Community driven Protection of the Molatedi Dam Catchment area
(南非)
描述
Development and capacity building in participating communities through the implementation of measures to prevent topsoil losses through erosion in the Molatedi dam catchment area.
Aims / objectives: Initiated by Welkom Farmers' Association through the Marico corridor sub-regional soil conservation committee. The aims were: 1) development and capacity building in participating communities and 2) implementation of measures to prevent topsoil losses through erosion in the Molatedi dam catchment area.
地点
地点: North West Province, 南非
启动日期: 1994
终止年份: 1995
方法的类型
Old map of South Africa (former homelands and old borders of provinces).
.
方法目标和有利环境
该方法的主要目的/目标
The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (Development objective, Rehabilitation of the production potential of the land, Job creation component, Training component, Stabilising the catchment area of the Molatedi dam against erosion and excessive topsoil losses.)
Help the community, work together
The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Unemployment. Lack of training. Erosion - loss of topsoil. Rehabilitation of natural resources
推动实施本办法所应用技术的条件
-
法律框架(土地使用权、土地和水使用权): The existing land ownership, land use rights / water rights greatly helped the approach implementation: Hinder: great Private ownership helps implementation. Communal land - hindrance because no individual accepts responsibility
阻碍实施本办法所应用技术的条件
-
财务资源和服务的可用性/可得性: Grant from D.B.S.A. Contribution by participating farmers associations
Treatment through the SLM Approach: farmers associations
-
了解SLM,获得技术支持:
Treatment through the SLM Approach: Soil conservation technician and soil conservation committee support
-
其他: Knowledge
Treatment through the SLM Approach: Training
相关利益相关者的参与和角色
该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责
该方法涉及哪些利益相关者/执行机构? |
指定利益相关者 |
说明利益相关者的角色 |
当地土地使用者/当地社区 |
Working land users were mainly women (Groups - divided slightly more women) |
Every community involved in project through their participation in the implementing committee. |
地方政府 |
Soil conservation committee |
|
国家政府(规划者、决策者) |
|
Supported communities |
领导机构
Together - project description funding and execution.
当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段
启动/动机
public meetings; Monthly - special meetings as need arose
计划
public meetings; Monthly - special meetings as need arose
实施
Mainly: responsibility for major steps; partly: responsibility for minor steps; Monthly - special meetings as need arose
有关SLM技术选择的决策
决策是由......做出的
-
仅限土地使用者(自主)
-
主要是土地使用者,由SLM专家提供支持
-
所有相关参与者,作为参与式方法的一部分
-
主要是SLM专家,咨询土地使用者之后
-
仅限SLM专家
-
政治家和领袖
决策是基于
-
对充分记录的SLM知识进行评估(基于证据的决策)
-
研究结果
-
个人经验和意见(无记录)
技术支持、能力建设和知识管理
以下活动或服务是该方法的一部分
-
能力建设/培训
-
咨询服务
-
机构强化(组织发展)
-
监测和评估
-
研究
能力建设/培训
涵盖的主题
Description of training component
监测和评估
bio-physical aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations
technical aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations
socio-cultural aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations
economic / production aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations
area treated aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations
no. of land users involved aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations
management of Approach aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations
There were few changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation: Project period was only 6 months. Very strict procedures had to be followed in all events. E.g. wager sheets - full particulars of workers External audit concerning finances.
研究
研究涉及以下主题
Observation with everted tyre structure
Research was carried out on-farm
融资和外部物质支持
SLM组成部分的年度预算,以美元计算
-
< 2,000
-
2,000-10,000
-
10,000-100,000
-
100,000-1,000,000
-
> 1,000,000
Precise annual budget: 不适用
Approach costs were met by the following donors: government (national - Development bank of RSA, NEF fund): 60.0%; local community / land user(s) (Commercial farmers): 40.0%
已向土地使用者提供以下服务或激励
-
为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援
-
特定投入的补贴
-
信用
-
其它激励或手段
为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援
土地使用者的劳动力为
影响分析和结论性陈述
方法的影响
该方法是否帮助土地使用者实施和维护SLM技术?
Lessons learnt from this project can be adapted and be implemented in new projects.
该方法是否改善了阻碍SLM技术实施的土地使用权/用户权问题?
The problem is unlikely to be overcome in the near future. Only if private ownership of land is propagated.
Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?
方法活动的可持续性
土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施(无外部支持的情况下)?
结论和吸取的教训
长处: 土地使用者的观点
-
Job creation (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Project planning must be done carefully and job creation planned according to sustainability)
-
Improvement of natural resources (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Plan additional new projects)
长处: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点
-
Project initiated by land users (bottom-up approach) (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Necessary support from institutions (financial, technical - provide research, information, training etc.))
-
Equal rights and participation for all participants (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Ensure equal representing on a joint implementing committee)
-
Adequate technical assistance (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Ensure that capable technicians are involved with planning and execution of project)
-
Adequate financial assistance (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Budget to be draw-up by all specialists and land users)
弱点/缺点/风险: 土地使用者的观点如何克服
-
Project was not long enough
弱点/缺点/风险: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点如何克服
-
The budget was unbalanced and not drawn up with all stakeholders involved
Involve specialists and all the role players in the project
-
Payment of daily wages as opposed to paying for task executed well.
Develop contractors that is paid according to work done and productivity.
-
The budget was inadequate for material needed for conservation works
Draw up a budget with SWC specialists input to ensure funds for conservation works
-
The facilitator was not capable to do facilitation
Use well trained proven facilitator acceptable to participation communities
参考文献
实施日期: Jan. 15, 2009
上次更新: June 13, 2017
资源人
-
Philippe Zahner (philippe.zahner@deza.admin.ch) - SLM专业人员
文件编制者
机构
- Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (DEZA / COSUDE / DDC / SDC) - 瑞士
项目