1.2 Контактные данные специалистов и организаций, участвующих в описании и оценке Подхода

Название проекта, содействовавшего документированию/оценке Подхода (если применимо)

Sustainable land management in the Russian steppes (KULUNDA / GLUES)

Название проекта, содействовавшего документированию/оценке Подхода (если применимо)

Book project: Making sense of research for sustainable land management (GLUES)

Название организации (-ий), содействовавших документированию/оценке Подхода (если применимо)

Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg (Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg) - Германия

Название организации (-ий), содействовавших документированию/оценке Подхода (если применимо)

Altai State University (ASU) - Российская Федерация

Название организации (-ий), содействовавших документированию/оценке Подхода (если применимо)

Leibniz Institute for Regional Geography (IfL) - Германия

1.3 Условия, регламентирующие использование собранных ВОКАТ данных

Когда были собраны данные (на местах)?

26/07/2016

Составитель и ответственный/-ые специалист(-ы) согласны с условиями, регламентирующими использование собранных ВОКАТ данных:

Да

1.4 Ссылка (-и) на Анкету (-ы) по Технологиям УЗП

2.1 Краткое описание Подхода

Regular in-service training of land use specialists and farm managers in the fields of sustainable land use management, and monitoring in the agrarian sector.

2.2 Подробное описание Подхода

Подробное описание Подхода:

Aims / objectives: By, as well as improved linkages of the agricultural consulting systems with universities and vocational training facilities,

Through targeted improved knowledge transfer, the Vocational Training Center is strengthening links between the agricultural consulting/ advisory systems, universities and vocational training facilities. The aim is to enhance capacity building and knowledge transfer for a better consultation / advisory system, especially. This concerns alternative conservation measures and SLM in rural areas. The centre and members of the different sub-projects of the KULUNDA project gave lectures covering up-to-date research results and on various topics, including SLM technologies (no-till and minimum tillage). Socio-economic and ecological impact was covered, as well as environmental monitoring. This took place at the ‘Barnaul Institute for Qualification in Agriculture’. These lectures are embedded into an existing training programme for young professionals within the agronomic service and extension service/ advisory service as well as heads of agricultural enterprises.
Through the targeted improved knowledge transfer between the agricultural consulting/ advisory systems, universities and vocational training facilities we want to strengthen the implementation of conservative conservation technologies in agricultural practice.


Methods: It is also planned to present project results on the topic of sustainable land management in the State Agrarian University in Barnaul, which is the main training centre for future agronomists. This presentation takes different forms – for example through poster presentations or conferences. The implementation courses material/ modules are partially running (for lectures at the Barnaul Institute for Qualification in Agriculture) or are under preparation. Furthermore, there is a plan to cooperate with the Altai State University to organise a seminar on the topic entitled “Laboratory analysis to investigate soil conditions”. Thus it helps to implement new methods of environmental monitoring into the current teaching program.

Stages of implementation: More recently, the project’s partner, the German company Amazone, has started an initiative of vocational training for young people in the region: these students are being given the opportunity to enhance their knowledge at the company’s production site in Samara and to learn about technical aspects of the two SLM technologies, namely no-till and minimum till.

Role of stakeholders: The measures are aimed at different stakeholder groups within the Altai Krai identified in the AKIS-Network (Agricultural Knowledge and Information System). The greatest importance is attached to the stakeholders of extension service and agricultural producers/ heads of agricultural enterprises because of the high level of dependency on the successful implementation of the SLM technologies on their knowledge and support. The managers who participated in advanced trainings are mainly from economically strong agricultural enterprises.

2.3 Фотографии, иллюстрирующие Подход

2.5 Страна/ регион/ место, где применялся Подход

2.6 Даты начала и окончания реализации Подхода

2.7 Тип Подхода

• традиционная/ местная система землепользования, используемая коренным населением

2.8 Каковы цели/ задачи Подхода

The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (Knowledge transfer and capacity building not only in the field of soil conservation but also in the resulting socioeconomic and environmental effects and ways to improve regional development in rural areas.)

Improvement of technology adoption through: Capacity building, training and knowledge transfer. Awareness raising.

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: There is a lack of knowledge on current scientific findings regarding innovative agronomic methods like minimum and no-till and a lack of awareness concerning the importance of the conservation technologies for economic and ecological sustainable farming strategies. A big problem is that the system for advising farmers is not sufficient, although there is a state institution for this purpose. There is a lack of awareness about the importance of vocational training, and lack of international, scientifically-based expertise in the regional institution conducting vocational training.

2.9 Условия содействующие применению Технологии/ Технологий в рамках Подхода или затрудняющие его

3.1 Заинтересованные стороны, участвующие в реализации Подхода и их роли

3.2 Участие местных землепользователей/ местных сообществ на разных стадиях реализации Подхода

	Участие местных землепользователей/ местных сообществ	Перечислите участников и опишите их вовлеченность
инициирование/ мотивация	интерактивное	The embedded training measures modules are embedded in the already existing training program of vocational training centre in Barnaul. At the last seminar land users and specialists were the target audience. Interactive lectures (teaching modules) were held. The participants of the seminar were actively involved by asking questions as well as by intensive discussions.
планирование	нет	The planning of the approach was first of all project-internal in consultation with the head of the regional vocational training institute in Barnaul.
выполнение	интерактивное	Interactive lectures to agricultural consultants/ extension agents/ advisory services and farmers on latest findings and recommendations of the KULUNDA project. Following the lectures the participants could ask questions and discuss the various research results presented. In addition, brochures and USB-sticks containing project results and lectures were distributed.
мониторинг/ оценка	интерактивное	Evaluation after the event through project intern discussions as well as interviews with regional stakeholder
Research	нет	The vocational training is mainly intended to inform the audience (target groups) about the scientific results and their application-specific relevance by the scientific project staff. The audience is not involved in research work.

3.3 Схема реализации (если имеется)

3.4 Принятие решений по выбору Технологии/ Технологий УЗП

Укажите, кто принимал решение по выбору применяемой Технологии/ Технологий:

• преимущественно специалисты по УЗП после консультаций с землепользователями

Поясните:

The SLM specialists of the the KULUNDA project mainly make the decisions on the choice of the SLM technology in cooperation with the farmers.

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by Project staff. At the beginning of the project a large interview campaign with relevant local stakeholders was conducted by the scientists of the KULUNDA-project. Based on the survey results, a decision on the implementation measures were made by the scientific staff on the German and Russian site with consultation with local stakeholder groups.

4.1 Повышение компетенций/ обучение

Проводилось ли обучение землепользователей/ других заинтересованных лиц?

Да

Укажите, кто проходил обучение:

• землепользователи
• местный персонал/консультанты

Тип обучения:

• курсы

Рассматриваемые темы:

Competitiveness of agricultural enterprises, ecologically and economically effective farm management through the use of resource-conserving crop production, costs for introducing modern tillage systems, personnel management, monitoring systems

4.2 Консультационные услуги

Есть ли у землепользователей возможность получать консультации?

Да

Укажите, где именно оказываются консультационные услуги:

• в постоянно функционирующих центрах

Описание/ комментарий:

Name of method used for advisory service: Vocational training for land use specialists / advisers and land user; Key elements: Knowledge / exchange, Capacity building, Training of trainers

There is already mainly a governmental advisory structure. The consultants are able to make recommendations for soil conserving technologies. However, we have observed a missing international expertise and demand of consultation for the farmers.

4.3 Институциональная (организационная) поддержка

В ходе реализации Подхода были ли организованы новые институциональные структуры или поддержаны уже существующие?

• нет

4.4 Мониторинг и оценка

Являются ли мониторинг и оценка частью Подхода?

Да

Комментарии:

Technical aspects were ad hoc monitored by project staff, government, land users through observations; indicators: information and discussion on the technical obervation results relating conservation technologies by the target groups
Technical aspects were ad hoc monitored by project staff, government, land users through measurements; indicators: information and discussion on the technical measurement results relating conservation technologies by the target groups
Economic / production aspects were ad hoc monitored by project staff, government, land users through observations; indicators: information and discussion on the economic obervation results relating economic parametres (margin profit and others) by the target groups
Economic / production aspects were None monitored by project staff, government, land users through measurements; indicators: information and discussion on the technical measurement results relating conservation technologies by the target groups
Management of Approach aspects were None monitored by None through observations; indicators: information and discussion on the management obervation results relating the approach by the target groups
There were no changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation
There were no changes in the Technology as a result of monitoring and evaluation

4.5 Научные исследования

Были ли научные исследования частью Подхода?

Нет

5.1 Годовой бюджет мероприятий по УЗП в рамках Подхода

Если точный годовой бюжет неизвестен, укажите примерный диапазон затрат:

• 2000-10000

Комментарий (например, основные источники финансирования/ ключевые доноры):

Approach costs were met by the following donors: international (German Ministry of Education and Research, BMBF): 100.0%

5.2 Финансирование и внешняя материальная поддержка, предоставляемая землепользователям

Предоставлялась ли землепользователям финансовая/ материальная поддержка для применения Технологии /Технологий?

Да

Если да, укажите тип(-ы) поддержки, кто ее предоставил и условия предоставления:

The Altai Institute for Advanced Training in Agriculture that is publicly founded provided personnel staff, an auditorium and hast made the promotion for the event.

5.3 Субсидии на отдельные затраты (включая оплату труда)

• другие

Комментарии:

The approach of vocational training was only to inform the land users without financial inputs in equipment and others.

5.4 Кредитование

Предоставлялись ли в рамках Подхода кредиты на мероприятия УЗП?

Нет

6.1 Влияние Подхода

6.2 Основные причины, побуждающие землепользователей внедрять УЗП

6.3 Долгосрочная устойчивость мероприятий в рамках Подхода

Могут ли землепользователи самостоятельно (без внешней поддержки) продолжать применение того, что было реализовано в рамках Подхода?

• да

Если да, опишите как:

The Altai Institute of vocational training can continue with the help of learning modules and various information materials that we prepared as implementation products under the project.

6.4 Сильные стороны/ преимущества Подхода

Сильные стороны/ преимущества/ возможности по мнению землепользователей
To have a platform for discussion and knowledge exchange with different national stakeholder groups as well as international scientists (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Regular meetings for knowledge exchange.)
To get information about the latest international ‘trends’ in agriculture that aim at economically effective, resource-saving and environment-friendly cropping management (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Regular presentation of innovations and new results that are up to date and on international high level.)

Сильные стороны/ преимущества/ возможности по мнению составителя или других ключевых специалистов
Capacity building (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Through better linkage between the actors of different stakeholder groups (see point 1) and by regular teaching and consultation)
Better knowledge transfer (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: By presenting practice-oriented project findings, which show the current state of research.)
Improved linkage between different stakeholder groups like specialists, advisers and farmers/ land users (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: By regular joint vocational workshops and seminars on education, research, consulting, needs of end users with actors of the Agricultural Knowledge and Information System network in the Altai region. For the realization of this purpose the regional “Altai Vocational Training Centre in Barnaul was and can be used as a platform. )
Better consultation of land users and specialists (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: By presenting use-oriented project findings, which present the current state of research as well as discussions about the presented issues.)

6.5 Слабые стороны/ недостатки Подхода и пути их преодоления

Слабые стороны/ недостатки/ риски по мнению землепользователей	Возможные пути их преодоления/снижения?
For land user it takes a lot of effort like high costs and time to visit the event in the capital Barnaul.

Слабые стороны/ недостатки/ риски по мнению составителя или ответственных специалистов	Возможные пути их преодоления/снижения?
In contrast to the field seminar the vocational training is more theoretical, which is less attractive for farmers	Combination of different implementation measures like vocational training for the theoretical background and the field seminar to show the opportunities of technology implementation in practice.

7.1 Методы сбора/источники информации