Incentive based CCPPA
(埃塞俄比亚)
描述
The participation of the communities in the planning implementation and evaluation of SWC activities and provided with food for work as an insentive to encourage participation.
Aims / objectives: The objective of the approach is to enable indiividual farmers be aware of soil erosion problem and importance of SWC to control erosion and improve soil fertility,
Methods: The method of the approach includes discussion with farmers group and general descusion with community and local administrative units, include site selection community meeting awarness creation, planning, selection of participants, implementation, planning, implementation and management of SWC technology.
地点
地点: SNNPR, 埃塞俄比亚
启动日期: 2000
终止年份: 不适用
方法的类型
方法目标和有利环境
该方法的主要目的/目标
The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (Foreage development, income generating planting on bunds.)
The main objectives of the approach are to reduce soil erosion, improve soil fertility and increase productivity.
The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Soil erosion, low soil fertility, low productivity and food insecurity.
阻碍实施本办法所应用技术的条件
-
社会/文化/宗教规范和价值观: low participation of women due to social and cultural problem
Treatment through the SLM Approach: to encourage women to participat on the activitiy.
-
财务资源和服务的可用性/可得性: lack of operational cost
Treatment through the SLM Approach: to support adequate finance
-
法律框架（土地使用权、土地和水使用权）: The existing land ownership, land use rights / water rights moderately hindered the approach implementation Because of the land is under the state ownrship
-
了解SLM，获得技术支持: lack of technical knoweledge
Treatment through the SLM Approach: training and providing technical support
相关利益相关者的参与和角色
该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责
| 该方法涉及哪些利益相关者/执行机构？ |
指定利益相关者 |
说明利益相关者的角色 |
| 当地土地使用者/当地社区 |
Wereda Agri. And Rural Development Office and Community of the project area |
Working land users were mainly men. Because of cultural limitation. In this approach proirity is given for the poorest of the poors and they are the main beneficeries. |
| 国家政府（规划者、决策者） |
MERET Project |
|
| 国际组织 |
|
|
领导机构
The basic principle and steps of the SWC approach have been adopted from internatial specialists and adopted to local conditions by national, regional and woreda specialists.
当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段
启动/动机
Mainly:public meetings; partly: interviews/questionnaires; The involvement of land uses in public meetings is important to change their attitudes.
计划
rapid/participatory rural appraisal; In this stage the community plann SWC activities.
实施
Mainly: responsibility for major steps; partly: responsibility for minor steps; SWC activities are implemented in areas that are affected highly by erosion.
监测/评估
Mainly: measurements/observations; partly: reporting; Monitoring omit evaluation is done on the basis of work norm and technical specification of the SWC technology.
有关SLM技术选择的决策
决策是由......做出的
-
仅限土地使用者（自主）
-
主要是土地使用者，由SLM专家提供支持
-
所有相关参与者，作为参与式方法的一部分
-
主要是SLM专家，咨询土地使用者之后
-
仅限SLM专家
-
政治家和领袖
决策是基于
-
对充分记录的SLM知识进行评估（基于证据的决策）
-
研究结果
-
个人经验和意见（无记录）
技术支持、能力建设和知识管理
以下活动或服务是该方法的一部分
-
能力建设/培训
-
咨询服务
-
机构强化（组织发展）
-
监测和评估
-
研究
能力建设/培训
向以下利益相关者提供培训
-
土地使用者
-
现场工作人员/顾问
-
SWC specialists (1), extensionists/trainers(2)
涵盖的主题
Training on SWC techniques and management.
咨询服务
Name of method used for advisory service: Convantional; 1) Advisory service was carried out through: government's existing extension system; Extension staff: mainly government employees 2) Target groups for extension: land users; Activities: Implement SWC activities
Awarness creation is given to the land users to practice SWC technology for the control of soil erosion and generat income.
监测和评估
bio-physical aspects were regular monitored through observations
economic / production aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations
no. of land users involved aspects were regular monitored through observations
management of Approach aspects were regular monitored through observations
There were several changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation
研究
研究涉及以下主题
Observation and trials on technologies have enabled the project to screen best practices and management techniques.
Research was carried out on-farm
融资和外部物质支持
SLM组成部分的年度预算，以美元计算
-
< 2,000
-
2,000-10,000
-
10,000-100,000
-
100,000-1,000,000
-
> 1,000,000
Precise annual budget: 不适用
Approach costs were met by the following donors: international (WFP): 80.0%; government (national): 5.0%; local community / land user(s) (-): 15.0%
已向土地使用者提供以下服务或激励
-
为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援
-
特定投入的补贴
-
信用
-
其它激励或手段
为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援
土地使用者的劳动力为
影响分析和结论性陈述
方法的影响
该方法是否帮助土地使用者实施和维护SLM技术？
Soil erosion controlled, water is conserved and soil fertility increased.
该方法是否改善了阻碍SLM技术实施的土地使用权/用户权问题？
Because the land is owend by the state
Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?
Land users, NGOS and government organization are using the CCPPA for their development prgram.
方法活动的可持续性
土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施（无外部支持的情况下）？
结论和吸取的教训
长处: 土地使用者的观点
-
Soil Erosion is controlled (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: By continious training and following)
-
Environment is rehabilitated
-
Income is generated (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: contineous technical support)
长处: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点
-
Soil erosion is reduced, soil fertility and improvement land activity increase. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Strenathe in incentive based SWC approach, technical support.)
-
Addiional income is generated (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: by introducing additional improved input)
-
The community has gained knowledge of participatory planning (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Training the planning team and land users.)
弱点/缺点/风险: 土地使用者的观点如何克服
弱点/缺点/风险: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点如何克服
参考文献
实施日期: Jan. 22, 2009
上次更新: July 24, 2017
资源人
-
Daniel Danano (dale.daniel@fao.org) - SLM专业人员
-
Mesfin Mentasseawito - SLM专业人员
文件编制者
机构
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) - 意大利
项目
