBN:

=

¿Dónde se halla disponible? ¿Costo?

=

7.3 Vínculos a la información relevante disponible en línea

Título/ descripción:

Man changes the world SS4 TAPE 28: Mae Chaam model plus (9 Jul 18) 1/3

URL:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7Bex9ku_qY&feature

Título/ descripción:

Man changes the world SS4 TAPE 28: Mae Chaam model plus (9 Jul 18) 2/3

URL:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwY01nOLVvs&feature

Título/ descripción:

Man changes the world SS4 TAPE 28: Mae Chaam model plus (9 Jul 18) 3/3

URL:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=doiZ8r6Bo9I&feature

Vínculos y módulos

Expandir todo Colapsar todos

Módulos