A Kudu (antelope) in a game ranch (W.N. Mphinyane (Gaborone Botswana))
This is a community project that proposesto farm wildlife in a ranch. The community will seek the land through the Land-board authorities. Department of wildlife (which is incharge of wildlife) will be consulted on animal species to ranch or to bring in. The main inputs will include fencing the ranch, water provision and labour to run the enterprise (a to be incurred by the community). The proposal has to be approved by the Department of Wildlife and National Parks who are incharge of all wildlife in the country. This will be done after the Rang Ecologists have surveyed the vegetation of the area; its suitability for game ranching. The purpose of this technology is to utilize some of the the available resources in the area so as to reduce poverty among the community members through returns gained from the enterprise and to conserve rangeland because wildlife species are more efficient users of semi - arid ecosystems. The community will seek land for game ranching from the land-board. Fencing is a pre-requisit in game faming for the purpose of rangeland conservation through controlled grazing. Water provision is also anecessity of which whould be well distributed within the ranch. Local wildlife species will be used to stock the ranch and if necessary some may be brought in from elsewhere. All the expenses will be the responsibility of the community. Day to day work in the ranch will be done by the community while technical advise will be provided by relevant expertise. Thetechnical knowledge from the community is very limited or low, professional advice would be needed time and again. The SLM technology is located on the fringes of the Makgadikgadi Salt Panswhich are prone to salty water, dusty locations because of bare ground and very fine soils. The community is of rural type where livilihoods are subsistence farming. The community is oriented more to livestock farming than to crop farming. Rangeland degradation is evident in the regionbecause of overstocking. Rainfall in the area is unpredictable and erratic with a mean of 450 - 500 mm per annum
Байршил: Central District, Boteti, Ботсван
Дүн шинжилгээнд хамрагдсан технологи нэвтрүүлсэн газрын тоо:
Технологийн тархалт: газар дээр жигд тархсан (10.0 km²)
Тусгай хамгаалалттай газар нутагт?:
Хэрэгжилтийн огноо: >50 жилийн өмнө (уламжлалт)
Нутагшууллын төрөл
| Зардлын нэр, төрөл | Хэмжих нэгж | Тоо хэмжээ | Нэгжийн үнэ (Pula) | Зардал бүрийн нийт өртөг (Pula) | Нийт дүнгээс газар ашиглагчийн төлсөн % |
| Хөдөлмөр эрхлэлт | |||||
| Labour | 1.0 | 4.29 | 4.29 | ||
| Барилгын материал | |||||
| Fencing material | 1.0 | 3883.0 | 3883.0 | ||
| Бусад | |||||
| Borehole | 1.0 | 12.36 | 12.36 | ||
| Технологи бий болгох нийт үнэ өртөг | 3'899.65 | ||||
| Технологи бий болгох нийт үнэ өртөг, ам.доллар | 557.09 | ||||
| Зардлын нэр, төрөл | Хэмжих нэгж | Тоо хэмжээ | Нэгжийн үнэ (Pula) | Зардал бүрийн нийт өртөг (Pula) | Нийт дүнгээс газар ашиглагчийн төлсөн % |
| Хөдөлмөр эрхлэлт | |||||
| Labour | 1.0 | 2.51 | 2.51 | ||
| Барилгын материал | |||||
| Fencing material | 1.0 | 158.0 | 158.0 | ||
| Бусад | |||||
| Borehole | 1.0 | 0.54 | 0.54 | ||
| Технологийн арчилгаа/урсгал үйл ажиллагаанд шаардагдах нийт үнэ өртөг | 161.05 | ||||
| Технологи арчилах ба урсгал ажлын нийт үнэ өртөг, ам.доллар | 23.01 | ||||
Increased economic inequity
Technology not yet applied in Boteti
