Municipal forest management plan -MFMP (decade 2010-2019) (意大利)

PAF

描述

Management plan for silvopastoral areas with a ten year intervention plan

Aims / objectives: The management plan is a legally binding document which outlines an analysis of the current situation of the forest and pastures and gives indications on the best future interventions to ensure their sustainable future management.
The MFMP provides prescription to: cutting periods and tree ages, forest cultivation care, opening of firebreaks and their maintenance, allowance of grazing animals in the forest area, etc.

Methods: This legislative instrument, provides provisions and directions wich have to be followed and wich are legally binding in the local territory the plan covers. Any violations of the plan will result in sanctions.

Stages of implementation: The MFMP is a commitment of the municipality imposed by the Region. The Region provides funds to both to build and implement it when it has been approved. A specific forestry committee is appointed by the Region who provides the technical support to approve the MFMP presented by the municipalities.

Role of stakeholders: Stakeholders participate in drawing up the plan (at a municipal level) which is then approved at a regional level.

地点

地点: Castelsaraceno, Basilicata, 意大利

选定地点的地理参考
  • 不适用

启动日期: 2010

终止年份: 不适用

方法的类型

方法目标和有利环境

该方法的主要目的/目标
The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities

The land-use plan has the general objective of managing public forests and rangelands.

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: The management plan aims at a correct, rational and sustainable management of woods and silvo-pastoral areas.
推动实施本办法所应用技术的条件
  • 土地治理（决策、实施和执行）: The Forest Management Plan applies exclusively to public lands and so does not affect private property in any way.
阻碍实施本办法所应用技术的条件
  • 了解SLM，获得技术支持: The technologies aim at preventing fires. However, in public woodland, which makes up the majority of the territory, no-one has a “vested interest” in carried out fire prevention actions and, as such, interventions must be made compulsory under law. Treatment through the SLM Approach: The management plan, being legally binding, forces the implementation of the two technologies associated with this approach.

相关利益相关者的参与和角色

该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责
该方法涉及哪些利益相关者/执行机构？ 指定利益相关者 说明利益相关者的角色
当地土地使用者/当地社区 There is minimal participation of women because of the nature of the implementation work.
SLM专家/农业顾问
地方政府 Regional
国家政府（规划者、决策者） Municipal Technical Services Department
Municipality
当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段
无
被动
外部支持
互动
自我动员
启动/动机
x
Municipality, region, relative associations
计划
x
During the planning phase local land users help the specialists in identifying the problems facing the territory and in the choice of best technologies to improve land mangement
实施
x
监测/评估
x
State forest service
Research
x
流程图

Organization chart of MFMP

作者：Velia De Paola (via dell'Ateneo Lucano, 10)
有关SLM技术选择的决策

决策是由......做出的

  • 仅限土地使用者（自主）
  • 主要是土地使用者，由SLM专家提供支持
  • 所有相关参与者，作为参与式方法的一部分
  • 主要是SLM专家，咨询土地使用者之后
  • 仅限SLM专家
  • 政治家和领袖

决策是基于

  • 对充分记录的SLM知识进行评估（基于证据的决策）
  • 研究结果
  • 个人经验和意见（无记录）

技术支持、能力建设和知识管理

以下活动或服务是该方法的一部分
能力建设/培训
向以下利益相关者提供培训
  • 土地使用者
  • 现场工作人员/顾问
培训形式
  • 在职
  • 农民对农民
  • 示范区域
  • 公开会议
  • 课程
涵盖的主题

咨询服务
已提供咨询服务
  • 在土地使用者的土地上
  • 在固定中心
Name of method used for advisory service: Publication in the Regional Official Gazette.; Key elements: Local stakeholders presentation, Distribution of MFMP copies to whum is concerned; When approved, the MFMP is published on Regional Official Gazette. Implementation responsible is the Municipal thought its technical department and forestry services who is also responsible for updating and upgrading it periodically.

Advisory service is quite adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; the forest service constantly monitors the implementation of the management plan and in cases of violations applies sanctions
机构强化
机构已强化/建立
  • 否
  • 是，少许
  • 是，适度
  • 是，非常
在下述层面上
  • 本地
  • 区域
  • 国家
描述机构、角色和职责、成员等.
支持类型
  • 财务
  • 能力建设/培训
  • 设备
  • dissemination of paf
进一步细节
监测和评估
area treated aspects were regular monitored by other through observations; indicators: State forest service There were no changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation There were no changes in the Technology as a result of monitoring and evaluation

融资和外部物质支持

SLM组成部分的年度预算，以美元计算
  • < 2,000
  • 2,000-10,000
  • 10,000-100,000
  • 100,000-1,000,000
  • > 1,000,000
Precise annual budget: 不适用
Approach costs were met by the following donors: local government (district, county, municipality, village etc) (70% region, 30% municipality): 100.0%
已向土地使用者提供以下服务或激励
  • 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援
  • 特定投入的补贴
  • 信用
  • 其它激励或手段
为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援

影响分析和结论性陈述

方法的影响
否
是，很少
是，中等
是，支持力度很大
该方法是否帮助土地使用者实施和维护SLM技术？

Since the region adopted the Forest Management Plan for each municipality the management of woods and silvo-pastoral areas has been much more sustainable compared to the past.

x
该方法是否有助于社会和经济弱势群体？

x
Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?

Larger owners adopted some measures of the path although they were not obliged.

x
土地使用者实施SLM的主要动机
方法活动的可持续性
土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施（无外部支持的情况下）？

结论和吸取的教训

长处: 土地使用者的观点
  • The Forest Management Plan was first viewed with suspicion as another example of red tape but then during its implementation land users saw the benefits it brought and even private land owners began implementing the same technologies on their own land. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: They rely on public funding for implementation.)
长处: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点
  • The Forest Management Plan plays a vital role in local land management. It is revised and renewed every ten years which allows for a periodic re-assessment of changes to economic and environmental conditions. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Public funding must be guaranteed for actions as interventions aim at protecting public resources. )
弱点/缺点/风险: 土地使用者的观点如何克服
弱点/缺点/风险: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点如何克服
  • The only disadvantage is the high initial costs to draft the plan.
    After the first 10 years the costs for updating the plan are greatly reduced so that costs are ultimately spread out over the long term. The only thing which garantees the adoption of the plan is public funding.

参考文献

编制者
  • Velia De Paola
Editors
审查者
  • Fabian Ottiger
实施日期: July 29, 2014
上次更新: July 17, 2017
资源人
WOCAT数据库中的完整描述
链接的SLM数据
文件编制者
机构 项目
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International