Подходы

A Decision Support Tool for integrating stakeholder perspectives through WEFE Nexus [Узбекистан]

approaches_7356 - Узбекистан

Просмотреть разделы

Развернуть все
Завершённость: 86%

1. Общая информация

1.2 Контактные данные специалистов и организаций, участвующих в описании и оценке Подхода

Ответственный (-ые) специалист (-ы)

Senior Scientist:

Akramkhanov Akmal

International Center of Agricultural Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA)

Узбекистан

Специалист по УЗП:

Ulugbek Sadullayev

Специалист по УЗП:

Ruhongiz Nurbekova

Название проекта, содействовавшего документированию/оценке Подхода (если применимо)
ICARDA Institutional Knowledge Management Initiative
Название организации (-ий), содействовавших документированию/оценке Подхода (если применимо)
International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) - Ливан

1.3 Условия, регламентирующие использование собранных ВОКАТ данных

Когда были собраны данные (на местах)?

2024

Составитель и ответственный/-ые специалист(-ы) согласны с условиями, регламентирующими использование собранных ВОКАТ данных:

Да

2. Описание Подхода УЗП

2.1 Краткое описание Подхода

The Decision Support Tool helps decision-makers prioritize sustainable land management practices using the Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystem Nexus, fostering collaboration, facilitating social learning, and balancing diverse stakeholder interests.

2.2 Подробное описание Подхода

Подробное описание Подхода:

Land management and agricultural production often face diverse and conflicting interests from various stakeholders. The Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystem (WEFE) Nexus offers a framework for addressing these challenges. Under the CGIAR Nexus Gains Initiative, the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) developed a Decision Support Tool (DST) designed to help decision-makers balance stakeholder interests within the WEFE Nexus. The DST’s main objective is to enable comparison and thus prioritization of sustainable land management (SLM) technologies based on specific criteria and stakeholder-assigned weights.
The DST applies a multi-criteria analysis (MCA) framework combined with the Best-Worst Method (BWM) to capture stakeholder preferences and assign weights to different criteria. The MCA follows a hierarchical structure: the overarching goal of SLM is divided into sector-specific objectives for water, energy, food, and ecosystem health. Each is assessed through specific indicators, with stakeholder interviews used to derive weights and calculate a "Nexus Score"—a weighted average reflecting preferences for different SLM practices.
The tool’s development involved two field campaigns:
* The 2023 campaign gathered indicator values for SLM practices through field visits and interviews with farmers, ensuring data reflected field-level conditions. It concluded with a validation workshop leading to adjustments in the ranking system.
* The 2024 campaign focused on collecting stakeholder weights for indicators within the WEFE Nexus through key informant interviews. A workshop gathered stakeholders from ministries and research institutions, and updated participants on the DST’s development and preliminary findings, while collecting feedback.
Using the DST involves the following steps:
Identify Area: Define geographic boundaries, consult local SLM experts for technical validation, and engage stakeholders at local and regional levels.
Use the Tool: Download the DST, compile an inventory of local SLM practices, gather stakeholder weights, review and complete indicator values, generate results, and refine inputs.
Social Learning: Hold validation workshops with stakeholders to review DST outputs, foster knowledge sharing, and address concerns to build consensus.
Implementation: Based on validated DST outcomes and stakeholder input, implement agreed SLM practices.
Overall, the DST aims to unite stakeholders in a shared understanding of land management decisions while addressing conflicting interests and policies. Findings reveal that departments often weigh indicators differently. Cross-departmental weight comparisons indicate shared priorities for certain criteria and highlight gaps in others, paving the way for interdepartmental collaboration.
The results of the weight survey provided notable insights. Within departments, responses exhibit a wide spread, indicating no collective priority. Across departments, certain criteria—such as reducing fuel consumption, food production, and net profit—are prioritized by all. Conversely, criteria like rain use efficiency, non-food production, and employment opportunities are collectively deprioritized.
This work was conducted under the CGIAR Initiative on Nexus Gains, with gratitude to the CGIAR Trust Fund contributors (www.cgiar.org/funders). The DST and approach are inspired by the thesis of J. Verbist, titled “Perspectives on the Economic Feasibility of Increasing Soil-Based Ecosystem Services on Arable Farms in The Netherlands” (2022), conducted at the Business Economics (BEC) Group of Wageningen University under the supervision of Professors H. Saatkamp and M. Kik.

2.3 Фотографии, иллюстрирующие Подход

Медиа-галерея

Общие замечания к фотографиям:

More elaboration on the figures and the figures for the other departments can be found in the final report (see references).

2.5 Страна/ регион/ место, где применялся Подход

Страна:

Узбекистан

Более точная привязка места:

Tashkent (Uzbekistan)

Предварительный просмотр карты

2.6 Даты начала и окончания реализации Подхода

Год начала реализации:

2022

Комментарии:

Tool was developed in 2022, with a literature review and followed by initial design, data collection and two validation workshops. The tool is downloadable via repo MEL (ICARDA knowledge repository).

2.7 Тип Подхода

  • в рамках проекта/ программы

2.8 Каковы цели/ задачи Подхода

The objective of the DST is scale Sustainable Land Management through improved stakeholder engagement and integrated Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystem Nexus management.

2.9 Условия содействующие применению Технологии/ Технологий в рамках Подхода или затрудняющие его

Институциональные условия
  • затрудняют

Institutional setting is relatively set in silos so departments and ministries generally do not mix and exchange ideas optimally.

Сотрудничество/ координация действий
  • содействуют

All of the interviewed and collaborated department and ministries were willing to support and attend the workshop, closely following the developments of the DST.

Программные документы/ руководящие установки
  • затрудняют

Policy in general often reflect the objective of a specific ministry, which can create conflicting policies.

Управление земельными ресурсами (принятие решений, осуществление и контроль за выполнением)
  • затрудняют

Land governance is characterized by a strong push for productivity and land tenure over ownership.

3. Участие и распределение ролей заинтересованных сторон

3.1 Заинтересованные стороны, участвующие в реализации Подхода и их роли

  • местные землепользователи/ местные сообщества

Farmers were interviewed to understand their preference and to quantify indicator values (e.g., how much fuel does their current practice consume)

  • эксперты по УЗП/ сельскому хозяйству

Experts from the four WEFE departments

They were interviewed to get weights for indicators.

  • ученые-исследователи

ICARDA

ICARDA developed the DST based on Multi-Criteria-Decision-Making (MCDM) literature.

  • государственные власти (отвечающие за планирование или принятие решений)

Four WEFE departments

These stakeholders implement and formulate policies for land management.

Если участвовало несколько заинтересованных сторон, назовите ведущую организацию:

ICARDA developed the DST and organized the field campaigns and workshops.

3.2 Участие местных землепользователей/ местных сообществ на разных стадиях реализации Подхода
Участие местных землепользователей/ местных сообществ Перечислите участников и опишите их вовлеченность
инициирование/ мотивация нет SLM specialist, as user of the DST, should identify a working area and identify relevant stakeholders and locally available good practices.
планирование интерактивное When indicator data is retrieved and study area is known, weights for the different WEFE indicators should be given by the stakeholders. Based on that a workshop should be organized where stakeholders can discuss the outcome of the DST and move towards implementation.
выполнение интерактивное Once stakeholder agree on the outcome of the DST, the resulting SLM Technologies can be implemented
мониторинг/ оценка интерактивное The DST can be used for MEL as well. Stakeholders can interviewed to see if preferences have changed over time and to validate indicator values when data becomes available.

3.3 Схема реализации (если имеется)

Описание:

The Decision Support Tool (DST) facilitates the planning and implementation of Sustainable Land Management (SLM) practices through a structured process. The flow chart illustrates the four main phases of using the DST: identifying the area, utilizing the tool, promoting social learning, and implementing the plan. Each phase involves specific steps to ensure the tool’s effective use and stakeholder collaboration. The following guidelines provide a detailed explanation of these steps, guiding users from initial planning to final execution.

Objective Values: The first distinct process within the framework of the DST is the incorporation of objective values. These values are derived from measurable and verifiable data such as yield, fertilizer use, irrigation efficiency, and net-income. The DST leverages this quantitative information to assess how well different interventions perform across a range of technical criteria.

Subjective Values: The second process addresses the integration of subjective values, which stem from the perceptions, priorities, and preferences of stakeholders. These values are gathered through weighing, such as Direct Ranking or the Best-Worst Method (BWM), to reflect stakeholders’ interests, but also reflecting social and cultural dimensions. Incorporating subjective values ensures that the tool aligns with the needs and interests of the communities and stakeholders involved, fostering greater acceptance and ownership of the chosen SLM practices. This process emphasizes the importance of balancing technical efficiency with social relevance, resulting in a more holistic and inclusive decision-making process.

1. Identify Area
A.Demarcate Area: Define the geographical boundaries at the farm and watershed levels. These scales are suitable for applying the DST because the DST focusses on land management rather than more abstract national and policy levels.
B.Identify Local SLM Experts: Engage local experts in SLM early in the process to leverage their knowledge about the area’s specific practices and challenges. They are the right people to validate technical aspects of land management, which is invaluable regarding the indicator values.
C.Identify Stakeholders: Identify relevant stakeholders across different levels, including local authorities, farmers, and regional organizations. Even if broader-scale stakeholders (e.g., national ministries) are involved, focus on local or regional branches that directly influence the area.

2. Use the Tool
A.Download the Tool: Access the DST from ICARDA's Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) platform after defining the area and identifying stakeholders.
B.Inventory Local Good Practices: Review existing SLM practices and identify those most relevant for the area. The DST comes with predefined options, but additional practices can be added to reflect the local context.
C.Collect Weights: Gather weights for different indicators from stakeholders using methods like the Best-Worst-Method (BWM) or direct ranking. These weights will be used to reflect stakeholder preferences in the evaluation.
D.Review and Complete Indicator Values: Assess and adjust the default indicator values within the DST to better reflect local conditions, considering factors like soil properties, rainfall, and market conditions. In addition, when local SLM practices are added, these indicators values should also be given.
E.Generate Results: Use the weighted indicators to run the DST and produce visualizations and evaluations of various SLM options.
F.Adjust Inputs: If necessary, refine the input data based on insights gained during the tool’s use, allowing for recalibration of indicator values, weights, or additional local practices.

3. Social Learning
A.Prepare Validation Workshops, Inviting Stakeholders: Organize workshops with identified stakeholders to validate the DST’s outputs. Ensure that all relevant voices are heard, and prepare to address any concerns raised.
B.Validation Workshop: Facilitate a structured workshop where stakeholders can review and discuss the tool’s results. The workshop should encourage knowledge sharing and foster social learning. The DST is a mean to create common understanding and appreciation among WEFE stakeholders for sustainable land management.
C.Iterate:
C1. Concerns to be Considered: Document and address any issues or concerns raised by stakeholders during the workshop, potentially revising the DST inputs or methodology.
C2. Common Approval: Aim for a shared understanding and acceptance of the results, incorporating feedback from the validation process.

4. Implementation
Once the results are validated and any necessary adjustments have been made, proceed to implement the agreed-upon SLM practices. The plan should reflect the insights gained through the DST analysis and stakeholder feedback, ensuring that the execution phase aligns with the validated recommendations.

3.4 Принятие решений по выбору Технологии/ Технологий УЗП

Укажите, кто принимал решение по выбору применяемой Технологии/ Технологий:
  • все участники как часть процесса совместных действий
Поясните:

The rationale behind the DST as an Approach is that there is somewhat consensus on which SLM Technologies are implemented.

Поясните на чём было основано принятие решений:
  • анализ подробно описанного опыта и знаний по УЗП (принятие решений на основе подтвержденных фактов)
  • результаты исследований
  • личный опыт и мнения (незадокументированные)

4. Техническая поддержка, повышение компетенций и управление знаниями

4.1 Повышение компетенций/ обучение

Проводилось ли обучение землепользователей/ других заинтересованных лиц?

Да

  • WEFE Departments
Тип обучения:
  • курсы
Рассматриваемые темы:

A short course on the WEFE concept and its relation to land management was conducted, to build a common understanding.

4.2 Консультационные услуги

Есть ли у землепользователей возможность получать консультации?

Да

Укажите, где именно оказываются консультационные услуги:
  • на полях землепользователей
  • в постоянно функционирующих центрах

4.3 Институциональная (организационная) поддержка

В ходе реализации Подхода были ли организованы новые институциональные структуры или поддержаны уже существующие?
  • нет

4.4 Мониторинг и оценка

Являются ли мониторинг и оценка частью Подхода?

Нет

Комментарии:

ME is not necessarily part of the DST, the process of intermediate feedback is more seen as the process rather than monitoring. ME implementation depends on what is in place by local authorities and land users.

4.5 Научные исследования

Были ли научные исследования частью Подхода?

Да

Напишите подробнее и назовите тех, кто выполнял исследования:

A publication in Operations and Research was done. This paper elaborated on the need, concept, and use of the DST.

5. Финансирование и внешняя материальная поддержка

5.1 Годовой бюджет мероприятий по УЗП в рамках Подхода

Комментарий (например, основные источники финансирования/ ключевые доноры):

The main objective was to make a DST so not to implement SLM Technologies. DST is programmed in excel exactly for the reason to have no ongoing finance for IT. The Tool is downloadable through the institutional knowledge management of ICARDA (repo MEL). Costs are expected for implementing/constructing the SLMs or for holding the workshops.

5.2 Финансирование и внешняя материальная поддержка, предоставляемая землепользователям

Предоставлялась ли землепользователям финансовая/ материальная поддержка для применения Технологии /Технологий?

Нет

5.3 Субсидии на отдельные затраты (включая оплату труда)

  • нет
 

5.4 Кредитование

Предоставлялись ли в рамках Подхода кредиты на мероприятия УЗП?

Нет

5.5 Другие методы или инструменты стимулирования

Использовались ли другие методы или инструменты стимулирования для продвижения Технологий УЗП?

Нет

6. Анализ влияния и заключительные положения

6.1 Влияние Подхода

Сумел ли Подход дать возможность принимать решения на основе подтвержденных фактов?
  • Нет
  • Да, немного
  • Да, умеренно
  • Да, существенно

The DST requires input data such as indicators value and weight of these indicators. Therefore, the DST is also framework to elaborate decision and priorities in SLM/WEFE, increase evidence-based DM.

Сумел ли Подход улучшить согласованность действий и повысить рентабельность применения практик УЗП:
  • Нет
  • Да, немного
  • Да, умеренно
  • Да, существенно

The DST shows where stakeholders can work together and where their action contradict, knowing this can lead to more cost-effective policies and improve coordination.

Сумел ли Подход расширить знания и возможности других заинтересованных сторон?
  • Нет
  • Да, немного
  • Да, умеренно
  • Да, существенно

The DST revolves around WEFE Nexus, hence when presenting the DST, WEFE is also automatically considered as well, which enhanced the knowledge of the stakeholders.

Сумел ли Подход укрепить сотрудничество между заинтересоваными сторонами/ выстроить механизмы сотрудничества?
  • Нет
  • Да, немного
  • Да, умеренно
  • Да, существенно

The DST should lead to cross-department collaborations.

6.4 Сильные стороны/ преимущества Подхода

Сильные стороны/ преимущества/ возможности по мнению составителя или других ключевых специалистов
Integrated Analysis Across Multiple Sectors: The DST incorporates the Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystem (WEFE) Nexus, enabling a holistic evaluation of Sustainable Land Management (SLM) practices. This allows stakeholders to assess potential trade-offs and synergies across sectors, promoting balanced, multi-faceted decision-making.
Stakeholder-Driven Approach: By gathering weights from stakeholders through methods like the Best-Worst Method, the DST reflects diverse priorities and values. This inclusivity fosters greater acceptance and ownership of SLM decisions, enhancing alignment with local needs and contexts.
User-Friendly and Adaptable Design: The DST is designed to be intuitive and compatible with common spreadsheet software, reducing the need for specialized training. Users can also adapt the tool by adding local practices and adjusting parameters, ensuring it remains relevant across varying contexts.
Support for Social Learning and Collaborative Decision-Making: The DST’s framework encourages stakeholder validation workshops, which facilitate knowledge sharing and collaborative refinement of the tool. This social learning process enhances mutual understanding among stakeholders and builds consensus on SLM priorities.
Visual and Quantitative Decision Support: By translating data into weighted scores and visual representations, the DST provides clear, actionable insights into SLM options. This visual aid helps decision-makers quickly identify win-win solutions or understand potential trade-offs, aiding more informed and efficient planning.

6.5 Слабые стороны/ недостатки Подхода и пути их преодоления

Слабые стороны/ недостатки/ риски по мнению составителя или ответственных специалистов Возможные пути их преодоления/снижения?
Dependence on Stakeholder Involvement: The DST’s effectiveness relies heavily on active engagement from a diverse set of stakeholders to provide accurate weighting and feedback. If stakeholders are unwilling to participate or lack interest, the tool’s output may not fully reflect local priorities and needs. If stakeholder involvement is limited, their weights can be estimated based on previous studies or similar contexts to approximate their likely priorities. Alternatively, you can demonstrate the DST’s relevance by showcasing how it supports their specific goals or decision-making processes, encouraging them to see the value of their input.
Oversimplification of Indicator Values: The DST may reduce complex, multi-faceted indicators to single values, which can overlook important nuances, such as temporal variability or site-specific conditions, potentially leading to decisions that don’t capture the full reality. This can be considered during the proposed workshop and may result in change of indicator values.

7. Справочные материалы и ссылки

7.1 Методы сбора/источники информации

  • выезды на места, полевые обследования

Two surveys were doen. First, one was done to talk to farmers in order to get the values related to the WEFE indicators. Then a second was done to obtain weights of indicates given by the WEFE departements.

  • опросы землепользователей

Interviews to understand how they implement their practice, to fill in indicator values. We have surveyed 20 practices with three farmers each.

  • опросы специалистов/экспертов по УЗП

Two workshops were held to validate the developments of the DST and the collected data. The participants can be considers experts and researched.

  • данные, собранные из отчетов и достоверных документов

Numerous

7.2 Ссылки на опубликованные материалы

Название, автор, год публикации, ISBN:

Verbist, J., & Akramkhanov, A. (2024). A decision support tool for stakeholder engagement in sustainable land management using the WEFE Nexus: A simulation for the Aral Sea Basin stakeholders. Lecture Notes in Operations Research.

7.3 Ссылки на материалы, доступные онлайн

Название/ описание:

Joren Verbist, Ulugbek Sadullaev, Ruhangiz Nurbekova, Akmal Akramkhanov. (18/12/2023). DSS for WEFE Nexus: Balancing Stakeholder Priorities for Sustainable Land Management and survey results on SLM practices.

Адрес в сети Интернет:

https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/69182

Название/ описание:

Akmal Akramkhanov, Joren Verbist, Shakhzoda Umarova. (18/12/2023). Report on the validation of "Sustainable land use practices: increasing soil fertility, effective use of water resources, and increasing the efficiency of agrotechnical activities" workshop.

Адрес в сети Интернет:

https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/69038

Название/ описание:

Support Tool for Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainable Land Management using the WEFE Nexus: A simulation for the Aral Sea Basin stakeholders.

Адрес в сети Интернет:

https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/69569

Название/ описание:

Joren Verbist, Akmal Akramkhanov. (25/9/2024). A Decision Support Tool for Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainable Land Management using the WEFE Nexus: A simulation for the Aral Sea Basin stakeholders. BWM conference in Delft university.

Адрес в сети Интернет:

https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/69567

Название/ описание:

Akmal Akramkhanov, Joren Verbist. (25/9/2024). Decision Support Tool for Sustainable Land Management: Integrating Stakeholders and WEFE Nexus. Landscape 2024 conference Humboldt university.

Адрес в сети Интернет:

https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/69568

Название/ описание:

Joren Verbist, Akmal Akramkhanov. (1/12/2023). Progress Report 2023: Decision Support System for WEFE Nexus to balance stakeholder priorities in sustainable land management.

Адрес в сети Интернет:

https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/68947

Ссылки и модули

Развернуть все Свернуть все

Модули