Incentive Based Participatory Planning and Implementation Approach Integrated watershed Management [Etiópia]
- Criação:
- Atualização:
- Compilador/a: Daniel Danano
- Editor: –
- Revisor: Fabian Ottiger
approaches_2383 - Etiópia
Veja as seções
Expandir tudo Recolher tudo1. Informação geral
1.2 Detalhes do contato das pessoas capacitadas e instituições envolvidas na avaliação e documentação da abordagem
Especialista em GST:
Dantamo Daniael
046-555-1135 / 046-555-2799
Agr. & RD Office, SNNR, Hadiya zone Sorro Wereda
Gimbicho
Etiópia
Especialista em GST:
Mugoro Amare
046-2205276 / 046-2204753
SOS. Sahel Awassa project offic
P.O.Box 135 Awassa
Etiópia
Nome da(s) instituição(ões) que facilitou(ram) a documentação/avaliação da Abordagem (se relevante)
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) - ItáliaNome da(s) instituição(ões) que facilitou(ram) a documentação/avaliação da Abordagem (se relevante)
SNNPR Bureau of Agriculture - Etiópia1.3 Condições em relação ao uso da informação documentada através de WOCAT
O/a compilador/a e a(s) pessoa(s) capacitada(s) aceitam as condições relativas ao uso de dados documentados através da WOCAT:
Sim
2. Descrição da abordagem de GST
2.1 Descrição curta da abordagem
Integrated watershed management is implementation of SWC measures, forage development and crop production activitiesthrough increasing production and productivity per unit area of land on suistainable manner.
2.2 Descrição detalhada da abordagem
Descrição detalhada da abordagem:
Aims / objectives: Overall purpose of the approach is to attain food security at household level and then contribute for the anticipated national goals. Specifically the objectives are improving food security of targeted area land users by capacitating community members with incentive support application of SWC activities. Promoting and implementing integrated watershed management practice promote catchment based natural resources management and enhance forage development from matreials used for bund stablization.
Methods: Methods of participatory planning and implementation approach is using local institutions (groups), local leaders community development committee) and existing infrastructure/facilities.
Stages of implementation: Monitoring and evaluation.
Role of stakeholders: SOS Sahel--financinig are evaluating the programmee, Bureau of agriculture and rural development--follow up, monitoring and evaluation, Office of agricultue and rural development--coordinating, planning, and implimenting the project activities with the community and Community/land users--they do the actual implementation phase and evaluation the activities.
2.5 País/região/locais onde a abordagem foi aplicada
País:
Etiópia
Região/Estado/Província:
SNNPR/Hadiya Zone/Sorro Woreda
Map
×2.6 Datas de início e término da abordagem
Indique o ano de início:
1999
Ano de término (caso a abordagem não seja mais aplicada):
2004
2.7 Tipo de abordagem
- Baseado em projeto/programa
2.8 Principais metas/objetivos da abordagem
The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (Provision sheep credit to resource poor women with 10% insurance payment and transfer of the first born lamb to other resource poor women.)
Empowerment of the community memebers with incentive support to improve food security at household level; promoting and and implementing integrated watershed management and forage development.
The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Food insecurity, shortage of animal feed, severe land degradation.
2.9 Condição que propiciam ou inibem a implementação de tecnologia/tecnologias aplicada(s) segundo a abordagem
Disponibilidade/acesso a recursos e serviços financeiros
- Inibitivo
allocation and transfer of budget delay & bureaucracy
Treatment through the SLM Approach: direct budget transfer to the implementors
Quadro institucional
- Inibitivo
turnover of technical staff
Treatment through the SLM Approach: provide the necessary incentives to technical staff
Quadro jurídico (posse de terra, direitos de uso da terra e da água)
- Propício
The existing land ownership, land use rights / water rights moderately helped the approach implementation: some land user is not accept constructing SWC structure on their land & even planting desho grass b/s the land in the future may be transter to others & why I worry for it they said. This is the question of land ownership.
Conhecimento sobre GST, acesso a suporte técnico
- Inibitivo
no or low level of incentive & training for technical staff
Treatment through the SLM Approach: provision of incentives and training
3. Participação e papel das partes interessadas envolvidas
3.1 Partes interessadas envolvidas na abordagem e seus papéis
- Usuários de terra/comunidades locais
Watershed dwellers
Working land users were mainly men (as being a household in the watershed area majority men & women were member of the group for SWC activities implementation.) Women were active participant in the activities because of sheep credit scheme operation initiate their pasticipation. Both poor and medium land users are the majority in the community: by deciding number of working days in a week for SWC activities, who can det sheep credit and penality according to their bylaws applied on those violating the rules and regulations established by the community.
- Especialistas em GST/ consultor agrícola
- Organização não governamental
SOS Sahel Ethiopia
- Governo local
Local government, woreda Agriculture Office
- Governo nacional (planejadores, responsáveis pelas decisões)
Caso várias partes interessadas foram envolvidas, indique a agência líder:
SOS Sahel Integrated watershed Management on the base of participatory planning and implemention deshograss intervation MOA-SWC activities, BOFED - M & E system
3.2 Envolvimento do usuários de terra/comunidades locais nas diferentes fases da abordagem
Envolvimento do usuários de terra/comunidades locais | Especifique quem estava envolvido e descreva as atividades | |
---|---|---|
Iniciação/motivação | Passivo | Mainly:rapid/participatory rural appraisal; partly: experience sharing vist; need assessment, problem indentification solution seeking, by demonstration |
Planejamento | Participativo | rapid/participatory rural appraisal; use participatary planning approach |
Implementação | Apoio externo | responsibility for minor steps; all the SWC structure constructed by participation |
Monitoramento/avaliação | Participativo | Mainly: reporting; partly: Terminal evaluation; The representatives of the land users observe & measure what has been done report the accomplishment monthly, impact was assessed |
Research | Nenhum |
3.4 Decisão sobre a seleção de tecnologia/tecnologias de GST
Especifique quem decidiu sobre a seleção de tecnologia/tecnologias a serem implementadas:
- Principalmente usuários da terra, apoiados por especialistas em GST
Explique:
Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by mainly by land users supported by SLM specialists. Land users report the severity of land degradation in their area and seek assistance. The SWC specialist advice and support the land users to be organized in groups in a sub-watershed bases to implement SWC activities by train the Community Development Committee (CDC). The CDC and other member land users decide what, why, where, when to do SWC activities in their watershed.
4. Suporte técnico, reforço das capacidades e gestão do conhecimento
4.1 Reforço das capacidades/ formação
Foi oferecida formação aos usuários da terra/outras partes interessadas?
Sim
Especifique quem foi capacitado:
- Usuários de terra
- SWC specialists, extensionists/trainers
Tipo de formação:
- Em exercício
- Agricultor para agricultor
- Reuniões públicas
Assuntos abordados:
SWC about physical structure construction methods & layout biological SWC- planting of deshograss & other legume species. Integrating watershed management. Sheep credit facility & management.
4.2 Serviço de consultoria
Os usuários de terra têm acesso a um serviço de consultoria?
Sim
Especifique se foi oferecido serviço de consultoria:
- nas áreas dos usuários da terra
Descreva/comentários:
Name of method used for advisory service: Pilot Extension proram (based on conventional extension approach.; Key elements: Integratd Watershed Management, (IWM), Participatory planning and implementation (PPI), Community Development Committee (CDC); 1) Advisory service was carried out through: government's existing extension system; Extension staff: mainly government employees 2) Target groups for extension: technicians/SWC specialists; Activities: Training discuss with community on soil erosion problem group organizing providing tools & sheep credit.
Advisory service is quite adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; Three middle level trained extension agents were assiened in one kebele and wereda experts capacitated by summer course.
4.3 Fortalecimento da instituição (desenvolvimento organizacional)
As instituições foram fortalecidas ou estabelecidas através da abordagem?
- Sim, moderadamente
Especifique a que nível (níveis) as instituições foram fortalecidas ou estabelecidas:
- Local
Especifique o tipo de apoio:
- Financeiro
- Reforço das capacidades/ formação
- petty cash for purchase of equipment & sheep for c
4.4 Monitoramento e avaliação
Monitoramento e avaliação são partes da abordagem?
Sim
Comentários:
bio-physical aspects were regular monitored through observations
technical aspects were regular monitored through measurements
economic / production aspects were ad hoc monitored through measurements
area treated aspects were regular monitored through observations
no. of land users involved aspects were monitored through observations
Management of Approach aspects were monitored
There were many changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation: Monthly based monitoring and evaluation initiate to improve the performance & use to address problem area to be solved in both stakeholders by doing so many project weredas improve their performance.
4.5 Pesquisa
A pesquisa foi parte da abordagem?
Sim
Especifique os tópicos:
- Sociologia
- on farm trail research by SOS Sahel
Dê mais detalhes e indique quem realizou a pesquisa:
Adoption level, role of bund stablization, economic importance & impact of expansion cose study was under taken.
Research was carried out on-farm
5. Financiamento e apoio material externo
5.1 Orçamento anual para o componente de GST da abordagem
Caso o orçamento exato seja desconhecido, indique a faixa:
- 2.000-10.000
Comentários (p. ex. principais fontes de recursos/principais doadores):
Approach costs were met by the following donors: national non-government (SOS Sahel, Awassa): 94.0%; local community / land user(s) (Resource poor womon land users): 6.0%
5.2 Apoio financeiro/material concedido aos usuários da terra
Os usuários da terra receberam apoio financeiro/material para a implementação de tecnologia/tecnologias?
Sim
5.3 Subsídios para entradas específicas (incluindo mão-de-obra)
- Equipamento
Especifique quais entradas foram subsidiadas | Em que medida | Especifique os subsídios |
---|---|---|
Maquinário | Totalmente financiado | |
Ferramentas | Parcialmente financiado | Handtools |
- Agrícola
Especifique quais entradas foram subsidiadas | Em que medida | Especifique os subsídios |
---|---|---|
Sementes | Totalmente financiado | |
Seedlings | Totalmente financiado | |
Se a mão-de-obra pelos usuários da terra foi uma entrada substancial, isso foi:
- Recompensado com outras formas de apoio material
Comentários:
with 30% down payment share shovels and/or hoes provision for SWC structure.
5.4 Crédito
Foi concedido crédito segundo a abordagem para atividades de GST?
Sim
Especifique as condições (taxa de juros, reembolso, etc):
repayment conditions: Sheep credit provision with 10% insurance and transfer of first lamb and Agricultural tools like shvel & hoe provision with 30% contribution..
Especifique os destinatários do crédito:
not applied so we can't compare.
6. Análise de impactos e declarações finais
6.1 Impactos da abordagem
A abordagem auxiliou os usuários da terra a implementar e manter as tecnologias de GST?
- Não
- Sim, pouco
- Sim, moderadamente
- Sim, significativamente
Planting desho grass on bund and any embankment and around homestead constructing new bund by their time to plant desho grass.
A abordagem melhorou as questões de posse de terra/diretos do usuário que inibiam a implementação das tecnologias de GST?
- Não
- Sim, pouco
- Sim, moderadamente
- Sim, significativamente
At that time some land users in the catchment did not accept to participate in SWC activities b/s the were not owner of the land. The problem is likely to be overcome in the near future. The land use legislation of SNNPR restricts & stated how to use the land, the responsibility & obligation of the users. Then the land user acts according to the rules & regulation stated by the legislation improves natural resource utilization properly.
Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?
- Não
- Sim, pouco
- Sim, moderadamente
- Sim, significativamente
The land users from shashogo, Misha, Lemmo and Duna Wereda has taken 3 truck 3 pick up, 5 Truck and 10 Trucks of grass planting materials has been taken respectively for the bund stabilization and forage development purposes.
6.3 Atividades de sustentabilidade de abordagem
Os usuários da terra podem manter o que foi implementado através da abordagem (sem apoio externo)?
- Incerto
Caso negativo ou incerto, especifique e comente:
1. Extension service is very crucial to support technical aspects of SWC activities and coordination of watershed group members to follow integrated watershed management approach in a participatory planning and implementation method. 2. Desho grass planting material is very expensive so that for the first time planing material supply is necessary
6.4 Pontos fortes/vantagens da abordagem
Pontos fortes/vantagens/oportunidades na visão do usuário da terra |
---|
IWM approach very important for the farmer by prodiving basic skill in all activities (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Thraining the farmers) |
The introduced Desho grass become cash source by selling the planting material & grass (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: By creating awareness to all farmers.) |
Hand tool provision help them in facilitating working condition (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: By circulating 30% down payment share.) |
Sheep credition provision (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: with 10% insurance down payment and transfer to first lamb to the next poor.) |
Pontos fortes/vantagens/oportunidades na visão do/a compilador/a ou de outra pessoa capacitada |
---|
Desho grass introjduction is a new technology which has multipurpose use. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Extension work should be strong until they know & see the advantage & Adopt.) |
Integrate all the agricultural and natural resource management activities in the catchment. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Awareness creation work has to be following in a continous way) |
Introduction of Desho grass become income generating means by selling & forage source. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: By introducing the grass to new areas & supply planting material of the grass for the first time to the resource poors.) |
6.5 Pontos fracos, desvantagens da tecnologia e formas de superá-los
Pontos fracos/desvantagens/riscos na visão do usuário da terra | Como eles podem ser superados? |
---|---|
other. | Doing as stated on the agreement & credit contruct. |
Failure of payment of 10% insurance and acting accoringly. | enforcing to pay the stack 10% of insurance. |
Mis use of down payment by CDC and Development Agent | close follow and facilitating the payment procedure for the debted CDC. |
Pontos fracos/vantagens/riscos na visão do/a compilador/a ou de outra pessoa capacitada | Como eles podem ser superados? |
---|---|
Lack of close follow up of the activities may stak or hindered over all activities. | Office of Agriculture & Natural Resource should work hard extension to sustain the approach & function normally. |
failure of supply of desho grass planting material for those who start SWC activities for the first time. | These could be solved by coordinating NGOs other project to help desho grass purchasing |
using open access grazing of farmland destroy the grass & constructed bund. | using controlled grassing &/or stall feeding |
7. Referências e links
7.1 Métodos/fontes de informação
- visitas de campo, pesquisas de campo
- entrevistas com usuários de terras
7.2 Referências às publicações disponíveis
Título, autor, ano, ISBN:
Integrated food support supply project document, 2000 SOS Sahel
Disponível de onde? Custos?
SOS Sahel, Awassa, Sorro Wereda
Título, autor, ano, ISBN:
Assessing significance of Desho grass intervention on SWC structure, As food security strategy A case of Sorro wereda, Lintala watershed Author Daniel Dantamo Jan. 2005.
Disponível de onde? Custos?
Daniael Dantamo, Hossana/Sorro Te- 046-555-1135 cost 8,000 Eth. Birr
Título, autor, ano, ISBN:
IFSSP- Terminal evaluation report 2004 Bureau of Finance & Ecnomic Development
Disponível de onde? Custos?
Wereda Agriculture Office (Sorro)
Links e módulos
Expandir tudo Recolher tudoLinks
Não há links
Módulos
Não há módulos