Agroforestry to improve soil fertility, water retention, and sustainable income for local communities [Afganistán]
- Creación:
- Actualización:
- Compilador: Ahmad Zia Jalalzai
- Editores: Mohammad Amin Nesar, Megha bajaj, Mir Wali Khan Lakanwal
- Revisores: Rima Mekdaschi Studer, Illias Animon, Muhammad Ishaq Safi
د خاورې د خاصلخيزۍ ودې، اوبو ذخيره کولو او محلي ټولنو له پاره د دوامداره عايد په موخه د کرنيزې ځنګلدارۍ قطعو جوړول /ایجاد پلات زراعت جنگلی برای بهبود سلامت خاک، نگهداری آب و تأمین درآمد پایدار برای جوامع محلی
technologies_7443 - Afganistán
Visualizar secciones
Expandir todo Colapsar todos1. Información general
1.2 Detalles de contacto de las personas de referencia e instituciones involucradas en la evaluación y la documentación de la Tecnología
Especialista MST:
Especialista MST:
Andar Ahmadullah
FAO Afghanistan
Afganistán
usuario de la tierra:
Mohammad Haider
Ghaibi Rangeland Management Association (RMA)
Afganistán
usuario de la tierra:
Ghullam Sakhi
Qarcha Rangeland Management Association (RMA)
Afganistán
Nombre del proyecto que financió la documentación/ evaluación de la Tecnología (si fuera relevante)
Community-based sustainable land and forest management in AfghanistanNombre de la(s) institución(es) que facilitaron la documentación/ evaluación de la Tecnología (si fuera relevante)
FAO Afghanistan (FAO Afghanistan) - Afganistán1.3 Condiciones referidas al uso de datos documentados mediante WOCAT
El compilador y la/s persona(s) de referencia claves aceptan las condiciones acerca del uso de los datos documentados mediante WOCAT:
Sí
1.4 Declaración de la sostenibilidad de la Tecnología descrita
¿La Tecnología aquí descrita resulta problemática en relación a la degradación de la tierra, de tal forma que no puede considerársela una tecnología sostenible para el manejo de la tierra?
No
Comentarios:
This technology is applied with a focus on land restoration and conservation and is not problamatic with regard to land degradation.
2. Descripción de la Tecnología MST
2.1 Breve descripción de la Tecnología
Definición de la Tecnología:
The Agroforestry system in Malistan district combines traditional practices with support from the Community-Based Sustainable Land and Forest Management project in Afghanistan. This initiative provides technical support, training, and resources like apple trees, fertilizers, and alfalfa seeds to establish 400 orchards (1,000 m² each). The goal is to enhance community livelihoods by reducing dependence on rangelands, helping to preserve local ecosystems.
2.2 Descripción detallada de la Tecnología
Descripción:
The agroforestry system adopted in the mountainous districts of Ghazni province, particularly in Navor and Malistan district is an innovative approach that is transforming the way local farmers cultivate their land. This system integrates agricultural crops, tree cultivation, and livestock farming to maximize land productivity while promoting environmental sustainability. At the heart of the system are apple orchards, alfalfa seeds, and fertilizers, which work together to enhance food security, provide livestock feed, and improve soil fertility. Supported by modern agricultural techniques, the project includes a total of 400 orchards, each covering 1,000 square meters, helping to alleviate pressure on overgrazed rangelands while improving local livelihoods.
This agroforestry method is particularly well-suited to Ghazni’s rugged terrain, where farming communities rely heavily on livestock and rangelands for sustenance. However, the region’s dry climate, frequent overgrazing, and ongoing land degradation have made traditional farming increasingly unsustainable. By introducing apple trees and alfalfa cultivation, farmers now have an alternative source of income and animal feed while actively restoring degraded lands. Alfalfa serves as a nutrient-rich fodder for livestock, and in return, livestock manure is used as fertilizer, creating a self-sustaining agricultural cycle that enhances soil health.
Beyond its environmental benefits, this system plays a crucial role in improving livelihoods. By diversifying agricultural production, it enhances food security and generates additional income for local farmers. More importantly, it helps alleviate the burden on fragile rangelands by offering an alternative source of livestock feed, reducing overgrazing and preventing further land degradation. Through natural nutrient recycling, alfalfa provides essential fodder for livestock, while their manure replenishes soil nutrients, ensuring long-term soil fertility.
To successfully implement and maintain this system, several key activities and inputs are required. Local farmers receive specialized training and technical support to equip them with the necessary skills. Essential supplies, including apple saplings, fertilizers, and alfalfa seeds, are provided to help establish the orchards. Additionally, proper maintenance, such as irrigation, pruning, and weed control, ensures that the orchards remain productive. Soil and water conservation efforts, such as constructing contour banks and water diversion structures, further safeguard the land against erosion and water loss.
The impact of this technology extends far beyond the fields. Environmentally, it significantly reduces soil erosion, improves water retention, and restores soil health. Economically, it increases household income by boosting apple production and generating sales from alfalfa as livestock feed. Socially, it strengthens community resilience by offering a reliable source of food and income, while encouraging the adoption of sustainable farming practices.
While many farmers appreciate the system for its cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and diverse benefits, some challenges remain. Because of the duration for fruit production of apple trees are typically taking three to four years to bear fruit, patience and long-term planning is crucial. Additionally, the dry climate means that farmers must invest extra time and effort in irrigation, especially during drought periods, to ensure optimal growth and fruit yield. Despite these challenges, the agroforestry system in Malistan and Navor presents a promising solution for sustainable land management and rural development.
2.3 Fotografías de la Tecnología
2.4 Videos de la Tecnología
Comentarios, descripción breve:
Artificial reseeding plays a vital role in the restoration of degraded rangeland ecosystems. Reseeding of local palatable fodder species in degraded rangeland is a restoration technique aimed at reintroducing native plants that support soil health and local biodiversity. This process enhances forage availability for grazing animals, stabilizes soil, and helps combat desertification by promoting sustainable vegetation cover. By using palatable, locally adapted species, artificial reseeding improves the health and productivity of degraded rangeland ecosystem.
Fecha:
20 october 2023
Lugar:
Malistan district Mokly village.
Nombre del videógrafo:
Ahmad Zia Jalalzai
2.5 País/ región/ lugares donde la Tecnología fue aplicada y que se hallan comprendidos por esta evaluación
País:
Afganistán
Región/ Estado/ Provincia:
Southeastern Ghazni province
Especifique más el lugar :
The technology is applied in 44 villages through 7 Rangeland Management Associations (RMAs). Hemat and Faqir are sample villages reflected in the map.
Especifique la difusión de la Tecnología:
- aplicada en puntos específicos/ concentrada en un área pequeña
¿El/los sitio(s) de la Tecnología se ubica(n) en un área de protección permanente?
No
Comentarios:
This project established 400 agroforestry plots (for 400 land users); the coordinates represent the samples locations for 400 orchards.
Map
×2.6 Fecha de la implementación
Indique año de implementación:
2022
2.7 Introducción de la Tecnología
Especifique cómo se introdujo la Tecnología:
- mediante proyectos/ intervenciones externas
Comentarios (tipo de proyecto, etc.):
The agroforestry system was introduced as an innovative, community-driven approach, offering an environmentally friendly alternative. This initiative was developed in response to the community's call for sustainable solutions that enhance livelihoods while preserving natural resources.
The agroforestry system integrates apple tree plantation with alfalfa intercropping, enhancing land productivity and sustainability by providing both fruit and forage. This technology improves livelihoods and promotes soil fertility and moisture retention for long-term environmental benefits
3. Clasificación de la Tecnología MST
3.1 Propósito(s) principal(es) de la Tecnología MST
- mejorar la producción
- reducir, prevenir, restaurar la degradación de la tierra
- mitigar cambio climático y sus impactos
- crear impacto económico benéfico
- crear impacto social benéfico
3.2 Tipo(s) actuales de uso de la tierra donde se aplica la Tecnología
Mezcla de tipos de uso de tierras dentro de la misma unidad de tierras: :
Sí
Especifique el uso combinado de tierras (cultivos/ pastoreo/ árboles):
- Agropastoralismo (incluyendo cultivo-ganado integrados)
Tierras cultivadas
- Cultivos perennes (no leñosos)
Cultivos perennes (no maderables) - Especifique cultivos:
- cultivos florales - perennes
Número de temporadas de cultivo por año:
- 2
Especifique:
summer and fall season
¿Se practica el intercultivo?
Sí
Si respondió que sí, especifique qué cultivos son intercultivados:
Alfaalfa is mainly used for intercropping
¿Se practica la rotación de cultivos?
No
Tierra de pastoreo
Pastoreo intensivo/ producción de forraje:
- Cortar y llevar/ cero pastoreo
Tipo de animal:
- cattle - dairy and beef (e.g. zebu)
¿Se practica el manejo integrado de cultivos - ganado?
Sí
Si fuera el caso, especifique :
Animal manure is added in the fall season
Productos y servicios:
- economic security, investment prestige
Especies:
cattle - dairy and beef (e.g. zebu)
Conteo:
1345
Comentarios:
In autumn, people in the community graze their land with animals like cattle, sheep and goats. To manage and control the grazing, they use stakes and ropes to fence a specific area of land and ensure that the saplings are not damaged.
Planting of fruit trees helps to reduce pressure on rangeland grasses and shrubs to support landscape restoration.
Most land users plant apple trees and alfalfa. Some land users, who do not have animals, cultivate legumes instead of alfalfa.
3.3 ¿Cambió el uso de tierras debido a la implementación de la Tecnología?
¿Cambió el uso de tierras debido a la implementación de la Tecnología?
- Sí (Por favor responda las preguntas de abajo referidas al uso de la tierra antes de implementar la Tecnología)
Mezcla de tipos de uso de tierras dentro de la misma unidad de tierras: :
Sí
Especifique el uso combinado de tierras (cultivos/ pastoreo/ árboles):
- Agropastoralismo (incluyendo cultivo-ganado integrados)
Tierras cultivadas
- Cultivos perennes (no leñosos)
Cultivos perennes (no maderables) - Especifique cultivos:
- cultivos florales - perennes
¿Se practica el intercultivo?
Sí
Si respondió que sí, especifique qué cultivos son intercultivados:
Earlier, wheat was planted only on the cropland and the only grazing land that was overgrazed and it became degraded. Now there is a mixed system agro-pastoralism in place due to the application of the technology.
¿Se practica la rotación de cultivos?
No
Tierra de pastoreo
Pastoreo intensivo/ producción de forraje:
- Cortar y llevar/ cero pastoreo
Tipo de animal:
- cattle - dairy and beef (e.g. zebu)
¿Se practica el manejo integrado de cultivos - ganado?
No
Comentarios:
Most land users plant apple trees and alfalfa seeds. Some land users, who do not have animals, cultivate legume intercropping instead of alfalfa.
3.4 Provisión de agua
Provisión de agua para la tierra donde se aplica la Tecnología:
- mixta de secano – irrigada
Comentarios:
Out of the 400 agroforestry plots, some have full water availability, while others have 80% water availability. About 10% of the agroforestry plots receive only 40% to 60% of the required water. The saplings are mainly irrigated by spring rainfall. In a few plots, additional irrigation is provided two to three times during the warm season by transporting water from the canal using animals.
3.5 Grupo MST al que pertenece la Tecnología
- pastoralismo y manejo de tierras de pastoreo
- manejo de agricultura—ganadería integrada
- manejo integrado de la fertilidad del suelo
3.6 Medidas MST que componen la Tecnología
medidas agronómicas
- A2: materia orgánica/ fertilidad del suelo
medidas estructurales
- S2: Taludes, bancos
medidas de manejo
- M6: Manejo de desperdicios (reciclado, reutilización o reducción)
Comentarios:
Residue management of trees is used for fuel, and alfalfa is utilized as livestock fodder in winter.
3.7 Principales tipos de degradación de la tierra encarados con la Tecnología
erosión de suelos por agua
- Wt: pérdida de capa arable/ erosión de la superficie
erosión de suelos por viento
- Et: pérdida de capa arable
deterioro químico del suelo
- Cn: reducción de la fertilidad y contenido reducido de la materia orgánica del suelo (no ocasionados por la erosión)
- Ca: acidificación
- Cp: contaminación del suelo
- Cs: salinización/ alcalinización
deterioro físico del suelo
- Pc: compactación
- Pk: desmoronamiento y encostramiento
- Pw: encharcamiento
- Ps: hundimiento de suelos orgánicos, asentamiento del suelo
degradación biológica
- Bc: reducción de la cobertura vegetal del suelo
- Bh: pérdida de hábitats
- Bq: reducción de la cantidad/ biomasa
- Bs: reducción en la calidad y composición/ diversidad de las especies
- Bl: pérdida de la vida del suelo
- Bp: incremento de pestes/ enfermedades, pérdida de depredadores
degradación del agua
- Ha: aridificación
- Hg: cambio en nivel de aguas subterráneas/ nivel de acuífero
- Hq: reducción de la calidad de subterráneas
- Hw: reducción de la capacidad de amortiguación de las áreas humedales
3.8 Prevención, reducción o restauración de la degradación de la tierra
Especifique la meta de la Tecnología con relación a la degradación de la tierra:
- reducir la degradación de la tierra
- restaurar/ rehabilitar tierra severamente degradada
Comentarios:
This project reduced the land degradation by applying this agroforestry technology.
4. Especificaciones técnicas, actividades de implementación, insumos y costos
4.1 Dibujo técnico de la Tecnología
Especificaciones técnicas (relacionadas al dibujo técnico):
Saplings are planted in plotted areas with widths ranging from 4 to 5 meters. The outlines of the plots measure 40 × 50 meters, depending on the land structure. The spacing between saplings is 4 meters, with 5 meters between rows. Alfalfa and legume seeds are planted in the gaps. Small plots of 0.1 hectares were used, each containing 50 saplings.
Autor:
Ahmad Zia Jalalzai
Fecha:
16/10/2024
4.2 Información general sobre el cálculo de insumos y costos
Especifique cómo se calcularon los costos e insumos:
- por área de Tecnología
Indique tamaño y unidad de área:
0.1 ha
Especifique la moneda usada para calcular costos:
- USD
Indique el costo promedio del salario de trabajo contratado por día:
5 USD
4.3 Actividades de establecimiento
| Actividad | Momento (estación) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Survey and site selection follow by feasibility study | December to January |
| 2. | Procurement sapling and equipment | December and January |
| 3. | Levelling plots, cleaning from weeds | March |
| 4. | Designing layout | March |
| 5. | Digging planting pits | March |
| 6. | Planating apple saplings | spring |
| 7. | Irrigating | April to September |
| 8. | Training and pruning of orchard | October and Noverber |
4.4 Costos e insumos necesarios para el establecimiento
| Especifique insumo | Unidad | Cantidad | Costos por unidad | Costos totales por insumo | % de los costos cubiertos por los usuarios de las tierras | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mano de obra | Labour for preparation of plots levelling, digging pits and cleaning weeds | Person/day | 10,0 | 5,0 | 50,0 | 100,0 |
| Mano de obra | Labour for plantation | Person/day | 5,0 | 8,0 | 40,0 | 100,0 |
| Equipo | Shovel | Number | 1,0 | 4,0 | 4,0 | 100,0 |
| Equipo | Rope | Meter | 1,0 | 2,0 | 2,0 | 100,0 |
| Equipo | Hoe | Number | 1,0 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 100,0 |
| Equipo | Pruning scissors | Number | 1,0 | 10,0 | 10,0 | 100,0 |
| Equipo | Wheelbarrow | Number | 1,0 | 1,0 | 1,0 | 100,0 |
| Material para plantas | Alfalfa seeds | Kg | 4,0 | 3,0 | 12,0 | |
| Material para plantas | Apple sapling | Number | 50,0 | 1,0 | 50,0 | |
| Fertilizantes y biocidas | DAP | Kg | 25,0 | 3,0 | 75,0 | |
| Fertilizantes y biocidas | Urea | Kg | 25,0 | 1,0 | 25,0 | |
| Costos totales para establecer la Tecnología | 272,0 | |||||
| Costos totales para establecer la Tecnología en USD | 272,0 | |||||
4.5 Actividades de establecimiento/ recurrentes
| Actividad | Momento/ frequencia | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Applying manure for growth of crops and trees(refers to using organic animal waste (such as cow, horse, chicken, or sheep manure) to improve soil fertility and promote plant growth.) | in fall season |
| 2. | Disc ploughing and harrowing | in fall season |
| 3. | Chemical fertilizer application to crops | at the time of observing needs |
| 4. | Pest management with chemicals | in spring season |
| 5. | Irrigation of sapling | As per needed time |
| 6. | Mulching trees (humus cover)refers to the practice of covering the soil around trees with organic material, such as humus, straw, leaves, wood chips, or compost. | In a hot summer and lack of water, dry year |
| 7. | Pruning trees | in spring season |
| 8. | Operation and maintenance | spring, summer and fall |
Comentarios:
Inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)
4.6 Costos e insumos necesarios para actividades de mantenimiento/ recurrentes (por año)
| Especifique insumo | Unidad | Cantidad | Costos por unidad | Costos totales por insumo | % de los costos cubiertos por los usuarios de las tierras | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mano de obra | Unskilled labour | Person/day | 20,0 | 5,0 | 100,0 | 100,0 |
| Mano de obra | ploughing | person/day | 2,0 | 5,0 | 10,0 | |
| Mano de obra | apply of fertilizer and manure | person/day | 2,0 | 5,0 | 10,0 | |
| Mano de obra | form pest management | person/day | 3,0 | 5,0 | 15,0 | |
| Mano de obra | planting of annual crops / perennial alfalfa | person/day | 2,0 | 5,0 | 10,0 | |
| Mano de obra | Uprooting dry sapling and replacing to fresh sapling. | Number | 2,0 | 1,0 | 2,0 | 100,0 |
| Equipo | Shovel | Number | 1,0 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 100,0 |
| Fertilizantes y biocidas | Organic fertilizer | M3 | 1,0 | 10,0 | 10,0 | 100,0 |
| Fertilizantes y biocidas | DAP | |||||
| Fertilizantes y biocidas | Urea | |||||
| Fertilizantes y biocidas | Pesticides | |||||
| Indique los costos totales para mantenecer la Tecnología | 160,0 | |||||
| Costos totales para mantener la Tecnología en USD | 160,0 | |||||
Comentarios:
After establishment, all responsibilities for maintenance, operations activity, care, and management belongs to land users.
4.7 Factores más determinantes que afectan los costos:
Describa los factores más determinantes que afectan los costos:
Usually, the land users are farmers, and all the activities are performed by the land users. The project team provides technical support and capacity building. The most important factors affecting the cost in the project are the materials’ accessibility in the field such as saplings, chemical fertilizer, and pesticides.
5. Entorno natural y humano
5.1 Clima
Lluvia anual
- < 250 mm
- 251-500 mm
- 501-750 mm
- 751-1,000 mm
- 1,001-1,500 mm
- 1,501-2,000 mm
- 2,001-3,000 mm
- 3,001-4,000 mm
- > 4,000 mm
Zona agroclimática
- semi-árida
5.2 Topografía
Pendientes en promedio:
- plana (0-2 %)
- ligera (3-5%)
- moderada (6-10%)
- ondulada (11-15%)
- accidentada (16-30%)
- empinada (31-60%)
- muy empinada (>60%)
Formaciones telúricas:
- meseta/ planicies
- cordilleras
- laderas montañosas
- laderas de cerro
- pies de monte
- fondo del valle
Zona altitudinal:
- 0-100 m s.n.m.
- 101-500 m s.n.m.
- 501-1,000 m s.n.m
- 1,001-1,500 m s.n.m
- 1,501-2,000 m s.n.m
- 2,001-2,500 m s.n.m
- 2,501-3,000 m s.n.m
- 3,001-4,000 m s.n.m
- > 4,000 m s.n.m
Comentarios y especificaciones adicionales sobre topografía :
As the technology have been applied in a 400 different topography plots, some of the plots are in a flatted, gentle and hilly slop and most of the technologies are applied in flatted area.
5.3 Suelos
Profundidad promedio del suelo:
- muy superficial (0-20 cm)
- superficial (21-50 cm)
- moderadamente profunda (51-80 cm)
- profunda (81-120 cm)
- muy profunda (>120 cm)
Textura del suelo (capa arable):
- mediana (limosa)
Textura del suelo (> 20 cm debajo de la superficie):
- mediana (limosa)
Materia orgánica de capa arable:
- media (1-3%)
Si se halla disponible, adjunte una descripción completa de los suelos o especifique la información disponible, por ej., tipo de suelo, pH/ acidez de suelo, capacidad de intercambio catiónico, nitrógeno, salinidad, etc. :
In Ghazni province, the primary soil types include Aridisols in arid regions, Entisols on slopes, Sierozems in desert areas, and fertile Alluvial soils in valleys that support agriculture. Soil pH levels in the region range from 6.33 (slightly acidic) to 8.52 (alkaline), indicating varying degrees of acidity and alkalinity. The Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC), nitrogen levels, and salinity vary across these soil types, influencing agricultural productivity and land management practices. For more detailed information, including specific nutrient content and soil characteristics, resources such as the FAO’s Agro-Climatic Atlas can be consulted.
5.4 Disponibilidad y calidad de agua
Agua subterránea:
5-50 m
Disponibilidad de aguas superficiales:
excesiva
Calidad de agua (sin tratar):
agua potable de buena calidad
La calidad de agua se refiere a:
agua subterránea y superficial
¿La salinidad del agua es un problema?
No
¿Se está llevando a cabo la inundación del área? :
Sí
Frecuencia:
frecuentemente
Comentarios y especificaciones adicionales sobre calidad y cantidad de agua:
In years with heavy snowfall, water availability increases, and springs are replenished. Conversely, during drought years, water resources decrease significantly. From July to September, a water shortage is commonly experienced, prompting farmers to transport water from canals using animals. Additionally, some farmers rely on groundwater specifically for irrigating saplings. This seasonal variation in water supply is critical for agricultural practices in the province.
5.5 Biodiversidad
Diversidad de especies:
- mediana
Diversidad de hábitats:
- mediana
5.6 Las características de los usuarios de la tierra que aplican la Tecnología
Sedentario o nómada:
- Sedentario
Orientación del mercado del sistema de producción:
- mixta (subsistencia/ comercial)
Ingresos no agrarios:
- 10-50% de todo el ingreso
Nivel relativo de riqueza:
- muy pobre
- pobre
Individuos o grupos:
- individual/ doméstico
Nivel de mecanización:
- trabajo manual
Género:
- mujeres
- hombres
Edad de los usuarios de la tierra:
- personas de mediana edad
- ancianos
5.7 Área promedio de la tierra usada por usuarios de tierra que aplican la Tecnología
- < 0.5 ha
- 0.5-1 ha
- 1-2 ha
- 2-5 ha
- 5-15 ha
- 15-50 ha
- 50-100 ha
- 100-500 ha
- 500-1,000 ha
- 1,000-10,000 ha
- > 10,000 ha
¿Esto se considera de pequeña, mediana o gran escala (refiriéndose al contexto local)?
- escala mediana
Comentarios:
Everyone individually has possessed land ranging from 0.5 hectares to 2 hectares in communities. However, land users has allocated only 0.1 hectares of land for the application of this technology.
5.8 Tenencia de tierra, uso de tierra y derechos de uso de agua
Tenencia de tierra:
- comunitaria/ aldea
- individual, con título
Derechos de uso de tierra:
- comunitarios (organizado)
- individual
Derechos de uso de agua:
- acceso abierto (no organizado)
- comunitarios (organizado)
¿Los derechos del uso de la tierra se basan en un sistema legal tradicional?
Sí
Especifique:
The traditional system refers to a record that recognizes land ownership and is issued based on the customs and traditions of local communities. This document is not legal but is used within the community to validate ownership.
Comentarios:
The land in this area is privately owned, while the rangeland is government-owned and accessible for public use. However, some individuals have encroached the rangeland, converting it into agricultural land and claiming it as their own property, despite lacking legal ownership documentation.
5.9 Acceso a servicios e infraestructura
salud:
- pobre
- moderado
- bueno
educación:
- pobre
- moderado
- bueno
asistencia técnica:
- pobre
- moderado
- bueno
empleo (ej. fuera de la granja):
- pobre
- moderado
- bueno
mercados:
- pobre
- moderado
- bueno
energía:
- pobre
- moderado
- bueno
caminos y transporte:
- pobre
- moderado
- bueno
agua potable y saneamiento:
- pobre
- moderado
- bueno
servicios financieros:
- pobre
- moderado
- bueno
6. Impactos y comentarios para concluir
6.1 Impactos in situ demostrados por la Tecnología
Impactos socioeconómicos
Producción
producción de cultivo
Cantidad antes de MST:
0
Cantidad luego de MST:
Now we have 400 apple orchards
Comentarios/ especifique:
In the past, there were no apple orchard in this area. The community mostly relied on the rangeland, and the animal feed was limited then. Due to the application of these technologies, the apple orchard has increased, and alfalfa intercrops have been expanded for animal feeding. As a result, pressure on the rangeland has decreased.
calidad de cultivo
Cantidad antes de MST:
less then 10 orchard. No alfaalf crops
Cantidad luego de MST:
400 orchards with Alfaalfa crops
Comentarios/ especifique:
Alfalfa intercrops have become friendly feeds for animals, along with other grasses harvested from the rangeland.
producción de forraje
Cantidad antes de MST:
less then 10 plots of Alfaalfa
Cantidad luego de MST:
400 plots
calidad de forraje
Comentarios/ especifique:
Crops production specifically grown to feed livestock. It plays a crucial role in ensuring a steady supply of nutritious feed for animals, especially in dairy and meat production systems.
producción animal
Disponibilidad y calidad de agua
disponibilidad de agua para ganado
calidad de agua para ganado
disponibilidad de agua para irrigar
Ingreso y costos
ingreso agrario
Cantidad antes de MST:
It is not distinguishable for now
Cantidad luego de MST:
It is not distinguishable for now
Comentarios/ especifique:
The cultivation of apple orchards and alfalfa crops has significant environmental, economic, and agricultural benefits. When grown together in an agroforestry system, they create a sustainable and productive farming model.
Otros impactos socioeconómicos
The cultivation of apple orchards and alfalfa crops has significant environmental, economic, and agricultural benefits. When grown together in an agroforestry system, they create a sustainable and productive farming model.
Cantidad antes de MST:
It is not distinguishable for now
Cantidad luego de MST:
It is not distinguishable for now
Comentarios/ especifique:
The cultivation of apple orchards and alfalfa crops has significant social benefits, contributing to rural development, employment, food security, and community well-being.
Impactos socioculturales
seguridad alimentaria/ autosuficiencia
Cantidad antes de MST:
less then 10 orchard
Cantidad luego de MST:
400
Comentarios/ especifique:
Food security is achieved when people have consistent access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food to maintain a healthy life. The cultivation of apple orchards and alfalfa crops plays a crucial role in enhancing food security by ensuring the availability of fruits, livestock feed, and sustainable agricultural income.
situación de salud
Cantidad antes de MST:
less then 10 orchard
Cantidad luego de MST:
400 orchard
Comentarios/ especifique:
The cultivation of apple orchards and alfalfa crops has a direct and indirect impact on human and animal health. These crops provide essential nutrients, improve environmental conditions, and contribute to sustainable food systems that enhance overall well-being.
oportunidades recreativas
Cantidad antes de MST:
less then 10 orchard
Cantidad luego de MST:
400
Comentarios/ especifique:
The cultivation of apple orchards and alfalfa crops not only provides food and economic benefits but also creates various recreational opportunities. These activities promote tourism, community engagement, and overall well-being, contributing to rural development and environmental appreciation.
MST/ conocimiento de la degradación de la tierra
Comentarios/ especifique:
The cultivation of apple orchards and alfalfa crops plays a significant role in Sustainable Land Management (SLM) by improving soil health, preventing degradation, and enhancing ecosystem services. Properly managed apple orchards and alfalfa fields help restore land fertility, prevent erosion, and support long-term agricultural sustainability.
Impactos ecológicos
Suelo
humedad del suelo
Comentarios/ especifique:
The cultivation of apple orchards and alfalfa crops has significant effects on soil moisture due to their respective water demands, root systems, and overall impact on the surrounding ecosystem. Both crops, when properly managed, can help retain moisture in the soil and improve its structure, but if mismanaged, they can also lead to issues like water depletion or soil erosion.
cubierta del suelo
Comentarios/ especifique:
The cultivation of apple orchards and alfalfa crops can have significant effects on soil cover, which plays a crucial role in protecting the soil from erosion, enhancing water retention, and promoting overall soil health. Proper management of soil cover is essential for ensuring sustainable agricultural practices and maintaining soil fertility over time.
materia orgánica debajo del suelo C
Comentarios/ especifique:
The cultivation of apple orchards and alfalfa crops plays a significant role in the accumulation and dynamics of soil organic matter (SOM) and below-ground carbon (C). Both of these components are essential for soil fertility, carbon sequestration, and overall ecosystem health. The management of these factors has critical implications for sustainable farming practices, climate change mitigation, and long-term soil productivity.
Biodiversidad: vegetación, animales
especies benéficas
Reducción de riesgos de desastres y riesgos climáticos
impactos de inundaciones
Comentarios/ especifique:
Floods are one of the most significant climate-related risks that can affect agricultural systems, particularly in regions prone to heavy rainfall or where irrigation infrastructure is inadequate. Both apple orchards and alfalfa crops are vulnerable to flood impacts, which can result in loss of yield, soil degradation, and cause damage to the overall ecosystem. However, with effective disaster risk reduction strategies, the negative impacts of floods on these crops can be mitigated.
impactos de sequías
Comentarios/ especifique:
apple orchards and alfalfa crops are highly sensitive to water stress, and prolonged drought conditions can reduce crop yields, degrade soil quality, and negatively affect the overall health of these plants. Understanding the impacts of drought on these crops and implementing appropriate water management strategies are crucial for maintaining agricultural productivity in drought-prone areas.
6.2 Impactos fuera del sitio demostrados por la Tecnología
disponibilidad de agua
Comentarios/ especifique:
The cultivation of apple orchards and alfalfa crops, especially when enhanced by technology, can have significant off-site impacts on water availability. These impacts stem from how irrigation systems, water management practices, and agricultural technologies influence local and regional water resources, hydrology, and ecosystems. Off-site effects include changes to water quality, water use efficiency, and the sustainability of water resources in surrounding areas.
6.3 Exposición y sensibilidad de la Tecnología al cambio climático gradual y a extremos relacionados al clima/ desastres (desde la percepción de los usuarios de tierras)
Comentarios:
The cultivation of apple orchards and alfalfa crops is highly sensitive to both gradual climate change and climate-related extremes like floods, droughts, and temperature fluctuations. These climate impacts affect not only the crops' growth and yield but also the technologies used in managing these crops. Understanding the exposure and sensitivity of these agricultural technologies to such climate factors is crucial for farmers and land users to ensure long-term sustainability.
6.4 Análisis costo-beneficio
¿Cómo se comparan los beneficios con los costos de establecimiento (desde la perspectiva de los usuarios de tierra)?
Ingresos a corto plazo:
neutral/ balanceado
Ingresos a largo plazo:
muy positivo
¿Cómo se comparan los beneficios con los costos de mantenimiento/ recurrentes (desde la perspectiva de los usuarios de tierra)?
Ingresos a corto plazo:
neutral/ balanceado
Ingresos a largo plazo:
positivo
Comentarios:
Before the project was implemented, the land was either used for wheat cultivation or left fallow. With the introduction of the agroforestry project, tree seedlings were planted, and alfalfa was grown. In some plots, legumes were cultivated instead of alfalfa. In the first year, the production of alfalfa and legumes significantly outpaced the wheat yield, resulting in high levels of satisfaction and happiness among the local communities.
6.5 Adopción de la Tecnología
- 1-10%
De todos quienes adoptaron la Tecnología, ¿cuántos lo hicieron espontáneamente, por ej. sin recibir nada de incentivos/ materiales:
- 11-50%
Comentarios:
In addition to the 400 gardens established through the project, local communities independently created 50 small and large gardens without any financial assistance. They purchased saplings from the market and, having previously received capacity-building training from the project team, applied agroforestry practices on plots of various sizes, tailored to their available land.
6.6 Adaptación
¿La tecnología fue modificada recientemente para adaptarse a las condiciones cambiantes?
No
6.7 Fuerzas/ ventajas/ oportunidades de la Tecnología
| Fuerzas/ ventajas/ oportunidades desde la perspectiva del usuario de la tierra |
|---|
| Integrated systems that combine apple trees with alfalfa and legumes offer several benefits. Farmers appreciated the enhanced biodiversity, which supports pest control and improves pollination, leading to healthier crops and increased yields. The intercropping of legumes is particularly valued for its role in improving soil fertility through nitrogen fixation, reducing dependence on synthetic fertilizers, and promoting sustainable farming practices. |
| Economically, farmers find that this system provides diversified income sources, as they can sell both fruit and forage crops, which mitigates risks associated with crop failure. Additionally, the ability to optimize land use while maintaining ecological balance is a significant advantage. This resource efficiency, coupled with the adaptability of practices to different climates and soils, enables farmers to achieve resilience against climate variability. |
| Furthermore, land users recognize the opportunities for community engagement and knowledge sharing to promotes agroforestry. As these systems gain popularity, farmers are increasingly accessing markets for sustainably produced goods, enhancing their profitability. With supportive policies of sustainable land management, the future of agroforestry initiatives appears promising, benefiting both the environment and local economies. |
| Fuerzas/ ventajas/ oportunidades desde la perspectiva del compilador o de otra persona de referencia clave |
|---|
| Integrated systems of apple trees intercropped with alfalfa and legumes are recognized for their multifaceted benefits. They highlight the importance of these systems in promoting sustainable agricultural practices, noting that the biodiversity fostered by agroforestry enhances pest control and supports healthier ecosystems. This ecological balance is crucial not only for soil health but also for mitigating the reliance on chemical inputs, which aligns with global sustainability goals (Nair, 2019; FAO, 2020). |
| Moreover, compilers emphasize the economic advantages of agroforestry. By diversifying income streams, these systems reduce financial risks for farmers and stabilize local economies. The adaptability of agroforestry practices to various climates and soil types allows for broader implementation, making it an attractive option for diverse agricultural settings (Schroth et al., 2004; Somarriba et al., 2016). |
| Key resource persons also note the social dimension of agroforestry, as these systems encourage community engagement and collaboration. This participatory technology fosters knowledge sharing, leading to improved agricultural practices and strengthening local capacities. With increasing support from policies advocating for sustainable land management, agroforestry initiatives are well-positioned for growth and development, contributing to both environmental health and economic resilience (Pretty, 2018; Wang et al., 2020). |
6.8 Debilidades/ desventajas/ riesgos de la Tecnología y formas de sobreponerse a ellos
| Debilidades/ desventajas/ riesgos desde la perspectiva del usuario de la tierra | ¿Cómo sobreponerse a ellas? |
|---|---|
| Initial costs and investment risks | The project team provided seedlings, fertilizers, and Alfalfa seeds at the start of the technology. Land users were responsible for carrying out physical activities such as digging holes, planting seedlings, and irrigation, which helps reduce costs and fosters a sense of ownership among the participants. |
| Low knowledge of the technology and skill gaps | To address educational gaps, the project’s field team conducted capacity-building programs and workshops before implementing the technology. This initiative has enabled land users to become familiar with new methods and enhance their capabilities in agroforestry |
| Market access and economic viability | The project team established agroforestry committees and facilitated direct market communication and improved access for land users to sell their produce. It has provided sales skills training to land users, allowing them to make more profit from their produce |
| 4) Pest and disease management: | 4) The project's field team has educated land users about common pests and diseases in the area and provided them with preventive management strategies. In case of new issues, they have been linked with the Department of Agriculture to ensure timely and effective support. |
| Debilidades/ desventajas/ riesgos desde la perspectiva del compilador o de otra persona de referencia clave | ¿Cómo sobreponerse a ellas? |
|---|---|
| Provision of Resources and Local Engagement: | Importance of equipping land users with essential materials, such as sapling and fertilizers, to lower initial barriers and encourage participation. Enhance ownership to ensure sustainability when the project pulls out |
| Addressing educational gaps | Realizing that knowledge gaps could hinder the project’s success, the team implemented pre-launch training workshops. These sessions were aimed at familiarizing land users with innovative agroforestry, helping to ensure their understanding and effective implementation of new techniques. |
| Market connections and economic benefits | Key resource personnel highlighted the importance of establishing market access for sustainable success. By Rangeland management Association and offering training in market engagement, the project helped land users gain market literacy, empowering them to maximize income potential from their produce. |
| Support for pest and disease management | The project team prioritized proactive pest and disease management by training land users in common pest prevention techniques. The creation of a support network with the Department of Agriculture ensures that land users have access to timely guidance for any emerging issues, ensuring resilience and adaptability in their practices. |
7. Referencias y vínculos
7.1 Métodos/ fuentes de información
- visitas de campo, encuestas de campo
Field visits and field surveys by project team
- entrevistas con usuarios de tierras
About one per agroforestry plot by project team
- entrevistas con especialistas/ expertos en MST
Three people - project implementation unit.
- compilación de informes y otra documentación existente
Field reports and documents.
¿Cuándo se compilaron los datos (en el campo)?
16/12/2024
Vínculos y módulos
Expandir todo Colapsar todosVínculos
No hay vínculos
Módulos
No se hallaron módulos