Overview
The initial project focused on 10 villages within Kutch District, Gujarat, Western India. Each of these villages developed 10 acres of associated common pastureland. In total, 100 acres were developed. The project offered local solutions to develop village wastelands (common term in India for degraded lands) into ecologically regenerated pasturelands. Village pastureland, developed in such manner was used for open and free grazing for livestock. This enhanced milk production thus generating income for village women and their families.
Process
MARAG formed a WPLMC (Women’s Pastureland Management Committee) in each village consisting of 10 members. Each WPLMC managed 10 acres of these common pasturelands in their respective villages. WPLMCs were trained and engaged in land mapping and demarcation through GPS, soil testing, land cleaning and land levelling, selection of native grass seeds, sowing of such grasses, and general maintenance and management of the land.
The rules and regulations for land management were determined by the WPLMCs. WPLMCs jointly decided to use 5 of 10 acres of each village gaucher (local term for pasture) to develop traditional grasses for small ruminants. Out of this, 2.5 acres were developed as fodder for large livestock and 2.5 acres were developed for drought tolerant species. Finally, the WPLMCs documented the regulation and use of pastureland and the responsibility of the management.
The following processes were employed for pastureland regeneration:
1.Silvipasture practice
2.Land treatment and afforestation
3.Reintroduction of traditional grass seeds.
4.Tapping of indigenous pastoral knowledge for grass development and breed conservation.
5.Forming and strengthening Women Pastureland Management Committees (WPLMC) at village level for project sustainability.
6.Using technology and capacity building of the WPLMC (e.g. GPS tools for land measuring, mobile app use for determining land fertility and water catchment etc.)
Livestock rearing can be a tool for the sustainable management of land, especially in arid and semiarid areas, by improving soil health, mitigating desertification and protecting the local ecosystem against invasive species. Sustanable livestock grazing breaks soil crust, increasing rain water absorpstion and converts grass into organic waste, increasing soil health and regenarating grasses by spreading seed.
Project Impact
1.Developed women leadership and management capacities as well as decision making throughout the project process.
2.Ownership of the pastureland development taken by pastoralist women.
3.Pastoralist women learning and using the smartphone for land mapping. Such knowledge is easily copied by other women in the village.
4.Traditional knowledge on pasture grasses women to deepen their knowledge on pasture management.
5.Biodiversity conservation through traditional knowledge.
6.Secured livelihood security and food sovereignty.
ສະຖານທີ່: Dhabda village of Kutch District, Gujarat, ອິນເດຍ
ຈໍານວນ ພື້ນທີ່ ທີ່ໃຊ້ ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ ທີ່ໄດ້ວິເຄາະ: 2-10 ພຶ້ນທີ່
ການແຜ່ກະຈາຍຂອງເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ: ນໍາໃຊ້ໃນຈຸດສະເພາະ / ແນໃສ່ນໍາໃຊ້ໃນພື້ນທີ່ຂະໜາດນ້ອຍ
ຢູ່ໃນເຂດປ່າສະຫງວນທີ່ບໍ?: ບໍ່ແມ່ນ
ວັນທີຂອງການປະຕິບັດ: 2022
ປະເພດຂອງການນໍາສະເໜີ
ສາຍພັນ | Count |
ຄວາຍ | n.a. |
ສັດໃຫ່ຍ-ງົວພັນນົມ | n.a. |
ແບ້ | n.a. |
ແກະ | n.a. |
ລະບຸ ປັດໃຈ ນໍາເຂົ້າ ໃນການຜະລີດ | ຫົວໜ່ວຍ | ປະລິມານ | ຕົ້ນທຶນ ຕໍ່ຫົວໜ່ວຍ (INR) | ຕົ້ນທຶນທັງໝົດ ຂອງປັດໃຈຂາເຂົ້າ ໃນການຜະລິດ (INR) | % ຂອງຕົ້ນທຶນທັງໝົດ ທີ່ຜູ້ນໍາໃຊ້ທີ່ດິນ ໃຊ້ຈ່າຍເອງ |
ແຮງງານ | |||||
GPS - mapping | Person-Day | 2.0 | 500.0 | 1000.0 | |
Land leveling and preparation | Person | 15.0 | 550.0 | 8250.0 | 25.0 |
Seed sowing | Person | 3.0 | 700.0 | 2100.0 | 100.0 |
Tree plantation | Person | 12.0 | 300.0 | 3600.0 | 100.0 |
Pastureland security guard | Person | 6.0 | 500.0 | 3000.0 | 50.0 |
Fodder harvest | Person | 10.0 | 200.0 | 2000.0 | 40.0 |
ອຸປະກອນ | |||||
Smart Phone | Piece | 1.0 | 14000.0 | 14000.0 | 100.0 |
JCB (backhoe tractor for land levelling) | per Hour | 12.0 | 900.0 | 10800.0 | |
Tractor | Per Hour | 25.0 | 700.0 | 17500.0 | |
Tree Guard | Piece | 17.0 | 550.0 | 9350.0 | 30.0 |
Fencing Material | Kg | 50.0 | 70.0 | 3500.0 | |
Farming tools | Piece | 6.0 | 350.0 | 2100.0 | 50.0 |
ວັດສະດຸໃນການປູກ | |||||
Grass seeds | Kg | 400.0 | 50.0 | 20000.0 | 30.0 |
Tree saplings | No of plants | 125.0 | 50.0 | 6250.0 | 100.0 |
ຝຸ່ນ ແລະ ຢາຊີວະພາບ | |||||
Manure | No of Trolly | 3.0 | 1500.0 | 4500.0 | 100.0 |
Biofertilizer | No of Trolly | 2.0 | 1500.0 | 3000.0 | 100.0 |
ຕົ້ນທຶນທັງໝົດ ໃນການຈັດຕັ້ງປະຕິບັດ ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ | 110'950.0 | ||||
ຄ່າໃຊ້ຈ່າຍທັງໝົດ ສຳລັບການສ້າງຕັ້ງເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ ເປັນສະກຸນເງີນໂດລາ | 1'315.35 |
ລະບຸ ປັດໃຈ ນໍາເຂົ້າ ໃນການຜະລີດ | ຫົວໜ່ວຍ | ປະລິມານ | ຕົ້ນທຶນ ຕໍ່ຫົວໜ່ວຍ (INR) | ຕົ້ນທຶນທັງໝົດ ຂອງປັດໃຈຂາເຂົ້າ ໃນການຜະລິດ (INR) | % ຂອງຕົ້ນທຶນທັງໝົດ ທີ່ຜູ້ນໍາໃຊ້ທີ່ດິນ ໃຊ້ຈ່າຍເອງ |
ແຮງງານ | |||||
Trench repairing | per person | 7.0 | 500.0 | 3500.0 | 100.0 |
Removal of invasive species | per person | 10.0 | 550.0 | 5500.0 | 100.0 |
Seed sowing | per person | 3.0 | 700.0 | 2100.0 | 100.0 |
Irrigation | per person | 3.0 | 350.0 | 1050.0 | 100.0 |
Harvest | per person | 10.0 | 200.0 | 2000.0 | 100.0 |
ອຸປະກອນ | |||||
Water charges (watering tree saplings) | No of tanks | 7.0 | 1200.0 | 8400.0 | |
ວັດສະດຸໃນການປູກ | |||||
Seed ( fodder seeds, e.g. sorghum species) | kg | 400.0 | 50.0 | 20000.0 | |
Tree saplings | no of plants | 20.0 | 50.0 | 1000.0 | 100.0 |
ຝຸ່ນ ແລະ ຢາຊີວະພາບ | |||||
Manure | per trolly | 3.0 | 1500.0 | 4500.0 | 100.0 |
Bio fertilizer | per trolly | 2.0 | 1500.0 | 3000.0 | 100.0 |
ອື່ນໆ | |||||
Soil testing | per test | 1.0 | 1000.0 | 1000.0 | 100.0 |
ຕົ້ນທຶນທັງໝົດ ທີ່ໃຊ້ໃນການບໍາລຸງຮັກສາ ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ | 52'050.0 | ||||
ຄ່າໃຊ້ຈ່າຍທັງໝົດ ສຳລັບການບົວລະບັດຮກສາເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ ເປັນສະກຸນເງີນໂດລາ | 617.07 |
ປະລິມານ ກ່ອນການຈັດຕັ້ງປະຕິບັດ ການຄຸ້ມຄອງ ທີ່ດິນແບບຍືນຍົງ: 0
ປະລີມານ ຫຼັງການຈັດຕັ້ງປະຕິບັດ ການຄຸ້ມຄອງ ທີ່ດິນແບບຍືນຍົງ: 10%
Cultivation of indigenous fodder lead to qualitative fodder for livestock.
ປະລິມານ ກ່ອນການຈັດຕັ້ງປະຕິບັດ ການຄຸ້ມຄອງ ທີ່ດິນແບບຍືນຍົງ: None
ປະລີມານ ຫຼັງການຈັດຕັ້ງປະຕິບັດ ການຄຸ້ມຄອງ ທີ່ດິນແບບຍືນຍົງ: 75%
Priorly Wasteland was not managed at all. With the onset of the project , land is now managed and yields results for the people who live from the land. In this way land management is simplified and productive.
Food sovereignty of livestock improved.
The process of transforming wasteland to rich pasture by the community led to reviving as well as improving traditional knowledge of grass- and breed management and conservation.
Indigenous plants survive under extreme climatic conditions.