Подходы

Land reclamation by agave forestry with native species [Мексика]

  • Создание:
  • Обновить:
  • Составитель:
  • Редактор:
  • Рецензент:

Recuperación de tierras degradadas por agaveforestería con especies locales de agaves, arboles y hierbas

approaches_2454 - Мексика

Просмотреть разделы

Развернуть все
Завершённость: 89%

1. Общая информация

1.2 Контактные данные специалистов и организаций, участвующих в описании и оценке Подхода

Ответственный (-ые) специалист (-ы)

Специалист по УЗП:
Специалист по УЗП:

Martínez Palacios Alejandro

Tel (443) 334-0475, Ext. 119

apalacios56@gmail.com

Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo (IIAF-UMSNH)

Morelia-Zinapecuaro, Tarímbaro, Michoacán 58330, México

Мексика

Специалист по УЗП:

Ríos Patrón Eduardo

01 (443) 3226017

eduardo.rios@semarnat.gob.mx

Delegación de SEMARNAT (Secretaria del Medio Ambiente) en Michoacán. Secretaria del Medio ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT), Delegacion en Michoacan, Mexico

Unidad de Planeación y Política Ambiental, Morelia, Michoacán.

Мексика

Название проекта, содействовавшего документированию/оценке Подхода (если применимо)
DESIRE (EU-DES!RE)
Название организации (-ий), содействовавших документированию/оценке Подхода (если применимо)
Institut de recherche pour le développement IRD (Institut de recherche pour le développement IRD) - Франция
Название организации (-ий), содействовавших документированию/оценке Подхода (если применимо)
Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias y Forestales (IIAF) - Мексика
Название организации (-ий), содействовавших документированию/оценке Подхода (если применимо)
SECRETARÍA DE MEDIO AMBIENTE Y RECURSOS NATURALES (SECRETARÍA DE MEDIO AMBIENTE Y RECURSOS NATURALES) - Мексика

1.3 Условия, регламентирующие использование собранных ВОКАТ данных

Составитель и ответственный/-ые специалист(-ы) согласны с условиями, регламентирующими использование собранных ВОКАТ данных:

Да

1.4 Ссылка (-и) на Анкету (-ы) по Технологиям УЗП

2. Описание Подхода УЗП

2.1 Краткое описание Подхода

Land reclamation with local agave (to produce mezcal) associated wotj trees, shrubs and grasses planted through participative actions for economic benefit.

2.2 Подробное описание Подхода

Подробное описание Подхода:

Aims / objectives: Rehabilitation of degraded land is achieved by using native agave and trees, shrubs and grasses which creates, over the medium-term (7-10 years), a sustainable production of an alcoholic drink and/or pharmaceutical products and/or fodder for cattle and/or wood. Further objectives are water conservation, biodiversity, generation of permanend employment, carbon sequestration, generation of higher family incomes and a reduction of the amount of livestock and number of animals and uncontrolled grazing. These positive impacts of the Approach contribute to preventing the rural population from emigrating to the cities or abroad.

Methods: Coordination, cooperation and systematic participatory process among stakeholders are the basis of the Approach. Promoting participatory process occurs through workshops, interviews with community leaders, field visits conducted with owners of the land to recognize the problems and identify areas of opportunity, training courses, exchange of experiences with other people who are developing similar projects at different stages. Technical advice and the links with scientists, technicians and public officials in charge of project beneficiaries is given under a two-way process of mutual learning and seeking to strengthen self-management capabilities that inspires innovation at the different stages. The key to success of a participatory Approach lies in liberating and developing community leadership and self-organization processes.

Stages of implementation: The project is part of a regional planning context and a basin scale approach of intervention. The watershed of the site project is included in a special programme of the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources of Mexico which gives the opportunity of developing and financing a medium- to long-term project. The participatory process is delivered from planning, organizing, programming and implementing to financing, training, monitoring and disseminating the results. The greenhouse and nursery management, the technical assessment for the improvement of the agave forestry system, guidance with quality production of mezcal and marketing support to diversity products and sell them in order to make the project financially self-sustaining and profitable. All these stages range from short- to medium- and long-term.

Role of stakeholders: The government finances the project through grant resources, promotes the participation of beneficiaries and monitors it, seeking the management of resources and intersectoral participation. Scientists and academics share their knowledge, techniques and methodologies for implementation, improvement, evaluation and monitoring of each stage, and they support capacity-building of the community. The owners of the land and the community implement and develio each of the activities from building and maintaining the greenhouse and nursery, planting agaves, trees and shrubs, to the use and production of mezcal and other commercial products.

2.3 Фотографии, иллюстрирующие Подход

2.5 Страна/ регион/ место, где применялся Подход

Страна:

Мексика

Административная единица (Район/Область):

Mexico/Michoacán

Более точная привязка места:

Morelia, Cointzio watershed

2.6 Даты начала и окончания реализации Подхода

Год начала реализации:

2007

2.7 Тип Подхода

  • в рамках проекта/ программы

2.8 Каковы цели/ задачи Подхода

The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (Economical activity, Health, agriculture, wood, agaveforestry)

Rehabilitation of degraded land is done using native agave, trees, shrubs and grasses which creates over the medium-term (7-10 years) sustainable production of an alcoholic drink (mezcal) and/or pharmaceutical products and/or fodder for cattle and/or wood.

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Social and economic problems: Agriculture and livestock in the region are primarily for subsistence. The level of poverty and marginalization of the people of the project site is medium to high with low education levels. People need to migrate to the cities or outside the country to supplement the family budget. Prices of farmer productions are too low and do not allow economic survival. Therefore, only 10 to 20% of the total incomes are derived from agricultural products. This explains why the children of farmers do not wnat to become farmers and lands are less and less cultuvated. In correlation, as the livestock price is good and animals can be raised whth little input of time. Thus the number of animals is increasing and as they are grazing everywhere, they have a strong soil erosion impact.

2.9 Условия содействующие применению Технологии/ Технологий в рамках Подхода или затрудняющие его

Социальные/ культурные/ религиозные нормы и ценности
  • затрудняют

The social arrangement of the 'ejido' requires all people to agree on moving forward with different activities. The level of education and migration

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Systematic and constant promotion of the participatory process through community assembly meetings, workshops, community exchange travel, experiences and training. Promote complementarity and targeting of resources from other sectors.

Наличие/ доступность финансовых ресурсов и услуг
  • затрудняют

Potential constraints in the final stages of the project when receiving revenue from the sale of mezcal and other products

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Strengthening capacities of organization and administration, promoting transparency and accountability in the community. Development and consolidation of the formation of cooperatives as an alternative to social enterprise

Институциональные условия
  • затрудняют

The risk that the six-year change in administration does not follow the care programme in the area

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Strengthening self-management capabilities of the group of beneficiaries of the project. Involving other government levels and sectors funding training and monitoring of subsequent stages.

Нормативно-правовая база (землевладение, права на земле- и водопользование)
  • содействуют

The existing land ownership, land use rights / water rights greatly helped the approach implementation: The project starts with bad lands used by the community, so risks are limited for farmers

  • затрудняют

Federal, state and municipal regulations for preventing clearance of woods, biodiversity uses, forest exploitation, water concessions and water quality must be applied. Mexican official standards of mezcal production must be used.

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Conduct a through review with a focus on prospective different stages of a project and the legal implications and regulations that must be met at these stages. Informa land ownders about their rights, obligations and mechnisms of fulfilment.

Осведомленность в области УЗП, доступность технической поддержки
  • затрудняют

Lack of validation and technology transfer of agave forestry. Lack of information on the requirements of these species of agave. Potential risk to move from non-intensive system to an intensive one due to economic and market factors.

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Development of technological packages for an agave forestry system as a basis for the production of mezcal, considering soil erision levels and system arrangements. Promote only ecologically diversified, non-intensive systems. Design environmental and ecological monitoring stage.

3. Участие и распределение ролей заинтересованных сторон

3.1 Заинтересованные стороны, участвующие в реализации Подхода и их роли

  • местные землепользователи/ местные сообщества

they are concerned! Traditionally, women are more in charge of the house and the area close to the house. Women have a specialized involvement in this project which is mainly focus on the beginning of the installation of the crops (management of the greenhouse and plantation) as well as the collect of annual herbaceous and fruit trees, meanwhile the agave collect and alcohol production is done by men. Women are woried about possible impacts of alcohol in the communities, because alcoholism is a social drama. There is no discrimination inside the communities until now

  • эксперты по УЗП/ сельскому хозяйству
  • учителя/ преподаватели/ школьники / студенты
  • общественные организации

Scientific and pratical approaches University (UMNSH)

  • местные власти

Technical help, interests for the results (extension of the approach)

  • государственные власти (отвечающие за планирование или принятие решений)

Funding (Mainly SEMARNAT) and interests for the results (extension of the approach)

  • международные организации

Scientific approaches (DESIRE project)

3.2 Участие местных землепользователей/ местных сообществ на разных стадиях реализации Подхода
Участие местных землепользователей/ местных сообществ Перечислите участников и опишите их вовлеченность
инициирование/ мотивация самоорганизация Balance alternatives and take decisions to test the agave forestry
планирование интерактивное Planning,organizing and programming the project, defining responsibilities, time and initial investment. Identification of agave seeds and a proper place to install the greenhouse and nursery.
выполнение самоорганизация Building and maintenance of greenhouse and nursery, selecting the sites for the plantation and planting. Training of land users by other land users to produce mezcal according to quality rules for a recognized product.
мониторинг/ оценка самоорганизация In each field: monitoring plant growth, status of the protection against cattle grazing, indications of soil erosion.
Research интерактивное Monitoring by some land users of some parameters defined by scientists.

3.3 Схема реализации (если имеется)

Описание:

Agaveforestry system production cycle

Автор:

Alejandro Martínez Palacios (apalacios56@gmail.com)

3.4 Принятие решений по выбору Технологии/ Технологий УЗП

Было решение по выбору Технологии (-ий) принято:
  • by SLM specialists and by land users
Поясните:

To answer the preoccupation of land degradation, poverty etc... by land users, the SLM specialits present alternatives which were analyzed, avaluated through field visit to actual producers, and then discussed and accepted by land users

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by mainly by SLM specialists with consultation of land users. Proposals of SLM specialists based on experiences from other projects

4. Техническая поддержка, повышение компетенций и управление знаниями

4.1 Повышение компетенций/ обучение

Проводилось ли обучение землепользователей/ других заинтересованных лиц?

Да

Укажите, кто проходил обучение:
  • землепользователи
  • местный персонал/консультанты
Если существенно, укажите гендерный и возрастной состав, статус, этническую принадлежность и т.д.

none

Тип обучения:
  • в ходе работы
  • общие собрания
Рассматриваемые темы:

Training focused to explain which plant to select for seeds, how to create and maintain plants in greenhouses, how transplant them, and what is the strategy to plants them in the fields (border/production-trees/Agave...) Training for the alcohol production: management of the equipments, quality rules, tips, etc.. done by another mescal producer (small farmer) Training for annual herb

4.2 Консультационные услуги

Есть ли у землепользователей возможность получать консультации?

Да

Укажите, где именно оказываются консультационные услуги:
  • на полях землепользователей
Описание/ комментарий:

Name of method used for advisory service: Plant (native Agave, trees and herbaceous) production advises; Key elements: Plant selection, Management of plants under greenhouse, Field plantation design; 4. Process of the mature plants (Production of certified mescal, medicinal herbs...)

Advisory service is very adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; The extension system is very adequate to ensure continuation of activities

4.3 Институциональная (организационная) поддержка

В ходе реализации Подхода были ли организованы новые институциональные структуры или поддержаны уже существующие?
  • да, существенно
Укажите уровень, на котором структуры были укреплены или вновь созданы:
  • местные
Укажите тип поддержки:
  • финансовая
  • повышение компетенций/ обучение
  • оборудование
Подробнее:

transport

4.4 Мониторинг и оценка

Являются ли мониторинг и оценка частью Подхода?

Да

Комментарии:

area treated aspects were regular monitored by project staff, government, land users, other through observations

no. of land users involved aspects were regular monitored by project staff, government through observations

management of Approach aspects were regular monitored by project staff, government through observations

area treated aspects were regular monitored by project staff through measurements

economic / production aspects were regular monitored by project staff, government through measurements

economic / production aspects were regular monitored by project staff, government through observations

technical aspects were regular monitored by project staff, land users through observations

technical aspects were regular monitored by project staff through measurements

bio-physical aspects were regular monitored by project staff through measurements

bio-physical aspects were monitored by project staff, government through observations

There were few changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation: Too early to answer

There were few changes in the Technology as a result of monitoring and evaluation: Too early to answer

4.5 Научные исследования

Были ли научные исследования частью Подхода?

Да

Укажите темы исследований:
  • экономика / маркетинг
  • экология
  • технология
Напишите подробнее и назовите тех, кто выполнял исследования:

No information about condition of production of this agave species, especially to the sugar produce by the plant which will be used for alcohol production (better plant in the shadow or under direct sun? better old plants than young one? etc...). Effectiveness of soil control erosion system (density of Agave plantations on line of green walls...) have not been measured until now

Research was carried out on station

5. Финансирование и внешняя материальная поддержка

5.1 Годовой бюджет мероприятий по УЗП в рамках Подхода

Если точный годовой бюжет неизвестен, укажите примерный диапазон затрат:
  • 2000-10000
Комментарий (например, основные источники финансирования/ ключевые доноры):

Approach costs were met by the following donors: government: 80.0%; local government (district, county, municipality, village etc): 10.0%; local community / land user(s): 10.0%

5.2 Финансирование и внешняя материальная поддержка, предоставляемая землепользователям

Предоставлялась ли землепользователям финансовая/ материальная поддержка для применения Технологии /Технологий?

Да

Если да, укажите тип(-ы) поддержки, кто ее предоставил и условия предоставления:

Parts comes from UE research project (DESIRE) and main part comes from environmental taxes funds managed by SEMARNAT (Sec environment)

5.3 Субсидии на отдельные затраты (включая оплату труда)

  • оборудование
Укажите, какие ресурсы были субсидированы В какой степени Опишите субсидии подробнее
инвентарь/ инструменты профинансированы полностью shovel, hammer, pickaxes
Greenhouse профинансированы полностью
  • сельскохозяйственные
Укажите, какие ресурсы были субсидированы В какой степени Опишите субсидии подробнее
семена профинансированы частично
Plastic bags, soil, water профинансированы частично
  • строительные материалы
Укажите, какие ресурсы были субсидированы В какой степени Опишите субсидии подробнее
Materials for greenhouse профинансированы частично
  • другие
Другой (какой именно) В какой степени Опишите субсидии подробнее
Transports профинансированы частично People, plants, materials
Если труд землепользователя был существенным вкладом, укажите, был ли этот вклад:
  • за денежное вознаграждение
Комментарии:

'PET' programs=payement in cash of local farmers for doing environmental works designed and directed by the SEMARNAT

5.4 Кредитование

Предоставлялись ли в рамках Подхода кредиты на мероприятия УЗП?

Нет

6. Анализ влияния и заключительные положения

6.1 Влияние Подхода

Too early to answer but it should

Too early to answer but it should greatly as it is the objective n°1

6.2 Основные причины, побуждающие землепользователей внедрять УЗП

  • рост продуктивности
  • рост прибыли (доходности) и рентабельности
  • материальное стимулирование/ субсидии
  • экологическая сознательность
  • well-being and livelihoods improvement

6.3 Долгосрочная устойчивость мероприятий в рамках Подхода

Могут ли землепользователи самостоятельно (без внешней поддержки) продолжать применение того, что было реализовано в рамках Подхода?
  • да
Если да, опишите как:

The first step need external funds, but then, when the production will start, the beneficts will cover all the costs of management and extension to cover more surface

6.4 Сильные стороны/ преимущества Подхода

Сильные стороны/ преимущества/ возможности по мнению составителя или других ключевых специалистов
Productive project which generates economic benefits over the medium-term (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: As a result of the money earned, it will be possible to extend the area concerned and subsides will not be necessary anymore.)
The project is done in a participative way where different kinds of stakeholders are involved: administrators, politicians, scientists and the public (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Maintenance of the interaction between stakeholders from the workshops, present results to other authorities and appropriate fora.)

6.5 Слабые стороны/ недостатки Подхода и пути их преодоления

Слабые стороны/ недостатки/ риски по мнению составителя или ответственных специалистов Возможные пути их преодоления/снижения?
Selling alcoholic drink is not necessarily beneficial from a health and societal point of view Maintenance of campaign to reduce consumption and develop a responsible attitude to alcohol.
Women particularly, are worried about the possibility of the increas in alcohol consumtion Since alcoholic drink will be produced in a semi-industrial way for external market, it is not supposed to be consumed by the communities themselves.

7. Справочные материалы и ссылки

7.2 Ссылки на опубликованные материалы

Название, автор, год публикации, ISBN:

DESIRE project Mexico partner (IRD 22)

Где опубликовано? Стоимость?

http://www.desire-project.eu/

Модули