Approaches

Natural Agriculture Club [Thailand]

-

approaches_4243 - Thailand

Completeness: 100%

1. General information

1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Approach

Key resource person(s)

co-compiler:
ผู้รวบรวม:
land user:

Mongkolkankul Phongphat

084-5276227 / -

- / -

-

119/1Moo.4 Tambon Nongped Srisawat District Kanchanaburi province 71250

Thailand

land user:

Riangruap Manop

086-9865017 / -

- / -

-

1/1Moo2 Tambon Nongped Srisawat District Kanchanaburi province 71250

Thailand

land user:

Wisarnwaekin Chavalit

034-696169 / 089-8976212

- / -

-

99…Moo.3 Tambon Nongped Srisawat District Kanchanaburi province 71250

Thailand

land user:

Phisut Thipmat

089-8251578 / -

- / -

-

83Moo.4 Tambon Nongped Srisawat District Kanchanaburi province 71250

Thailand

1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT

The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:

Yes

1.4 Reference(s) to Questionnaire(s) on SLM Technologies

2. Description of the SLM Approach

2.1 Short description of the Approach

The Natural Agriculture Club is a group of farmers who conduct organic farming on sloping land. An organic farming technology transfer centre has been established.

2.2 Detailed description of the Approach

Detailed description of the Approach:

The objectives of the Natural Agriculture Club are to bring together the farmers who practice organic farming on sloping land by setting up a forum for knowledge exchange and then sharing through the Organic Agriculture Technology Transfer Center. This will enable farmers gain knowledge and better understanding about organic agriculture production, and then increase their management capability from farm to market.
The Natural Agriculture Club guides organic production on sloping land and this involves restoration of agricultural ecosystems on farms. Therefore, it is necessary to improve learning about nature and farm management. Organic agriculture is a guiding principle of agriculture, based learning processes because farmers have to observe, analyze, synthesize and summarize lessons learned from their own farm. The physical conditions, such as soil, climate, and socioeconomics need to be considered in developing an organic approach that is specific to the area. The group learning system process includes the following steps:
1. Establishing a Natural Agriculture Club
2. Inviting interested farmers to join the club
3. Setting up a group management committee
4. Training club members about organic agriculture production and the process of managing the products
5. Creating a knowledge transfer process through practicing in the learning center
6. Providing an internal audit system to maintain the standards of organic farming
7. Running club seminars
8. Outreaching to YouTube videos, brochures, TV and radio interviews
9. Promotion and support from the Land Development Department, Department of Agricultural Extension, Department of Alternative Energy Development and The Energy Conservation Electricity Generating Authority
There are various stakeholders who are involved in the activities of the Natural Agriculture Club. Lead farmers and farmer members will participate in group management, to share and transfer knowledge among group members. Government and private agencies are promoting and supporting in terms of finance, inputs, promotion and public relations activities for the club. Exporters of organic products help distributing agricultural products to foreign countries. FAO is one of the agencies involved. Schools, universities, with their teachers and students are learning and observing the club activities. Members of the club are of the opinion that: the Natural Agriculture Club is a participatory forum involving both public agencies and farmers; group operations have the power to negotiate and contact the market directly; group learning provides better knowledge, skills and experience in organic agriculture; loyalty of farmer members makes the Natural Agriculture Club strong; and farmer members adopt and apply appropriate technologies because they have learned from the knowledge sharing and exchange - and from their own doing.

2.3 Photos of the Approach

General remarks regarding photos:

-

2.4 Videos of the Approach

Comments, short description:

-

Location:

-

Name of videographer:

-

2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Approach has been applied

Country:

Thailand

Region/ State/ Province:

Kanchanaburi

Further specification of location:

Government agencies, such as DOAE, LDD, support the project and giving information and public relations

Comments:

-

2.6 Dates of initiation and termination of the Approach

Indicate year of initiation:

2006

Comments:

There have been doing organic farming continuously

2.7 Type of Approach

  • project/ programme based

2.8 Main aims/ objectives of the Approach

1. To gather the farmers who practice organic farming on sloping land by setting up a forum for knowledge exchange and sharing through the establishment of the Organic Agriculture Technology Transfer Center.
2. To enable farmers to gain knowledge and better understanding about organic agriculture production and to increase their organic agricultural products management capability from farm to market.

2.9 Conditions enabling or hindering implementation of the Technology/ Technologies applied under the Approach

social/ cultural/ religious norms and values
  • hindering

Most of the farmers and neighbouring farmers are still using chemicals; it is difficult to control the contamination.

availability/ access to financial resources and services
  • enabling

Finance is available at the Bank of Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives (BAAC) or community fund.

institutional setting
  • enabling

There are several supporting agencies such as the Department of Agriculture (DOA), the Land Development Department (LDD) and the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT).

collaboration/ coordination of actors
  • enabling

Integrated working among local organizations

legal framework (land tenure, land and water use rights)
  • hindering

No land ownership certificate

policies
  • enabling

National policy

knowledge about SLM, access to technical support
  • enabling

Close cooperation with the government agencies makes the technical support and transfer faster.

markets (to purchase inputs, sell products) and prices
  • enabling

Produce the products that meet the market demand.

other
  • hindering

Shortage of labour and high labour cost

3. Participation and roles of stakeholders involved

3.1 Stakeholders involved in the Approach and their roles

  • local land users/ local communities

Lead farmers and farmer members

Lead farmers and farmer members will participate in group management, to share and transfer knowledge among the group members.

  • teachers/ school children/ students

Teachers/ school children/ students

Teachers, students are learning and observing the club activities.

  • private sector

EGAT

Private agencies are promoting and supporting in terms of finance, inputs, promotion and public relations activities for the club.

  • national government (planners, decision-makers)

Government agencies such as LDD, the Department of Agricultural Extension (DOAE), Rural Development Dept., Energy Ministry, etc.

Promoting and supporting in terms of finance, inputs, promotion and public relations activities for the club.

  • international organization

FAO visits and advices

Awarded the contest, giving advice.

If several stakeholders were involved, indicate lead agency:

-

3.2 Involvement of local land users/ local communities in the different phases of the Approach
Involvement of local land users/ local communities Specify who was involved and describe activities
initiation/ motivation self-mobilization Government agencies, such as DOAE, LDD, support the project and giving information and public relations
planning interactive Government agencies and farmers participate in planning, meeting, monitoring and examining the farm for organic agriculture practice
implementation interactive Farmers, public and private agencies
monitoring/ evaluation interactive Member farmers, public and private agencies

3.3 Flow chart (if available)

Description:

The steps of operating the Natural Agriculture Club are:
1. Establishing the Natural Agriculture Club
2. Inviting interested farmers to join the club
3. Setting up a group management committee to carry out club activities
4. Training club members to have knowledge of organic agriculture production and the process of managing the products
5. Creating a knowledge transfer process through practicing in the learning center by planning and managing the farm manually
6. Providing internal audit system to maintain the standards of organic farming
7. Running club seminars
8. Outreaching to YouTube video, brochures, TV and radio interviews
9. Promotion and support from the Land Development Department, Department of Agricultural Extension, Department of Alternative Energy Development and The Energy Conservation Electricity Generating Authority

Author:

Kulwadee Suthawas

3.4 Decision-making on the selection of SLM Technology/ Technologies

Specify who decided on the selection of the Technology/ Technologies to be implemented:
  • all relevant actors, as part of a participatory approach
Explain:

-

Specify on what basis decisions were made:
  • personal experience and opinions (undocumented)

4. Technical support, capacity building, and knowledge management

4.1 Capacity building/ training

Was training provided to land users/ other stakeholders?

Yes

Specify who was trained:
  • land users
  • students
If relevant, specify gender, age, status, ethnicity, etc.

-

Form of training:
  • farmer-to-farmer
  • courses
Subjects covered:

Land development technology

Comments:

Systematic organic farming technology transfer

4.2 Advisory service

Do land users have access to an advisory service?

Yes

Specify whether advisory service is provided:
  • at permanent centres
Describe/ comments:

Related government officers often advised.

4.3 Institution strengthening (organizational development)

Have institutions been established or strengthened through the Approach?
  • yes, moderately
Specify the level(s) at which institutions have been strengthened or established:
  • local
Describe institution, roles and responsibilities, members, etc.

-

Specify type of support:
  • financial
  • capacity building/ training
Give further details:

Financial support from LDD and EGAT

4.4 Monitoring and evaluation

Is monitoring and evaluation part of the Approach?

Yes

Comments:

Monitoring and evaluation

If yes, is this documentation intended to be used for monitoring and evaluation?

Yes

4.5 Research

Was research part of the Approach?

No

5. Financing and external material support

5.1 Annual budget for the SLM component of the Approach

If precise annual budget is not known, indicate range:
  • > 1,000,000
Comments (e.g. main sources of funding/ major donors):

LDD, EGAT, Energy Ministry

5.2 Financial/ material support provided to land users

Did land users receive financial/ material support for implementing the Technology/ Technologies?

Yes

If yes, specify type(s) of support, conditions, and provider(s):

Building, farm inputs, processing plant, packaging machine and accessories

5.3 Subsidies for specific inputs (including labour)

  • equipment
Specify which inputs were subsidised To which extent Specify subsidies
machinery fully financed Building 500,000 THB, Processing Plant 60,000 THB, Packaging machine 190,000 THB and solar cell 160,000 THB
tools fully financed
  • agricultural
Specify which inputs were subsidised To which extent Specify subsidies
seeds fully financed LDD supported sunn hemp seed, 2,000 THB; 20,000 vetiver grass slips, costing 14,600 THB; 4,200 kg dolomite, costing 16,800 THB.
If labour by land users was a substantial input, was it:
  • voluntary
Comments:

-

5.4 Credit

Was credit provided under the Approach for SLM activities?

No

5.5 Other incentives or instruments

Were other incentives or instruments used to promote implementation of SLM Technologies?

Yes

If yes, specify:

LDD and EGAT supported and promoted in terms of inputs, accessories, finance and policy.

6. Impact analysis and concluding statements

6.1 Impacts of the Approach

Did the Approach empower local land users, improve stakeholder participation?
  • No
  • Yes, little
  • Yes, moderately
  • Yes, greatly

Farmers operating farming continuously and get income for their living.

Did the Approach enable evidence-based decision-making?
  • No
  • Yes, little
  • Yes, moderately
  • Yes, greatly

Farmer did farm account as a tool for decision-making

Did the Approach help land users to implement and maintain SLM Technologies?
  • No
  • Yes, little
  • Yes, moderately
  • Yes, greatly

Farmers applied various technologies.

Did the Approach improve coordination and cost-effective implementation of SLM?
  • No
  • Yes, little
  • Yes, moderately
  • Yes, greatly

Opportunity to share/learn/advise/be motivated and be supported by various agencies.

Did the Approach improve knowledge and capacities of land users to implement SLM?
  • No
  • Yes, little
  • Yes, moderately
  • Yes, greatly

Opportunity to exchange and gain more organic farming experiences

Did the Approach improve knowledge and capacities of other stakeholders?
  • No
  • Yes, little
  • Yes, moderately
  • Yes, greatly

Advice has been given to neighbors and other farmers.

Did the Approach build/ strengthen institutions, collaboration between stakeholders?
  • No
  • Yes, little
  • Yes, moderately
  • Yes, greatly

There is cooperation among agencies in this matter

Did the Approach encourage young people/ the next generation of land users to engage in SLM?
  • No
  • Yes, little
  • Yes, moderately
  • Yes, greatly

There are a number agencies to help and support the group activities especially on the empowerment of the community and the next generation.

Did the Approach lead to improved food security/ improved nutrition?
  • No
  • Yes, little
  • Yes, moderately
  • Yes, greatly

The aims of the club are to sustain the organic farming system in the community.

Did the Approach improve the capacity of the land users to adapt to climate changes/ extremes and mitigate climate related disasters?
  • No
  • Yes, little
  • Yes, moderately
  • Yes, greatly

Digging an artesian well is a way to solve the problem of drought.

6.2 Main motivation of land users to implement SLM

  • increased production

Crop diversification in production, and meeting the market demand

  • increased profit(ability), improved cost-benefit-ratio

Safety and better quality products to meet the market need

  • reduced risk of disasters

Reduce soil erosion

  • environmental consciousness

Chemical free and better environment

  • enhanced SLM knowledge and skills

A number of agencies supported, gained more knowledge, skill and experiences

6.3 Sustainability of Approach activities

Can the land users sustain what has been implemented through the Approach (without external support)?
  • yes
If yes, describe how:

Production of safe products and public certification help

6.4 Strengths/ advantages of the Approach

Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the land user’s view
Farmers are working together in various group activities; the works are integrated among farmers and public and private sectors.
Working as a group makes gives bargaining power and better access to markets.
Working as a group builds up more skill and experience to produce organic products.
The farmer members' honesty makes the group stronger.
Learning by doing and technology transfer system of the group make higher rate of adoption.
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
Systematic land use planning is applied.
Certifying organic products from a third party creates more market demand.
National organic products policy from the government makes public awareness and more interest is paid to it.
More market to sell the organic products
Raising the demand of health food
New generations participate more and more

6.5 Weaknesses/ disadvantages of the Approach and ways of overcoming them

Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the land user’s view How can they be overcome?
Lack of public relations and continued support from the government sector Government and private sector should be more involving and set a long-term policy.
It takes time and one has to be patient to do organic farming Looking for alternative machinery and more techniques to help/ support organic farming.
Running an organic farm in a remote area or far from the market place makes selling organic products a problem Open more markets nearby.
Consumers’ lack of understanding of the organic products Public sector should give more support.
Packaging of the organic products is not so attractive Related agencies esp. those in the public sector should give more support.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view How can they be overcome?
Much less volume of organic products than ordinary farm products Farmers grouping should encourage more members to join and, thus, more products will be obtained.

7. References and links

7.1 Methods/ sources of information

  • interviews with land users
  • interviews with SLM specialists/ experts

-

7.2 References to available publications

Title, author, year, ISBN:

Land Development Department MOAC

Available from where? Costs?

http://www.ldd.go.th/www/lek_web/

Title, author, year, ISBN:

DOA

Available from where? Costs?

http://www.doa.go.th/main/

Title, author, year, ISBN:

DOAE

Available from where? Costs?

www.doae.go.th

7.3 Links to relevant information which is available online

Title/ description:

-

URL:

-

Links and modules

Expand all Collapse all

Modules