1.2 Coordonnées des personnes-ressources et des institutions impliquées dans l'évaluation et la documentation de l'Approche

Nom du ou des institutions qui ont facilité la documentation/ l'évaluation de l'Approche (si pertinent)

FAO Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO Food and Agriculture Organization) - Italie

Nom du ou des institutions qui ont facilité la documentation/ l'évaluation de l'Approche (si pertinent)

SNNPR Bureau of Agriculture - Ethiopie

1.3 Conditions relatives à l'utilisation par WOCAT des données documentées

Le compilateur et la(les) personne(s) ressource(s) acceptent les conditions relatives à l'utilisation par WOCAT des données documentées:

Oui

2.1 Courte description de l'Approche

Integrated watershed management is implementation of SWC measures, forage development and crop production activitiesthrough increasing production and productivity per unit area of land on suistainable manner.

2.2 Description détaillée de l'Approche

Description détaillée de l'Approche:

Aims / objectives: Overall purpose of the approach is to attain food security at household level and then contribute for the anticipated national goals. Specifically the objectives are improving food security of targeted area land users by capacitating community members with incentive support application of SWC activities. Promoting and implementing integrated watershed management practice promote catchment based natural resources management and enhance forage development from matreials used for bund stablization.

Methods: Methods of participatory planning and implementation approach is using local institutions (groups), local leaders community development committee) and existing infrastructure/facilities.

Stages of implementation: Monitoring and evaluation.

Role of stakeholders: SOS Sahel--financinig are evaluating the programmee, Bureau of agriculture and rural development--follow up, monitoring and evaluation, Office of agricultue and rural development--coordinating, planning, and implimenting the project activities with the community and Community/land users--they do the actual implementation phase and evaluation the activities.

2.5 Pays/ région/ lieux où l'Approche a été appliquée

2.6 Dates de début et de fin de l'Approche

2.7 Type d'Approche

• fondé sur un projet/ programme

2.8 Principaux objectifs de l'Approche

The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (Provision sheep credit to resource poor women with 10% insurance payment and transfer of the first born lamb to other resource poor women.)

Empowerment of the community memebers with incentive support to improve food security at household level; promoting and and implementing integrated watershed management and forage development.

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Food insecurity, shortage of animal feed, severe land degradation.

2.9 Conditions favorisant ou entravant la mise en œuvre de la(des) Technologie(s) appliquée(s) sous l'Approche

3.1 Parties prenantes impliquées dans l'Approche et rôles

3.2 Participation des exploitants locaux des terres/ communautés locales aux différentes phases de l'Approche

	Participation des exploitants locaux des terres/ communautés locales	Spécifiez qui était impliqué et décrivez les activités
initiation/ motivation	passive	Mainly:rapid/participatory rural appraisal; partly: experience sharing vist; need assessment, problem indentification solution seeking, by demonstration
planification	interactive	rapid/participatory rural appraisal; use participatary planning approach
mise en œuvre	soutien extérieur	responsibility for minor steps; all the SWC structure constructed by participation
suivi/ évaluation	interactive	Mainly: reporting; partly: Terminal evaluation; The representatives of the land users observe & measure what has been done report the accomplishment monthly, impact was assessed
Research	aucun

3.4 Prises de décision pour la sélection de la Technologie/ des Technologies

Indiquez qui a décidé de la sélection de la Technologie/ des Technologies à mettre en œuvre:

• principalement les exploitants des terres soutenus par des spécialistes de la GDT

Expliquez:

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by mainly by land users supported by SLM specialists. Land users report the severity of land degradation in their area and seek assistance. The SWC specialist advice and support the land users to be organized in groups in a sub-watershed bases to implement SWC activities by train the Community Development Committee (CDC). The CDC and other member land users decide what, why, where, when to do SWC activities in their watershed.

4.1 Renforcement des capacités/ formation

Une formation a-t-elle été dispensée aux exploitants des terres/ autres parties prenantes?

Oui

Spécifiez qui a été formé:

• exploitants des terres

• SWC specialists, extensionists/trainers

Formats de la formation:

• sur le tas
• entre agriculteurs (d'exploitants à exploitants)
• réunions publiques

Thèmes abordés:

SWC about physical structure construction methods & layout biological SWC- planting of deshograss & other legume species. Integrating watershed management. Sheep credit facility & management.

4.2 Service de conseils

Les exploitants des terres ont-ils accès à un service de conseils?

Oui

Spécifiez si le service de conseils est fourni:

• dans les champs des exploitants?

Décrivez/ commentez:

Name of method used for advisory service: Pilot Extension proram (based on conventional extension approach.; Key elements: Integratd Watershed Management, (IWM), Participatory planning and implementation (PPI), Community Development Committee (CDC); 1) Advisory service was carried out through: government's existing extension system; Extension staff: mainly government employees 2) Target groups for extension: technicians/SWC specialists; Activities: Training discuss with community on soil erosion problem group organizing providing tools & sheep credit.

Advisory service is quite adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; Three middle level trained extension agents were assiened in one kebele and wereda experts capacitated by summer course.

4.3 Renforcement des institutions (développement organisationnel)

Des institutions ont elles été mises en place ou renforcées par le biais de l'Approche?

• oui, modérément

Spécifiez à quel(s) niveau(x), ces institutions ont été renforcées ou mises en place:

• local

Précisez le type de soutien:

• financier
• renforcement des capacités/ formation

• petty cash for purchase of equipment & sheep for c

4.4 Suivi et évaluation

Le suivi et l'évaluation font ils partie de l'Approche? :

Oui

Commentaires:

bio-physical aspects were regular monitored through observations
technical aspects were regular monitored through measurements

economic / production aspects were ad hoc monitored through measurements

area treated aspects were regular monitored through observations

no. of land users involved aspects were monitored through observations

Management of Approach aspects were monitored

There were many changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation: Monthly based monitoring and evaluation initiate to improve the performance & use to address problem area to be solved in both stakeholders by doing so many project weredas improve their performance.

4.5 Recherche

La recherche a-t-elle fait partie intégrante de l’Approche?

Oui

Spécifiez les thèmes:

• sociologie

• on farm trail research by SOS Sahel

Donnez plus de détails et indiquez qui a mené ces recherches:

Adoption level, role of bund stablization, economic importance & impact of expansion cose study was under taken.

Research was carried out on-farm

5.1 Budget annuel de la composante GDT de l'Approche

Si le budget annuel précis n'est pas connu, indiquez une fourchette:

• 2 000-10 000

Commentez (par ex. principales sources de financement/ principaux bailleurs de fonds):

Approach costs were met by the following donors: national non-government (SOS Sahel, Awassa): 94.0%; local community / land user(s) (Resource poor womon land users): 6.0%

5.2 Soutiens financiers/ matériels fournis aux exploitants des terres

Les exploitants des terres ont-ils reçu un soutien financier/ matériel pour la mise en œuvre de la Technologie/ des Technologies?

Oui

5.3 Subventions pour des intrants spécifiques (incluant la main d'œuvre)

• équipement

• intrants agricoles

Si la main d'œuvre fournie par les exploitants des terres était un intrant substantiel, elle était:

• récompensée avec un autre soutien matériel

Commentaires:

with 30% down payment share shovels and/or hoes provision for SWC structure.

5.4 Crédits

Des crédits ont-ils été alloués à travers l'Approche pour les activités de GDT?

Oui

Spécifiez les conditions (taux d'intérêts, remboursements, etc.):

repayment conditions: Sheep credit provision with 10% insurance and transfer of first lamb and Agricultural tools like shvel & hoe provision with 30% contribution..

Spécifiez les destinataires du crédit:

not applied so we can't compare.

6.1 Impacts de l'Approche

6.3 Durabilité des activités de l'Approche

Les exploitants des terres peuvent-ils poursuivre ce qui a été mis en œuvre par le biais de l'Approche (sans soutien extérieur)?

• incertain

Si non ou incertain, spécifiez et commentez:

1. Extension service is very crucial to support technical aspects of SWC activities and coordination of watershed group members to follow integrated watershed management approach in a participatory planning and implementation method. 2. Desho grass planting material is very expensive so that for the first time planing material supply is necessary

6.4 Points forts/ avantages de l'Approche

Points forts/ avantages/ possibilités du point de vue de l'exploitant des terres
IWM approach very important for the farmer by prodiving basic skill in all activities (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Thraining the farmers)
The introduced Desho grass become cash source by selling the planting material & grass (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: By creating awareness to all farmers.)
Hand tool provision help them in facilitating working condition (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: By circulating 30% down payment share.)
Sheep credition provision (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: with 10% insurance down payment and transfer to first lamb to the next poor.)

Points forts/ avantages/ possibilités du point de vue du compilateur ou d'une autre personne ressource clé
Desho grass introjduction is a new technology which has multipurpose use. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Extension work should be strong until they know & see the advantage & Adopt.)
Integrate all the agricultural and natural resource management activities in the catchment. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Awareness creation work has to be following in a continous way)
Introduction of Desho grass become income generating means by selling & forage source. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: By introducing the grass to new areas & supply planting material of the grass for the first time to the resource poors.)

6.5 Faiblesses/ inconvénients de l'Approche et moyens de les surmonter

Faiblesses/ inconvénients/ risques du point de vue de l’exploitant des terres	Comment peuvent-ils être surmontés?
other.	Doing as stated on the agreement & credit contruct.
Failure of payment of 10% insurance and acting accoringly.	enforcing to pay the stack 10% of insurance.
Mis use of down payment by CDC and Development Agent	close follow and facilitating the payment procedure for the debted CDC.

Faiblesses/ inconvénients/ risques du point de vue du compilateur ou d'une autre personne ressource clé	Comment peuvent-ils être surmontés?
Lack of close follow up of the activities may stak or hindered over all activities.	Office of Agriculture & Natural Resource should work hard extension to sustain the approach & function normally.
failure of supply of desho grass planting material for those who start SWC activities for the first time.	These could be solved by coordinating NGOs other project to help desho grass purchasing
using open access grazing of farmland destroy the grass & constructed bund.	using controlled grassing &/or stall feeding

7.1 Méthodes/ sources d'information

7.2 Références des publications disponibles

Titre, auteur, année, ISBN:

Integrated food support supply project document, 2000 SOS Sahel

Disponible à partir d'où? Coût?

SOS Sahel, Awassa, Sorro Wereda

Titre, auteur, année, ISBN:

Assessing significance of Desho grass intervention on SWC structure, As food security strategy A case of Sorro wereda, Lintala watershed Author Daniel Dantamo Jan. 2005.

Disponible à partir d'où? Coût?

Daniael Dantamo, Hossana/Sorro Te- 046-555-1135 cost 8,000 Eth. Birr

Titre, auteur, année, ISBN:

IFSSP- Terminal evaluation report 2004 Bureau of Finance & Ecnomic Development

Disponible à partir d'où? Coût?

Wereda Agriculture Office (Sorro)