Abordagens

Entertainment-education for ecological engineering [Vietnã]

Cong Nghe Xanh (Vietnamese)

approaches_2613 - Vietnã

Completude: 89%

1. Informação geral

1.2 Detalhes do contato das pessoas capacitadas e instituições envolvidas na avaliação e documentação da abordagem

Pessoa(s) capacitada(s)

Especialista em GST:
Especialista em GST:

Heong Kong Luen

+60 11-3604 7833

kl.heong@gmail.com

Centre for Agricultural BioSciences International (CABI) South East Asia Regional Centre

PO Box 210, 43400 UPM Serdang

Malásia

Especialista em GST:

Settele Josef

+49(0)345 558 5320

Josef.Settele@ufz.de

Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung GmbH - UFZ

Theodor-Lieser-Straße 4 Halle 06120

Alemanha

Nome do projeto que facilitou a documentação/avaliação da Abordagem (se relevante)
Book project: Making sense of research for sustainable land management (GLUES)
Nome da(s) instituição(ões) que facilitou(ram) a documentação/avaliação da Abordagem (se relevante)
Visayas State University (VSU) - Filipinas
Nome da(s) instituição(ões) que facilitou(ram) a documentação/avaliação da Abordagem (se relevante)
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) - Alemanha
Nome da(s) instituição(ões) que facilitou(ram) a documentação/avaliação da Abordagem (se relevante)
Centre for Agricultural BioSciences International (CABI) - Reino Unido

1.3 Condições em relação ao uso da informação documentada através de WOCAT

O compilador e a(s) pessoa(s) capacitada(s) aceitam as condições relativas ao uso de dados documentados através do WOCAT:

Sim

2. Descrição da abordagem de GST

2.1 Descrição curta da abordagem

Entertainment-education for ecological engineering involves a series of TV pro-grammes that educate rice farmers about ecosystem services, as well as ecologi-cal engineering techniques to conserve biodiversity in rice landscapes.

2.2 Descrição detalhada da abordagem

Descrição detalhada da abordagem:

Aims / objectives: A multi-stakeholder participatory process was adopted in formative research, then designing and developing a soap-opera series, launching the programme, followed by implementing on-the-ground support, and monitoring of progress. The stakeholders involved were from research, extension, a video production company and local government. To make sure the educational content was accurately and seamlessly woven into drama, the collaborating team was composed of technical experts and scriptwriters, nicknamed the ‘‘turtles and peacocks’’. Each 15-minute episode is composed of 3 parts: a short drama by comedians, an explanation by experts, and then a summary of the lesson portrayed in that particular episode.

Methods: The LEGATO TV series was produced by Viet Idea, a video company based in Ho Chi Minh City, and was broadcast on Long An TV (LA34) weekly for 20 weeks. The 18 episodes were based on the values grid that LEGATO scientists had developed. They covered a range of topics including organic matter decomposition, organisms and microorganisms, straw burning, rural habitats, the food chain, the architecture of traditional houses, the role of silicon in rice production, honey bees, plant health, eco-tourism and eco-engineering.

Stages of implementation: To popularize and enhance the viewership of the LEGATO Ecological Engineering TV series, a “Meet the Actors Day” was organized in Khanh Hau village, Tan An Town, Long An Province. The organisers comprised “Cong Nghe Xanh”, Long An TV (LA34), Y Tuong Viet (Idea Vietnam), and the Southern Regional Plant Protection Centre. The event was attended by the village People’s Committee Chair, farmers, Long An TV staff and plant protection officers. The “Meet the Actors” day is one of the elements in the entertainment-education approach. To track viewership and audience reactions to the TV series, four focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with 41 rice farmers in four villages in Long An province. A post-broadcast survey was carried out in January 2015 among 396 randomly selected rice farmers in Long An and Tien Giang Provinces.

Role of stakeholders: The role of the different stakeholders in the approach was as follows: 1) Farmers provided feedback on the relevance and usefulness of the TV episodes and sug-gested other topics; 2) Plant protection officers worked with TV episode scriptwriters and served as subject matter specialists to simplify the educational content of each episode; 3) Local plant protection experts provided the scientific explanation behind the topics tackled in the episodes; 4) Local government was represented by Dr Nguyen Van Khang, former Director of Agriculture in Tien Giang province who agreed to allocate a portion of the provincial pesticide budget into ecological engineering demonstrations as he required data to be generated locally. Since then, from 2010 to 2014, more demonstration fields were set up.

Other important information: Preliminary analyses showed no significant differences in farmers’ insecticide use, but significant differences were found in beliefs and positions about growing flowers, biocontrol, and silicon use. A follow-up farmer survey was conducted to further eval-uate the effects of the TV series on rice farmers in Tien Giang and Long An Provinces.

2.3 Fotos da abordagem

2.5 País/região/locais onde a abordagem foi aplicada

País:

Vietnã

Região/Estado/Província:

Long An and Tien Giang

Especificação adicional de localização:

Tan An town, Tan Tru, Thu Thua, Ben Luc, Chau Thanh,Tan Phuoc, Cai Lay

2.6 Datas de início e término da abordagem

Indique o ano de início:

2014

Ano de término (caso a abordagem não seja mais aplicada):

2016

2.7 Tipo de abordagem

  • Iniciativa/inovação local recente

2.8 Principais metas/objetivos da abordagem

The Approach focused on SLM only (reducing insecticide use, restoring biodiversity in rice landscapes )

Improve farmers’ pest management, reduce their insecticide use and improve their land use to include conservation of biodiversity.

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Lack of funds to support SLM; Unregulated pesticide marketing continues to negate the gains obtained by SLM.

2.9 Condição que propiciam ou inibem a implementação de tecnologia/tecnologias aplicada(s) segundo a abordagem

Normas e valores sociais/culturais/religiosos
  • Inibitivo

Educate farmers to appreciate parasitoids that are too tiny to be seen by the naked eye.

Treatment through the SLM Approach: As the parasitoids and bees belong to the same insect group, hymenoptera, we associated parasitoids with bees that farmers are familiar with.

Disponibilidade/acesso a recursos e serviços financeiros
  • Inibitivo

Funds to support education system.

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Encourage local governments to provide support.

Quadro institucional
  • Inibitivo

Lack of direct linkage between agricultural and TV broadcast stations.

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Use stakeholder meetings and field activities to establish these new links.

Quadro jurídico (posse de terra, direitos de uso da terra e da água)
  • Propício

The existing land ownership, land use rights / water rights helped a little the approach implementation

Conhecimento sobre GST, acesso a suporte técnico
  • Inibitivo

Technical information.

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Explore research findings for information.

Carga de trabalho, disponibilidade de força de trabalho
  • Inibitivo

Lack of work force dedicated to this entertainment-education process.

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Encourage provincial government to allocate more staff who can simplify and disseminate scientific information.

Outro
  • Inibitivo

Unregulated pesticide sales continue to erode gains from education.

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Encourage government to review and reform current pesticide sales regulations.

3. Participação e papel das partes interessadas envolvidas

3.1 Partes interessadas envolvidas na abordagem e seus papéis

  • Usuários de terra/comunidades locais

Communication specialist (female), regional director of plant protection (male), ecologist (male)

Farmers, male and female, Vietnamese

  • Especialistas em GST/ consultor agrícola

Ecologist (male), plant protection director (male)

  • Pesquisadores

Visayas State University, Leyte, Philippines

  • Governo local

Local government of Long An province

People's Committee chair (provincial)

  • Governo nacional (planejadores, responsáveis pelas decisões)
  • Organização internacional

Center for Agricultural BioSciences International (CABI), Malaysia

3.2 Envolvimento do usuários de terra/comunidades locais nas diferentes fases da abordagem
Envolvimento do usuários de terra/comunidades locais Especifique quem estava envolvido e descreva as atividades
Iniciação/motivação Passivo SLM promoters
Planejamento Participativo All stakeholders
Implementação Automobilização All stakeholders
Monitoramento/avaliação Automobilização SLM promoters and local implementers
Research Participativo SLM promoters

3.3 Fluxograma (se disponível)

Descrição:

Steps in developing and promoting a soap opera

Autor:

Kong Luen Heong, Monina Escalada (CABI, Kuala Lumpur; Visayas State University)

3.4 Decisão sobre a seleção de tecnologia/tecnologias de GST

Especifique quem decidiu sobre a seleção de tecnologia/tecnologias a serem implementadas:
  • Principalmente especialistas em GST, após consulta com usuários da terra
Explique:

A stakeholder consultation workshop was organized at the initial stage.

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by mainly by SLM specialists with consultation of land users. Through stakeholder consultation and focus group discussions

4. Suporte técnico, reforço das capacidades e gestão do conhecimento

4.1 Reforço das capacidades/formação

Foi oferecida formação aos usuários da terra/outras partes interessadas?

Sim

Especifique quem foi capacitado:
  • Usuários de terra
  • Equipe de campo/consultores
Tipo de formação:
  • Em exercício
  • Agricultor para agricultor
  • Áreas de demonstração
  • Reuniões públicas
Tipo de formação:
  • Communication campaign
Assuntos abordados:

Principles of ecological engineering and pest management

4.2 Serviço de consultoria

Os usuários de terra têm acesso a um serviço de consultoria?

Sim

  • Consultation

4.3 Fortalecimento da instituição (desenvolvimento organizacional)

As instituições foram fortalecidas ou estabelecidas através da abordagem?
  • Não

4.4 Monitoramento e avaliação

Monitoramento e avaliação são partes da abordagem?

Sim

Comentários:

socio-cultural aspects were regular monitored by land users through observations

socio-cultural aspects were regular monitored by land users through measurements

There were no changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation

There were no changes in the Technology as a result of monitoring and evaluation

4.5 Pesquisa

A pesquisa foi parte da abordagem?

Sim

Especifique os tópicos:
  • Ecologia
Dê mais detalhes e indique quem realizou a pesquisa:

Research was carried out on-farm

5. Financiamento e apoio material externo

5.1 Orçamento anual para o componente de GST da abordagem

Caso o orçamento exato seja desconhecido, indique a faixa:
  • 10.000-100.000
Comentários (p. ex. principais fontes de recursos/principais doadores):

Approach costs were met by the following donors: international (German Ministry of Education and Research, BMBF (70,000 USD)): 70.0%; government (30,000 USD): 30.0%

5.2 Apoio financeiro/material concedido aos usuários da terra

Os usuários da terra receberam apoio financeiro/material para a implementação de tecnologia/tecnologias?

Sim

5.3 Subsídios para entradas específicas (incluindo mão-de-obra)

  • Agrícola
Especifique quais entradas foram subsidiadas Em que medida Especifique os subsídios
Flower seedlings Parcialmente financiado
Se a mão-de-obra pelos usuários da terra foi uma entrada substancial, isso foi:
  • Voluntário

5.4 Crédito

Foi concedido crédito segundo a abordagem para atividades de GST?

Não

6. Análise de impactos e declarações finais

6.1 Impactos da abordagem

A abordagem auxiliou os usuários da terra a implementar e manter as tecnologias de GST?
  • Não
  • Sim, pouco
  • Sim, moderadamente
  • Sim, significativamente

Reduction in fertilizer and pesticide use

A abordagem concedeu autonomia aos grupos social e economicamente desfavorecidos?
  • Não
  • Sim, pouco
  • Sim, moderadamente
  • Sim, significativamente
A abordagem melhorou as questões de posse de terra/diretos do usuário que inibiam a implementação das tecnologias de GST?
  • Não
  • Sim, pouco
  • Sim, moderadamente
  • Sim, significativamente

The problem is likely to be overcome in the near future.

Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?
  • Não
  • Sim, pouco
  • Sim, moderadamente
  • Sim, significativamente
Did the Approach lead to improved livelihoods / human well-being?
  • Não
  • Sim, pouco
  • Sim, moderadamente
  • Sim, significativamente
Did the Approach help to alleviate poverty?
  • Não
  • Sim, pouco
  • Sim, moderadamente
  • Sim, significativamente

6.2 Principal motivação dos usuários da terra para implementar a GST

  • Produção aumentada
  • Lucro (lucrabilidade) aumentado, melhora da relação custo-benefício
  • Consciência ambiental

6.3 Atividades de sustentabilidade de abordagem

Os usuários da terra podem manter o que foi implementado através da abordagem (sem apoio externo)?
  • Incerto

6.4 Pontos fortes/vantagens da abordagem

Pontos fortes/vantagens/oportunidades na visão do usuário da terra
Our research partners find the use of Entertainment-Education an easy approach to implement as there is often a warm response from the audience - farmers, women's groups and local government officials.
Pontos fortes/vantagens/oportunidades na visão do compilador ou de outra pessoa capacitada
The use of entertainment-education approach has been found to be highly successful in Vietnam. An evaluation survey of a radio drama program we launched in 2004, after completion of the program, showed that farmers who had listened to at least two episodes of the program reduced their insecticide sprays by 60%, their fertilizer and seed rates by 9% and 33% respectively (Heong et al., 2008).
(How to sustain/ enhance this strength: It can be sustained if there is funding to support the activities.)

6.5 Pontos fracos, desvantagens da tecnologia e formas de superá-los

Pontos fracos/desvantagens/riscos na visão do usuário da terra Como eles podem ser superados?
The land users would rely on funding to be able to implement this approach as there is a cost in producing the TV series.
Pontos fracos/vantagens/riscos na visão do compilador ou de outra pessoa capacitada Como eles podem ser superados?
An important challenge is the longer-term sustainability of the TV series. The challenge is to mainstream such programs into the TV station’s regular programming. To maintain a long TV series will require funding. A further threat to sustain the gains made by the TV series is “advertising piracy” where the TV series is being used to advertise new pesticides.

7. Referências e links

7.1 Métodos/fontes de informação

  • visitas de campo, pesquisas de campo
  • entrevistas com usuários de terras

7.2 Referências às publicações disponíveis

Título, autor, ano, ISBN:

Westpal, Catrin, Vidal, Stefan, Horgan, Finbarr G., Gurr, Geoff M., Escalada, Monina, Chien, Ho Van, Tscharntke, Teja, Heong, Kong Luen & Settele, Josef. (2015). Promoting multiple ecosystem services with flower strips and participatory approaches in rice production landscapes. Basic and Applied EcologyHeong, K.L., Escalada, M.M., Chien, H.V. and Cuong, L,Q. 2014. Restoration of rice landscape biodiversity by farmers in Vietnam through education and motivation using media. In G. Mainguy (ed) Special issue on large scale restoration of ecosystems. S.A.P.I.E.N.S (online) Vol 7 No. 2. http://sapiens.revues.org/1578. Electronic ISSN 1993-3819Heong, K.L., Escalada, M.M., Huan, N.H., Ky Ba, V.H., Quynh, P.V., Thiet, L.V. and Chien, H.V. 2008. Entertainment-Education and rice pest management: A radio soap opera in Vietnam. Crop Protection, 27: 1392-1397.

Disponível de onde? Custos?

Basic and Applied EcologyG. Mainguy (ed) Special issue on large scale restoration of ecosystems. S.A.P.I.E.N.S (online) Vol 7 No. 2. http://sapiens.revues.org/1578. Electronic ISSN 1993-3819 Crop Protection, 27: 1392-1397.

Título, autor, ano, ISBN:

Heong, K.L., Escalada, M.M., Chien, H.V. and Cuong, L,Q. 2014. Restoration of rice landscape biodiversity by farmers in Vietnam through education and motivation using media. In G. Mainguy (ed) Special issue on large scale restoration of ecosystems. S.A.P.I.E.N.S (online) Vol 7 No. 2. http://sapiens.revues.org/1578. Electronic ISSN 1993-3819

Disponível de onde? Custos?

G. Mainguy (ed) Special issue on large scale restoration of ecosystems. S.A.P.I.E.N.S (online) Vol 7 No. 2. http://sapiens.revues.org/1578. Electronic ISSN 1993-3819

Título, autor, ano, ISBN:

Heong, K.L., Escalada, M.M., Huan, N.H., Ky Ba, V.H., Quynh, P.V., Thiet, L.V. and Chien, H.V. 2008. Entertainment-Education and rice pest management: A radio soap opera in Vietnam. Crop Protection, 27: 1392-1397.

Disponível de onde? Custos?

Crop Protection, 27: 1392-1397.

Módulos