A farmer using MechanizedRaised Bed (MRB)-technology in the field

Mechanized Raised Bed (MRB) Technology in a wheat based production system. (Egypte)

Description

Mechanized Raised Beds (MRB)-technology improves livelihoods because raised beds lead to significantly reduced costs (30% less water, 20-40% less nitrogen fertilizer) and higher wheat yields increased by 20-30%. MRB-technology helps to do more with less.

Mechanized Raised Beds (MRB)-technology has been applied by the International Centre of Agriculture Research in Dryland Areas (ICARDA) and national partners in Egypt. Egypt is a water scarce country and 95% of its water comes from beyond its borders. In addition, Egypt is highly dependent on the import of wheat, 50% of the wheat demand is met by import.

In Egypt, water scarcity and mediocre yield are two issues that keep the majority of people working in the agricultural sector in poverty. Water is scarce as the annual precipitation is less than 250mm leading to most farming to be irrigated. The water comes from the Nile river. However, available irrigation water per farmer is rather low due to population growth. Thus, due to clay soil and the use of flood irrigation, water logging and uneven water distribution over the field lead to salinization of the soil, harming the farmer's yields. Furthermore, the latter is caused by the lack of water, insufficient use of fertilizers and the use of relatively low-quality seeds. In particular, fertilizers are expensive leading to an insufficient and poor application of fertilizers.
In effect, the core objective of MRB-technology package is to fit within this context and realize more output with less input, consequently improving involved livelihoods. Indeed, MRB improves farmers' resilience with increased water and nutrient efficiency. The adopters of MRB receive benefits from direct effects such as improvement in their livelihoods, a decreased workload, increased yields and more efficient use of resources (water, fertilizer and seeds).

The first stage research and designing of MRB-technology was done in 2003. Introductions and pilots of the technology were designed together with regular farmers in the Nile Delta-area, from 2010 until 2013. In 2015, MRB-technology was proven beneficial permitting out-scaling. Thanks to the shown potential of MRB-technology and Egypt's reliance on foreign countries for water and wheat, that MRB-technology has become a strong component of Egypt's national wheat campaign. The Egyptian Government aims to cultivate 2 million acres of wheat under MRB-technology, by 2022.

MRB-technology raises the seedbed simultaneously seeding wheat, consequently creating furrows, of which the length depend on the dimensions of the farm- field. The inter- furrow spacing and the width depends on the type of crop planted and on the soil type. The field/terrain may not exceed a slope of 5%. This allows water to infiltrate, reach the end of the furrow and for safe run-off, preventing water-logging. So, to implement MRB-technology, the field might be levelled prior to implementation, but this is often not the case as MRB is designed to local conditions, and most fields already have a slope of less than 5%. The practice of the machine requires a loose soil, so it is required that the field is ploughed prior to seeding, and therefore MRB is not seen as a type of ploughing. If the field preparation is done, a MRB-machine can start seeding and raising the seedbed. Specific characteristics for MRB-technology with respect to conventional seeding, is that seeding and raising seedbeds are done simultaneously. Raising seedbeds mechanically saves 80% of the workload with respect to manually raising seedbeds. The after-harvest practice depends on the farmer preference, as some farmers prefer letting the stubble grazed, while others clear the field. The after-harvest practices are thus independent with respect to MRB.
In addition, to complement the Mechanized Raised Bed, High Quality Seeds are offered. These are beneficial as they yield higher than the regular wheat seeds. Nevertheless, the machine can also be practiced with regular wheat seeds, if the high-quality seeds are found too expensive by the farmer. The High Quality Sees are hybrid, and need to be replaced after three years to ensure high quality.

The technology has significant positive impacts for local farmers as applied water is saved by 25%, water pumping costs decreased by 25%, seed rate reduced by 50%, farming costs decreased by 30%, fertilizer use efficiency increased by 30%, and crop yield increased by 15-30% with respect to conventional farming. On overall, it is estimated that farming under MRB is about 1/3 of the cost with respect to conventional farming. Manually raising seedbeds was considered too expensive due to the required amount of labour. Thus, regular flood irrigation was practiced. Practically, this results in full surface flooding of the field. This has significantly higher evaporation hence increasing salinization, as opposed to furrow irrigation through raised seedbeds. Also, because water is well distributed over the field due to the furrows (reducing water stress and water logging), there is less leaching of the nutrient hence increased nutrient-efficiency. The raised seedbeds allow excess water, in case of a heavy rainfall event or over-irrigating, to safely run-off. These features of better water disposal and reduced evaporation makes MRB-technology well suited with respect to climate change, which leads to more concentrated rainfall events and increased temperature hence increased evaporation. In addition, as MRB prevents e.g. waterlogging it prevents land degradation (e.g. salinization).

Therefore, livelihoods of farmers who have adopted this technology have been greatly improved. Farmers who have adopted MRB, agree that MRB is affordable, easy to apply, improves production and is cost saving. Furthermore, since this technology increases irrigation efficiency , it can mitigate existing upstream-downstream issues in terms of availability, as there is more available irrigation water. Also, as MRB-technology is currently out scaled, it creates employment opportunities since MRB-machines are locally produced from scratch.

Lieu

Lieu: Sharkia, Dakahlia, Beheira, Fayoum, Minya and Asuit, Egypte

Nbr de sites de la Technologie analysés: > 1000 sites

Géo-référence des sites sélectionnés
  • 29.98834, 31.1035
  • 31.49597, 31.16498
  • 30.34331, 30.84526
  • 30.61714, 29.35617
  • 30.72452, 28.09497
  • 31.21721, 27.19784

Diffusion de la Technologie: répartie uniformément sur une zone (approx. 1-10 km2)

Dans des zones protégées en permanence ?: Non

Date de mise en oeuvre: 2003

Type d'introduction
Water in the furrows on a farmfield under MRB-technology. (Swelam, A.)
This picture shows the well and uniformly established wheat field, as a consequence of MRB. (Swelam, A.)

Classification de la Technologie

Principal objectif
  • améliorer la production
  • réduire, prévenir, restaurer les terres dégradées
  • préserver l'écosystème
  • protéger un bassin versant/ des zones situées en aval - en combinaison avec d'autres technologies
  • conserver/ améliorer la biodiversité
  • réduire les risques de catastrophes
  • s'adapter au changement et aux extrêmes climatiques et à leurs impacts
  • atténuer le changement climatique et ses impacts
  • créer un impact économique positif
  • créer un impact social positif
L'utilisation des terres
Les divers types d'utilisation des terres au sein du même unité de terrain: Non

  • Terres cultivées
    • Cultures annuelles: céréales - blé d'hiver
    Nombre de période de croissance par an: : 1
    Est-ce que les cultures intercalaires sont pratiquées? Non
    Est-ce que la rotation des cultures est appliquée? Non

Approvisionnement en eau
  • pluvial
  • mixte: pluvial-irrigué
  • pleine irrigation

But relatif à la dégradation des terres
  • prévenir la dégradation des terres
  • réduire la dégradation des terres
  • restaurer/ réhabiliter des terres sévèrement dégradées
  • s'adapter à la dégradation des terres
  • non applicable
Dégradation des terres traité
  • dégradation chimique des sols - Cs: salinisation/ alcalinisation
  • dégradation physique des sols - Pw: saturation en eau des sols
  • dégradation biologique - Bq: baisse de la quantité/ biomasse
  • dégradation hydrique - Ha: aridification
Groupe de GDT
  • amélioration des variétés végétales, des races animales
  • gestion de l'irrigation (incl. l'approvisionnement en eau, le drainage)
Mesures de GDT
  • pratiques agronomiques - A3: Traitement de la couche superficielle du sol, A5: Gestion des semences, amélioration des variétés
  • structures physiques - S3: Fossés étagés, canaux, voies d'eau

Dessin technique

Spécifications techniques
Firstly, prior to Mechanized Raised Seedbed (MRB)-implementation the field is prepared. This consist of two-way ploughing. This makes the soil sufficiently loose, to enable the practice of MRB i.e. construction of the raised seedbeds. Also, for successful implementation of the MRB, the field should have a slope of less than 5%.

Secondly, the raised bed seeder is pulled by a tractor and raises the seed bed while seeding wheat, hence Mechanized Raised Seedbed technology. The width of the furrow (A) is 35 -45 cm, this is affected by the related soil texture. The width of the raised seedbed (B) is 100-130 cm, also dependent on the soil texture. Between
seed rows (C) there is a space of 14 cm.This inter-row spacing of the crops relates to the type of crop seeded. The furrow has a depth (D) of 35-45 cm. However, after the first irrigation event the depth could be reduced to 25 cm, due to the influx of loose soil. This is not a problem for the current growing season.
This technical drawing is based on the most common conditions where MRB is implemented. These are that the crop is winter wheat, the soil texture is mostly clay and the system is watered through irrigation coming from the Nile river, rather than rain-fed. If MRB is used under different circumstances, the dimension would change as well.

Lastly, once these above-mentioned steps are successfully done, the agricultural practices do not differ from the previous/traditional method. After harvest, prior to the new season, the raised seedbed structures are still well in shape. This means that after some small reshaping, the raised seedbeds can be used for cultivation again, without using MRB and/or the previously mentioned field preparation. This reshaping is done by cleaning/digging out the furrows. Additionally, this reduces the consequences of compaction by heavy machinery, such as the tractor. As these heavy machinery are used less frequently.
Author: Joren Verbist (Drawing: Atef Swelam)

Mise en œuvre et entretien : activités, intrants et coûts

Calcul des intrants et des coûts
  • Les coûts sont calculés : par superficie de la Technologie (taille et unité de surface : 1 acre; facteur de conversion pour un hectare : 1 ha = 2.47 acres)
  • Monnaie utilisée pour le calcul des coûts : dollars américains
  • Taux de change (en dollars américains - USD) : 1 USD = n.d.
  • Coût salarial moyen de la main-d'oeuvre par jour : 6.31
Facteurs les plus importants affectant les coûts
The most impacting cost factor is the purchase of a MRB-machine. Whereas, the High Yield Seeds are also significant, but the increased yield justifies this. In addition, farmers could also choose to use different seeds. Additionally, the High Yield Seeds are hybrid and can be reproduced for three years on the farm.
Activités de mise en place/ d'établissement
  1. Purchase MRB (Calendrier/ fréquence: None)
Intrants et coûts de mise en place (per 1 acre)
Spécifiez les intrants Unité Quantité Coûts par unité (dollars américains) Coût total par intrant (dollars américains) % des coût supporté par les exploitants des terres
Equipements
MRB-Machine Machine 1,0 6000,0 6000,0 100,0
Coût total de mise en place de la Technologie 6'000.0
Coût total de mise en place de la Technologie en dollars américains (USD) 6'000.0
Activités récurrentes d'entretien
  1. Ploughing (Calendrier/ fréquence: Prior to seeding)
  2. Levelling (if needed) (Calendrier/ fréquence: Prior to seeding)
  3. Seeding/Raising seedbeds (i.e. use of MRB) (Calendrier/ fréquence: November)
  4. Irrigation Event (300-400m3) (Calendrier/ fréquence: Once in every 25-30 days)
  5. Fertilizer Application (Calendrier/ fréquence: Establishment Stage (November))
  6. Fertilizer Application (Calendrier/ fréquence: Flowering Stage (March-May))
  7. Fertilizer Application (Calendrier/ fréquence: Grain Filling Stage (June-July))
  8. Harvesting (Calendrier/ fréquence: April)
  9. Purchase new High Yield Seeds (Calendrier/ fréquence: Once in the 3 years)
Intrants et coûts de l'entretien (per 1 acre)
Spécifiez les intrants Unité Quantité Coûts par unité (dollars américains) Coût total par intrant (dollars américains) % des coût supporté par les exploitants des terres
Main d'œuvre
Pesticide and herbicide application Person-Day 2,0 6,0 12,0 100,0
Field Preparation and Raising Seedbeds Person-Day 2,0 100,0
Fertilizer Application Person-Day 1,0 7,0 7,0 100,0
Irrigation Management Person-Day 5,0 7,0 35,0 100,0
Equipements
Combine (harvesting) Machine Day 1,0 64,0 64,0 100,0
MRB Machine-Day 1,0 10,0 10,0 100,0
Tractor (Raising Seedbed) Machine-Day 1,0 17,0 17,0 100,0
Sprayer Machine-Day 1,0 20,0 20,0 100,0
Plough Machine-Day 1,0 32,0 32,0 100,0
Tractor (Field Preparation) Machine-Day 1,0 32,0 32,0 100,0
Matériel végétal
High Yield Seeds Kilogram 45,0 0,6 27,0 100,0
Engrais et biocides
Fertilizer Kilogram 150,0 0,26 39,0 100,0
Herbicide Kilogram 1,0 9,5 9,5 100,0
Pesticide Kilogram 2,0 7,0 14,0 100,0
Matériaux de construction
Water (Irrigation Event) 350m^3 20,0 8,0 160,0 100,0
Autre
Harvesting Person-Day 5,0 7,0 35,0 100,0
Maintenance Raised Seedbed Person-Day 8,0 7,0 56,0 100,0
Coût total d'entretien de la Technologie 569.5
Coût total d'entretien de la Technologie en dollars américains (USD) 569.5

Environnement naturel

Précipitations annuelles
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1000 mm
  • 1001-1500 mm
  • 1501-2000 mm
  • 2001-3000 mm
  • 3001-4000 mm
  • > 4000 mm
Zones agro-climatiques
  • humide
  • subhumide
  • semi-aride
  • aride
Spécifications sur le climat
The annual rainfall varies between 20mm and 200mm
Egypt is characterized as a hot desert climate (Köppen climate classification BWh). The hot season is from May to October. While the cool season is opposite, from October to May.
Egypt is characterized as a hot desert climate (Köppen climate classification BWh). The hot season is from May to October. While the cool season is oppesite, from October to May.
Pentes moyennes
  • plat (0-2 %)
  • faible (3-5%)
  • modéré (6-10%)
  • onduleux (11-15%)
  • vallonné (16-30%)
  • raide (31-60%)
  • très raide (>60%)
Reliefs
  • plateaux/ plaines
  • crêtes
  • flancs/ pentes de montagne
  • flancs/ pentes de colline
  • piémonts/ glacis (bas de pente)
  • fonds de vallée/bas-fonds
Zones altitudinales
  • 0-100 m
  • 101-500 m
  • 501-1000 m
  • 1001-1500 m
  • 1501-2000 m
  • 2001-2500 m
  • 2501-3000 m
  • 3001-4000 m
  • > 4000 m
La Technologie est appliquée dans
  • situations convexes
  • situations concaves
  • non pertinent
Profondeurs moyennes du sol
  • très superficiel (0-20 cm)
  • superficiel (21-50 cm)
  • modérément profond (51-80 cm)
  • profond (81-120 cm)
  • très profond (>120 cm)
Textures du sol (de la couche arable)
  • grossier/ léger (sablonneux)
  • moyen (limoneux)
  • fin/ lourd (argile)
Textures du sol (> 20 cm sous la surface)
  • grossier/ léger (sablonneux)
  • moyen (limoneux)
  • fin/ lourd (argile)
Matière organique de la couche arable
  • abondant (>3%)
  • moyen (1-3%)
  • faible (<1%)
Profondeur estimée de l’eau dans le sol
  • en surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Disponibilité de l’eau de surface
  • excès
  • bonne
  • moyenne
  • faible/ absente
Qualité de l’eau (non traitée)
  • eau potable
  • faiblement potable (traitement nécessaire)
  • uniquement pour usage agricole (irrigation)
  • eau inutilisable
La qualité de l'eau fait référence à: eaux de surface
La salinité de l'eau est-elle un problème ?
  • Oui
  • Non

Présence d'inondations
  • Oui
  • Non
Diversité des espèces
  • élevé
  • moyenne
  • faible
Diversité des habitats
  • élevé
  • moyenne
  • faible

Caractéristiques des exploitants des terres appliquant la Technologie

Orientation du système de production
  • subsistance (auto-approvisionnement)
  • exploitation mixte (de subsistance/ commerciale)
  • commercial/ de marché
Revenus hors exploitation
  • moins de 10% de tous les revenus
  • 10-50% de tous les revenus
  • > 50% de tous les revenus
Niveau relatif de richesse
  • très pauvre
  • pauvre
  • moyen
  • riche
  • très riche
Niveau de mécanisation
  • travail manuel
  • traction animale
  • mécanisé/ motorisé
Sédentaire ou nomade
  • Sédentaire
  • Semi-nomade
  • Nomade
Individus ou groupes
  • individu/ ménage
  • groupe/ communauté
  • coopérative
  • employé (entreprise, gouvernement)
Genre
  • femmes
  • hommes
Âge
  • enfants
  • jeunes
  • personnes d'âge moyen
  • personnes âgées
Superficie utilisée par ménage
  • < 0,5 ha
  • 0,5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1 000 ha
  • 1 000-10 000 ha
  • > 10 000 ha
Échelle
  • petite dimension
  • moyenne dimension
  • grande dimension
Propriété foncière
  • état
  • entreprise
  • communauté/ village
  • groupe
  • individu, sans titre de propriété
  • individu, avec titre de propriété
Droits d’utilisation des terres
  • accès libre (non organisé)
  • communautaire (organisé)
  • loué
  • individuel
Droits d’utilisation de l’eau
  • accès libre (non organisé)
  • communautaire (organisé)
  • loué
  • individuel
Accès aux services et aux infrastructures
santé

pauvre
bonne
éducation

pauvre
bonne
assistance technique

pauvre
bonne
emploi (par ex. hors exploitation)

pauvre
bonne
marchés

pauvre
bonne
énergie

pauvre
bonne
routes et transports

pauvre
bonne
eau potable et assainissement

pauvre
bonne
services financiers

pauvre
bonne
Commentaires

In the Nile Delta, the MRB-technology is used on very large area with many different farmers, therefore it is hard to generalize the aspects of the Health and Education since these are highly related to the income of a farm.

Impact

Impacts socio-économiques
Production agricole
en baisse
en augmentation

Quantité avant la GDT: None
Quantité après la GDT: +20%-30%
The yield is increased due to reduced water stress and because of the use of improved wheat varieties.

qualité des cultures
en baisse
en augmentation


The quality of the crops is increased due to reduced water stress.

risque d'échec de la production
en augmentation
en baisse


This decrease as the impact of intense rainfall events is reduced as consequence of safe disposal through furrows.

demande pour l'eau d'irrigation
en augmentation
en baisse


The demand of irrigation water is reduced because the efficiency of it is increased i.e. water is applied more effectively.

dépenses pour les intrants agricoles
en augmentation
en baisse


50% less seed rate. 20% higher fertilizer efficiency.

revenus agricoles
en baisse
en augmentation


Because of higher yield and less input

charge de travail
en augmentation
en baisse


The workload was reduced by 80% for mechanized seedbed raising (MRB) compared to manual seedbed raising.

Impacts socioculturels
Impacts écologiques
ruissellement de surface
en augmentation
en baisse


Run-off occurs more easily with respect to traditional practices. This is positive, since this prevent water-logging.

drainage de l'excès d'eau
réduit
amélioré

évaporation
en augmentation
en baisse


Compared to previous border/field irrigation, the water infiltrates easier, and is concentrated more. This leads to a decrease in evaporation.

humidité du sol
en baisse
en augmentation

cycle/ recharge des éléments nutritifs
en baisse
en augmentation


Due to better infiltration, the fertilizers are used more efficient.

salinité
en augmentation
en baisse


Salinity is decreased because evaporation and water logging is reduced.

biomasse/ au dessus du sol C
en baisse
en augmentation

impacts des inondations
en augmentation
en baisse


The impact of a flood is reduced because the excess water is able to safely run-off through the established furrows.

Impacts hors site
inondations en aval (indésirables)
en augmentation
réduit


Due to the increased irrigation water efficiency, there is relatively more water available to desirably flood (border/surface irrigation/ MRB) farm fields downstream

Analyse coûts-bénéfices

Bénéfices par rapport aux coûts de mise en place
Rentabilité à court terme
très négative
très positive

Rentabilité à long terme
très négative
très positive

Bénéfices par rapport aux coûts d'entretien
Rentabilité à court terme
très négative
très positive

Rentabilité à long terme
très négative
très positive

In the short-term investments are weighing relatively more than in the long term with respect to the benefits. However, on the overall, the MRB-technology offers more efficient use of resources, coming down to achieving more output with less input. Thus, highly improving the involved livelihoods. In the long term the benefits are less positive with respect to maintenance. This is due to the aging of machinery. MRB-machines are estimated to have a life span of 12 years.

Changement climatique

Changements climatiques progressifs
températures annuelles augmente

pas bien du tout
très bien
précipitations annuelles décroît

pas bien du tout
très bien
Extrêmes climatiques (catastrophes)
inondation générale (rivière)

pas bien du tout
très bien
crue éclair

pas bien du tout
très bien

Adoption et adaptation de la Technologie

Pourcentage d'exploitants des terres ayant adopté la Technologie dans la région
  • cas isolés/ expérimentaux
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Parmi tous ceux qui ont adopté la Technologie, combien d'entre eux l'ont fait spontanément, à savoir sans recevoir aucune incitation matérielle ou aucun paiement ?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
La Technologie a-t-elle été récemment modifiée pour s'adapter à l'évolution des conditions ?
  • Oui
  • Non
A quel changement ?
  • changements/ extrêmes climatiques
  • évolution des marchés
  • la disponibilité de la main-d'œuvre (par ex., en raison de migrations)
  • Local Conditions
These adaptations are initiated because of the successes of the MRB, so currently MRB-technology is modified to be used with other crops (e.g. Faba Bean), other soil textures and for rain-fed areas.

Conclusions et enseignements tirés

Points forts: point de vue de l'exploitant des terres
  • MRB significantly contributes to the prosperity of the farmers who have adopted this technology. For farmers, the major advantage of MRB (High Quality Seeds plus the raised seedbeds) is the increased yield.
  • The adoption of the technology leads eventually to less leaching hence higher fertilizer efficiency. This is also highly valued by the farmers as this translates into less expenses. This advantage of the MRB combined to the increased yield, results in the realization of more income with less expenses, and thus a higher net income.
  • In Egypt climate change is visibly present and water does not seem to be abundant anymore, the farmers do have increasingly attention for the value of water. MRB increases the irrigation efficiency, therefore this is also observed as a great advantage of MRB.
Points forts: point de vue du compilateur ou d'une autre personne-ressource clé
  • The increased yield is of great advantage not only for the improved situation of the involved livelihood, but also on national level. Namely, because more yield means less import of food from other countries. This makes Egypt more self-sufficient, and less dependent on other countries. This is particularly relevant with respect to the significant population growth of Egypt.
  • The increased water availability, because of higher irrigation efficiency is important on a national level. This is certainly important, with respect to trend of increasing the power generation by water (hydraulic power plants), in upstream areas of Egypt.
  • MRB-technology has led to a local industry. This industry is the manufacturing of MRB-machines. This is on broader level beneficial, because it creates local employment, efficient supply chain, easy and fast access to technical knowledge and gives Egypt an independent position.
  • MRB improves soil health because salinization is reduced as water is less evaporated and logged.
Faiblesses/ inconvénients/ risques: point de vue de l'exploitant des terrescomment surmonter
  • A current risk of MRB is that many farmers are convinced of the beneficial application of the MRB, which means that there is higher demand. Therefore, there is currently not a sufficient number of MRB-machines. In practice this means that some farmers are not able to use MRB-machine during the essential seeding period. This is possibly followed by tensions between users since the technology is often purchased as communities. Land users found this a weakness of the technology. This is to overcome if public and private sectors invest in the manufacturing of MRB. This would lead to an increased supply of machine, thus eliminating the deficit of machines.
  • The cost of the High Yield Seeds is a weakness of MRB-technology. This is because the costs of the seeds are quite high and they contribute significantly to the increased yields. So without the seeds, MRB-technology does not reach its full potential. Farmers dislike the costs of these seeds and the yearly purchasing. There are investments needed and plans to improve the production of these seeds. The increased supply would lead to reduced costs.
Faiblesses/ inconvénients/ risques: point de vue du compilateur ou d'une autre personne-ressource clécomment surmonter
  • The risk of tensions that are a consequence of the limited availability of the MRB's. This could be overcome by increasing the production. However, better social cooperation could reduce the tensions between and within communities as well.
  • The costs of the High Yield Seeds. This is a weakness, because MRB-technology is significantly improved by these seeds, realizing its full potential. There are investments needed and plans to improve the production of these seeds. This would lead to reduced costs. However, alternatively, other seeds can be used.

Références

Compilateur
  • Joren Verbist
Editors
Examinateur
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
Date de mise en oeuvre: 13 août 2020
Dernière mise à jour: 16 février 2021
Personnes-ressources
Description complète dans la base de données WOCAT
Données de GDT correspondantes
La documentation a été facilitée par
Institution Projet
Références clés
  • Atef Swelam and Y. Atta, (2012) Improve Water Saving and Water Productivity by New Approach of Farm Management under Surface Irrigation. Mi. J. Ag. Eng., 29 (2):745-762.: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/12227
Liens vers des informations pertinentes disponibles en ligne
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International