1.2 Контактные данные специалистов и организаций, участвующих в описании и оценке Подхода

Название проекта, содействовавшего документированию/оценке Подхода (если применимо)

Environmental Land Management and Rural Livelihoods (ELMAR)

Название организации (-ий), содействовавших документированию/оценке Подхода (если применимо)

Committee for Environment Protection of Tajikistan (Committee for Environment Protection of Tajikistan) - Таджикистан

1.3 Условия, регламентирующие использование собранных ВОКАТ данных

Когда были собраны данные (на местах)?

24/06/2018

Составитель и ответственный/-ые специалист(-ы) согласны с условиями, регламентирующими использование собранных ВОКАТ данных:

Да

2.1 Краткое описание Подхода

Improvement of the level of care and breeding cattle by opening a veterinary drugstore by this way to support livestock keepers somehow control pastures lands and livestock quantity

2.2 Подробное описание Подхода

Подробное описание Подхода:

Animal diseases would not mention by livestock keepers as a problem. Likely because they themselves perceive the present losses as unavoidable. The veterinary staff, however, estimates the annual losses of livestock due to diseases at 5-10%. Reasons given for this is that vaccines are often not made available for entire herd populations, but are only sufficient for around 70% of the total number of animals. Furthermore are some vaccination only carried out in case of an outbreak of disease (ring vaccination) and not as a routine. It was also noted that the privatization of veterinary services is problematic as the taxation of services is making it difficult for the vets in the rural areas to make a living out of their service provision. According to data infections diseases, such as gangrene, foot and mouth disease, brucellosis and other infectious diseases were registered in this rural area so depending on the season monitoring is conducted. Except for infectious diseases, there are other parasites infections are met in this rural area. In the case of not carrying out vaccination in a timely manner they will be spread, as well as failure to timely prevent other diseases leads to the loss of livestock, which will also reduce the economic level of the population and their living. This was the first problem, the second and the main is the balancing of fodder and livestock, and only villagers need to discuss how either the production of fodder can be increased or the number of animals can be reduced in order to achieve the potential production level of the animals, for which balancing fodder and number of livestock is a precondition. There are several options for how the balance between fodder and animals can be restored. The villagers need to have a plan and it would stipulate controlled grazing measures, this group does not have a plan but they some of the prevention activities. As the result of the approach, they opened livestock registered book that they regularly monitored the number of the livestock, calendar with the type of disease season, breeding process, mortality of the livestock, artificial insemination of animals at the clinic is planned to open, and species of birds. Additionally, vet clinic group specialists have been trained a different type of the training on; pasture assessment practical, how to develop and implement a scheme for rotational grazing, how to monitor potential pasture yields, determining the quality of fodder and feeds, housing process and so on. On behalf of the project for the representatives all the groups been provided composting, mulching, managing salinization, intercropping on slopes, drip irrigation, low-cost watering techniques, solar greenhouses, drought-resistant crops, bee-keeping, mixed fruit orchards, local varieties nurseries, rotational grazing, livestock breeding and maintaining, strategic watering points, use of perennial forage, solar energy technologies, marketing options and opportunities trainings through the facilitation organisation

2.3 Фотографии, иллюстрирующие Подход

2.5 Страна/ регион/ место, где применялся Подход

2.6 Даты начала и окончания реализации Подхода

2.7 Тип Подхода

• в рамках проекта/ программы

2.8 Каковы цели/ задачи Подхода

The main goal of approach is to prevent infectious diseases of animals in a timely manner and infection of domestic animals, as well as to provide treatment and preventive measures for infectious diseases, such as immunization of cattle and small cattle and improving pasture lands through prevention activities

2.9 Условия содействующие применению Технологии/ Технологий в рамках Подхода или затрудняющие его

3.1 Заинтересованные стороны, участвующие в реализации Подхода и их роли

3.2 Участие местных землепользователей/ местных сообществ на разных стадиях реализации Подхода

	Участие местных землепользователей/ местных сообществ	Перечислите участников и опишите их вовлеченность
инициирование/ мотивация	интерактивное	There are 274 households residing in the village with the total number of 2225 people. The CIG head is Isroil Nazarov. He is as the specialist responsible for the subproject/approach activities implementation, make all their efforts and put their enthusiasm for the successful implementation
планирование	пассивное	The local land users prioritized investments based on a fixed budget for each type of rural investment determined by the number of households and on behalf of the CAP participants decided on the allocation of investments to groups of households (Common Interest Groups, CIGs) using rules that limit the funding for any one household. At least 50% of the village households should participate in either farm production or land resource management investments.
выполнение	интерактивное	Villagers made grant allocation decisions. CIGs managed grant funds and purchased needed materials and products.
мониторинг/ оценка	пассивное	Local land users have activelly participated during the monitoring

3.3 Схема реализации (если имеется)

3.4 Принятие решений по выбору Технологии/ Технологий УЗП

Укажите, кто принимал решение по выбору применяемой Технологии/ Технологий:

• в основном землепользователи при поддержке специалистов по УЗП

Поясните:

The local land users prioritized investments based on a fixed budget for each type of rural investment determined by the number of households and on behalf of the CAP participants decided on the allocation of investments to groups of households (Common Interest Groups, CIGs) using rules that limit the funding for any one household

Поясните на чём было основано принятие решений:

• анализ подробно описанного опыта и знаний по УЗП (принятие решений на основе подтвержденных фактов)

• Project initial phases

4.1 Повышение компетенций/ обучение

Проводилось ли обучение землепользователей/ других заинтересованных лиц?

Да

Укажите, кто проходил обучение:

• землепользователи
• местный персонал/консультанты

Если существенно, укажите гендерный и возрастной состав, статус, этническую принадлежность и т.д.

Provided participation of the male and female during the training process

Тип обучения:

• в ходе работы
• обмен опытом между фермерами
• общие собрания

Рассматриваемые темы:

Grant allocation mechanisms. Fund flow arrangements, management and technical

Комментарии:

Trainings included such king themes; composting, mulching, managing salinization, intercropping on slopes, drip irrigation, low-cost watering techniques, solar greenhouses, drought-resistant crops, bee-keeping, mixed fruit orchards, local varieties nurseries, rotational grazing, Livestock breeding and maintaining, strategic watering points, use of perennial forage, solar energy technologies, marketing options and opportunities,

4.2 Консультационные услуги

Есть ли у землепользователей возможность получать консультации?

Да

Укажите, где именно оказываются консультационные услуги:

• на полях землепользователей
• в постоянно функционирующих центрах

Описание/ комментарий:

Jamoat representatives and also local vet specialists from the district advise them

4.3 Институциональная (организационная) поддержка

В ходе реализации Подхода были ли организованы новые институциональные структуры или поддержаны уже существующие?

• да, немного

Укажите уровень, на котором структуры были укреплены или вновь созданы:

• местные

Опишите организацию, функции и ответственность, членство и т.д.

The Common Interest Groups formed in the villages on behalf households and enhanced their knowledge. And the project provides small-scale grants at the village level for groups of households (CIG) to implement rural production and land management investments, as well as related small-scale infrastructure investments. Villages will prioritize investments based on a fixed budget for each type of rural investment, determined by the number of households.

Укажите тип поддержки:

• финансовая
• повышение компетенций/ обучение

Подробнее:

Project-financed grants to CIGs for each investment under categories of rural production and land management investments, as well as related small-scale infrastructure investments that will not exceed US$7,000 and will require a match of 25% in beneficiary contributions which may be in cash or in-kind

4.4 Мониторинг и оценка

Являются ли мониторинг и оценка частью Подхода?

Нет

4.5 Научные исследования

Были ли научные исследования частью Подхода?

Нет

5.1 Годовой бюджет мероприятий по УЗП в рамках Подхода

Если точный годовой бюжет неизвестен, укажите примерный диапазон затрат:

• 2000-10000

Комментарий (например, основные источники финансирования/ ключевые доноры):

GEF/PPCR through the WB

5.2 Финансирование и внешняя материальная поддержка, предоставляемая землепользователям

Предоставлялась ли землепользователям финансовая/ материальная поддержка для применения Технологии /Технологий?

Да

Если да, укажите тип(-ы) поддержки, кто ее предоставил и условия предоставления:

The project will finance investments in three categories that are expected to improve household assets and sustainable land management, and build climate resilience, examples ofwhich are listed below: (i) Farm Production: field and horticultural crop productivity and diversity (e.g., crop rotations, drought resistant varieties, diversified cropping regimes, community seed funds, low-cost greenhouses), livestock production efficiency (e.g., breed choice, veterinary services), agro-processing and market access;(ii) Land Resource Management: pasture management (e.g., fodder productivity through appropriate species, rotational grazing, watering holes, growing perennials on slopes), watermanagement (e.g., drip irrigation and similar measures, water harvesting), soil fertility (e.g.,composting, mulch crops) integrated pest management (e.g., use of pheromone traps,biological controls) and sustainable sloping lands cultivation (including terracing, inter cropped orchards and woodlots, shelter-belts); and (iii) Small-scale Rural Production Infrastructure: irrigation/drainage system rehabilitation, minor transport infrastructure rehabilitation (e.g., repair of bridges), renewable energy (e.g.,low cost solar energy, and energy efficiency measures (e.g., improved stoves, insulation).Project-financed grants to CIGs for each investment under categories (i), (ii), and (iii) will not exceed US$7,000 and will require a match of 25% in beneficiary contributions which may be in cash or in-kind. Beneficiaries of rural infrastructure investments (category iii above) will have to contribute at least 5% of the total cost in cash at inception. Grants under this subcomponent will be disbursed in tranches directly to beneficiaries or groups to their own bank account with Amonatbank that has branches in most districts.

5.3 Субсидии на отдельные затраты (включая оплату труда)

• нет

Если труд землепользователя был существенным вкладом, укажите, был ли этот вклад:

• добровольный

Комментарии:

The CIG group contributed more then 25 % from the total subproject/approach

5.4 Кредитование

Предоставлялись ли в рамках Подхода кредиты на мероприятия УЗП?

Нет

5.5 Другие методы или инструменты стимулирования

Использовались ли другие методы или инструменты стимулирования для продвижения Технологий УЗП?

Нет

6.1 Влияние Подхода

6.2 Основные причины, побуждающие землепользователей внедрять УЗП

6.3 Долгосрочная устойчивость мероприятий в рамках Подхода

Могут ли землепользователи самостоятельно (без внешней поддержки) продолжать применение того, что было реализовано в рамках Подхода?

• да

Если да, опишите как:

The CIG head is Isroil Nazarov and an accountant is Hussein Abdurahmonov. They are responsible for the subproject activities implementation, make all their efforts and put their enthusiasm for the successful implementation. While carrying out preventive measures and treatment of farm animals rural people spend their service fees for the purchase of medicines and equipment. In the future, the head of the group is responsible to care of and make the veterinary clinic operation more sustainable.

6.4 Сильные стороны/ преимущества Подхода

Сильные стороны/ преимущества/ возможности по мнению составителя или других ключевых специалистов
High-qualified specialists in the group
Office speace, where they will be able to conduct meetings with the farmers
Required knowledge

6.5 Слабые стороны/ недостатки Подхода и пути их преодоления

Слабые стороны/ недостатки/ риски по мнению составителя или ответственных специалистов	Возможные пути их преодоления/снижения?
Knowledge on the market analysis, fundraising, business planning	They need additional support on capacity building
Support on behalf of the district local government	They need to work more closely with the district and local government
New sources to go ahead	The group needs to come up with the requested letters to the sufficient donors or government funds

7.1 Методы сбора/источники информации

7.2 Ссылки на опубликованные материалы

Название, автор, год публикации, ISBN:

ELMARL Annual Report 2017

Где опубликовано? Стоимость?

Committee of Environment Protection of RT.

7.3 Ссылки на материалы, доступные онлайн

Название/ описание:

ELMARL documents on SLM Knowledge Management platform

Адрес в сети Интернет:

https://slmtj.net