Abordagens

Water Resource Users Association for the management of water resources in a river sub-catchment. [Quênia]

approaches_2477 - Quênia

Completude: 78%

1. Informação geral

1.2 Detalhes do contato das pessoas capacitadas e instituições envolvidas na avaliação e documentação da abordagem

Pessoa(s) capacitada(s)

Especialista em GST:
Especialista em GST:

Ndung'u Martin

0735-789-423

WRUA Naro Moru

Naro Moru, P.O box 32-10105 Naro Moru

Quênia

Nome da(s) instituição(ões) que facilitou(ram) a documentação/avaliação da Abordagem (se relevante)
University of Bern, Institute of Geography (GIUB) - Suíça
Nome da(s) instituição(ões) que facilitou(ram) a documentação/avaliação da Abordagem (se relevante)
Water Resource Use Association Naro Moru (WRUA Naro Moru) - Quênia

1.3 Condições em relação ao uso da informação documentada através de WOCAT

O/a compilador/a e a(s) pessoa(s) capacitada(s) aceitam as condições relativas ao uso de dados documentados através da WOCAT:

Sim

2. Descrição da abordagem de GST

2.1 Descrição curta da abordagem

WRUA are associations of water users and riparian land owners who have associated for the purposes of cooperatively sharing, managing and conserving a common water resource.

2.2 Descrição detalhada da abordagem

Descrição detalhada da abordagem:

Aims / objectives: The overall objective is to facilitate everybody in the river sub-catchment with sufficient and good quality water supply even during dry spells. Further objectives are to conserve the water catchment, to manage the resources properly, to preserve riverine forests and the riparian ecosystem, stop pollution and establish water use rules that are broadly accepted.

Methods: The WRUA is an association of stakeholders who wants to achieve the objectives mentioned above. During the regular meetings each stakeholder can raise his voice, express his needs and vote in a democratic manner. For outsiders and the government it is also an official contact in terms of water resources. The WRUA members arrive at a decision together and thus lead to direct democratic and sustainable development. Together, they accomplish the activities mentioned below.

Stages of implementation: First, a WRUA needs to register at the regional WRMA (Water Resources Management Authority) office, this ensures legal security for the WRUA. The WRMA provides the WRUA with technical and administrative advisory and is part of the Ministry of Water and Irrigation. The members of the WRUA conduct a water abstraction survey in the sub-catchment to identify all legal and illegal water abstractions. It is crucial to know the accurate water flows before you can conserve the water resources. The goal is to convince illegal abstractors to apply for a permit to legalise the abstractions. The WRUA
organises meetings, called barazzas, with the local chief and the riparian land users. In these meetings special conservation measures applied in the riparian area are discussed together with land management specialists. The conservation measures are cutting of water guzzling trees, planting of water-friendly indigenous trees, raise public awareness of pollution, rehabilitation of riverbanks and introduction of new technologies like drip
irrigation and rooftop water harvesting. To raise public awareness of the importance of the riparian area, the WRUA members conduct a pegging campaign along the main river of the sub-catchment. The water act 2002 dictates a riparian area of at least 6 metres on either side of the river. This area is being delineated to indicate the location of the protected to the land users. During water shortages (for example a dry spell), the WRUA publishes rules for water abstractions to ensure water supply for all land users.

Role of stakeholders: Furthermore, the WRUA is an important tool for stakeholders for communication and conflict management related to water resources. Due to the immense importance of water for ecosystem services a proper management of this resource is required.

2.5 País/região/locais onde a abordagem foi aplicada

País:

Quênia

Região/Estado/Província:

Kenya/Central Province

Especificação adicional de localização:

Nyeri/Naro Moru

2.6 Datas de início e término da abordagem

Indique o ano de início:

2002

2.7 Tipo de abordagem

  • government

2.8 Principais metas/objetivos da abordagem

The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities

The objective of implementing a governmental promoted association was to counter the numerous conflicts that have
arisen around water resources. The water resources were distributed inequitably and the riparian ecosystem was
damaged. Therefore WRUAs were built to improve water quality and increase water quantity by implementing protective
measures in riparian zones, mediate conflicts concerning water, stop river pollution and establish water use rules.

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: The WRUA was formed when some non-riparian water abstractors had no more water because the river was running dry.
Meanwhile also bad land use practices in the riparian zones of Kapingazi river diminished water quality. Due to forest
clearing close to the river, the soil lost its water storage capacity, even worse indigenous trees were replaced by water
guzzling trees like eucalyptus. The knowledge about conservation measures in the riparian areas was very low.

2.9 Condição que propiciam ou inibem a implementação de tecnologia/tecnologias aplicada(s) segundo a abordagem

Outro
  • Inibitivo

There are land users who do not want to implement the proposed technologies. Some land users do not agree with the ideas of the WRUA, others are just conservative and want to continue their old habits.

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Restless spreading of the ideas and reasons of the WRUA can maybe convince some land users.

3. Participação e papel das partes interessadas envolvidas

3.1 Partes interessadas envolvidas na abordagem e seus papéis

  • Usuários de terra/comunidades locais

Especially riparian land users

All riparian users were adressed no matter what social or economical status they had. However it must be said that the riparian land users are among the more privileged ones, because they have direct access to water resources. In this sense, non-riparian land users were disadvantaged, because they could not profit of the seedling distribution. Non-riparian users were not target of the approach. The men/women ratio of the adressed land users depended strongly on the point in time the meetings were scheduled. At a morning meeting in a downstream area, 60% of the present land users were women. The reason is that many men were not available at this time, so the wife replaced them. In an upstream area, there were mostly men attendant.
In this region, the land ownership traditionally belongs to the man of the family. That is the reason why mostly men are adressed and participated at the barazza meetings. In case the husband is not available, the wife participates at the meeting.

  • Especialistas em GST/ consultor agrícola
  • Governo nacional (planejadores, responsáveis pelas decisões)

Water Resources Management Authority

3.2 Envolvimento do usuários de terra/comunidades locais nas diferentes fases da abordagem
Envolvimento do usuários de terra/comunidades locais Especifique quem estava envolvido e descreva as atividades
Iniciação/motivação Automobilização In the year 1999 Naro Moru river dried completely up for the first time. The consequence was a big clash between up- and downstreamers. The downstreamers located below Naro Moru town blamed the upstreamers and their irrigation systems for the low flows. The downstreamers walked upwards the river in search of water, eating food from the fields of upstreamers. This conflict made the formation of the association necessary involving all relevant water users.
Planejamento Apoio externo The final measures were elaborated with support of the Water Resource Management Authority (WRMA). WRMA supported capacity building in terms of administrative knowledge and conservation technologies.
Implementação Participativo The implementation took place at barazzas with local chiefs. The associated riparian land users came together and were informed by the members of the WRUA and a land use specialist about the advantages of riparian protection. The different measures like tree planting and introduction of Napier were communicated. Water unfriendly trees like Eucalyptus were recommended to be cut. Also, the background of water quality and improved drought resistance were teached. Seedlings were distributed.
Monitoramento/avaliação Automobilização The monitoring is done by the WRUA. Members walk regularly along the river and point out positive and negative examples. In case of negative examples, persuading of the land users is needed.
Research Nenhum

3.3 Fluxograma (se disponível)

Descrição:

The Chart shows how WRMA and WSTF support the WRUA with knowledge, technical advisory and financial assistance. The WRUA, composed of land users, is in contact with the land users via the chief.

Autor:

Manuel Fischer

3.4 Decisão sobre a seleção de tecnologia/tecnologias de GST

Especifique quem decidiu sobre a seleção de tecnologia/tecnologias a serem implementadas:
  • Principalmente usuários da terra, apoiados por especialistas em GST
Explique:

The WRUA was thinking about measures that could be implemented and proposed them.

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by WRUA. The members of the water resource users association mainly decided and implemented the measures for the protection of the riparian areas.

4. Suporte técnico, reforço das capacidades e gestão do conhecimento

4.1 Reforço das capacidades/ formação

Foi oferecida formação aos usuários da terra/outras partes interessadas?

Sim

Tipo de formação:
  • Agricultor para agricultor
  • Áreas de demonstração
  • Reuniões públicas
Assuntos abordados:

The most recent knowledge in riverbank protection and land conservation was communicated by the
WRMA to the WRUA and from the WRUA to the land users. Subjects treated are planting of waterfriendly indigenous
trees and chopping of water guzzling eucalyptus trees, as well as riverbank stabilization with trees and Napier grass. Pegging techniques were introduced to outline the riparian area. Furthermore, pollution prevention and new water-saving land use technologies were discussed.

4.2 Serviço de consultoria

Os usuários de terra têm acesso a um serviço de consultoria?

Sim

Especifique se foi oferecido serviço de consultoria:
  • nas áreas dos usuários da terra
Descreva/comentários:

Name of method used for advisory service: Technical and institutional advisory; Key elements: Conservation advisory, Administrative advisory; The WRMA provides technical training for the WRUA members concerning planting of waterfriendly/water guzzling trees, riverbank stabilization with trees and Napier grass, pollution prevention, new water-saving land use technologies and also climate change issues that rose recently. The WRUA wrote also a sub-catchment management plan in cooperation with WRMA advisors.


Advisory service is very adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; Campaigns are being done as planned, but patrolling is not that profound.

4.3 Fortalecimento da instituição (desenvolvimento organizacional)

As instituições foram fortalecidas ou estabelecidas através da abordagem?
  • Sim, moderadamente
Especifique a que nível (níveis) as instituições foram fortalecidas ou estabelecidas:
  • Local
  • Seedling were bought locally
Dê mais detalhes:

The seedlings were bought from local community based organisations.

4.4 Monitoramento e avaliação

Monitoramento e avaliação são partes da abordagem?

Sim

Comentários:

bio-physical aspects were None monitored by land users through observations; indicators: surviving trees were counted

There were several changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation: It turned out that areas for the seedling distribution should be identified in a first step.
Also care taking of the seedlings is an important step to ensure the survival, since 25% of the seedlings died.
4 out of ten drip irrigation demonstration plots were relocated.

There were no changes in the Technology as a result of monitoring and evaluation

5. Financiamento e apoio material externo

5.1 Orçamento anual para o componente de GST da abordagem

Caso o orçamento exato seja desconhecido, indique a faixa:
  • 10.000-100.000
Comentários (p. ex. principais fontes de recursos/principais doadores):

Approach costs were met by the following donors: government (Water services trust fund): 57.0%; local government (district, county, municipality, village etc) (Laikipia Wildlife Forum): 43.0%

5.2 Apoio financeiro/material concedido aos usuários da terra

Os usuários da terra receberam apoio financeiro/material para a implementação de tecnologia/tecnologias?

Sim

Caso afirmativo, especifique tipo(s) de apoio, condições e fornecedor(es):

Got the seedlings

5.3 Subsídios para entradas específicas (incluindo mão-de-obra)

  • Agrícola
Especifique quais entradas foram subsidiadas Em que medida Especifique os subsídios
Sementes Totalmente financiado
Comentários:

Land users got the seedlings and planted them by themselves.

5.4 Crédito

Foi concedido crédito segundo a abordagem para atividades de GST?

Não

6. Análise de impactos e declarações finais

6.1 Impactos da abordagem

A abordagem auxiliou os usuários da terra a implementar e manter as tecnologias de GST?
  • Não
  • Sim, pouco
  • Sim, moderadamente
  • Sim, significativamente

Water quality has been improved, riverine wildlife habitats have been enlarged, water storage capacity of the riparian zone has been ameliorated, vegetation cover and biodiversity have been increased.

A abordagem concedeu autonomia aos grupos social e economicamente desfavorecidos?
  • Não
  • Sim, pouco
  • Sim, moderadamente
  • Sim, significativamente
Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?
  • Não
  • Sim, pouco
  • Sim, moderadamente
  • Sim, significativamente

Even land users who did not participate at the barazzas finally implement the proposed technologies, because they communicated with other land users.

Did the Approach lead to improved livelihoods / human well-being?
  • Não
  • Sim, pouco
  • Sim, moderadamente
  • Sim, significativamente

Higher water quality is a direct output. In a long-term view, water availability will be bigger and riparian ecosystems will be able to regenerate.

Did the Approach help to alleviate poverty?
  • Não
  • Sim, pouco
  • Sim, moderadamente
  • Sim, significativamente

6.2 Principal motivação dos usuários da terra para implementar a GST

  • Pagamentos/subsídios

seedlings

  • normas e regulamentos (multas)/aplicação
  • law

water act was recited at the meetings

  • current state of the riparian

makes farmers think about the future

6.3 Atividades de sustentabilidade de abordagem

Os usuários da terra podem manter o que foi implementado através da abordagem (sem apoio externo)?
  • Sim
Caso afirmativo, descreva como:

Under the condition that they keep applying the conservation measures. Public awareness raising and patrols by the WRUA have to continue.

6.4 Pontos fortes/vantagens da abordagem

Pontos fortes/vantagens/oportunidades na visão do usuário da terra
The meetings show a good turn up of people, this shows that they are needed. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Maybe even more land users can be motivated to show up at the meetings.)
A main advantage is that it is easy to communicate among the water stakeholders. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Regular meetings should be scheduled.)

6.5 Pontos fracos, desvantagens da tecnologia e formas de superá-los

Pontos fracos/desvantagens/riscos na visão do usuário da terra Como eles podem ser superados?
Not all riparian members are totally committed to the activities of the WRUA. Try to persuade them to show more motivation.

7. Referências e links

7.1 Métodos/fontes de informação

  • visitas de campo, pesquisas de campo
  • entrevistas com usuários de terras

Módulos