General Assembly of Ratopahiro Community Forest User Group (Prabha Neupane)

Rato-Pahiro Community Forest (尼泊尔)

Rato-Pahiro community Forest

描述

It is a particular land conservation activity by participatory approach forest protection and management,a project for sustainable forest use.

Aims / objectives: To Integrate conservation and livelihoods goals.
To legally empower local communities to take control of forest resources and develop local level institutions to organize sustainable use of forest resources.
To protect biodiversity.

Methods: By increasing people's participation in afforestation programs.
Sustainable extraction of raw materials.
Regular supervision
Planting the economically high priced or demanded plant species.

Stages of implementation: Firstly DISTRICT FOREST OFFICE, KUDAHAR planted trees and it was later handed to local people.They started afforestation on the yearly basis since 2052 B.S.Now it is under the supervision of community only.

Role of stakeholders: They are the main organizers for successful and sustainable management of forest.
They collect the fund for forest maintenance.
They frequently study the condition of forest.

Other important information: It contains a lot of herbal plants but due to lack of experts and other technical resource,they are not being identified and valuable species have been destroyed as well.

地点

地点: Kaski,Seti Bank Area, Western Development Region, 尼泊尔

选定地点的地理参考
  • 83.59264, 28.11216

启动日期: 2052

终止年份: 不适用

方法的类型
General Assembly of Ratopahiro Community Forest User Group (Prabha Neupane (Banepa))

方法目标和有利环境

该方法的主要目的/目标
The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (Forest products such as tree and grass fodder, fuel wood and timber,making handicrafts, Supply of raw materials,Major products(Economic))

Protect the forest resource to some extent or ensure security of the houses around as the forest mostly covers the sloopy lands.Protect soil from erosion thus have a secure ,fresh,green environment.

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Low technical knowledge
Robbery of the forest products
Are not aware about the community forest approach
No proper supervision of the forest
推动实施本办法所应用技术的条件
阻碍实施本办法所应用技术的条件
  • 社会/文化/宗教规范和价值观: Problem of robbery,theft of forest property and selling illegally. Treatment through the SLM Approach: Advisory groups and local members went for frequent check,knowledge to local people.
  • 财务资源和服务的可用性/可得性: People from low class family cannot afford annual fee for the renewal or membership card. Treatment through the SLM Approach: Special discount for the people with low quality of life.
  • 机构设置: Before it was own by Area Forest Office. Treatment through the SLM Approach: Collaboration with the locals and turning into community forest.
  • 法律框架（土地使用权、土地和水使用权）: Land was unusable ,difficult to access. Treatment through the SLM Approach: Now turned as common property useful to all. The existing land ownership, land use rights / water rights hindered a little the approach implementation At the beginning people didn't know about this approach but as it progressed they gave land rights for their own good.
  • 了解SLM，获得技术支持: Knowledge Treatment through the SLM Approach: Experience and common sense
  • 工作量、人力资源可用性: Low mass involvement ,male members went to office Treatment through the SLM Approach: Female members entered for forest conservation
  • 其他: Unavailability of fodders,forest products Treatment through the SLM Approach: Division and shared turn by turn within the forest capacity.

相关利益相关者的参与和角色

该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责
该方法涉及哪些利益相关者/执行机构？ 指定利益相关者 说明利益相关者的角色
当地土地使用者/当地社区 Both male and female are involved. But no. of female is large,age group from 22 and above and below 60,people from all ethnic group are involved. Women are more active. They are idle at home ,male members go to office. There is a system of two quotas(seats) place for socially backward group.
社区组织 Member of community forest
地方政府 District Forest Office
国家政府（规划者、决策者） Head Office Forest Department
当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段
无
被动
外部支持
互动
自我动员
启动/动机
x
This was done by DFO first and by the community forest mem bers.
计划
x
All carried out by the CFUG members for the betterment of CF.
实施
x
By the CF members like making rules and implementing.
监测/评估
x
Local people monitor timely. They.They keep the record of used materials and account.
Research
x
None
流程图

This shows the relational chart of managing committee with some functions.

作者：Prabha Neupane (Banepa)
有关SLM技术选择的决策

决策是由......做出的

  • 仅限土地使用者（自主）
  • 主要是土地使用者，由SLM专家提供支持
  • 所有相关参与者，作为参与式方法的一部分
  • 主要是SLM专家，咨询土地使用者之后
  • 仅限SLM专家
  • 政治家和领袖
  • District Forest Office

决策是基于

  • 对充分记录的SLM知识进行评估（基于证据的决策）
  • 研究结果
  • 个人经验和意见（无记录）

技术支持、能力建设和知识管理

以下活动或服务是该方法的一部分
能力建设/培训
向以下利益相关者提供培训
  • 土地使用者
  • 现场工作人员/顾问
培训形式
  • 在职
  • 农民对农民
  • 示范区域
  • 公开会议
  • 课程
涵盖的主题

Awareness on conservation of the land ,nursery plants,etc.

咨询服务
已提供咨询服务
  • 在土地使用者的土地上
  • 在固定中心
Name of method used for advisory service: Public meeting; Key elements: Held on the regular basis, inform forest condition and give options for improving., Help to choose the best methods.; Need to have the experts and learned personals.

Advisory service is quite adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; 60-70% works are done under the supervision of the advisory groups.Some deny to take the advice.
机构强化
机构已强化/建立
  • 否
  • 是，少许
  • 是，适度
  • 是，非常
在下述层面上
  • 本地
  • 区域
  • 国家
描述机构、角色和职责、成员等.
支持类型
  • 财务
  • 能力建设/培训
  • 设备
进一步细节
The raw materials for making handicrafts like roots, branch of old trees were provided.
监测和评估
bio-physical aspects were ad hoc monitored by land users through observations; indicators: runoff,erosion socio-cultural aspects were regular monitored by land users through observations; indicators: age, status,health economic / production aspects were regular monitored by land users through measurements; indicators: yield,income no. of land users involved aspects were regular monitored by land users through measurements; indicators: local people management of Approach aspects were regular monitored by land users through observations; indicators: allocation of activities There were few changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation: Plantation of value adding plants such as bamboo. coffee plantation is in testing phase. Economically viable plants are given preference. There were several changes in the Technology as a result of monitoring and evaluation: Less valued are replaced by the other plants.

融资和外部物质支持

SLM组成部分的年度预算，以美元计算
  • < 2,000
  • 2,000-10,000
  • 10,000-100,000
  • 100,000-1,000,000
  • > 1,000,000
Precise annual budget: 不适用
Approach costs were met by the following donors: local community / land user(s) (All handled by the members of the CF.): 100.0%; other (Self)
已向土地使用者提供以下服务或激励
  • 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援
  • 特定投入的补贴
  • 信用
  • 其它激励或手段
为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援
The raw materials for making handicrafts like roots, branch of old trees were provided.

影响分析和结论性陈述

方法的影响
否
是，很少
是，中等
是，支持力度很大
该方法是否帮助土地使用者实施和维护SLM技术？

The erosion is totally stopped by conserving the land and thus secured.

x
该方法是否有助于社会和经济弱势群体？

Females were involved and participation of people from all ethnic groups.

x
该方法是否改善了阻碍SLM技术实施的土地使用权/用户权问题？

Government and CFUG help to reduce the problem by giving rights to local people. The problem is likely to be overcome in the near future.

x
Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?

In the group overall.

x
土地使用者实施SLM的主要动机
方法活动的可持续性
土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施（无外部支持的情况下）？

People are independent and had not received any funds from national or international agency. It's been almost 20 years that they are handling the forest on their own so they definitely can continue the approach in a sustainable way.

结论和吸取的教训

长处: 土地使用者的观点
  • Forests are local resources for household activities (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Utilization and conservation in sustainable manner.)
长处: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点
  • The living standard is improved.
    Employment to the people. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Need to be more conscious while cutting the trees and grasses. Afforestation should be highly prioritized.)
弱点/缺点/风险: 土地使用者的观点如何克服
  • No proper improvement
    Low technical manpower
    Individualistic thoughts Need to have the regular meetings.
    Take as common property.
    Training and awareness raising programs.
弱点/缺点/风险: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点如何克服
  • No technical manpower.
    Low plant breeds.
    No doners Regular monitoring.
    Need to have the improved plants for more production.
    Technical help from experts.

参考文献

编制者
  • Sabita Aryal
Editors
审查者
  • Fabian Ottiger
实施日期: Jan. 17, 2014
上次更新: July 8, 2017
资源人
WOCAT数据库中的完整描述
链接的SLM数据
文件编制者
机构 项目
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International