Maize under conservation agriculture intercropped with velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens) as a dense cover crop in western Kenya. (George Ayaga)

Conservation agriculture for maize-legume systems with velvet bean as a dense cover crop (Kenya)

Kilimo hifadhi

Description

Conservation agriculture for maize-legume systems with velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens) as a dense cover crop is being promoted in western Kenya to address the challenges of land degradation, low crop yields, low incomes, high production costs and climate change.

Agriculture in western Kenya suffers from low productivity due to the degraded landscape. The soils are predominantly acidic and low in fertility, with the yields of food staples, such as maize and common bean averaging 1 ton/ ha and 5 tons/ ha, respectively. Consequently, the smallholder farmers have encroached into the adjacent Kakamega and Nandi forests in their quest for supplementary agro-ecosystem services and farm incomes. Degradation of the agro-resource base is underpinned by unsustainable practices carried out under conventional farming; for example, continuous cultivation with low nutrient inputs, mono-cropping, removal of crop residues and full tillage. Some of these practices enhance climate change by intensifying the emissions of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere. Therefore, widespread adoption of conservation agriculture (CA) technology is being promoted to reduce the adverse impacts of conventional farming and enhance sustainable land management, environmental protection, and climate change mitigation and adaptation in 10 micro-catchments located within a 5-km radius from the edge of Kakamega and Nandi forests. The CA technology is characterized by the principles of minimum mechanical soil disturbance, maintenance of at least 30 percent permanent organic soil cover, diversified cropping through intercropping and crop rotations, and weed control. These principles have been adapted to the local conditions and needs.

The establishment of CA technology begins with land preparation. That is, the existing weeds and previous crop residues in the field are either slashed, or controlled through the application of appropriate herbicides. All the residues are retained on soil surface as opposed to burning, or removal in the conventional system. Land preparation is followed by planting, where the jab planter is used for precise placement of seeds and fertilizers in un-ploughed field, or within the established planting hills and rip lines to minimize soil tillage. This contrasts with conventional farming practice where a plough, or a hand hoe is used to till the entire field and establish the planting holes for placing seeds and fertilizers. A combination of cereal (maize – Zea mays L.) and legumes (common bean – Phaseolus vulgaris L., soybean - Glycine max, velvet bean – Mucuna pruriens and cowpea – Vigna unguiculata) are either intercropped, or rotated in the field each season to optimize the use of the available soil resources, including water, nutrients, and micro-organisms. The main cereal-legume association involves the establishment of Mucuna pruriens under maize as a dense cover crop. In this cropping system, Mucuna pruriens seeds are sown within a spacing of 1 m × 0.5 m where they grow and spread to completely cover the soil surface. As the cover crop grows, the leaves fall and decompose on the ground, enriching the soil’s nutrients, organic matter and fertility. The maize - Mucuna pruriens mix is rotated with either sole common bean, soybean and cowpea crop, or an intercrop of maize with any of the legumes. Weeding is carried out using either selective herbicides, or weed scrapers. When designing the intercropping and rotation plans, crop families (N-fixing vs. non-fixing), root depths (shallow vs. deep roots), and susceptibility to diseases, pests and weeds are all considered.

Generally, CA technologies have multiple benefits for farmers and the environment. In the context of the Kakamega-Nandi forest landscape, the CA plots with Mucuna pruriens as a dense cover crop have shown improved soil organic matter, soil structure and nutrient status. It is expected that this will reduce the use of fertilizers over time. Most farmers have also reported that reduced tillage and direct placement of inputs (seeds and fertilizers) save them time, money, fuel, labour and inputs. Aside from saving resources, reduced tillage will ultimately enhance soil living organisms and mitigate atmospheric CO2 emissions through the decrease in fuel consumption and soil disturbance. Moreover, farmers have observed that the maize established with Mucuna pruriens as a cover crop remains green and healthy for long during mid-season dry spells compared to those under mono-culture, or light mulch. This implies that the CA technology also increases water infiltration and soil water content; thus, acting as insurance against drought. The increase in water infiltration and soil moisture occurs because the dense Mucuna pruriens cover crop not only regulates the soil surface temperatures and evaporation, but also reduces surface runoff and exposure to wind erosion. In addition, farmers have witnessed the suppression of weeds, such as Striga hermonthica (witchweed) in plots under dense cover crop and diversified cropping. Besides, diversified cropping through rotations has reduced the incidences of insect pests and diseases, as well as the risk of crop failure during extreme weather conditions and pest infestations. Specifically, farmers have noticed that the CA plots under maize - Mucuna pruriens intercrop are less affected by the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) compared to those under mono-culture. They have also noted that, in seasons of excessive rainfall, the maize intercropped with the common bean is usually harvested even when the common bean fails. Most importantly, these CA benefits have boosted maize yields by over 50 percent, meaning more food and income, and fewer forest encroachments.

Proper adoption of the CA technology by land users within the Kakamega-Nandi forest landscape is being hampered by several factors. Firstly, crop residues are inadequate due to competing uses, such as animal feed and fuel. At times, livestock is even allowed to graze on the stubble field, contravening the CA principles. Besides, some farmers have not fully embraced crop diversification and still grow maize throughout the seasons without rotation with other drought-tolerant cereals, such as sorghum and millet. Conventional ploughing is also quite entrenched. Further, some farmers still do not prefer Mucuna pruriens as a cover crop because of insufficient knowledge on the utilization of its inedible yields. Lastly, some farmers are finding it hard to access CA inputs and tools, such as the jab planters, weed scrapers, herbicides and seeds of Mucuna pruriens owing to either high prices, or shortages.

Lieu

Lieu: Kakamega-Nandi forest landscape, Western region, Kenya

Nbr de sites de la Technologie analysés: 10-100 sites

Géo-référence des sites sélectionnés
  • 34.83124, 0.28684
  • 34.76718, 0.294
  • 34.761, 0.29941
  • 34.84792, 0.47542
  • 34.97712, 0.05276
  • 34.85608, 0.1509
  • 35.01455, 0.20834
  • 34.88496, 0.14398
  • 34.94756, 0.11799
  • 35.01247, 0.39162

Diffusion de la Technologie: appliquée en des points spécifiques ou concentrée sur une petite surface

Dans des zones protégées en permanence ?: Non

Date de mise en oeuvre: 2019

Type d'introduction
Maize intercropped with Mucuna pruriens as a dense cover crop in western Kenya. Maize and Mucuna pruriens are intercropped, but after the harvesting of maize, Mucuna pruriens is left to cover and improve the soil conditions. (George Ayaga)
A field under total soil cover with Mucuna pruriens in western Kenya. This allows the soil to be re-nourished before planting the next crop. (George Ayaga)

Classification de la Technologie

Principal objectif
  • améliorer la production
  • réduire, prévenir, restaurer les terres dégradées
  • préserver l'écosystème
  • protéger un bassin versant/ des zones situées en aval - en combinaison avec d'autres technologies
  • conserver/ améliorer la biodiversité
  • réduire les risques de catastrophes
  • s'adapter au changement et aux extrêmes climatiques et à leurs impacts
  • atténuer le changement climatique et ses impacts
  • créer un impact économique positif
  • créer un impact social positif
L'utilisation des terres
Les divers types d'utilisation des terres au sein du même unité de terrain: Oui - Agropastoralisme (y compris les systèmes culture-élevage intégrés)

  • Terres cultivées
    • Cultures annuelles: céréales - maïs, légumineuses et légumes secs - fèves, légumineuses et légumes secs - pois, légumineuses et légumes secs - soja. Cropping system: Maïs/sorgho/mil en culture intercalaire avec des légumineuses
    Nombre de période de croissance par an: : 2
    Est-ce que les cultures intercalaires sont pratiquées? Oui
    Est-ce que la rotation des cultures est appliquée? Oui
  • Pâturages
    • Affouragement en vert/ zéro-pâturage
    • Prairies améliorées
    Type d'animal: cattle - dairy and beef (e.g. zebu)
    Est-ce que la gestion intégrée cultures-élevage est pratiquée? Oui
    Produits et services: manure as fertilizer/ energy production, viande, lait, peaux/ cuirs, transports/ traction
Approvisionnement en eau
  • pluvial
  • mixte: pluvial-irrigué
  • pleine irrigation

But relatif à la dégradation des terres
  • prévenir la dégradation des terres
  • réduire la dégradation des terres
  • restaurer/ réhabiliter des terres sévèrement dégradées
  • s'adapter à la dégradation des terres
  • non applicable
Dégradation des terres traité
  • érosion hydrique des sols - Wt: perte de la couche superficielle des sols (couche arable)/ érosion de surface
  • érosion éolienne des sols - Et: perte de la couche superficielle des sols (couche arable)
  • dégradation chimique des sols - Cn: baisse de la fertilité des sols et réduction du niveau de matière organique (non causée par l’érosion)
  • dégradation physique des sols - Pc: compaction
  • dégradation biologique - Bl: perte de la vie des sols
  • dégradation hydrique - Ha: aridification
Groupe de GDT
  • Amélioration de la couverture végétale/ du sol
  • perturbation minimale du sol
  • gestion intégrée de la fertilité des sols
Mesures de GDT
  • pratiques agronomiques - A1: Couverture végétale/ du sol, A2: Matière organique/ fertilité du sol , A3: Traitement de la couche superficielle du sol (A 3.2: Reduced tillage (> 30% soil cover)), A6: Gestion des résidus des cultures (A 6.5: Résidus retenus)

Dessin technique

Spécifications techniques
The first technical drawing shows a typical farm under CA with various principles:
A - Clearance of weeds and previous crop residues through slashing in preparation for planting in season 1 (long rains). The residues are retained on the plot.
B - In a plot under total soil cover with Mucuna pruriens, maize seed and fertilizer are placed at the precise planting hills, denoted by the white circles along the red line, using a jab planter to minimize soil tillage.
C - Maize crop establishes under the dense cover of Mucuna pruriens.
D - Weeding of the maize crop is done using a weed scraper.
E & F - In season 2 (short rains), after harvesting maize in the previous maize – Mucuna cropping system and cutting down the residues, either a row intercropping system with alternate rows of maize and soybean (E), or maize and common bean (F) under maize straw mulch is established.
G & H - Alternatively, in season 2 (short rains), either sole common bean (cowpea, or soybean) production under maize straw mulch (G), or total soil cover with Mucuna pruriens (H) is established in the plot.
Author: Sam Koile, Kennedy Were & George Ayaga
The second technical drawing is an illustration of a four season (2-year) rotation of maize, legumes and cover crop
Author: Kennedy Were, Sam Koile & George Ayaga

Mise en œuvre et entretien : activités, intrants et coûts

Calcul des intrants et des coûts
  • Les coûts sont calculés : par superficie de la Technologie (taille et unité de surface : 1 ha; facteur de conversion pour un hectare : 1 ha = 2.47 acres)
  • Monnaie utilisée pour le calcul des coûts : KES
  • Taux de change (en dollars américains - USD) : 1 USD = 107.08 KES
  • Coût salarial moyen de la main-d'oeuvre par jour : 300
Facteurs les plus importants affectant les coûts
1. Prevailing market prices of the inputs, equipment and labour.
Activités de mise en place/ d'établissement
  1. Purchase of CA tools - jab planter, knapsack sprayer, protection gear, slasher, weed scraper, and gunny bag) (Calendrier/ fréquence: Initial stage)
Intrants et coûts de mise en place (per 1 ha)
Spécifiez les intrants Unité Quantité Coûts par unité (KES) Coût total par intrant (KES) % des coût supporté par les exploitants des terres
Equipements
Jab planter Piece 2,0 1500,0 3000,0 100,0
Knapsack sprayer Piece 2,0 2500,0 5000,0 100,0
Protection gear Piece 2,0 1000,0 2000,0 100,0
Weed scraper Piece 2,0 500,0 1000,0 100,0
Slasher Piece 2,0 500,0 1000,0 100,0
Gunny bag Piece 50,0 50,0 2500,0 100,0
Coût total de mise en place de la Technologie 14'500.0
Coût total de mise en place de la Technologie en dollars américains (USD) 135.41
Activités récurrentes d'entretien
  1. Land preparation - Slashing (Calendrier/ fréquence: Initial stage)
  2. Preparing the planting hills and rip lines (Calendrier/ fréquence: Initial stage)
  3. Planting - placing seeds and fertilizer using jab planter (Calendrier/ fréquence: Initial stage)
  4. Herbicide application (Calendrier/ fréquence: Initial and growing stages)
  5. Pesticide application (Calendrier/ fréquence: Growing stage)
  6. Fertilizer application (top-dressing) (Calendrier/ fréquence: Growing stage)
  7. Harvesting, drying and shelling (Calendrier/ fréquence: Final stage)
Intrants et coûts de l'entretien (per 1 ha)
Spécifiez les intrants Unité Quantité Coûts par unité (KES) Coût total par intrant (KES) % des coût supporté par les exploitants des terres
Main d'œuvre
Land preparation - slashing and herbicide application Man day 4,0 300,0 1200,0 100,0
Planting - preparing the planting hills and placing seeds and fertilizer Man day 38,0 300,0 11400,0 100,0
Top-dressing and pesticide application Man day 8,0 300,0 2400,0 100,0
Harvesting, shelling and drying Man day 30,0 300,0 9000,0 100,0
Matériel végétal
Maize seed Kg 20,0 250,0 5000,0 100,0
Legume seed Kg 8,0 250,0 2000,0 100,0
Engrais et biocides
Planting fertilizer Kg 125,0 60,0 7500,0 100,0
Top-dressing fertilizer Kg 125,0 50,0 6250,0 100,0
Pesticide Litre 2,0 1250,0 2500,0 100,0
Herbicide Litre 5,0 875,0 4375,0 100,0
Autre
Transport Km 5,0 1500,0 7500,0 100,0
Coût total d'entretien de la Technologie 59'125.0
Coût total d'entretien de la Technologie en dollars américains (USD) 552.16

Environnement naturel

Précipitations annuelles
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1000 mm
  • 1001-1500 mm
  • 1501-2000 mm
  • 2001-3000 mm
  • 3001-4000 mm
  • > 4000 mm
Zones agro-climatiques
  • humide
  • subhumide
  • semi-aride
  • aride
Spécifications sur le climat
Rainfall is bi-modal with the long rain season starting from March to May, and the short rains from October to December.
mean annual temperature varies from 18 to 29° C
Pentes moyennes
  • plat (0-2 %)
  • faible (3-5%)
  • modéré (6-10%)
  • onduleux (11-15%)
  • vallonné (16-30%)
  • raide (31-60%)
  • très raide (>60%)
Reliefs
  • plateaux/ plaines
  • crêtes
  • flancs/ pentes de montagne
  • flancs/ pentes de colline
  • piémonts/ glacis (bas de pente)
  • fonds de vallée/bas-fonds
Zones altitudinales
  • 0-100 m
  • 101-500 m
  • 501-1000 m
  • 1001-1500 m
  • 1501-2000 m
  • 2001-2500 m
  • 2501-3000 m
  • 3001-4000 m
  • > 4000 m
La Technologie est appliquée dans
  • situations convexes
  • situations concaves
  • non pertinent
Profondeurs moyennes du sol
  • très superficiel (0-20 cm)
  • superficiel (21-50 cm)
  • modérément profond (51-80 cm)
  • profond (81-120 cm)
  • très profond (>120 cm)
Textures du sol (de la couche arable)
  • grossier/ léger (sablonneux)
  • moyen (limoneux)
  • fin/ lourd (argile)
Textures du sol (> 20 cm sous la surface)
  • grossier/ léger (sablonneux)
  • moyen (limoneux)
  • fin/ lourd (argile)
Matière organique de la couche arable
  • abondant (>3%)
  • moyen (1-3%)
  • faible (<1%)
Profondeur estimée de l’eau dans le sol
  • en surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Disponibilité de l’eau de surface
  • excès
  • bonne
  • moyenne
  • faible/ absente
Qualité de l’eau (non traitée)
  • eau potable
  • faiblement potable (traitement nécessaire)
  • uniquement pour usage agricole (irrigation)
  • eau inutilisable
La qualité de l'eau fait référence à: à la fois les eaux souterraines et de surface
La salinité de l'eau est-elle un problème ?
  • Oui
  • Non

Présence d'inondations
  • Oui
  • Non
Diversité des espèces
  • élevé
  • moyenne
  • faible
Diversité des habitats
  • élevé
  • moyenne
  • faible

Caractéristiques des exploitants des terres appliquant la Technologie

Orientation du système de production
  • subsistance (auto-approvisionnement)
  • exploitation mixte (de subsistance/ commerciale)
  • commercial/ de marché
Revenus hors exploitation
  • moins de 10% de tous les revenus
  • 10-50% de tous les revenus
  • > 50% de tous les revenus
Niveau relatif de richesse
  • très pauvre
  • pauvre
  • moyen
  • riche
  • très riche
Niveau de mécanisation
  • travail manuel
  • traction animale
  • mécanisé/ motorisé
Sédentaire ou nomade
  • Sédentaire
  • Semi-nomade
  • Nomade
Individus ou groupes
  • individu/ ménage
  • groupe/ communauté
  • coopérative
  • employé (entreprise, gouvernement)
Genre
  • femmes
  • hommes
Âge
  • enfants
  • jeunes
  • personnes d'âge moyen
  • personnes âgées
Superficie utilisée par ménage
  • < 0,5 ha
  • 0,5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1 000 ha
  • 1 000-10 000 ha
  • > 10 000 ha
Échelle
  • petite dimension
  • moyenne dimension
  • grande dimension
Propriété foncière
  • état
  • entreprise
  • communauté/ village
  • groupe
  • individu, sans titre de propriété
  • individu, avec titre de propriété
Droits d’utilisation des terres
  • accès libre (non organisé)
  • communautaire (organisé)
  • loué
  • individuel
Droits d’utilisation de l’eau
  • accès libre (non organisé)
  • communautaire (organisé)
  • loué
  • individuel
Accès aux services et aux infrastructures
santé

pauvre
x
bonne
éducation

pauvre
x
bonne
assistance technique

pauvre
x
bonne
emploi (par ex. hors exploitation)

pauvre
x
bonne
marchés

pauvre
x
bonne
énergie

pauvre
x
bonne
routes et transports

pauvre
x
bonne
eau potable et assainissement

pauvre
x
bonne
services financiers

pauvre
x
bonne

Impact

Impacts socio-économiques
Production agricole
en baisse
x
en augmentation

Quantité avant la GDT: 24 bags/ ha
Quantité après la GDT: 43 bags/ ha
This can be attributed to the multiple benefits of the CA technology, such as improved soil organic matter content and nutrient status. Note: A standard bag weighs 90 kgs.

qualité des cultures
en baisse
x
en augmentation


The multiple benefits of the CA technology, such as improved soil conditions and alleviation of pests and diseases, not only increased crop production (yields), but also the quality of the crops.

production fourragère
en baisse
x
en augmentation


Increased crop production also means increased fodder production because the crop residues are partly used as animal feed

qualité des fourrages
en baisse
x
en augmentation


Increased crop quality also implies increased fodder quality because the crop residues are partly used as animal feed

risque d'échec de la production
en augmentation
x
en baisse


Specifically,
- the maize established with Mucuna pruriens as a cover crop have remained green and healthy for long during mid-season dry spells. The CA technology increases water infiltration and soil moisture because the dense cover crop not only regulates the soil surface temperatures and evaporation, but also reduces surface runoff
- the CA plots under maize - Mucuna pruriens inter-crop have been less affected by the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda).
- in seasons of excessive rainfall, the maize intercropped with the common bean has been harvested even when the common bean fails.

diversité des produits
en baisse
x
en augmentation


Farmers not only grow maize, but also mix or rotate it with common bean, soybean and cowpea

gestion des terres
entravé
x
simplifié


Operations such as precise and direct placement of inputs and minimum tillage have simplified land management

dépenses pour les intrants agricoles
en augmentation
x
en baisse


Expenses on inputs, such as herbicides and fertilizers increased marginally, because the conventional farming practice had been characterized by low inputs; however, with improved soil organic matter, soil structure and nutrient status, as well as reduced incidences of pest, diseases and weeds, it is expected that the use of these inputs will diminish over time

revenus agricoles
en baisse
x
en augmentation


Increased crop production means, more surplus and incomes

diversité des sources de revenus
en baisse
x
en augmentation


Diversified cropping enables the farmers to get income from maize, common bean, soybean and cowpea production

charge de travail
en augmentation
x
en baisse


Reduced tillage has subsequently decreased the farmers' workload because they no longer have to plough the entire field

Impacts socioculturels
sécurité alimentaire/ autosuffisance
réduit
x
amélioré


Increased crop production means more food and less hungry periods. The legumes also provide a good source of protein to the farmers' households

institutions communautaires
affaibli
x
renforcé


The common interest groups have been greatly involved in the selection of the CA technologies. The strengthening of the community institutions has been done for sustainability and to allow sensitization of the technology to the wider population in the landscape. Some of thaccess by the communities. e promotion approaches have been on-farm demonstrations and training of trainers (ToTs), which have involved and empowered different farmer groups within the communities. Seed producers have also been trained to multiply seeds of specific crops, such as Mucuna pruriens for ease of access

connaissances sur la GDT/ dégradation des terres
réduit
x
amélioré


On-farm demonstrations of the CA technology and the training of trainers (ToTs) have empowered different stakeholders within the communities with sufficient SLM/ land degradation knowledge

Impacts écologiques
ruissellement de surface
en augmentation
x
en baisse


The dense Mucuna pruriens cover crop reduces surface runoff

nappes phréatiques/ aquifères
en baisse
x
rechargé


There has been increase in water infiltration and soil water content because the dense Mucuna pruriens cover crop not only regulates the soil surface temperatures and evaporation, but also reduces surface runoff. This recharges the aquifer

évaporation
en augmentation
x
en baisse


The dense Mucuna pruriens cover crop regulates both the soil surface temperatures and evaporation

humidité du sol
en baisse
x
en augmentation


The increase in soil water content occurs because the dense Mucuna pruriens cover crop not only regulates the soil surface temperatures and evaporation, but also reduces surface runoff

couverture du sol
réduit
x
amélioré


The dense Mucuna pruriens completely covers the soil surface, and is left on the ground even after the harvesting of maize

perte en sol
en augmentation
x
en baisse


The dense Mucuna pruriens cover crop reduces surface runoff and exposure to wind erosion

accumulation de sol
en baisse
x
en augmentation


Accumulation of soil organic carbon has occurred because the dense cover crop has a higher net primary productivity and sheds more leaves on the ground, resulting in more inputs of detritus to the soil. Similarly, retention of the large amount of crop residues especially those obtained from the leguminous crops has increased the inputs of carbon and nitrogen to the soil.

encroûtement/ battance du sol
en augmentation
x
réduit


The cover crop, minimum tillage and crop residues have protected the soil from the impact of raindrops, improved the surface soil structure and aggregate stability by increasing the organic matter content in the soil and stimulated soil biological activity, making the soil resistant to crusting

compaction du sol
en augmentation
x
réduit


Reduced tillage or zero tillage has minimized farm land activities, e.g, ploughing which often result in compaction of soil. Incorporation of deep rooted crops with shallow rooted crops has also helped to break the various soil layers, thus hindering compaction. In addition, accumulation of soil organic carbon has improved soil biological activities that help to reduce soil compaction, through continuous burrowing.

cycle/ recharge des éléments nutritifs
en baisse
x
en augmentation


As the dense cover crop grows, the leaves fall and decompose on the ground, enriching the soils with nitrogen and organic matter

matière organique du sol/ au dessous du sol C
en baisse
x
en augmentation


As the dense cover crop grows, the leaves fall and decompose on the ground, with organic matter additions.

biomasse/ au dessus du sol C
en baisse
x
en augmentation


The dense cover crop has higher net primary productivity/ above-ground biomass C, which is left when the maize crop is harvested.

diversité végétale
en baisse
x
en augmentation


Farmers grow a mix of crops under the diverse cropping principle, which has increased plant diversity

espèces étrangères envahissantes
en augmentation
x
réduit


Farmers have witnessed the suppression of weeds, such as Striga hermonthica (witchweed) in plots under dense cover crop and diversified cropping.

contrôle des animaux nuisibles/ maladies
en baisse
x
en augmentation


Diversified cropping through rotations has reduced the incidences of insect pests and diseases through disruption of pest and disease cycles. Specifically, farmers have noticed that the CA plots under maize - Mucuna pruriens intercrop are less affected by the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda)

impacts de la sécheresse
en augmentation
x
en baisse


The maize established with Mucuna pruriens as a cover crop has remained green and healthy for long during mid-season dry spells. This implies that the CA technology also increases water infiltration and soil water content; thus, acting as insurance against drought.

émissions de carbone et de gaz à effet de serre
en augmentation
x
en baisse


Reduced tillage mitigates atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions through the decrease in fossil fuel consumption and soil disturbance. Crop residues are also retained in the field and not burnt; hence, reducing emission of carbon.

Impacts hors site
impact des gaz à effet de serre
en augmentation
x
réduit

Analyse coûts-bénéfices

Bénéfices par rapport aux coûts de mise en place
Rentabilité à court terme
très négative
x
très positive

Rentabilité à long terme
très négative
x
très positive

Bénéfices par rapport aux coûts d'entretien
Rentabilité à court terme
très négative
x
très positive

Rentabilité à long terme
très négative
x
très positive

For example, it is expected that the associated improvement in soil organic matter, soil structure and nutrient status will reduce the use of fertilizers in the long term.

Changement climatique

Changements climatiques progressifs
températures annuelles augmente

pas bien du tout
x
très bien
précipitations annuelles augmente

pas bien du tout
x
très bien
Extrêmes climatiques (catastrophes)
sécheresse

pas bien du tout
x
très bien
maladies épidémiques

pas bien du tout
x
très bien
infestation par des insectes/ vers

pas bien du tout
x
très bien

Adoption et adaptation de la Technologie

Pourcentage d'exploitants des terres ayant adopté la Technologie dans la région
  • cas isolés/ expérimentaux
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Parmi tous ceux qui ont adopté la Technologie, combien d'entre eux l'ont fait spontanément, à savoir sans recevoir aucune incitation matérielle ou aucun paiement ?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
La Technologie a-t-elle été récemment modifiée pour s'adapter à l'évolution des conditions ?
  • Oui
  • Non
A quel changement ?
  • changements/ extrêmes climatiques
  • évolution des marchés
  • la disponibilité de la main-d'œuvre (par ex., en raison de migrations)

Conclusions et enseignements tirés

Points forts: point de vue de l'exploitant des terres
  • Maize established with Mucuna pruriens as a dense cover crop is not adversely affected by the fall army worm (Spodoptera frugiperda)
  • Reduced tillage saves time, money and energy, while the direct placement of inputs (seeds and fertilizers) minimizes wastage. The saved resources can be used to engage in other income-generating activities
  • Maize established with Mucuna pruriens as a dense cover crop remains green and healthy for long during mid-season dry spells
  • Weeds, such as Striga hermonthica (witchweed) are suppressed in plots under dense cover crop and diversified cropping (rotations and inter-crops)
  • In seasons of excessive rainfall, the maize intercropped with the common bean is usually harvested even when the common bean fails
  • The CA technology has boosted maize yields, meaning more food and income, and reduced cost of feeding the family
Points forts: point de vue du compilateur ou d'une autre personne-ressource clé
  • The CA plots with Mucuna pruriens as a dense cover crop have improved soil organic matter, soil structure and nutrient status
  • Reduced tillage has enhanced soil living organisms, such as earthworms and decreased fuel consumption and soil disturbance; hence, mitigating atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions and storing carbon in soils
  • The CA technology has increased water infiltration and soil water content (moisture); thus, acting as insurance against drought
  • Diversified cropping through rotations has reduced the incidences of insect pests and diseases, as well as the risk of crop failure during extreme weather conditions and pest infestations
Faiblesses/ inconvénients/ risques: point de vue de l'exploitant des terrescomment surmonter
  • The Mucuna pruriens used as a dense cover crop intertwines on maize crop, which might increase manual labour Promote other erect cover crops like the lablab bean (Dolichos lablab), Desmodium and Canavalia that will have less effect on the cereal crop established
  • The yields of Mucuna pruriens used as a dense cover crop are not edible - Extension agents and Trainer of Trainees (ToTs) to equip farmers with knowledge on the options available for utilizing Mucuna pruriens yields other than being a cover crop
    - Promote other erect cover crops like the lablab bean (Dolichos lablab), Desmodium and Canavalia
  • Residue retention reduces the availability of fodder and fuel materials Adopt an agro-forestry system with tree species that can provide alternative source of fodder and fuel
  • The critical CA inputs and implements, such as the jab planters, weed scrapers, herbicides and Mucuna seeds are hard to access - Incentivize and train the local fabricators to fabricate affordable CA tools
    - Subsidize CA inputs, such as fertilizer and herbicides
    - Facilitate access to credit
    - Train more seed producers to multiply the seeds of Mucuna pruriens
Faiblesses/ inconvénients/ risques: point de vue du compilateur ou d'une autre personne-ressource clécomment surmonter
  • Agro-ecosystem contamination through use of herbicides and inorganic fertilizers Use the right doses of herbicides and fertilizers

Références

Compilateur
  • Kennedy Were
Editors
Examinateur
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
  • Tatenda Lemann
Date de mise en oeuvre: 31 mai 2020
Dernière mise à jour: 10 août 2020
Personnes-ressources
Description complète dans la base de données WOCAT
Données de GDT correspondantes
La documentation a été facilitée par
Institution Projet
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International