The field of one of the community members where the Climate Smart Agriculture was implemented. (Tshering Zangmo)

Climate-Smart Village Approach (Bhoutan)

Namshi Thuendrel Gi Yue (གནམ་གཤིས་མཐུན་འབྲེལ་གྱི་གཡུས།)

Description

Climate change has become inevitable, and there is a need to address this impending danger. In the Climate-Smart Village (CSV) approach, land users in Ngaru-Pongtang have implemented several technologies and innovations to address climate change impacts, and the programme has worked with 50 households on a total area of 137 acres (55 ha).

This approach focused on transforming Ngaru-Pontang into a Climate-Smart Village (CSV) with actions that also contribute to mitigating climate change. The programme has worked with 50 households on a total area of 137 acres (55 ha). The approach included a participatory vulnerability assessment, and extensive training and education for the land users. They were equipped with skills, technologies, and innovative practices related to climate-smart agriculture (CSA). Additionally, the approach emphasized collaborative efforts, working closely with community members to foster better engagement and cooperation.

The primary objectives of the approach were to transform Ngaru-Pontang village into a CSV and thus effectively address the challenges posed by climate change. To achieve these goals, the approach employed various methods. It involved meetings with the community members, vulnerability assessment, fostering collaboration between the community, Agriculture Research and Development Centre (ARDC) Wengkhar, and Commercial Agriculture and the Resilient Livelihood Enhancement Programme (CARLEP). The community members received comprehensive training and attended workshops on climate-smart agriculture practices.
The implementation of the approach adopted the following stages:
1. Resource and livelihood analysis carried out through a Participatory Vulnerability Assessment.
2. Based on the findings from the above assessment, a project proposal was submitted to secure funding.
3. Subsequently, discussions were held with the community members, the extension agent, and the local government to ensure collective agreement and support.
4. A detailed plan with a timeline was developed to guide project implementation and monitoring.
5. Training and workshops on CSA practices were conducted by the ARDC and the extension agent, empowering the community members to take charge of project implementation and ensure sustainability.

Key stakeholders involved in the approach included:
1. ARDC Wenkhar, which led the implementation of the project, facilitated the training and workshops, provided technical assistance, and monitored the programme's progress.
2. The Gewog administration and the extension agent played crucial roles by offering support and assistance in implementing climate-smart agriculture practices in the field.
3. The community members actively participated in various program activities, playing a pivotal role in driving the project forward.
4. The Commercial Agriculture and Resilient Livelihood Enhancement Programme (CARLEP) acted as the funding agency.

The key CSA practices implemented through this approach are soil fertility improvement technologies (composting through use of FYM and bio-slurry, vermicomposting; liquid manure, biochar, Bhutan Agri-Microbial Solution (BAMS) and hedgerow plantations), community solar-electric fencing, heat and drought tolerant crops (spring paddy, soybean, avocados, mangoes and pineapples), biogas installations and establishment of weather station.
The implementation of CSA interventions has resulted in a wide range of impacts on livelihoods, income, and enhanced climate resilience. The diversification of crops, electric fencing, and improvement in irrigation have enabled farmers to expand their cultivation area thereby directly enhancing crop production and cash income. Similarly, the integration of improved livestock farming systems along with crops and the installation of biogas plants have reduced impacts on natural resources. Farmers have gained knowledge and exposure to different climate-smart agriculture practices. The only negative impact of the measures has been extra damage to crops by wild animals.

Lieu

Lieu: Ngaru-Pongtang village, Thangrong gewog, Mongar Dzongkhag, Bhoutan

Géo-référence des sites sélectionnés
  • 91.35503, 27.19169

Date de démarrage: 2016

Année de fin de l'Approche: 2021

Type d'Approche
Ngaru-Pongtong community members (Lhap Dorji)
Enumerators and community members in one of the fields were CSA was implemented (Tshering Zangmo)

Objectifs de l'approche et environnement favorable

Principaux objectifs de l'Approche
The main objective of the approach was to establish Ngaru-Pongtang as a CSV and showcase different CSA practices geared towards combating, mitigating and addressing climate change impacts, which can be replicated to other gewogs and Dzongkhags.
Conditions favorisant la mise en oeuvre de la/(des) Technologie(s) appliquée(s) sous l'Approche
  • Disponibilité/ accès aux ressources et services financiers: Community members were provided with equipment and planting materials through project's support.
  • Cadre institutionnel: Local government and gewog agriculture extension agent were involved during the training, seminars and the implementation of the project activities to ensure ownership and sustainability of the project.
  • Collaboration/ coordination des acteurs: Stakeholders (ARDC Wengkhar, local government and community members) participated and cooperated together during the entire project period.
  • Connaissances sur la GDT, accès aux supports techniques: ARDC Wengkhar provided regular training and workshops with regard to climate-smart agriculture, good agricultural practices and sustainable land management for the successful implementation of the project.
  • Marchés (pour acheter les intrants, vendre les produits) et prix: ARDC Wengkhar has facilitated agricultural marketing by linking up the community with Bhutan Agro-Industry located at Lingmethang, Mongar.
Conditions entravant la mise en oeuvre de la/(des) Technologie(s) appliquée(s) sous l'Approche

Participation et rôles des parties prenantes impliquées dans l'Approche

Parties prenantes impliquées dans l'Approche et rôles
Quels acteurs/ organismes d'exécution ont été impliqués dans l'Approche? Spécifiez les parties prenantes Décrivez le rôle des parties prenantes
exploitants locaux des terres / communautés locales Ngaru-Pongtang community As a beneficiary, participated actively in the planning and implementation of the project activities, ensuring the project was successful and beneficial to them.
chercheurs ARDC Wenkhar Led the implementation of the project; facilitated the training and the workshops; provided technical assistance to the program; and monitored the progress of the program.
gouvernement local Gewog administration and gewog agriculture office They provided administrative support and collaborated with other stakeholders in successful designing and implementation of the project activities.
organisation internationale International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) IFAD provided financial assistance through its Commercial Agriculture and Resilient Livelihood Enhancement Programme (CARLEP)
Participation des exploitants locaux des terres/ communautés locales aux différentes phases de l'Approche
aucun
passive
soutien extérieur
interactive
auto-mobilisation
initiation/ motivation
x
The local community members were informed verbally and through community meeting about the project.
planification
x
ARDC Wengkhar, Thangrong gewog administration, gewog agriculture extension agent and the community members came together and discussed the way forward for the project.
mise en œuvre
x
Community members were provided with training and workshops on climate-smart agriculture and related agricultural skills. After the training and demonstrations, land users were divided into groups and made to apply these skills in their field.
suivi/ évaluation
x
Monitoring is being sporadically conducted by ARDC Wengkhar and the gewog agriculture extension agent, but it is left to the land users to monitor their own fields.
Diagramme/ organigramme

The flowchart was created based on the information provided by the community members

Auteur : Ongpo Lepcha
Prises de décision pour la sélection de la Technologie de GDT

Les décisions ont été prises par

  • les exploitants des terres seuls (auto-initiative)
  • principalement les exploitants des terres soutenus par des spécialistes de la GDT
  • tous les acteurs concernés dans le cadre d'une approche participative
  • principalement les spécialistes de la GDT, après consultation des exploitants des terres
  • les spécialistes de la GDT seuls
  • les responsables politiques/ dirigeants

Les décisions ont été prises sur la base de

  • l'évaluation de connaissances bien documentées en matière de GDT (prises de décision fondées sur des preuves tangibles)?
  • les résultats de recherches?
  • expériences et opinions personnelles (non documentées)
  • Consultation with the community members

Soutien technique, renforcement des capacités et gestion des connaissances

Les activités ou services suivants ont fait partie de l'approche
Renforcement des capacités/ formation
La formation a été dispensée aux parties prenantes suivantes
  • exploitants des terres
  • personnels/ conseillers de terrain
Formats de la formation
  • sur le tas
  • entre agriculteurs (d'exploitants à exploitants)
  • zones de démonstration
  • réunions publiques
  • cours
Sujets abordés

The topics covered included climate-smart agriculture, sustainable land management, and good agricultural practices.

Service de conseils
Le service de conseils était fourni
  • dans les champs des exploitants?
  • dans des centres permanents
ARDC Wengkhar and the agricultural extension agent provided all the technical advice and assistance required by the community members.
Renforcement des institutions
Institutions ont été renforcées ou mises en place
  • non
  • oui, un peu
  • oui, modérément
  • oui, beaucoup
au niveau suivant
  • local
  • régional
  • national
Décrivez l'institution, ses rôles et responsabilités, ses membres, etc.
The local government was involved in the project from start till end, which enhanced their understanding and capacity to initiate and replicate similar projects in other villages.
Type de soutien
  • financier
  • renforcement des capacités/ formation
  • équipement
  • Technical assistance
Plus de détails
Local government officials were engaged in the capacity building programs implemented for the community and also provided technical assistance as and when required.
Suivi et évaluation
ARDC Wenkhar and the agriculture extension agent sporadically conducted monitoring and evaluation. However, the local land users are given the full responsibility to monitor their own fields and seek assistance when required.
Recherche
La recherche a traité les sujets suivants
  • sociologie
  • économie/ marketing
  • écologie
  • technologie
  • Vulnerability Assessment

ARDC Wengkhar conducted a resource and livelihoods analysis through vulnerability assessment before designing and implementng the project in the community.

Financement et soutien matériel externe

Budget annuel en dollars US de la composante GDT
  • < 2 000
  • 2 000-10 000
  • 10 000-100 000
  • 100 000-1 000 000
  • > 1 000 000
Precise annual budget: 55920.82
The funding was through Commercial Agriculture and Resilient Livelihoods Enhancement Programme (CARLEP) funded by International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
Les services ou mesures incitatives suivantes ont été fournis aux exploitants des terres
  • Soutiens financiers/ matériels fournis aux exploitants des terres
  • Subventions pour des intrants spécifiques
  • Crédits
  • Autres incitations ou instruments
Soutiens financiers/ matériels fournis aux exploitants des terres
Material inputs such as seeds and seedlings, organic fertilizers, sprinkler pipes, and green shade net were provided through the project.
en partie financé
entièrement financé
équipement: machines

Sprinkler pipes and green shade nets

x
intrants agricoles: semences

Seeds and saplings

x
intrants agricoles: semences: fertilisants

Organic fertilizers

x

La main d'oeuvre fournie par les exploitants des terres était

Analyses d'impact et conclusions

Impacts de l'Approche
Non
Oui, un peu
Oui, modérément
Oui, beaucoup
Est-ce que l'Approche a autonomisé les exploitants locaux des terres, amélioré la participation des parties prenantes?

The project built capacity of the land users and are able to implement and monitor project activities in their own fields.

x
Est-ce que l'Approche a aidé les exploitants des terres à mettre en œuvre et entretenir les Technologies de GDT?

Conducting training and workshops were part of the approach and therefore this made implementing and maintaining the sustainability of the project possible.

x
Est-ce que l'Approche a amélioré les connaissances et les capacités des exploitants des terres pour mettre en œuvre la GDT?

The training and workshop helped provide knowledge and skills regarding sustainable land management and climate smart agriculture practices.

x
Est-ce que l'Approche a amélioré les connaissances et les capacités des autres parties prenantes?

The project enabled local government to enhance their knowledge and capacity through direct engagement in the training program and in the implementation of the project activities in the field.

x
Est-ce que l'Approche a autonomisé les groupes socialement et économiquement défavorisés?

The project benefited all the community members equally disregarding of their background.

x
Est-ce que l'Approche a conduit à améliorer la sécurité alimentaire et/ou la nutrition?

The climate-smart agriculture practices have improved the agricultural production through crop diversification, electric fencing and irrigation water improvement.

x
Est-ce que l'Approche a amélioré l'accès aux marchés?

ARDC Wengkhar and the local government have facilitated the market by linking the community with Bhutan Agro-industry for processing.

x
Est-ce que l'Approche a amélioré la capacité des exploitants des terres à s'adapter aux changements/ extrêmes climatiques et a atténué les catastrophes liées au climat?

Land users were trained on climate-smart agriculture and most importantly the land users have implemented climate smart agriculture practices in their fields which will definitely help build their capacity to adapt to the climate change.

x
Principale motivation des exploitants des terres pour mettre en oeuvre la GDT
Durabilité des activités de l'Approche
Les exploitants des terres peuvent-ils poursuivre ce qui a été mis en oeuvre par le biais de l'Approche (sans soutien extérieur) ?

The land users have built their capacity, improved their production and cash income which should enable them to sustain the project activities.

Conclusions et enseignements tirés

Points forts: point de vue de l'exploitant des terres
  • Capacity building and technical assistance on CSA and SLM were provided.
  • Gained knowledge and skills on CSA practices
  • Were able to increase crop production through CSA interventions
  • Were provided with an assured market for their produce
Points forts: point de vue du compilateur ou d'une autre personne-ressource clé
  • Built human and natural capital through capacity building and implementation of CSA practices.
  • Enhanced community resilience to climate change impacts
Faiblesses/ inconvénients/ risques: point de vue de l'exploitant des terrescomment surmonter
  • The approach didn't address the pest problem, specifically the vertebrate pest adequately. Explore additional funding to support electric fencing and if possible chain link fencing.
  • Farmers' hesitance to adopt technology. Create adequate awareness prior to actual design an implementation of the project.
Faiblesses/ inconvénients/ risques: point de vue du compilateur ou d'une autre personne-ressource clécomment surmonter

Références

Compilateur
  • ONGPO LEPCHA
Editors
Examinateur
  • William Critchley
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
  • Joana Eichenberger
Date de mise en oeuvre: 13 juillet 2023
Dernière mise à jour: 30 mai 2024
Personnes-ressources
Description complète dans la base de données WOCAT
Données de GDT correspondantes
La documentation a été facilitée par
Institution Projet
Références clés
  • Saanogo, D, Sail, M., & Camara, B. A.. (2020). The climate-smart village approach: putting communities at the heart of restoration. Tropenbos International, Wageningen.: https://www.tropenbos.org/file.php/2385/etfrn-news-60-sanogo-the-climate-smart-village-approach.pdf
  • Aggarwal, P. K., Jarvis, A., Campbell, B. M., & Zougmore, R. (2018). The climate-smart village approach: Framework of an integrative strategy for scaling up adaptation options in agriculture. Ecology and Society, 23(1).: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322765373_The_climate-smart_village_approach_Framework_of_an_integrative_strategy_for_scaling_up_adaptation_options_in_agriculture
Liens vers des informations pertinentes disponibles en ligne
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International