Maize under conservation agriculture intercropped with velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens) as a dense cover crop in western Kenya. (George Ayaga)

Conservation agriculture for maize-legume systems with velvet bean as a dense cover crop (ເຄັນຢາ)

Kilimo hifadhi

ຄຳອະທິບາຍ

Conservation agriculture for maize-legume systems with velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens) as a dense cover crop is being promoted in western Kenya to address the challenges of land degradation, low crop yields, low incomes, high production costs and climate change.

Agriculture in western Kenya suffers from low productivity due to the degraded landscape. The soils are predominantly acidic and low in fertility, with the yields of food staples, such as maize and common bean averaging 1 ton/ ha and 5 tons/ ha, respectively. Consequently, the smallholder farmers have encroached into the adjacent Kakamega and Nandi forests in their quest for supplementary agro-ecosystem services and farm incomes. Degradation of the agro-resource base is underpinned by unsustainable practices carried out under conventional farming; for example, continuous cultivation with low nutrient inputs, mono-cropping, removal of crop residues and full tillage. Some of these practices enhance climate change by intensifying the emissions of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere. Therefore, widespread adoption of conservation agriculture (CA) technology is being promoted to reduce the adverse impacts of conventional farming and enhance sustainable land management, environmental protection, and climate change mitigation and adaptation in 10 micro-catchments located within a 5-km radius from the edge of Kakamega and Nandi forests. The CA technology is characterized by the principles of minimum mechanical soil disturbance, maintenance of at least 30 percent permanent organic soil cover, diversified cropping through intercropping and crop rotations, and weed control. These principles have been adapted to the local conditions and needs.

The establishment of CA technology begins with land preparation. That is, the existing weeds and previous crop residues in the field are either slashed, or controlled through the application of appropriate herbicides. All the residues are retained on soil surface as opposed to burning, or removal in the conventional system. Land preparation is followed by planting, where the jab planter is used for precise placement of seeds and fertilizers in un-ploughed field, or within the established planting hills and rip lines to minimize soil tillage. This contrasts with conventional farming practice where a plough, or a hand hoe is used to till the entire field and establish the planting holes for placing seeds and fertilizers. A combination of cereal (maize – Zea mays L.) and legumes (common bean – Phaseolus vulgaris L., soybean - Glycine max, velvet bean – Mucuna pruriens and cowpea – Vigna unguiculata) are either intercropped, or rotated in the field each season to optimize the use of the available soil resources, including water, nutrients, and micro-organisms. The main cereal-legume association involves the establishment of Mucuna pruriens under maize as a dense cover crop. In this cropping system, Mucuna pruriens seeds are sown within a spacing of 1 m × 0.5 m where they grow and spread to completely cover the soil surface. As the cover crop grows, the leaves fall and decompose on the ground, enriching the soil’s nutrients, organic matter and fertility. The maize - Mucuna pruriens mix is rotated with either sole common bean, soybean and cowpea crop, or an intercrop of maize with any of the legumes. Weeding is carried out using either selective herbicides, or weed scrapers. When designing the intercropping and rotation plans, crop families (N-fixing vs. non-fixing), root depths (shallow vs. deep roots), and susceptibility to diseases, pests and weeds are all considered.

Generally, CA technologies have multiple benefits for farmers and the environment. In the context of the Kakamega-Nandi forest landscape, the CA plots with Mucuna pruriens as a dense cover crop have shown improved soil organic matter, soil structure and nutrient status. It is expected that this will reduce the use of fertilizers over time. Most farmers have also reported that reduced tillage and direct placement of inputs (seeds and fertilizers) save them time, money, fuel, labour and inputs. Aside from saving resources, reduced tillage will ultimately enhance soil living organisms and mitigate atmospheric CO2 emissions through the decrease in fuel consumption and soil disturbance. Moreover, farmers have observed that the maize established with Mucuna pruriens as a cover crop remains green and healthy for long during mid-season dry spells compared to those under mono-culture, or light mulch. This implies that the CA technology also increases water infiltration and soil water content; thus, acting as insurance against drought. The increase in water infiltration and soil moisture occurs because the dense Mucuna pruriens cover crop not only regulates the soil surface temperatures and evaporation, but also reduces surface runoff and exposure to wind erosion. In addition, farmers have witnessed the suppression of weeds, such as Striga hermonthica (witchweed) in plots under dense cover crop and diversified cropping. Besides, diversified cropping through rotations has reduced the incidences of insect pests and diseases, as well as the risk of crop failure during extreme weather conditions and pest infestations. Specifically, farmers have noticed that the CA plots under maize - Mucuna pruriens intercrop are less affected by the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) compared to those under mono-culture. They have also noted that, in seasons of excessive rainfall, the maize intercropped with the common bean is usually harvested even when the common bean fails. Most importantly, these CA benefits have boosted maize yields by over 50 percent, meaning more food and income, and fewer forest encroachments.

Proper adoption of the CA technology by land users within the Kakamega-Nandi forest landscape is being hampered by several factors. Firstly, crop residues are inadequate due to competing uses, such as animal feed and fuel. At times, livestock is even allowed to graze on the stubble field, contravening the CA principles. Besides, some farmers have not fully embraced crop diversification and still grow maize throughout the seasons without rotation with other drought-tolerant cereals, such as sorghum and millet. Conventional ploughing is also quite entrenched. Further, some farmers still do not prefer Mucuna pruriens as a cover crop because of insufficient knowledge on the utilization of its inedible yields. Lastly, some farmers are finding it hard to access CA inputs and tools, such as the jab planters, weed scrapers, herbicides and seeds of Mucuna pruriens owing to either high prices, or shortages.

ສະຖານທີ່

ສະຖານທີ່: Kakamega-Nandi forest landscape, Western region, ເຄັນຢາ

ຈໍານວນ ພື້ນທີ່ ທີ່ໃຊ້ ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ ທີ່ໄດ້ວິເຄາະ: 10-100 ພຶ້ນທີ່

ການຄັດເລືອກພື້ນທີ່ ທີ່ອີງໃສ່ຂໍ້ມູນທາງພູມີສາດ
  • 34.83124, 0.28684
  • 34.76718, 0.294
  • 34.761, 0.29941
  • 34.84792, 0.47542
  • 34.97712, 0.05276
  • 34.85608, 0.1509
  • 35.01455, 0.20834
  • 34.88496, 0.14398
  • 34.94756, 0.11799
  • 35.01247, 0.39162

ການແຜ່ກະຈາຍຂອງເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ: ນໍາໃຊ້ໃນຈຸດສະເພາະ / ແນໃສ່ນໍາໃຊ້ໃນພື້ນທີ່ຂະໜາດນ້ອຍ

ຢູ່ໃນເຂດປ່າສະຫງວນທີ່ບໍ?: ບໍ່ແມ່ນ

ວັນທີຂອງການປະຕິບັດ: 2019

ປະເພດຂອງການນໍາສະເໜີ
Maize intercropped with Mucuna pruriens as a dense cover crop in western Kenya. Maize and Mucuna pruriens are intercropped, but after the harvesting of maize, Mucuna pruriens is left to cover and improve the soil conditions. (George Ayaga)
A field under total soil cover with Mucuna pruriens in western Kenya. This allows the soil to be re-nourished before planting the next crop. (George Ayaga)

ການໄຈ້ແຍກເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ

ຈຸດປະສົງຕົ້ນຕໍ
  • ປັບປຸງ ການຜະລິດ
  • ຫຼຸດຜ່ອນ, ປ້ອງກັນ, ຟື້ນຟູ ການເຊື່ອມໂຊມຂອງດິນ
  • ການອະນຸລັກ ລະບົບນິເວດ
  • ປົກປັກຮັກສານໍ້າ / ນໍ້າພື້ນທີ່ - ປະສົມປະສານກັບ ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີອື່ນໆ
  • ປົກປັກຮັກສາ / ການປັບປຸງຊີວະນາໆພັນ
  • ຫຼຸດຜ່ອນຄວາມສ່ຽງ ທາງໄພພິບັດທໍາມະຊາດ
  • ປັບຕົວຕໍ່ກັບການປ່ຽນແປງດິນຟ້າອາກາດ / ທີ່ຮ້າຍແຮງ ແລະ ຜົນກະທົບ
  • ຫຼຸດຜ່ອນຜົນກະທົບ ຈາກການປ່ຽນແປງດິນຟ້າອາກາດ
  • ສ້າງຜົນກະທົບ ທາງເສດຖະກິດ ທີ່ເປັນປະໂຫຍດ
  • ສ້າງຜົນກະທົບ ທີ່ເປັນທາງບວກ ໃຫ້ແກ່ສັງຄົມ
ການນໍາໃຊ້ດິນ
ການນຳໃຊ້ທີ່ດິນ ປະສົມພາຍໃນພື້ນທີ່ດຽວກັນ: ແມ່ນ - ກະສິກໍາແບບປະສົມປະສານ (ລວມທັງ ການລ້ຽງສັດ-ປຸກຝັງ)

  • ດິນທີ່ປູກພືດ
    • ການປູກພືດປະຈໍາປີ: ທັນຍາພືດ-ສາລີ, ພືດຕະກູນຖົ່ວ ແລະ ຖົ່ວປະເພດອື່ນໆ, ພືດຕະກູນຖົ່ວ ແລະ ຖົ່ວແປກ, ພືດຕະກູນຖົ່ວ ແລະ ຖົ່ວເຫຼືອງ. Cropping system: ສາລີ/ພືດປະເພດເຂົ້າ/ພືດປະເພດເມັດ ປະສົມປະສານ ກັບ ຖົ່ວ
    ຈໍານວນ ລະດູການ ປູກໃນປີໜຶ່ງ: 2
    ມີການເຝືກປູກພືດແບບສັບຫວ່າງບໍ່? ແມ່ນ
    ມີການເຝືກປູກພືດແບບໝູນວຽນບໍ່? ແມ່ນ
  • ທົ່ງຫຍ້າລ້ຽງສັດ
    • ຕັດຫຍ້າ ແລະ ຂົນຫຍ້າ / ບໍ່ມີທົ່ງຫຍ້າທໍາມະຊາດ
    • ປັບປຸງ ທົ່ງຫຍ້າ
    ປະເພດສັດ: cattle - dairy and beef (e.g. zebu)
    ແມ່ນການເຝືກຄຸ້ມຄອງ ການປູກພືດປະສົມປະສານ ກັບການລ້ຽງສັດບໍ່? ແມ່ນ
    ຜະລິດຕະພັນ ແລະ ການບໍລິການ: manure as fertilizer/ energy production, ຊີ້ນ, ນ້ຳນົມ, ຜິວໜັງ/ໜັງ, ການຂົນສົ່ງ/ ການລາກ
ການສະໜອງນໍ້າ
  • ນໍ້າຝົນ
  • ປະສົມປະສານ ກັນລະຫວ່າງ ນໍ້າຝົນ ແລະ ນໍ້າຊົນລະປະທານ
  • ນໍາໃຊ້ ນໍ້າຊົນລະປະທານ ພຽງຢ່າງດຽວ

ຈຸດປະສົງທີ່ກ່ຽວຂ້ອງກັບການເຊື່ອມໂຊມຂອງດິນ
  • ປ້ອງກັນການເຊື່ອມໂຊມຂອງດິນ
  • ຫຼຸດຜ່ອນການເຊື່ອມໂຊມຂອງດິນ
  • ການຟື້ນຟູ / ຟື້ນຟູດິນທີ່ຊຸດໂຊມ
  • ປັບຕົວຕໍ່ການເຊື່ອມໂຊມຂອງດິນ
  • ບໍ່ສາມາດໃຊ້ໄດ້
ການເຊື່ອມໂຊມ ທີ່ຕ້ອງໄດ້ເອົາໃຈໃສ່
  • ດິນເຊາະເຈື່ອນ ໂດຍນໍ້າ - Wt: ການສູນເສຍຊັ້ນໜ້າດິນ / ການເຊາະເຈື່ອນຜິວໜ້າດິນ
  • ດິນເຊາະເຈື່ອນ ໂດຍລົມ - ການສູນເສຍຊັ້ນໜ້າດິນ
  • ການເຊື່ອມໂຊມ ຂອງດິນ ທາງເຄມີ - Cn: ຄວາມອຸດົມສົມບູນ ລົດໜ້ອຍຖອຍລົງ ແລະ ສານອິນຊີວັດຖຸລົດລົງ (ບໍ່ແມ່ນສາເຫດມາຈາກການເຊາະເຈື່ອນ)
  • ການເຊື່ອມໂຊມ ຂອງດິນ ທາງກາຍະພາບ - Pc: ການອັດແໜ້ນ
  • ການເຊື່ອມໂຊມ ທາງຊີວະພາບ - Bl: ການສູນເສຍ ຈຸລິນຊີໃນດິນ
  • ການເຊື່ອມໂຊມ ຂອງນໍ້າ - Ha: ສະພາບແຫ້ງແລ້ງ
ກຸ່ມການຄຸ້ມຄອງທີ່ດິນແບບຍືນຍົງ
  • ການປັບປຸງດິນ / ພືດຄຸມດິນ
  • ການຫຼຸດຜ່ອນ ກິດຈະກໍາ ທີ່ລົບກວນດິນ
  • ການຈັດການອຸດົມສົມບູນ ຂອງດິນປະສົມປະສານ
ມາດຕະການ ການຄຸ້ມຄອງທີ່ດິນແບບຍືນຍົງ
  • ມາດຕະການ ທາງການກະສິກໍາ - A1: ພືດ / ການປົກຫຸ້ມຂອງດິນ, A2: ອິນຊີວັດຖຸ ຫຼື ຄວາມອຸດົມສົມບູນໃນດິນ , A3: ການບໍາລຸງຮັກສາຊັ້ນໜ້າດິນ (A 3.2: Reduced tillage (> 30% soil cover)), A6: ການຈັດການສິ່ງເສດເຫຼືອ (A 6.4: ເກັບຮັກສາໄວ້)

​ເທັກ​ນິກ​ການ​ແຕ້ມ​ຮ​ູບ

​ຂໍ​ກຳ​ນົດ​ທາງ​ເທັກ​ນິກ
The first technical drawing shows a typical farm under CA with various principles:
A - Clearance of weeds and previous crop residues through slashing in preparation for planting in season 1 (long rains). The residues are retained on the plot.
B - In a plot under total soil cover with Mucuna pruriens, maize seed and fertilizer are placed at the precise planting hills, denoted by the white circles along the red line, using a jab planter to minimize soil tillage.
C - Maize crop establishes under the dense cover of Mucuna pruriens.
D - Weeding of the maize crop is done using a weed scraper.
E & F - In season 2 (short rains), after harvesting maize in the previous maize – Mucuna cropping system and cutting down the residues, either a row intercropping system with alternate rows of maize and soybean (E), or maize and common bean (F) under maize straw mulch is established.
G & H - Alternatively, in season 2 (short rains), either sole common bean (cowpea, or soybean) production under maize straw mulch (G), or total soil cover with Mucuna pruriens (H) is established in the plot.
Author: Sam Koile, Kennedy Were & George Ayaga
The second technical drawing is an illustration of a four season (2-year) rotation of maize, legumes and cover crop
Author: Kennedy Were, Sam Koile & George Ayaga

ການຈັດຕັ້ງ ແລະ ບໍາລຸງຮັກສາ: ກິດຈະກໍາ, ວັດຖຸດິບ ແລະ ຄ່າໃຊ້ຈ່າຍ

ການ​ຄຳ​ນວນ​ ປັດ​ໃຈ​ການ​ຜະ​ລິດ ແລະ ຄ່າ​ໃຊ້​ຈ່າຍ
  • ຄິດໄລ່ຄ່າໃຊ້ຈ່າຍ: ຕໍ່ພື້ນທີ່ ທີ່ໄດ້ຈັດຕັ້ງປະຕິບັດ ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ (ຂະໜາດ ແລະ ຫົວໜ່ວຍ ຂອງພື້ນທີ່:1 ha: ກໍານົດເປັນຫົວໜ່ວຍ ໜື່ງ ເຮັກຕາ:1 ເຮັກຕາ= 2.47 acres)
  • ສະກຸນເງິນທີ່ໃຊ້ສໍາລັບການຄິດໄລ່ຄ່າໃຊ້ຈ່າຍ: KES
  • ອັດຕາແລກປ່ຽນ (ເປັນເງີນ ໂດລາ): 1 USD = 107.08 KES
  • ຄ່າແຮງງານສະເລ່ຍ ຂອງການຈ້າງແຮງງານຕໍ່ມື້: 300
ປັດໄຈທີ່ສໍາຄັນສຸດທີ່​ສົ່ງຜົນກະທົບຕໍ່ຄ່າໃຊ້ຈ່າຍ
1. Prevailing market prices of the inputs, equipment and labour.
ກິດຈະກໍາການສ້າງຕັ້ງ
  1. Purchase of CA tools - jab planter, knapsack sprayer, protection gear, slasher, weed scraper, and gunny bag) (ໄລຍະເວລາ / ຄວາມຖີ່: Initial stage)
ປັດໄຈນໍາເຂົ້າໃນການຈັດຕັ້ງ ແລະ ຄ່າໃຊ້ຈ່າຍ (per 1 ha)
ລະບຸ ປັດໃຈ ນໍາເຂົ້າ ໃນການຜະລີດ ຫົວໜ່ວຍ ປະລິມານ ຕົ້ນທຶນ ຕໍ່ຫົວໜ່ວຍ (KES) ຕົ້ນທຶນທັງໝົດ ຂອງປັດໃຈຂາເຂົ້າ ໃນການຜະລິດ (KES) % ຂອງຕົ້ນທຶນທັງໝົດ ທີ່ຜູ້ນໍາໃຊ້ທີ່ດິນ ໃຊ້ຈ່າຍເອງ
ອຸປະກອນ
Jab planter Piece 2.0 1500.0 3000.0 100.0
Knapsack sprayer Piece 2.0 2500.0 5000.0 100.0
Protection gear Piece 2.0 1000.0 2000.0 100.0
Weed scraper Piece 2.0 500.0 1000.0 100.0
Slasher Piece 2.0 500.0 1000.0 100.0
Gunny bag Piece 50.0 50.0 2500.0 100.0
ຕົ້ນທຶນທັງໝົດ ໃນການຈັດຕັ້ງປະຕິບັດ ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ 14'500.0
ຄ່າໃຊ້ຈ່າຍທັງໝົດ ສຳລັບການສ້າງຕັ້ງເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ ເປັນສະກຸນເງີນໂດລາ 135.41
ກິດຈະກໍາບໍາລຸງຮັກສາ
  1. Land preparation - Slashing (ໄລຍະເວລາ / ຄວາມຖີ່: Initial stage)
  2. Preparing the planting hills and rip lines (ໄລຍະເວລາ / ຄວາມຖີ່: Initial stage)
  3. Planting - placing seeds and fertilizer using jab planter (ໄລຍະເວລາ / ຄວາມຖີ່: Initial stage)
  4. Herbicide application (ໄລຍະເວລາ / ຄວາມຖີ່: Initial and growing stages)
  5. Pesticide application (ໄລຍະເວລາ / ຄວາມຖີ່: Growing stage)
  6. Fertilizer application (top-dressing) (ໄລຍະເວລາ / ຄວາມຖີ່: Growing stage)
  7. Harvesting, drying and shelling (ໄລຍະເວລາ / ຄວາມຖີ່: Final stage)
ປັດໄຈນໍາເຂົ້າໃນການບໍາລຸງຮັກສາ ແລະ ຄ່າໃຊ້ຈ່າຍ (per 1 ha)
ລະບຸ ປັດໃຈ ນໍາເຂົ້າ ໃນການຜະລີດ ຫົວໜ່ວຍ ປະລິມານ ຕົ້ນທຶນ ຕໍ່ຫົວໜ່ວຍ (KES) ຕົ້ນທຶນທັງໝົດ ຂອງປັດໃຈຂາເຂົ້າ ໃນການຜະລິດ (KES) % ຂອງຕົ້ນທຶນທັງໝົດ ທີ່ຜູ້ນໍາໃຊ້ທີ່ດິນ ໃຊ້ຈ່າຍເອງ
ແຮງງານ
Land preparation - slashing and herbicide application Man day 4.0 300.0 1200.0 100.0
Planting - preparing the planting hills and placing seeds and fertilizer Man day 38.0 300.0 11400.0 100.0
Top-dressing and pesticide application Man day 8.0 300.0 2400.0 100.0
Harvesting, shelling and drying Man day 30.0 300.0 9000.0 100.0
ວັດສະດຸໃນການປູກ
Maize seed Kg 20.0 250.0 5000.0 100.0
Legume seed Kg 8.0 250.0 2000.0 100.0
ຝຸ່ນ ແລະ ຢາຊີວະພາບ
Planting fertilizer Kg 125.0 60.0 7500.0 100.0
Top-dressing fertilizer Kg 125.0 50.0 6250.0 100.0
Pesticide Litre 2.0 1250.0 2500.0 100.0
Herbicide Litre 5.0 875.0 4375.0 100.0
ອື່ນໆ
Transport Km 5.0 1500.0 7500.0 100.0
ຕົ້ນທຶນທັງໝົດ ທີ່ໃຊ້ໃນການບໍາລຸງຮັກສາ ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ 59'125.0
ຄ່າໃຊ້ຈ່າຍທັງໝົດ ສຳລັບການບົວລະບັດຮກສາເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ ເປັນສະກຸນເງີນໂດລາ 552.16

ສະພາບແວດລ້ອມທໍາມະຊາດ

ສະເລ່ຍປະລິມານນໍ້າຝົນປະຈໍາປີ
  • < 250 ມີລິແມັດ
  • 251-500 ມີລິແມັດ
  • 501-750 ມີລິແມັດ
  • 751-1,000 ມີລິແມັດ
  • 1,001-1,500 ມີລິແມັດ
  • 1,501-2,000 ມີລິແມັດ
  • 2,001-3,000 ມີລິແມັດ
  • 3,001-4,000 ມີລິແມັດ
  • > 4,000 ມີລິແມັດ
ເຂດກະສິກໍາ-ສະພາບອາກາດ
  • ຄວາມຊຸ່ມ
  • ເຄີ່ງຄວາມຊຸ່ມ
  • ເຄິ່ງແຫ້ງແລ້ງ
  • ແຫ້ງແລ້ງ
ຂໍ້ມູນຈໍາເພາະກ່ຽວກັບສະພາບອາກາດ
Rainfall is bi-modal with the long rain season starting from March to May, and the short rains from October to December.
mean annual temperature varies from 18 to 29° C
​ຄວາມຄ້ອຍ​ຊັນ
  • ພື້ນທີ່ຮາບພຽງ (0-2%)
  • ອ່ອນ (3-5 %)
  • ປານກາງ (6-10 %)
  • ມ້ວນ (11-15 %)
  • ເນີນ(16-30%)
  • ໍຊັນ (31-60%)
  • ຊັນຫຼາຍ (>60%)
ຮູບແບບຂອງດິນ
  • ພູພຽງ / ທົ່ງພຽງ
  • ສັນພູ
  • ເປີ້ນພູ
  • ເນີນພູ
  • ຕີນພູ
  • ຮ່ອມພູ
ລະດັບຄວາມສູງ
  • 0-100 ແມັດ a.s.l.
  • 101-500 ແມັດ a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 ແມັດ a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 ແມັດ a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 ແມັດ a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 ແມັດ a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 ແມັດ a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 ແມັດ a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 ແມັດ a.s.l.
ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີໄດ້ຖືກນໍາໃຊ້ໃນ
  • ລັກສະນະສວດ
  • ລັກສະນະກີ່ວ
  • ບໍ່ກ່ຽວຂ້ອງ
ຄວາມເລິກຂອງດິນ
  • ຕື້ນຫຼາຍ (0-20 ຊັງຕີແມັດ)
  • ຕື້ນ (21-50 ຊຕມ)
  • ເລີກປານກາງ (51-80 ຊຕມ)
  • ເລິກ (81-120 ຊມ)
  • ເລິກຫຼາຍ (> 120 cm)
ໂຄງສ້າງຂອງດິນ (ເທີງໜ້າດິນ)
  • ຫຍາບ / ເບົາ (ດິນຊາຍ)
  • ປານກາງ (ດິນໜຽວ, ດິນໂຄນ)
  • ບາງລະອຽດ / ໜັກ (ໜຽວ)
ໂຄງສ້າງຂອງດິນ (ເລິກລົງ 20 ຊັງຕີແມັດ)
  • ຫຍາບ / ເບົາ (ດິນຊາຍ)
  • ປານກາງ (ດິນໜຽວ, ດິນໂຄນ)
  • ບາງລະອຽດ / ໜັກ (ໜຽວ)
ທາດອິນຊີຢູ່ເທິງໜ້າດິນ
  • ສູງ (> 3 %)
  • ປານກາງ (1-3 %)
  • ຕໍາ່ (<1 %)
​ນ້ຳ​ໃຕ້​ດິນ
  • ເທິງຊັ້ນໜ້າດິນ
  • < 5 ແມັດ
  • 5-50 ແມັດ
  • > 50 ແມັດ
ມີນໍ້າໜ້າດິນ
  • ເກີນ
  • ດີ
  • ປານກາງ
  • ທຸກຍາກ / ບໍ່ມີ
ຄຸນນະພາບນໍ້າ (ການຮັກສາ)
  • ມີນໍ້າດື່ມ
  • ບໍ່ມີນໍ້າດື່ມ (ຮຽກຮ້ອງໃຫ້ມີການບຳບັດນ້ຳ)
  • ນຳໃຊ້ເຂົ້າໃນການຜະລິດກະສິກໍາພຽງຢ່າງດຽງ (ຊົນລະປະທານ)
  • ຜິດປົກກະຕິ
ຄຸນນະພາບນ້ຳ ໝາຍເຖີງ: ທັງນ້ຳໃຕ້ດິນ ແລະ ນ້ຳໜ້າດິນ
ດິນ​ເຄັມ​ເປັນ​ບັນ​ຫາ​ບໍ່?
  • ແມ່ນ
  • ບໍ່ແມ່ນ

ການເກີດນໍ້າຖ້ວມ
  • ແມ່ນ
  • ບໍ່ແມ່ນ
ຄວາມຫຼາກຫຼາຍຂອງຊະນິດ
  • ສູງ
  • ປານກາງ
  • ຕໍ່າ
ຄວາມຫຼາກຫຼາຍຂອງສິ່ງທີ່ມີຊີວິດ
  • ສູງ
  • ປານກາງ
  • ຕໍ່າ

ຄຸນລັກສະນະຂອງຜູ້ນຳໃຊ້ທີ່ດິນການນໍາໃຊ້ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ

ການວາງແນວທາງຕະຫຼາດ
  • ກຸ້ມຕົນເອງ (ພໍພຽງ)
  • ປະສົມປົນເປ( ກຸ້ມຕົນເອງ/ເປັນສິນຄ້າ)
  • ການຄ້າ / ຕະຫຼາດ
ລາຍຮັບທີ່ໄດ້ມາຈາກກິດຈະກໍາອື່ນໆ ທີ່ບໍ່ແມ່ນການຜະລິດກະສິກໍາ
  • ໜ້ອຍກ່ວາ 10 % ຂອງລາຍຮັບທັງໝົດ
  • 10-50 % ຂອງລາຍຮັບທັງໝົດ
  • > 50 % ຂອງລາຍຮັບທັງໝົດ
ລະດັບຄວາມຮັ່ງມີ
  • ທຸກ​ຍາກ​ຫຼາຍ
  • ທຸກຍາກ
  • ສະເລ່ຍ
  • ຮັ່ງມີ
  • ຮັ່ງມີຫຼາຍ
ລະດັບຂອງການຫັນເປັນກົນຈັກ
  • ການໃຊ້ແຮງງານຄົນ
  • ສັດລາກແກ່
  • ເຄື່ອງກົນຈັກ
ຢູ່​ປະ​ຈຳ ຫຼື ເລ​ລ້ອນ
  • ບໍ່ເຄື່ອນໄຫວ
  • ແບບເຄີ່ງຂັງ-ເຄີ່ງປ່ອຍ
  • ແບບປ່ອຍຕາມທຳມະຊາດ
ບຸກຄົນ ຫຼື ກຸ່ມ
  • ບຸກຄົນ / ຄົວເຮືອນ
  • ກຸ່ມ / ຊຸມຊົນ
  • ການຮ່ວມມື
  • ການຈ້າງງານ (ບໍລິສັດ, ອົງການ ລັດຖະບານ)
ເພດ
  • ຜູ້ຍິງ
  • ຜູ້ຊາຍ
ອາ​ຍຸ
  • ເດັກນ້ອຍ
  • ຊາວໜຸ່ມ
  • ໄວ​ກາງ​ຄົນ
  • ຜູ້ສູງອາຍຸ
ເຂດພື້ນທີ່ການນໍາໃຊ້ຕໍ່ຄົວເຮືອນ
  • <0.5 ເຮັກຕາ
  • 0.5-1 ເຮັກຕາ
  • 1-2 ເຮັກຕາ
  • 2-5 ເຮັກຕາ
  • 5-15 ເຮັກຕາ
  • 15-50 ເຮັກຕາ
  • 50-100 ເຮັກຕາ
  • 100-500 ເຮັກຕາ
  • 500-1,000 ເຮັກຕາ
  • 1,000-10,000 ເຮັກຕາ
  • > 10,000 ເຮັກຕາ
ຂະໜາດ
  • ຂະໜາດນ້ອຍ
  • ຂະໜາດກາງ
  • ຂະໜາດໃຫຍ່
ເຈົ້າຂອງທີ່ດິນ
  • ລັດ
  • ບໍລິສັດ
  • ຊຸມຊົນ / ບ້ານ
  • ກຸ່ມ
  • ບຸກຄົນ, ບໍ່ມີຕໍາແໜ່ງ
  • ບຸກຄົນ, ທີ່ມີຕໍາແໜ່ງ
ສິດທິການນໍາໃຊ້ທີ່ດິນ
  • ເປີດກວ້າງ (ບໍ່ມີການຈັດຕັ້ງ)
  • ຊຸມຊົນ (ທີ່ມີການຈັດຕັ້ງ)
  • ເຊົ່າ
  • ບຸກຄົນ
ສິດທິການນໍາໃຊ້ນໍ້າ
  • ເປີດກວ້າງ (ບໍ່ມີການຈັດຕັ້ງ)
  • ຊຸມຊົນ (ທີ່ມີການຈັດຕັ້ງ)
  • ເຊົ່າ
  • ບຸກຄົນ
ການເຂົ້າເຖິງການບໍລິການ ແລະ ພື້ນຖານໂຄງລ່າງ
ສຸຂະພາບ

ທຸກຍາກ
x
ດີ
ການສຶກສາ

ທຸກຍາກ
x
ດີ
ການຊ່ວຍເຫຼືອ ດ້ານວິຊາການ

ທຸກຍາກ
x
ດີ
ການຈ້າງງານ (ຕົວຢ່າງ, ການເຮັດກິດຈະກໍາອື່ນ ທີ່ບໍ່ແມ່ນ ການຜະລິດກະສິກໍາ)

ທຸກຍາກ
x
ດີ
ຕະຫຼາດ

ທຸກຍາກ
x
ດີ
ພະລັງງານ

ທຸກຍາກ
x
ດີ
ຖະໜົນຫົນທາງ ແລະ ການຂົນສົ່ງ

ທຸກຍາກ
x
ດີ
ການດື່ມນໍ້າ ແລະ ສຸຂາພິບານ

ທຸກຍາກ
x
ດີ
ການ​ບໍ​ລິ​ການ​ ທາງ​ດ້ານ​ການ​ເງິນ

ທຸກຍາກ
x
ດີ

ຜົນກະທົບ

ຜົນກະທົບທາງສັງຄົມ ແລະ ເສດຖະກິດ
ຜົນຜະລິດ
ຫຼຸດລົງ
x
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ

ປະລິມານ ກ່ອນການຈັດຕັ້ງປະຕິບັດ ການຄຸ້ມຄອງ ທີ່ດິນແບບຍືນຍົງ: 24 bags/ ha
ປະລີມານ ຫຼັງການຈັດຕັ້ງປະຕິບັດ ການຄຸ້ມຄອງ ທີ່ດິນແບບຍືນຍົງ: 43 bags/ ha
This can be attributed to the multiple benefits of the CA technology, such as improved soil organic matter content and nutrient status. Note: A standard bag weighs 90 kgs.

ຄຸນນະພາບຂອງພືດ
ຫຼຸດລົງ
x
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ


The multiple benefits of the CA technology, such as improved soil conditions and alleviation of pests and diseases, not only increased crop production (yields), but also the quality of the crops.

ການຜະລິດອາຫານສັດ
ຫຼຸດລົງ
x
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ


Increased crop production also means increased fodder production because the crop residues are partly used as animal feed

ຄຸນນະພາບຂອງອາຫານສັດ
ຫຼຸດລົງ
x
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ


Increased crop quality also implies increased fodder quality because the crop residues are partly used as animal feed

ຄວາມສ່ຽງ ຕໍ່ຜົນຜະລິດ
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ
x
ຫຼຸດລົງ


Specifically,
- the maize established with Mucuna pruriens as a cover crop have remained green and healthy for long during mid-season dry spells. The CA technology increases water infiltration and soil moisture because the dense cover crop not only regulates the soil surface temperatures and evaporation, but also reduces surface runoff
- the CA plots under maize - Mucuna pruriens inter-crop have been less affected by the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda).
- in seasons of excessive rainfall, the maize intercropped with the common bean has been harvested even when the common bean fails.

ຄວາມໜາແໜ້ນ ຂອງຜົນຜະລິດ
ຫຼຸດລົງ
x
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ


Farmers not only grow maize, but also mix or rotate it with common bean, soybean and cowpea

ການຈັດການຄຸ້ມຄອງທີ່ດິນ
ອຸປະສັກ
x
ເຮັດໃຫ້ງ່າຍຂຶ້ນ


Operations such as precise and direct placement of inputs and minimum tillage have simplified land management

ຄ່າໃຊ້ຈ່າຍ ປັດໄຈນໍາເຂົ້າ ໃນການຜະລິດກະສິກໍາ
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ
x
ຫຼຸດລົງ


Expenses on inputs, such as herbicides and fertilizers increased marginally, because the conventional farming practice had been characterized by low inputs; however, with improved soil organic matter, soil structure and nutrient status, as well as reduced incidences of pest, diseases and weeds, it is expected that the use of these inputs will diminish over time

ລາຍຮັບ ຈາກການຜະລີດ
ຫຼຸດລົງ
x
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ


Increased crop production means, more surplus and incomes

ຄວາມຫຼາກຫຼາຍ ຂອງແຫຼ່ງລາຍຮັບ
ຫຼຸດລົງ
x
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ


Diversified cropping enables the farmers to get income from maize, common bean, soybean and cowpea production

ມີວຽກໜັກ
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ
x
ຫຼຸດລົງ


Reduced tillage has subsequently decreased the farmers' workload because they no longer have to plough the entire field

ຜົນກະທົບທາງສັງຄົມ ວັດທະນະທໍາ
ການຄໍ້າປະກັນ ສະບຽງອາຫານ / ກຸ້ມຢູ່ກຸ້ມກິນ
ຫຼຸດຜ່ອນ
x
ປັບປຸງ


Increased crop production means more food and less hungry periods. The legumes also provide a good source of protein to the farmers' households

ສະຖາບັນ ການຈັດຕັ້ງຊຸມຊົນ
ຈຸດອ່ອນ
x
ຈຸດແຂງ


The common interest groups have been greatly involved in the selection of the CA technologies. The strengthening of the community institutions has been done for sustainability and to allow sensitization of the technology to the wider population in the landscape. Some of thaccess by the communities. e promotion approaches have been on-farm demonstrations and training of trainers (ToTs), which have involved and empowered different farmer groups within the communities. Seed producers have also been trained to multiply seeds of specific crops, such as Mucuna pruriens for ease of access

ຄວາມຮູ້ກ່ຽວກັບ ການຄຸ້ມຄອງ ທີ່ດິນແບບຍືນຍົງ / ການເຊື່ອມໂຊມຂອງດິນ
ຫຼຸດຜ່ອນ
x
ປັບປຸງ


On-farm demonstrations of the CA technology and the training of trainers (ToTs) have empowered different stakeholders within the communities with sufficient SLM/ land degradation knowledge

ຜົນກະທົບຕໍ່ລະບົບນິເວດ
ການໄຫຼ ຂອງນໍ້າໜ້າດິນ
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ
x
ຫຼຸດລົງ


The dense Mucuna pruriens cover crop reduces surface runoff

ຊັ້ນນໍ້າໄຕ້ດິນ / ນໍ້າ
ຕ່ໍາສຸດ
x
ບັນຈຸໃໝ່


There has been increase in water infiltration and soil water content because the dense Mucuna pruriens cover crop not only regulates the soil surface temperatures and evaporation, but also reduces surface runoff. This recharges the aquifer

ການລະເຫີຍອາຍ
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ
x
ຫຼຸດລົງ


The dense Mucuna pruriens cover crop regulates both the soil surface temperatures and evaporation

ຄວາມຊຸ່ມຂອງດິນ
ຫຼຸດລົງ
x
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ


The increase in soil water content occurs because the dense Mucuna pruriens cover crop not only regulates the soil surface temperatures and evaporation, but also reduces surface runoff

ການປົກຄຸມຂອງດິນ
ຫຼຸດຜ່ອນ
x
ປັບປຸງ


The dense Mucuna pruriens completely covers the soil surface, and is left on the ground even after the harvesting of maize

ການສູນເສຍດິນ
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ
x
ຫຼຸດລົງ


The dense Mucuna pruriens cover crop reduces surface runoff and exposure to wind erosion

ການທັບຖົມຂອງດິນ
ຫຼຸດລົງ
x
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ


Accumulation of soil organic carbon has occurred because the dense cover crop has a higher net primary productivity and sheds more leaves on the ground, resulting in more inputs of detritus to the soil. Similarly, retention of the large amount of crop residues especially those obtained from the leguminous crops has increased the inputs of carbon and nitrogen to the soil.

ດິນເປັນຜົງ / ການຈັບໂຕຂອງດິນ ທີ່ມີຂະໜາດນ້ອຍຫຼາຍ ທີ່ມີການຈັບໂຕກັນເປັນກ້ອນ
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ
x
ຫຼຸດຜ່ອນ


The cover crop, minimum tillage and crop residues have protected the soil from the impact of raindrops, improved the surface soil structure and aggregate stability by increasing the organic matter content in the soil and stimulated soil biological activity, making the soil resistant to crusting

ການອັດແໜ້ນຂອງດິນ
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ
x
ຫຼຸດຜ່ອນ


Reduced tillage or zero tillage has minimized farm land activities, e.g, ploughing which often result in compaction of soil. Incorporation of deep rooted crops with shallow rooted crops has also helped to break the various soil layers, thus hindering compaction. In addition, accumulation of soil organic carbon has improved soil biological activities that help to reduce soil compaction, through continuous burrowing.

ວົງຈອນ ຂອງສານອາຫານໃນດິນ
ຫຼຸດລົງ
x
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ


As the dense cover crop grows, the leaves fall and decompose on the ground, enriching the soils with nitrogen and organic matter

ອິນຊີວັດຖຸໃນດິນ / ຢູ່ລຸ່ມຊັ້ນດິນ C
ຫຼຸດລົງ
x
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ


As the dense cover crop grows, the leaves fall and decompose on the ground, with organic matter additions.

ມວນຊີວະພາບ / ຢູ່ເທິງຊັ້ນດິນ C
ຫຼຸດລົງ
x
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ


The dense cover crop has higher net primary productivity/ above-ground biomass C, which is left when the maize crop is harvested.

ຄວາມຫຼາກຫຼາຍຂອງພືດ
ຫຼຸດລົງ
x
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ


Farmers grow a mix of crops under the diverse cropping principle, which has increased plant diversity

ສາຍພັນຕ່າງຖີ່ນ
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ
x
ຫຼຸດຜ່ອນ


Farmers have witnessed the suppression of weeds, such as Striga hermonthica (witchweed) in plots under dense cover crop and diversified cropping.

ການຄວບຄຸມສັດຕູພືດ / ພະຍາດ
ຫຼຸດລົງ
x
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ


Diversified cropping through rotations has reduced the incidences of insect pests and diseases through disruption of pest and disease cycles. Specifically, farmers have noticed that the CA plots under maize - Mucuna pruriens intercrop are less affected by the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda)

ຜົນກະທົບ ຂອງໄພແຫ້ງແລ້ງ
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ
x
ຫຼຸດລົງ


The maize established with Mucuna pruriens as a cover crop has remained green and healthy for long during mid-season dry spells. This implies that the CA technology also increases water infiltration and soil water content; thus, acting as insurance against drought.

ການລະເຫີຍອາຍກາກບອນ ແລະ ອາຍຜິດເຮືອນແກ້ວ
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ
x
ຫຼຸດລົງ


Reduced tillage mitigates atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions through the decrease in fossil fuel consumption and soil disturbance. Crop residues are also retained in the field and not burnt; hence, reducing emission of carbon.

ຜົນກະທົບນອກ​ສະ​ຖານ​ທີ່
ຜົນກະທົບ ຂອງອາຍຜິດເຮືອນແກ້ວ
ເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນ
x
ຫຼຸດຜ່ອນ

ການວິເຄາະຕົ້ນທຶນ ແລະ ຜົນປະໂຫຍດ

ຜົນປະໂຫຍດເມື່ອທຽບກັບຄ່າໃຊ້ຈ່າຍໃນການສ້າງຕັ້ງ
ຜົນຕອບແທນ ໃນໄລຍະສັ້ນ
ຜົນກະທົບທາງລົບຫຼາຍ
x
ຜົນກະທົບທາງບວກຫຼາຍ

ຜົນຕອບແທນ ໃນໄລຍະຍາວ
ຜົນກະທົບທາງລົບຫຼາຍ
x
ຜົນກະທົບທາງບວກຫຼາຍ

ຜົນປະໂຫຍດເມື່ອທຽບກັບຄ່າໃຊ້ຈ່າຍບໍາລຸງຮັກສາ
ຜົນຕອບແທນ ໃນໄລຍະສັ້ນ
ຜົນກະທົບທາງລົບຫຼາຍ
x
ຜົນກະທົບທາງບວກຫຼາຍ

ຜົນຕອບແທນ ໃນໄລຍະຍາວ
ຜົນກະທົບທາງລົບຫຼາຍ
x
ຜົນກະທົບທາງບວກຫຼາຍ

For example, it is expected that the associated improvement in soil organic matter, soil structure and nutrient status will reduce the use of fertilizers in the long term.

ການປ່ຽນແປງສະພາບດິນຟ້າອາກາດ

ການປ່ຽນແປງດິນຟ້າອາກາດ ເທື່ອລະກ້າວ
ອຸນຫະພູມປະຈໍາປີ ເພີ່ມຂື້ນ

ບໍ່ດີຈັກຢ່າງ
x
ດີຫຼາຍ
ປະລິມານນໍ້າຝົນປະຈໍາປີ ເພີ່ມຂື້ນ

ບໍ່ດີຈັກຢ່າງ
x
ດີຫຼາຍ
ອາກາດ ທີ່ກ່ຽວພັນກັບຄວາມຮຸນແຮງ (ໄພພິບັດທາງທໍາມະຊາດ)
ແຫ້ງແລ້ງ

ບໍ່ດີຈັກຢ່າງ
x
ດີຫຼາຍ
ພະຍາດລະບາດ

ບໍ່ດີຈັກຢ່າງ
x
ດີຫຼາຍ
ແມງໄມ້ / ການລະບາດຂອງພະຍາດ

ບໍ່ດີຈັກຢ່າງ
x
ດີຫຼາຍ

ການຍອມຮັບ ແລະ ການປັບຕົວ

ອັດຕາສ່ວນຂອງຜູ້ຊົມໃຊ້ທີ່ດິນໃນເຂດພື້ນທີ່ທີ່ໄດ້ຮັບຮອງເອົາເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ
  • ກໍລະນີດຽວ / ການທົດລອງ
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
ທັງໝົດນັ້ນ ມີໃຜແດ່ທີ່ສາມາດປັບຕົວຕໍ່ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ,​ ມີຈັກຄົນທີ່ໄດ້ຮັບການກະຕຸກຊຸກຍູ້ ແລະ ອຸປະກອນ?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
ໄດ້ມີການດັດແປງເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ ເພື່ອປັບໃຫ້ເຂົ້າກັບເງື່ອນໄຂການປ່ຽນແປງບໍ່?
  • ແມ່ນ
  • ບໍ່ແມ່ນ
ໄດ້ປ່ຽນແປງເງື່ອນໄຂຫຍັງແດ່?
  • ການປ່ຽນແປງດິນຟ້າອາກາດ / ຮ້າຍແຮງ
  • ຕະຫຼາດມີການປ່ຽນແປງ
  • ມີແຮງງານ (ຕົວຢ່າງ, ເນື່ອງຈາກການເຄື່ອນຍ້າຍແຮງງານ)

ບົດສະຫຼຸບ ແລະ ບົດຮຽນທີ່ໄດ້ຮັບ

ຄວາມເຂັ້ມແຂງ: ທັດສະນະມູມມອງ ຂອງຜູ້ນໍາໃຊ້ທີ່ດິນ
  • Maize established with Mucuna pruriens as a dense cover crop is not adversely affected by the fall army worm (Spodoptera frugiperda)
  • Reduced tillage saves time, money and energy, while the direct placement of inputs (seeds and fertilizers) minimizes wastage. The saved resources can be used to engage in other income-generating activities
  • Maize established with Mucuna pruriens as a dense cover crop remains green and healthy for long during mid-season dry spells
  • Weeds, such as Striga hermonthica (witchweed) are suppressed in plots under dense cover crop and diversified cropping (rotations and inter-crops)
  • In seasons of excessive rainfall, the maize intercropped with the common bean is usually harvested even when the common bean fails
  • The CA technology has boosted maize yields, meaning more food and income, and reduced cost of feeding the family
ຄວາມເຂັ້ມແຂງ: ທັດສະນະມຸມມອງ ຂອງຜູ້ປ້ອນຂໍ້ມູນເອງ
  • The CA plots with Mucuna pruriens as a dense cover crop have improved soil organic matter, soil structure and nutrient status
  • Reduced tillage has enhanced soil living organisms, such as earthworms and decreased fuel consumption and soil disturbance; hence, mitigating atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions and storing carbon in soils
  • The CA technology has increased water infiltration and soil water content (moisture); thus, acting as insurance against drought
  • Diversified cropping through rotations has reduced the incidences of insect pests and diseases, as well as the risk of crop failure during extreme weather conditions and pest infestations
ຈຸດອ່ອນ / ຂໍ້ເສຍ / ຄວາມສ່ຽງ: ທັດສະນະມູມມອງ ຂອງຜູ້ນໍາໃຊ້ທີ່ດິນວິທີການແກ້ໄຂແນວໃດ
  • The Mucuna pruriens used as a dense cover crop intertwines on maize crop, which might increase manual labour Promote other erect cover crops like the lablab bean (Dolichos lablab), Desmodium and Canavalia that will have less effect on the cereal crop established
  • The yields of Mucuna pruriens used as a dense cover crop are not edible - Extension agents and Trainer of Trainees (ToTs) to equip farmers with knowledge on the options available for utilizing Mucuna pruriens yields other than being a cover crop
    - Promote other erect cover crops like the lablab bean (Dolichos lablab), Desmodium and Canavalia
  • Residue retention reduces the availability of fodder and fuel materials Adopt an agro-forestry system with tree species that can provide alternative source of fodder and fuel
  • The critical CA inputs and implements, such as the jab planters, weed scrapers, herbicides and Mucuna seeds are hard to access - Incentivize and train the local fabricators to fabricate affordable CA tools
    - Subsidize CA inputs, such as fertilizer and herbicides
    - Facilitate access to credit
    - Train more seed producers to multiply the seeds of Mucuna pruriens
ຈຸດອ່ອນ / ຂໍ້ເສຍ / ຄວາມສ່ຽງ: ທັດສະນະມຸມມອງ ຂອງຜູ້ປ້ອນຂໍ້ມູນເອງວິທີການແກ້ໄຂແນວໃດ
  • Agro-ecosystem contamination through use of herbicides and inorganic fertilizers Use the right doses of herbicides and fertilizers

ເອກກະສານອ້າງອີງ

ການລວບລວມ
  • Kennedy Were
Editors
ການທົບທວນຄືນ
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
  • Tatenda Lemann
ວັນທີຂອງການປະຕິບັດ: May 31, 2020
ປັບປຸງລ່າສຸດ: Aug. 10, 2020
ບຸກຄົນທີ່ສໍາຄັນ
ການບັນຍາຍລາຍລະອຽດ ໃນຖານຂໍ້ມູນ ຂອງ WOCAT
ຂໍ້ມູນການເຊື່ອມໂຍງຂໍ້ມູນການຄຸ້ມຄອງການນໍາໃຊ້ດິນແບບຍືນຍົງ
ເອກກະສານ ແມ່ນໄດ້ອໍານວຍຄວາມສະດວກໂດຍ
ສະຖາບັນ ​ໂຄງ​ການ
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International