The Pinus Halepensis seedlings were planted linearly which is still visible from the distance. (Nina Lauterburg)

Afforestation with Pinus Halepensis after the fire of 1979 (La Molinera) (Испани)

Repoblación “La Molinera” con Pino Halepensis después del incendio del año 1979 (Spanish)

Тодорхойлолт

Post-fire afforestation with Pinus Halepensis to reduce soil erosion and to enhance forest growth.

As a consequence of the devastating fire of the year 1979 which destroyed 33’000 ha of forest, strong erosion processes occurred on the bare soil and hindered the vegetation to regrow. Furthermore, this region was already abandoned (rural exodus) and missing management practices increased the problem of erosion. Therefore the government mandated to afforest the burnt areas in 1985.

The main purpose of the afforestation was to reduce the soil erosion (which was severe at that time) by planting trees, which increases soil stability and enables forest growth again. But the state also wanted to ensure wood extraction in the future. Furthermore, the visual impact was an important driver for afforesting this area.

The afforestation was executed in the winter of 1985 (November-February/March) by the regional forest services (Conselleria de agricultura). Forest engineers, who worked for the state and planned the project, collaborated with forest agents whereas the involved forest agents contracted local villagers to help afforesting these areas. The forest agent acted as a link between engineer and forest brigade and controlled if the brigade executed what the engineer proposed. He also provided assistance to the workers. The forest brigade was paid by day-if it was raining, people did not work and did not get any salary.
Nobody could provide direct information on the afforestation process in 1985 but there are not many differences of how they did it in the past and how it works today. The planting holes (60cm x 60cm x 60cm) were created with a machine (Caterpillar) using a “spoon” to open a hole and cover it again. This process loosens the soil (only possible in soils which are free from big stones). It should be noted that they did not use a ripper, they knew that the soil is destroyed using this technique. The seedlings were planted manually by the forest workers and arranged linearly because this facilitated the handling of the machines. Since the soil had a low stone content, it was suitable for the establishment of a forest.
The afforested area covered around 100 ha (not continuously). Today, the costs of an afforestation are around 1500 Euro per ha, but in the past it was less expensive. They only planted Pinus Halepensis. Today, a seedling of this tree species costs between 20 and 60 Cents. If the regional forest services have their own nurseries, they do not need to spend money to buy seedlings.
The success of an afforestation depends on numerous factors such as aspect and humidity (better on north-facing slopes), soil amount/fertility (better conditions on former cultivated fields), origin of the seedlings (adapted to the local climatic conditions), variability/uncertainty of the weather conditions (e.g. droughts, freezing). Usually a plantation is done in October/November and therefore especially the first summer determines the success. If it is too dry the plant will not grow (roots are too short to reach the humidity deeper in the ground). Further, the availability of trained people and the selection of appropriate machines are crucial.
The documented afforestation is one of a few examples of afforestation trials which succeeded. Today there is a forest where young pines are growing naturally ("children" of the planted ones), but also resprouter species (e.g. Quercus) can be found, which regenerated without having been planted and apparently were dispersed by birds.
But there are also some problems related to this afforestation. The forest agent explained that there is a high pest risk since monoplantations are less resilient to diseases (sick or dead plants in turn increase the fire risk). Another problem is that the trees were planted too densely (800-1000 plants per ha with a spacing of 5-10m) which requires recurrent management of the forest. Knowing about this problem, around the year 2003 they managed the area doing a selective clearing to reduce both the continuity and the competition between the species and thus also reduced the fire risk (“ayuda regeneración”). But the forest has become extremely dense again, thus increasing the risk of fires. There is a need to manage this area again and to extract biomass (selective clearing), but unfortunately no management project is planned for the near future.

The region of Ayora is mountainous with a dry subhumid climate (~380 mm annual rainfall). The risk of fire incidence is at its highest from June to September when there are adverse conditions like drought, high temperatures and strong winds (mainly the winds coming from central Spain, called “poniente”).
The population density is very low and there are only few job opportunities (e.g. marginal agriculture, grazing, hunting, beekeeping). The plantation provided jobs for rural people. Also today forest management could be a source for jobs.

Байршил

Байршил: Ayora, La Molinera, Spain, Valencia, Испани

Дүн шинжилгээнд хамрагдсан технологи нэвтрүүлсэн газрын тоо:

Сонгосон байршлуудын газарзүйн холболт
  • -0.91158, 39.05869

Технологийн тархалт: газар дээр жигд тархсан (approx. 0.1-1 км2)

Тусгай хамгаалалттай газар нутагт?:

Хэрэгжилтийн огноо: 10-50 жилийн өмнө

Нутагшууллын төрөл
The Pinus Halepensis seedlings were planted linearly which is still visible from the distance. (Nina Lauterburg)
Forest management (selective clearing) of the afforested area in the year 2003. (Nina Lauterburg)

Технологийн ангилал

Үндсэн зорилго
  • үйлдвэрлэлийг сайжруулах
  • газрын доройтлыг бууруулах, сэргийлэх, нөхөн сэргээх
  • экосистемийг хамгаалах
  • сав газрыг хамгаалах (усны эх/ голын адаг) - бусад технологитой хослуулах
  • биологийн төрөл зүйлийг хамгаалах / сайжруулах
  • гамшгийн эрсдлийг бууруулах
  • уур амьсгалын өөрчлөлт/ экстрим байдал болон түүний нөлөөлөлд дасан зохицох
  • уур амьсгалын өөрчлөлт, түүний үр нөлөөг багасгах
  • үр ашигтай эдийн засгийн нөлөөг бий болгох
  • нийгэмд үзүүлэх үр нөлөөг бий болгох
Газар ашиглалт

  • Байгалийн ой / модтой газарTree types: Нарсны төрөл, зүйл
    Бүтээгдэхүүн ба үйлчилгээ: Мод бэлтгэл, Жимс, самар, Ойн бусад дагалт бүтээгдэхүүн, Байгалийн нөөцийг хамгаалах, Байгалийн гамшигаас сэргийлэх, hunting

Усан хангамж
  • Байгалийн усалгаатай
  • Байгалийн/усалгаатай арга хосолсон
  • бүрэн усалгаатай

Газрын доройтолтой холбоотой зорилго
  • газрын доройтлоос урьдчилан сэргийлэх
  • Газрын доройтлыг бууруулах
  • Хүчтэй доройтсон газрыг нөхөн сэргээх/ сайжруулах
  • газрын доройтолд дасан зохицох
  • холбогдолгүй
Доройтолын төрөл
  • хөрс усаар эвдрэх - Wt: Хөрсний гадаргын угаагдал
  • биологийн доройтол - Bc: Ургамлан нөмрөг багасах, Bf: түймрийн хорт үр дагавар
ГТМ бүлэг
  • таримал ойн менежмент
ГТМ арга хэмжээ
  • Ургамлын арга хэмжээ - V1: Мод ба бут, сөөг

Техникийн зураг

Техникийн үзүүлэлтүүд
The Pinus Halepensis seedlings were planted on a line in order to facilitate the operation of machines. The linear arrangement is still visible when observing the plantation from the distance, but when finding oneself within the forest this alignment is not visible anymore since the forest grew very densely. A part of today's forest grew naturally after planting the trees - some young pines but also some resprouters (e.g. Quercus) can be found which is pleasant and shows the success of this plantation effort. However, it would have been better to plant less trees with a bigger distance between the individuals.
To reduce the high density and continuity of the forest (and thus to reduce the fire risk) a selective clearing would be required but currently the state does not invest money in forest management practices. Without extraction of biomass this dense forest contains a high risk of fire.
Location: Ayora. Valencia, Spain
Date: 11-12-2013

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: high (The forest agent needs a high technical knowledge. He acts as a link between engineer and forest brigade and controls if the brigade executes what the engineer dictates. He also provides assistance.)
Technical knowledge required for Engineer: high (The forest engineer works for the state and plans the project, therefore he needs a high technical knowledge)
Technical knowledge required for Forest brigade/workers: low (The forest workers only execute what the engineer and the forest agent tell them. They need to know how to handle the machines but don’t have to judge where to plant which species.)

Main technical functions: control of raindrop splash, control of dispersed runoff: retain / trap, control of dispersed runoff: impede / retard, control of concentrated runoff: retain / trap, control of concentrated runoff: impede / retard, improvement of ground cover, stabilisation of soil (eg by tree roots against land slides), sediment retention / trapping, sediment harvesting, increase of biomass (quantity)
Secondary technical functions: increase of surface roughness, increase in organic matter, increase in nutrient availability (supply, recycling,…), increase of infiltration, promotion of vegetation species and varieties (quality, eg palatable fodder)

Aligned: -linear
Vegetative material: T : trees / shrubs
Number of plants per (ha): 800-1000
Vertical interval within rows / strips / blocks (m): 5-10
Trees/ shrubs species: Pinus Halepensis
Author: Nina Lauterburg

Бий болгох ба арчилах: үйл ажиллагаа, материал ба зардал

Материал, зардлын тооцоо
  • Тооцоолсон зардлууд:
  • Зардал тооцоход ашигласан валют: Euro
  • Валютын ханш (ам.дол): 1 ам.дол = 0.74 Euro
  • Нэг өдрийн ажилчны хөдөлмөр хөлсний дундаж: 47.00
Зардалд нөлөөлөх хамгийн чухал хүчин зүйлс
The costs of a plantation can be affected by numerous factors, such as slope (if the slope is steep, the work is much more difficult and takes more time, also because machines cannot be used on steep slopes), distance from a street (people can work less in a day if they have to walk far to plant), stone content of the soil (if there are many stones the work is much more difficult for the machines), soil type (plantations work much better on previous cropland because the soil is more fertile), origin of the seedlings (adapted to the local climatic conditions), variability/uncertainty of the weather conditions (e.g. droughts, freezing). If there are adverse climatic conditions or other negative circumstances the afforestation will not work well and this might cause higher costs.
Хэрэгжүүлж эхлэхэд шаардлагатай үйл ажиллагаа
  1. Digging holes (60cm x 60cm x 60cm) (Хугацаа / давтамж: Once (1985), between November and February/March)
  2. Plantation of the seedlings (pinus halepensis) (Хугацаа / давтамж: Once (1985), between November and February/March)
Бий болгоход шаардагдах материал ба зардал
Зардлын нэр, төрөл Хэмжих нэгж Тоо хэмжээ Нэгжийн үнэ (Euro) Зардал бүрийн нийт өртөг (Euro) Нийт дүнгээс газар ашиглагчийн төлсөн %
Тоног төхөөрөмж
machine use ha 1.0 4857.0 4857.0
Технологи бий болгох нийт үнэ өртөг 4'857.0
Технологи бий болгох нийт үнэ өртөг, ам.доллар 6'563.51
Арчилгаа, урсгал үйл ажиллагаа
  1. Selective clearing "ayuda regeneración" (only done once in 2003 but should be done again to decrease the risk of fires and competition between species) (Хугацаа / давтамж: late spring 2003)
Арчилгаа, урсгал үйл ажиллагаанд шаардагдах материал ба зардал
Зардлын нэр, төрөл Хэмжих нэгж Тоо хэмжээ Нэгжийн үнэ (Euro) Зардал бүрийн нийт өртөг (Euro) Нийт дүнгээс газар ашиглагчийн төлсөн %
Тоног төхөөрөмж
machine use ha 1.0 2428.0 2428.0
Технологийн арчилгаа/урсгал үйл ажиллагаанд шаардагдах нийт үнэ өртөг 2'428.0
Технологи арчилах ба урсгал ажлын нийт үнэ өртөг, ам.доллар 3'281.08

Байгалийн нөхцөл

Жилийн дундаж хур тундас
  • < 250 мм
  • 251-500 мм
  • 501-750 мм
  • 751-1,000 мм
  • 1,001-1,500 мм
  • 1,501-2,000 мм
  • 2,001-3,000 мм
  • 3,001-4,000 мм
  • > 4,000 мм
Агро-уур амьсгалын бүс
  • чийглэг
  • чийглэг
  • хагас хуурай
  • хуурай
Уур амьсгалын үзүүлэлтүүд
Ayora: 383mm
Thermal climate class: temperate
Налуу
  • хавтгай (0-2 %)
  • бага зэрэг налуу (3-5 %)
  • дунд зэрэг налуу (6-10 % )
  • хэвгий (11-15 %)
  • налуу (16-30 %)
  • их налуу (31-60 % )
  • эгц налуу (>60 %)
Гадаргын хэлбэр
  • тэгш өндөрлөг / тал
  • нуруу
  • уулын энгэр
  • дов толгод
  • бэл
  • хөндий
Далайн түвшнөөс дээшхи өндөр
  • 0-100 д.т.д. м.
  • 101-500 д.т.д. м.
  • 501-1,000 д.т.д м.
  • 1,001-1,500 д.т.д м.
  • 1,501-2,000 д.т.д м.
  • 2,001-2,500 д.т.д. м.
  • 2,501-3,000 д.т.д. м.
  • 3,001-4,000 д.т.д м.
  • > 4,000 д.т.д. м.
Технологийг нэвтрүүлсэн
  • гүдгэр нөхцөл
  • хотгор нөхцөл
  • хамааралгүй
Хөрсний зузаан
  • маш нимгэн (0-20 см)
  • нимгэн (21-50 см)
  • дунд зэрэг зузаан (51-80 см)
  • зузаан (81-120 cм)
  • маш зузаан (>120 cм)
Хөрсний бүтэц (өнгөн хөрс)
  • бүдүүн/ хөнгөн (элсэрхэг)
  • дундаж (элсэнцэр, шавранцар)
  • нарийн /хүнд (шаварлаг)
Хөрсний бүтэц (гадаргаас доош > 20 см)
  • бүдүүн/ хөнгөн (элсэрхэг)
  • дундаж (элсэнцэр, шавранцар)
  • нарийн /хүнд (шаварлаг)
Өнгөн хөрсний ялзмагийн хэмжээ
  • их (>3 %)
  • дунд (1-3 % )
  • бага (<1 % )
Гүний усны түвшин
  • гадаргаас
  • < 5 м
  • 5-50 м
  • > 50 м
Гадаргын усны хүртээмж
  • хангалттай
  • сайн
  • дунд зэрэг
  • хангалтгүй/ байхгүй
Усны чанар (боловсруулаагүй)
  • сайн чанарын ундны ус
  • муу чанарын ундны ус (цэвэршүүлэх шаардлагатай)
  • зөвхөн газар тариалангийн зориулалтаар ашиглах (усалгаа)
  • ашиглах боломжгүй
Усны чанар гэж:
Усны давсжилтын түвшинийг орчны асуудал гэж тооцдог уу?
  • Тийм
  • Үгүй

Үерийн давтамж
  • Тийм
  • Үгүй
Зүйлийн олон янз байдал
  • Их
  • дунд зэрэг
  • Бага
Амьдрах орчны олон янз байдал
  • Их
  • дунд зэрэг
  • Бага

Технологи нэвтрүүлсэн газар ашиглагчдын тодорхойлолт

Зах зээлийн чиг хандлага
  • амь зуух арга хэлбэрийн (өөрийгөө хангах)
  • холимог (амьжиргаа ба худалдаанд)
  • худалдаа наймааны/ зах зээлийн
Орлогын бусад эх үүсвэр
  • Нийт орлогын 10 %-иас доош
  • Нийт орлогын 10-50 %
  • Нийт орлогын 50 %-иас дээш
Чинээлэг байдлын түвшин
  • нэн ядуу
  • ядуу
  • дундаж
  • чинээлэг
  • маш чинээлэг
Механикжуулалтын түвшин
  • гар ажил
  • ердийн хөсөг
  • механикжсан / мотортой
Суурин эсвэл нүүдлийн
  • Суурьшмал
  • Хагас-нүүдэлийн
  • Нүүдэлийн
Хувь хүн эсвэл бүлгүүд
  • Хувь хүн / өрх
  • бүлэг / олон нийтийн
  • хоршоо
  • ажилтан (компани, засгийн газар)
Хүйс
  • эмэгтэй
  • эрэгтэй
Нас
  • хүүхэд
  • залуус
  • дунд нас
  • ахимаг нас
Өрхийн зориулалтаар ашиглах газрын талбай
  • < 0.5 га
  • 0.5-1 га
  • 1-2 га
  • 2-5 га
  • 5-15 га
  • 15-50 га
  • 50-100 га
  • 100-500 га
  • 500-1,000 га
  • 1,000-10,000 га
  • > 10,000 га
Хэмжээ
  • бага-хэмжээний
  • дунд-хэмжээний
  • том-хэмжээний
Газар өмчлөл
  • төрийн
  • компани
  • нэгдлийн/ тосгон
  • бүлэг
  • хувь хүн, өмчийн гэрчилгээгүй
  • хувь хүн, өмчийн гэрчилгээтэй
Газар ашиглах эрх
  • нээлттэй хүртэх (зохион байгуулалтгүй)
  • нэгдлийн хэлбэрээр (зохион байгуулалттай)
  • түрээсийн хэлбэрээр
  • хувь хүн
  • public/open access but organised (e.g. hunting)
Ус ашиглах эрх
  • нээлттэй хүртэх (зохион байгуулалтгүй)
  • нэгдлийн хэлбэрээр (зохион байгуулалттай)
  • түрээсийн хэлбэрээр
  • хувь хүн
  • public/open access but organised (e.g. hunting)
Дэд бүтэц, үйлчилгээний хүртээмж

Нөлөө

Нийгэм-эдийн засгийн үр нөлөө
малын бүтээмж
буурсан
нэмэгдсэн


After planting, grazing should be banned/restricted

модлогийн бүтээмж
буурсан
нэмэгдсэн


The natural process of vegetation growth was accelerated through the plantation of pines. There will be more wood in the future (develops only slowly).

бүтээгдэхүүний олон янз хэлбэр
буурсан
нэмэгдсэн


Wood, hunting, mushrooms

бүтээмжит талбай (ашиглалт/тарилт хийгдэх талбай)
буурсан
нэмэгдсэн


Less agricultural land available (but the question is also if the land would be used for agriculture since it is quite a remote area)

эрчим хүч үйлдвэрлэл (усны, био г.м.)
буурсан
нэмэгдсэн

Нийгэм-соёлын үр нөлөө
амралт, рекреацийн боломжууд
буурсан
сайжирсан


Forest has a higher aesthetic value than a burnt area or shrubland. In general people are attracted by afforestations, but since this afforestation has been done in a remote area people don’t visit this place more frequently

ГТМ/ газрын доройтлын мэдлэг
буурсан
сайжирсан


Local people know about the importance of conservation of the area and like to have a healthy forest which is protected from wildfires.

маргааныг шийдвэрлэх
муудсан
сайжирсан

нийгэм, эдийн засгийн эмзэг бүлгүүдийн нөхцөл байдал (жендер, нас, төлөв, яс үндэс г.м.)
муудсан
сайжирсан


The afforestation provided many job opportunities (in the year 1985, today not anymore)

contribution to human well-being
decreased
increased


In the year 1985 the afforestation created jobs for the unemployed. But it seems that in general forest management is not something people want to do, they work in this sector only if there are no other job opportunities. Until today this attitude did not change much. Forest management means a hard job and this kind of work is not well-respected in society.

Экологийн үр нөлөө
ус хуримтлуулах (урсац, борооны ус, цас г.м.)
буурсан
сайжирсан

гадаргын урсац
Нэмэгдсэн
Буурсан

усны урсац
буурсан
сайжирсан

гүний усны түвшин / уст давхарга
буурсан
урсац нэмэгдсэн

ууршилт
Нэмэгдсэн
Буурсан


More moisture is stored in the soil and less water is lost by evaporation (the soil is covered)

хөрсний чийг
буурсан
нэмэгдсэн


More soil moisture because of vegetation cover (soil is not exposed and does therefore not dry out)

хөрсөн бүрхэвч
буурсан
сайжирсан

хөрс алдагдах
Нэмэгдсэн
Буурсан

хөрс хагарах/ хагсах
Нэмэгдсэн
багассан

шимт бодисын эргэлт/ сэргэлт
буурсан
нэмэгдсэн

хөрсний органик нэгдэл/ хөрсөнд агуулагдах карбон
буурсан
нэмэгдсэн

газрын дээрхи / доорхи карбон
буурсан
нэмэгдсэн

ургамлын төрөл, зүйл
буурсан
нэмэгдсэн


Today different plant species can be found although only pines (Pinus Halepensis) was planted

амьтны төрөл, зүйл
буурсан
нэмэгдсэн


There are maybe more animals because of shelter, different vegetation composition, and fodder supply. Hunters also cultivate some fields in this region to attract the game.

хортон шавж/өвчний хяналт
буурсан
нэмэгдсэн

түймрийн эрсдэл
Нэмэгдсэн
Буурсан


Higher fire risk than if there would be agriculture or bare land. Lack of forest management resulted in a high density of the vegetation which increases the risk of fire

салхины хурд
Нэмэгдсэн
Буурсан


Trees reduce the wind velocity compared to shrubland or bare soil

Зэргэлдээ талбайд илрэх нөлөө
голын адагт үерлэх (тааламжгүй)
Нэмэгдсэн
багассан


In general, but in this case it is not that important

хөрш зэргэлдээ газарт учирах хохирол
Нэмэгдсэн
багассан


In general but in this case it is not that important because in this area there are no cultivations

нийтийн/хувийн хэвшлийн дэд бүтцэд учрах хохирол
Нэмэгдсэн
багассан


Streets are better protected

Reduced amount of sediments in the water ponds for fire extinction
increased
reduced


Less work is required to clean the water ponds

Өртөг ба ашгийн шинжилгээ

Бий болгох зардалтай харьцуулахад олсон ашиг
Богино хугацаанд эргэн төлөгдөх байдал
маш сөрөг
маш эерэг

Урт хугацаанд эргэн төлөгдөх байдал
маш сөрөг
маш эерэг

Урсгал зардалтай харьцуулахад олсон ашиг
Богино хугацаанд эргэн төлөгдөх байдал
маш сөрөг
маш эерэг

Урт хугацаанд эргэн төлөгдөх байдал
маш сөрөг
маш эерэг

Short-term returns are negative because the management practice is expensive and until the trees reach a mature state, there are not many returns (in terms of wood and biomass). In the long-term this management practice shows a positive result because compared to bare soil or shrubland it has ecological benefits such as the reduction of soil erosion, and it also provides wood and biomass which could be extracted. Currently there is no management project because the state does not invest money but it would actually be required in order to maintain the healthy state of this forest patch and to control the fire risk. If there is money invested by the state they can do a selective clearing which will result in short-term returns, e.g. wood (but also in the long-term they will be able to extract wood).

Уур амьсгалын өөрчлөлт

Уур амьсгалын аажим өөрчлөлт
жилийн дундаж температур Өсөлт

маш муу
маш сайн
Уур амьсгалаас хамаарах аюул (гамшиг)
орон нутгийн аадар бороо

маш муу
маш сайн
орон нутгийн салхин шуурга

маш муу
маш сайн
Хариулт: мэдэхгүй
ган гачиг

маш муу
маш сайн
усны үер (гол)

маш муу
маш сайн
Хариулт: мэдэхгүй
Уур амьсгалд хамаарах бусад үр дагавар
цргалтын хугацаа багасах

маш муу
маш сайн
fires

маш муу
маш сайн

Нутагшуулах ба дасан зохицох

Тухайн нутаг дэвсгэрт Технологийг нэвтрүүлсэн газар ашиглагчдын хувь
  • жишээ/ туршилт
  • 1-10 %
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Технологийг нэвтрүүлсэн бүх хүмүүсийн хэд нь материаллаг урамшуулал авалгүйгээр технологийг хэрэгжүүлсэн бэ?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Технологи нь өөрчлөгдөж буй нөхцөл байдалд дасан зохицохын тулд өөрчлөгдсөн үү?
  • Тийм
  • Үгүй
Ямар өөрчлөлтөнд эмзэг вэ?
  • уур амьсгалын өөрчлөлт/ экстрим үзэгдэл
  • зах зээлийн өөрчлөлт
  • ажил хөдөлмөр эрхлэх боломж (ж.нь шилжих хөдөлгөөний улмаас)

Дүгнэлт, сургамж

Давуу тал: газар ашиглагчийн бодлоор
  • There are also economic benefits for local people. The afforestation provided jobs for rural people. Furthermore, Pinus Halepensis seedlings grow faster and show a higher survival rate than other species, therefore the natural process of forest growth is increased which in turn results in the possibility to use the forest after some years again, e.g. extraction of wood/biomass for bioenergy or timber. But unfortunately this is not done frequently because it is expensive to clear the forest (located in a remote area).
  • Many stakeholders mentioned the positive visual impact. They prefer to have a forest instead of bare soil or shrubland, and it reminds them of how the state of the forest was before the fire. Trees have a higher value for them than shrubs. They supported the fact that the afforestation helped the environment to regenerate.
  • Compared to the situation after the fire there is a higher biodiversity due to the afforestation.
  • The afforestation contributed to rural development
Давуу тал: эмхэтгэгч эсвэл бусад мэдээлэл өгсөн хүмүүсийн бодлоор
  • The afforestation allowed the rehabilitation of an area affected by a devastating wildfire. It is an example out of many afforestation trials which succeeded. The success of this Pinus Halepensis afforestation is not only shown by the occurrence of healthy old pines, but also by the growth of young pines and resprouter species such as Quercus which were not planted.
  • Through the plantation of pines, the soil cover and stability was improved which in turn led to a decrease of soil erosion. The reduction in soil erosion (less transported sediments) also resulted in a decrease of damages of the infrastructure (such as streets or water ponds for fire extinction).
Сул тал/ дутагдал / эрсдэл: газар ашиглагчийн бодлоордаван туулах боломжууд
  • The area which was afforested is now not available anymore for agriculture. There is therefore a loss of agricultural land, but it is not sure either whether there would be a farmer using this land since it is located in a remote area. Local hunters are cultivating cereals next to the forest to attract the animals. This is also important for the animals because without these fields, they would probably have to leave this area due to the scarce fodder supply
  • The area is now less accessible for hunters because of the density of the forest which allows animals to hide themselves In the opinion of the villagers it would be important to promote the relationship between humans and nature and to find a balance between forest use and natural processes. The consciousness of the patrimonial value of the forest should also be promoted.
  • Some stakeholders criticized the linear planting. This is not like nature “would do it”.
  • There are many stakeholder who said that it was an error to do so many afforestations with Pinus Halepensis because in many regions nature would have regenerated by itself. It would have been possible to save a lot of money. A plantation causes high costs.
  • Due to the lack of management and because there is almost no use of the forest by the local population, there is a high amount of shrubs which increases the fire risk and hinders from walking through the forest
Сул тал/ дутагдал / эрсдэл: эмхэтгэгч эсвэл бусад мэдээлэл өгсөн хүмүүсийн бодлоордаван туулах боломжууд
  • It would be necessary to extract biomass from the forest to decrease the continuity of the trees and shrubs. Due to the lack of forest management (the management activities are expensive and labour-intensive) there is an increased risk of fires. More investments in forest management such as selective forest clearings are required. Managing the forest would not only decrease the risk of fire and the competition between the species but also generate benefits such as timber or biomass for bioenergy production. Furthermore, jobs would be generated. In general, after afforestations, it would be required that people manage the forest. Nowadays, there is only limited use of the forest – in the past people lived of the land, but today this is not the case anymore. E.g. grazing is almost not existing anymore but in fact this would be really important for the reduction of the fire risk.
  • It is not fully clear whether Pinus Halepensis plantations are a useful tool for restoration and it is also questioned whether it is sustainable to plant only Pinus Halepensis. Monoplantations result in the simplification of the landscape and alterations of habitats. One of the reasons why they used this species is that planting pines is kind of a tradition: it was always used for economic purposes because in earlier times the wood had a higher value. Furthermore, Pinus Halepensis seedlings grow faster and show a higher survival rate than other species, and since the aim of the afforestations was to have forest again in a short period of time, this species seemed to be the most suitable. But often in Pinus Halepensis Monoplantations other species do not grow (which is not the case in the documented afforestation). Research carried out on this topic showed that it would be good to increase the diversity (e.g. with carrasca, sabina, enebros, madroños), to combine the plantation of pines with the plantation of broad-leaved resprouting species (such as holm oak), in order to take advantage of both the fast-growth features of pines and the high resilience of oaks. This also provides higher diversity and landscape heterogeneity
  • Monoplantations are more vulnerable to perturbations such as forest fires or pests. If there is a high amount of one specific species the spread of a pest is facilitated. Sick or dead trees in turn increase the fire risk. It would be good to increase the diversity (e.g. with carrasca, sabina, enebros, madroños), to combine the plantation of pines with the plantation of broad-leaved resprouting species (such as holm oak), in order to take advantage of both the fast-growth features of pines and the high resilience of oaks.
  • Additional information: The here documented afforestation was successful, but usually many plantations of Pinus Halepensis failed (low seedling survival rate) Seedling survival can in some cases (has also be questioned) be enhanced through preconditioning, water harvesting techniques (micro-catchments), tree-shelters (protective tubes), fertilisation, application of mulch, using facilitating effects (planting close to a resource island or a nurse plant, to benefit from shade, change in soil properties, retention of soil and nutrients, protection from grazers), perch effect (providing bird perches e.g. dead trees, artificial woody structures, in old fields to accelerate colonisation rates (bird-mediated restoration))

Суурь мэдээлэлүүд

Эмхэтгэгч
  • Nina Lauterburg
Хянан тохиолдуулагчид
Хянагч
  • Alexandra Gavilano
  • Deborah Niggli
  • Hanspeter Liniger
Баримтжуулсан огноо: 06 8-р сар 2013
Сүүлийн шинэчлэл: 01 12-р сар 2021
Мэдээлэл өгсөн хүн
WOCAT мэдээллийн сан дахь бүрэн тодорхойлолт
Холбогдох ГТМ мэдээлэл
Баримтжуулалтыг зохион байгуулсан
Байгууллага Төсөл
Гол сурвалж баримт сэлт
  • Fernández-Ondoño, E., Rojo Serrano, L., Jiménez, M. N., Navarro, F. B., Díez, M., Martín, F., … Aguilar, J. (2010). Afforestation improves soil fertility in south-eastern Spain. European Journal of Forest Research, 129(4), 707–717.:
  • Maestre, F. T., & Cortina, J. (2004). Are Pinus halepensis plantations useful as a restoration tool in semiarid Mediterranean areas? Forest Ecology and Management, 198(1-3), 303–317.:
  • Pausas, J. G., Blad, C., Valdecantos, A., Seva, P., Fuentes, D., Alloza, A., … Estudios, C. De. (2004). Pines and oaks in the restoration of Mediterranean landscapes of Spain : New perspectives for an old practice – a review, (Vázquez 1998), 209–220.:
  • Sánchez, J. R., Bonet, a., Bellot, J., & Chirino, E. (2006). Effects of 30-year-old Aleppo pine plantations on runoff, soil erosion, and plant diversity in a semi-arid landscape in south eastern Spain. Catena, 65(1), 19–29.:
  • Valdecantos, a, Baeza, M. J., & Vallejo, V. R. (2009). Vegetation Management for Promoting Ecosystem Resilience in Fire-Prone Mediterranean Shrublands. Restoration Ecology, 17(3), 414–421.:
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International